Connect with us

Health

RCMP warn COVID-related scams are on the rise

Published

on

RCMP are warning that scams are spreading faster than COVID-19.

British Columbians are being targeted by fraudsters wanting to profit from consumers’ fears and desire to protect themselves from the coronavirus.

The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre (CAFC) is reporting scammers are setting up websites to sell bogus products, and using fake emails, texts, and social media posts as a ruse to take your money and get your personal information.

Police said the emails and posts may be promoting awareness and prevention tips, and fake information about cases in your neighbourhood. They also may be asking to donate to victims, offering advice on unproven treatments, offering protective gear or detection kits, or fake home sanitizing services.

According to the RCMP statement, there are currently no vaccines or drugs approved to treat or prevent COVID-19. The current forecast to have efficient vaccines available for general public is months away and will be communicated via legitimate government and health authorities.

One fraud example is private companies offering fast COVID-19 tests for sale. Only hospitals can perform the test, no other tests are genuine or guaranteed to provide accurate results.

Police said other frauds include urging people to invest in hot new stocks related to the virus; emails, texts or online campaigns that capitalize on the public’s fears about Covid-19; creating fraudulent and deceptive online ads offering: cleaning products, hand sanitizers, other items in high demand.

Police are also warning about unauthorized or fraudulent charities requesting money for victims or research.

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Can Pets Contract the Coronavirus? – Slate

Published

on


A cat hiding under a carpet.

There’s no need to be so scared.

Mikhail Vasilyev/Unsplash

Slate is making its coronavirus coverage free for all readers. Subscribe to support our journalism. Start your free trial.

It was early March when the veterinary clinic in lower Manhattan where I work became inundated with calls from clients concerned about COVID-19. At that time, masks were not yet ubiquitous in public, the trains were still running on their normal schedule, and headstrong individuals could still wander into a bar for happy hour with friends. Yet even then, pet owners were concerned about the possibility that their dogs and cats could contract the novel virus that would come to dominate our collective consciousness. But for all the well-deserved panic that the coronavirus has induced in the human population so far, there’s very little evidence that you should be losing sleep over the possibility that your pet will need a ventilator, yes, even with the recent news about the tiger. Here’s what you need to know to keep your pets, and yourselves, safe.

Which animals have contracted the new coronavirus?

The most recent development in this vein came from the Bronx Zoo in New York earlier this week when a 4-year-old Malayan tiger named Nadia had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 in people. Nadia was one of seven big cats to develop mild symptoms like those seen in people with the disease, including a dry cough and loss of appetite, after being exposed to a then-asymptomatic zookeeper. No other cats were tested, as drawing blood from an apex predator requires general anesthesia.

As far as the novel coronavirus is concerned, pets seem to be a disappointing dead end.

These large cats are believed to be the first animals in the U.S. to contract the novel coronavirus (and the first confirmed case globally in which an animal became sick from human transmission of the virus). But similar stories about pets have littered the headlines in recent weeks. On March 4, reports emerged from Hong Kong that a 17-year-old Pomeranian tested “faint positive” for the virus on repeat oral and nasal swabs. About two weeks later, a second dog from Hong Kong tested positive, this time a young German shepherd. In Belgium, on March 27, researchers detected the virus in the vomit and feces of a domestic house cat that showed respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms. Four days later, Hong Kong announced yet another cat had tested positive.

That sounds … concerning.

Not so fast. If you consume news media like most Americans, these headlines may have you anticipating a wave of infected dogs and cats to follow the one seen in people. However, there are some important points to note that may get lost in a superficial reading of these case reports.

First, all of these animals were tested after being in sustained proximity to their corona-positive owners. So, that adds evidence behind our current understanding that it’s not likely that pets will contract the novel coronavirus from simply joining you outside on your evening walk, for example, or from other sources of infection that seem to be associated with lower viral “doses.” Being cooped up with an infected person is one of the best ways to get exposed to a high number of viral particles, short of working at a hospital.

Second, both dogs and the Hong Kong cat were asymptomatic, and the Belgian cat’s symptoms have not definitively been linked to SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, none of these animals actually died from the virus (the geriatric Pomeranian died shortly after release from quarantine, from unrelated issues). Throw in a study out of Wuhan, China, that found antibodies to the virus in asymptomatic feral cats there, and we’re left with a sense that most pets (and maybe all dogs) who become infected never develop symptoms.

What all this means is that dogs are probably what virologists call “aberrant hosts” for this virus, meaning while the virus can infect these species, conditions in the dog body are not very hospitable for the virus. Therefore, symptoms in aberrant hosts are absent or mild, and transmission to other aberrant hosts (other dogs) or even back to the original host (people) is highly unlikely to occur. Cat-to-cat transmission is possible in the laboratory setting but has not been observed in the real world. As far as the novel coronavirus is concerned, pets seem to be a disappointing dead end.

Could the coronavirus mutate over time into strains for dogs or cats?

Probably not. In general, viruses have been known to adapt to aberrant hosts over time (with a proportional loss of their ability to infect the original host species), but fortunately coronaviruses seem to be quite slow to mutate, in contrast with, say, the seasonal flu.

So how worried should pet owners be?

Not very. Epidemiologists generally agree that while SARS-CoV-2 was originally transmitted to people from bats, likely through an intermediate species, animals broadly do not play an important role in the COVID-19 transmission chain. There’s certainly no need to surrender your pets out of fear that you’ll catch the virus (although at least one group of researchers is recommending we practice social distancing from certain great apes). Research is ongoing, but currently there’s just no evidence that dogs and cats have the ability to infect people. “I think it’s far more likely that they’ll get it from the person that’s shedding large amounts of virus, rather than the other way around,” said Melissa Kennedy, a virologist at the University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine.

It sounds like dogs are fine. But say my cat starts coughing …

A coughing cat should be examined by a vet (but please call first!). Respiratory diseases and other causes of cough, like heart disease, are very common in cats and should certainly be given medical attention if noticed. It’s just extremely unlikely that the new coronavirus is the cause. If you believe the animal has been in close contact with a person with COVID-19, please let the staff know; just because cats aren’t likely to contract the virus doesn’t mean we can’t pick it up off their coat in the same way we might pick it up off a doorknob. And before you ask, no, we cannot test your animal for SARS-CoV-2.

Karen A. Terio, the chief of the Zoological Pathology Program at the University of Illinois veterinary college, thinks cats likely have a low chance of having it, anyway. “Given the number of people in this country that have been infected with the virus and have become ill, and the number of people in this country that own domestic cats,” she told the Times, “it seems fairly improbable that cats are an important source of the virus for people if the first case we’re diagnosing it in is a tiger.”

What do I do with my pets if I get COVID?

If you feel sick, you should consider distancing yourself from your cats or ferrets, given their possible susceptibility, if that’s an option for you. If you have COVID-19 and have already spent time around your pets, possibly infecting them, your pets should be quarantined with you to minimize risk of viral particles on the animal’s body infecting another person.

It’s true that many people might be asymptomatic carriers of the virus. Even if you feel fine, continue the usual safe practices like hand-washing. Because the virus is respiratory in nature, you may also want to avoid kissing cats (for their sake, not yours). 

Is there any evidence that pets other than dogs and cats could be susceptible?

Since the SARS epidemic in 2003, we have known that the physiology of cats and ferrets makes them more susceptible to certain coronaviruses. A more recent study confirmed experimentally that in ferrets, the novel coronavirus can infect the upper respiratory system but does not cause severe disease or death. Orangutans and some bat species are also theorized to be susceptible, although hopefully you’ve learned from Tiger King that wild animals don’t belong in private custody.

Readers like you make our work possible. Help us continue to provide the reporting, commentary, and criticism you won’t find anywhere else.

Join Slate Plus


Join

Slate Plus


Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Canada is expecting rise in Coronavirus deaths as job losses touch 1 million – International Business Times, Singapore Edition

Published

on


Canada is expecting the increase in the number of coronavirus deaths from the current 435 to as high as 22,000 by the time the pandemic ends, health officials stated on Thursday, while the economy suffered a loss of one million jobs last month.

The officials outlined two scenarios which are most likely to take place, showing that between 11,000 and 22,000 people will die. The total number of positive coronavirus cases ranged from 934,000 to 1.9 million.

The officials said they expected between 500 and 700 people in Canada to die from the coronavirus by April 16. There have been 18,447 positive diagnoses so far. “Models are not a crystal ball,” Theresa Tam, Canada’s chief public health officer, told a briefing, saying it was too early to predict when the peak would be.

Canada may witness 22,000 deaths due to Coronavirus

Pixabay

Tam said it was crucial that people continued to obey instructions to stay at home as much as possible. “While some of the numbers released today may seem stark, Canada’s modeling demonstrates that the country still has an opportunity to control the epidemic,” she said. “We cannot prevent every death but we must prevent all the deaths that we can.”

Local governments across Canada have ordered non-essential businesses shut to combat the spread of the coronavirus, throwing millions out of work. Canada lost a record-breaking 1 million jobs in March while the unemployment rate soared to 7.8 percent, Statistics Canada said on Thursday, adding that the figures did not reflect the real toll. “Sticker shock for sure. This was about as bad as it could be,” said Derek Holt, vice president of capital markets economics at Scotiabank.

More than five million Canadians had applied for all forms of federal emergency unemployment help since March 15, government data showed on Thursday, suggesting the real jobless rate is closer to 25 percent. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government has so far announced a range of measures to help businesses that total around C$110 billion ($78.3 billion) in direct spending, or 5 percent of gross domestic product. Canada’s independent parliamentary budget officer predicted the budget deficit would balloon to C$184.2 billion in the 2020-2021 fiscal year from C$27.4 billion in the 2019‑2020 fiscal year.

(With agency inputs)

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Controls can keep Canadian COVID-19 deaths under 22,000, health agency says – Agassiz-Harrison Observer

Published

on


With strong control measures, the federal public health agency projects that 11,000 to 22,000 Canadians could die of COVID-19 in the coming months.

In a report released Thursday, (April 9) Public Health Agency of Canada says short-term estimates are more reliable, and it anticipates 500 to 700 deaths by the end of next week.

The agency released modelling data this morning with different possible scenarios, warning that what happens depends very much on how Canadians behave to keep the respiratory illness from spreading.

With poor containment measures, the death toll could be much, much higher, the agency says.

It says the COVID-19 battle in Canada is still in its early stages but Canada’s numbers of confirmed cases have been increasing more slowly than in other countries.

The agency the fight against the novel coronavirus will likely take many months and require cycles of tighter and weaker controls.

Later on Thursday (April 9), Chief medical officer Dr. TheresaTam said the “aspirational and our ambitious goal” was that just one per cent of the population is infected with COVID-19. With a population of 37.6 million, that would mean about 376,000 people would be infected.

Tam said there were 17,766 total confirmed cases of the virus and 461 deaths as of Thursday.

“I recognize there changes in our daily lives… are extremely difficult,” Tam said during a press conference in Ottawa.

She said the measures had “allowed the healthcare system to cope.”

She called on Canadians to make the upcoming long weekend a “staycation for the nation,” and stay home to celebrate with their household, or virtually with other friends and family.

Tam said health officials were evaluation the effect of measures like physical distancing and self-isolation daily.

“No one is gathering, really… we’re just trying to strengthen the message to Canadians that you should avoid all non-essential travel and stay at home as much as possible,” she said.

“We know that contact tracing is very key.”

READ MORE: COVID-19 predictions coming ‘soon’, but results will depend on how Canadians act: Trudeau

READ MORE: Wearing non-medical masks can stop spread of COVID-19 before symptoms start: Tam

READ MORE: Canadians awake to extra COVID-19 emergency benefit money, feds clarify changes

The Canadian Press


Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Coronavirus

Get local stories you won’t find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending