Republicans upset as Trans Day of Visibility, Easter fall on same day | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Republicans upset as Trans Day of Visibility, Easter fall on same day

Published

 on

March 31 is not always Easter. The date of the holiest day on the Christian calendar varies, depending, as it does, on the timing of the full moon relative to the spring equinox. From 2001 to 2100, it will land on March 31 five times — making March 31 one of the most common dates for Easter. There are eight dates from March 20 to April 25 on which Easter falls four times this century and 12 dates on which it will fall three times.

End of carousel

In other words, since 2009, the year during which March 31 was first recognized as Trans Day of Visibility, Easter has usually not fallen on March 31. It did in 2013, but not on any of the other 14 years. But Trans Day of Visibility has always been on March 31, as it was this year, along with Easter.

And that coincidence, occasioned by the vagaries of the religious holiday rather than the secular one, got a lot of people performatively angry at President Biden.

After all, it isn’t just that Easter and Trans Day of Visibility fell on March 31. They fell on March 31 during an election year, one that is underway as the trans community becomes a more frequent target of the political right. So March 31, Sunday, was Trans Day of Visibility, and it was (thanks to what the moon has been doing) Easter, and it came as Biden’s opponents look for reasons to attack him, and it arrived as support for the trans community has joined so many other things as being robustly partisan.

It’s barely worth documenting the outrage that was presented, given how predictable it is. The Washington Post’s Amy B Wang walked through some examples. As a general rule, the complaints centered on Biden’s recognizing the day of visibility, as though he and the White House didn’t also recognize Easter. (Biden, who attends church regularly, also included a reference to Jesus in his message. Trump … did not.) The outrage, then, is not about Biden giving precedence to Trans Day of Visibility but that he had the gall to recognize it at all.

Thanks to the unusual manner in which the date of Easter is selected, it will fall on one of 33 dates this century, from March 23 (in 2008) to April 25 (in 2038). Of all of the most commonly celebrated holidays that fall on varying dates, few might arrive on as diverse a set of dates as the Christian holiday.

What that means, then, is that Easter will necessarily overlap with other holidays or days of recognition. Had the holiday fallen on March 23 this year, for example, it would have overlapped with National Puppy Day. Had the White House published a video of Biden playing with a puppy alongside its Easter message, it would no doubt have been rebuked — but almost certainly not to the same extent.

Using the robust index of holidays (of varying significance) compiled by calendarr.com, you can see that, regardless of when it might have fallen this year, Easter would almost certainly have overlapped with something else. If it had been on April 2, for example, it would have conflicted with Autism Awareness Day. Had the White House issued a statement about autism alongside the president’s message about Easter, it seems safe to assume there would have been far less outcry.

To some extent, Biden got lucky. Imagine if Easter overlapped with Earth Day and he had released a statement about conservation or the climate? (Talk about issues that have become polarized on partisan lines.) Or if it overlapped with World Book Day, given the eagerness with which some on the right have targeted certain books as unacceptable? Or “National Joe Day”? Imagine if his Easter missive had been coupled with a celebration of people named Joe.

It is certainly the case that Biden and the White House intended to send a signal of solidarity with the trans community by recognizing the day of visibility. That’s what incensed his opponents; the overlap with Easter was just a way to accentuate the outrage. When Donald Trump was president, after all, the White House didn’t recognize Pride Month during his first year in office — a celebration that doesn’t even raise eyebrows in corporate boardrooms any more.

Next year, Easter falls on April 20, a date recognized by the United Nations as “Chinese Language Day” each year. If Biden is still president, it would be interesting to see if he trolls his opponents by recognizing it. If, instead, Trump has returned to the White House, it will be interesting to see if he mentions Jesus.

correction

A previous version of this article incorrectly said that the date of Easter depends on the timing of the full moon relative to the solstice. It depends on the timing of the full moon relative to the spring equinox. The article has been corrected.

Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version