Randall Denley: Ontario Greenbelt audit finds no political meddling, but plenty of business as usual | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Randall Denley: Ontario Greenbelt audit finds no political meddling, but plenty of business as usual

Published

 on

Yes, developers potentially made money the day the Ontario government re-designated Greenbelt lands. They do every time new development land is approved

Is Ontario’s plan to redevelop a tiny portion of the Toronto-area Greenbelt a political scandal or not?

Ontario Auditor General Bonnie Lysyk’s eagerly-awaited report Wednesday failed to conclusively resolve that question. Lysyk did find a smoking gun, but she found no conclusive evidence on it of the fingerprints of Premier Doug Ford or his housing minister, Steve Clark. Instead, Lysyk discovered that Clark’s chief of staff hastily put together the Greenbelt development plan and changed some criteria in a way that favoured particular developers.

Both Clark and Ford say they weren’t aware of the selection process details and there is no evidence to the contrary. Nor did Lysyk uncover any evidence that anyone in the government benefited from the redevelopment plan. Suspicious minds will form their own conclusions, of course.

The AG spent most of her report on an auditor’s favourite subject: process deficiencies. Had the government consulted the usual experts, it would have found that there were many reasons not to develop the 7,400 acres of Greenbelt land, which constitutes about 0.3 per cent of the two-million-acre protected area. That’s hardly surprising. Since the land was in a Greenbelt, one might have presumed there were reasons not to develop it, including reserving it for farm use, wetlands and forests.

Lysyk further argues that the province had already assigned housing targets to all Ontario municipalities, targets that would enable it to meet the Ford government’s goal of building 1.5 million houses in a decade. The AG failed to distinguish between targets and having the land to meet them, but concluded that the Greenbelt land wasn’t needed. That point of view was supported by planning directors in the municipalities affected by the redevelopment. The auditor did not address what optimistic intensification assumptions might underlie that conclusion.

In their response to Lysyk’s report, Ford and Clark were quite happy to focus on the process criticisms. The government has accepted all but one of Lysyk’s recommendations and will make sure things are more transparent in the future, they said. The main point, they argued, is that the province is in desperate need of housing, with 500,000 people arriving in the last 12 months. The government considers itself guilty of nothing more than going in the right direction too quickly.

The Greenbelt affair is shocking to some for what it tells us about how development works in Ontario. For those familiar with the industry, it wasn’t surprising to learn that developers were speculating on land in the sacrosanct Greenbelt. Many Ontario developers are as much land speculators as home builders.

It’s a long play. At least one of the parcels in the new development area was acquired suspiciously close to the government announcement, but others had been owned by developers for years, some before the creation of the Greenbelt in 2005.

Developers can make serious money by buying land that they reasonably assume will eventually be approved for development. In the case of the Greenbelt lands, developers got a big heads-up when Ford said in 2018 that he intended to open up big chunks of the Greenbelt if elected premier. That was publicly reported, although Ford later changed his mind, then changed it again.

The idea that developers would reach out to Clark’s chief of staff to suggest that their properties be re-designated isn’t surprising, either. Lysyk’s report might create the impression that the normal state of affairs is for development decisions to follow from the impartial work of professional public servants. In fact, politicians can do whatever they like. Ottawans saw that in 2021, when the city council approved a remote suburban development fronted by an Algonquin group, calling it an act of reconciliation. That wasn’t the recommendation of city staff.

Yes, developers potentially made money the day the provincial government re-designated Greenbelt lands, but they made money when it recently expanded development lands in Ottawa and Hamilton, too. In fact, developers make money every time new development land is approved.

The Ford government is aggressively trying to change Ontario housing development from a process-driven approach designed to limit housing land to one that strongly encourages housing. That’s what Ontario needs as it tries to grapple with the effects of surging immigration. The former Greenbelt lands could yield 50,000 homes.

If Ontario is to have any hope at all of meeting housing demand, the government needs to focus on results, not process. The location of new housing development is always a political decision and it’s invariably preceded by vigorous lobbying. Some don’t like that, but it’s business as usual, not a scandal.

Randall Denley is an Ottawa journalist, author and former Ontario PC candidate. Contact him at randalldenley1@gmail.com

Politics

Gould calls Poilievre a ‘fraudster’ over his carbon price warning

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Liberal House leader Karina Gould lambasted Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre as a “fraudster” this morning after he said the federal carbon price is going to cause a “nuclear winter.”

Gould was speaking just before the House of Commons is set to reopen following the summer break.

“What I heard yesterday from Mr. Poilievre was so over the top, so irresponsible, so immature, and something that only a fraudster would do,” she said from Parliament Hill.

On Sunday Poilievre said increasing the carbon price will cause a “nuclear winter,” painting a dystopian picture of people starving and freezing because they can’t afford food or heat due the carbon price.

He said the Liberals’ obsession with carbon pricing is “an existential threat to our economy and our way of life.”

The carbon price currently adds about 17.6 cents to every litre of gasoline, but that cost is offset by carbon rebates mailed to Canadians every three months. The Parliamentary Budget Office provided analysis that showed eight in 10 households receive more from the rebates than they pay in carbon pricing, though the office also warned that long-term economic effects could harm jobs and wage growth.

Gould accused Poilievre of ignoring the rebates, and refusing to tell Canadians how he would make life more affordable while battling climate change. The Liberals have also accused the Conservatives of dismissing the expertise of more than 200 economists who wrote a letter earlier this year describing the carbon price as the least expensive, most efficient way to lower emissions.

Poilievre is pushing for the other opposition parties to vote the government down and trigger what he calls a “carbon tax election.”

The recent decision by the NDP to break its political pact with the government makes an early election more likely, but there does not seem to be an interest from either the Bloc Québécois or the NDP to have it happen immediately.

Poilievre intends to bring a non-confidence motion against the government as early as this week but would likely need both the Bloc and NDP to support it.

Gould said she has no “crystal ball” over when or how often Poilievre might try to bring down the government

“I know that the end of the supply and confidence agreement makes things a bit different, but really all it does is returns us to a normal minority parliament,” she said. “And that means that we will work case-by-case, legislation-by-legislation with whichever party wants to work with us. I have already been in touch with all of the House leaders in the opposition parties and my job now is to make Parliament work for Canadians.”

She also insisted the government has listened to the concerns raised by Canadians, and received the message when the Liberals lost a Toronto byelection in June in seat the party had held since 1997.

“We certainly got the message from Toronto-St. Paul’s and have spent the summer reflecting on what that means and are coming back to Parliament, I think, very clearly focused on ensuring that Canadians are at the centre of everything that we do moving forward,” she said.

The Liberals are bracing, however, for the possibility of another blow Monday night, in a tight race to hold a Montreal seat in a byelection there. Voters in LaSalle—Émard—Verdun are casting ballots today to replace former justice minister David Lametti, who was removed from cabinet in 2023 and resigned as an MP in January.

The Conservatives and NDP are also in a tight race in Elmwood-Transcona, a Winnipeg seat that has mostly been held by the NDP over the last several decades.

There are several key bills making their way through the legislative process, including the online harms act and the NDP-endorsed pharmacare bill, which is currently in the Senate.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

NDP caving to Poilievre on carbon price, has no idea how to fight climate change: PM

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the NDP is caving to political pressure from Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre when it comes to their stance on the consumer carbon price.

Trudeau says he believes Jagmeet Singh and the NDP care about the environment, but it’s “increasingly obvious” that they have “no idea” what to do about climate change.

On Thursday, Singh said the NDP is working on a plan that wouldn’t put the burden of fighting climate change on the backs of workers, but wouldn’t say if that plan would include a consumer carbon price.

Singh’s noncommittal position comes as the NDP tries to frame itself as a credible alternative to the Conservatives in the next federal election.

Poilievre responded to that by releasing a video, pointing out that the NDP has voted time and again in favour of the Liberals’ carbon price.

British Columbia Premier David Eby also changed his tune on Thursday, promising that a re-elected NDP government would scrap the long-standing carbon tax and shift the burden to “big polluters,” if the federal government dropped its requirements.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 13, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Quebec consumer rights bill to regulate how merchants can ask for tips

Published

 on

 

Quebec wants to curb excessive tipping.

Simon Jolin-Barrette, minister responsible for consumer protection, has tabled a bill to force merchants to calculate tips based on the price before tax.

That means on a restaurant bill of $100, suggested tips would be calculated based on $100, not on $114.98 after provincial and federal sales taxes are added.

The bill would also increase the rebate offered to consumers when the price of an item at the cash register is higher than the shelf price, to $15 from $10.

And it would force grocery stores offering a discounted price for several items to clearly list the unit price as well.

Businesses would also have to indicate whether taxes will be added to the price of food products.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version