The Note series is in an awkward position given Samsung’s S-series handsets are now so large and also still offer top-of-the-line specifications. However, the Note series comes with the S Pen stylus that many — not including myself — really value.
Rumours suggest that next year Samsung might launch an S21 smartphone with an S Pen, which means the Note 20 and 20 Ultra could be the last Note series smartphone ever — this is a good thing as far as I’m concerned.
While the Note 20 Ultra is a great smartphone, the device is expensive, especially when compared to last year’s Note 10+. On the other hand, the cheaper Note 20 is a nearly complete downgrade when compared to the Ultra.
Samsung’s Galaxy Note 20 is cheaper than the Note 20 Ultra, and sports a price tag of $1,399 CAD outright if you purchase the device directly from Samsung. This pricing is especially strange when you consider that you can currently buy the much-better Galaxy S20+ for $1,329. It might seem like you’re paying more for the S Pen when actually, you’re shelling out the additional cash for the arguably unnecessary Snapdragon 865+ processor.
With all of this in mind, Samsung’s Galaxy Note 20 is receiving a lot of deserved criticism, but the average consumer probably won’t find it’s that bad of a smartphone. That said, there are several better flagship handsets options currently on the market.
The plastic back
The Galaxy Note 20’s front looks modern and elegant. The smartphone features a rectangular, symmetrical design that includes Samsung’s ‘Infinity-O’ display, which is fancy branding for a screen with a hole-punch cutout. The cutout is a bit bigger than what is featured in the Note 20 Ultra, but it doesn’t feel too big.
On the bottom of the device, there’s a speaker, a USB-C port and an S Pen located on the left side. There’s also the volume rocker and the power button on the right side of the smartphone. When you flip the phone to the rear, there’s a large camera module that’s slightly smaller than the Note 20 Ultra’s and similar in size to the S20+’s. I’m using the ‘Mystic Bronze’ Note 20, and what I like is that Samsung matched the camera bump’s colour to the rest of the phone, which helps improve its look when compared to the S20 Series rear array.
Overall, if you’re just looking at the Note 20, the device appears solid, but touching the handset is an entirely different story.
The rear of the Note 20 is made of a cheap-feeling plastic material that is strange to see in a 2020 smartphone. At first, the back reminded me of the Pixel 4 series, but on closer inspection, the Pixel 4’s plastic-like glass material feels a lot more premium. Samsung likely did this to keep the smartphone’s cost down. However, for $1,400 CAD, the handset needs to not only appear premium but also feel like it’s worthy of that expensive price tag. To be fair, this isn’t an issue everyone will notice.
On the plus side, this plastic material doesn’t attract fingerprints, and I find that I only managed to get smudges on the back if I recently applied lotion to my hands. Overall, the decision to feature a less high-end feeling back on the Note 20 is a misstep on Samsung’s part.
No 90hz or 120Hz
Beyond the design, the first thing a lot of people notice about a smartphone is its display. The Note 20’s screen isn’t bad, and to my eye, there’s nothing significant wrong with it. Viewing content always looks good, games like Limbo are still dark and dreary, and overall, the screen offers a solid viewing experience — but this only if you don’t know what you’re missing out on.
The S20 series and Note 20 Ultra both feature displays better than the Note 20’s screen.
To start, Samsung’s Galaxy Note 20 offers a 1080 x 2400 pixel resolution, which is inferior to the 3200 x 1400 resolution available on each of Samsung’s S20 series smartphones. It’s also not as good as what’s the Note 20 Ultra offers, either. This may not be noticeable at first, but when you hold the two devices side-by-side, you’ll really see the difference.
A higher refresh rate results in smoother animations when scrolling, swiping and playing games, which makes the device feel more responsive.
The S Pen is the Samsung Galaxy Note series’ trademark stylus. While this is my first experience with the S Pen, I’ve used a smartphone that features a stylus before. Back in 2018, I went hands-on with the LG Q Stylo+. In comparison, the Note 20’s S Pen feels a lot better, but given the Q Stylo is a much cheaper mid-range smartphone, that isn’t an impressive feat.
Samsung’s Note 20 S Pen works well and sports ‘Air Gestures’ that allow users to ‘Navigate Back,’ ‘Home,’ ‘Recent Apps,’ ‘Smart Select’ and ‘Screen Capture.’ While I found these features interesting, they aren’t particularly useful.
Writing with the S Pen feels fine with the Note 20, but the latency isn’t as good as the Note 20 Ultra’s. MobileSyrup managing editor Patrick O’Rouke said in his review of the Note 20 Ultra that the S Pen feels like writing on paper. The Note 20 definitely doesn’t feel like writing on paper.
As for the S Pen itself, the stylus weighs 3.04g and measures in at 5.8 x 4.35 x 105.08mm. It has 4,096 pressure levels and sports up to 24 hours of battery standby time.
Is the Snapdragon 865+ really worth it?
Speaking of battery, the Note 20 sports a 4,300mAh cell that, for the most part, can get through a day easily. On days where I go to the gym and watch Crave and Netflix while running, or have to Hotspot because my home internet is down, I still find that the Note 20 can last until at least 10pm. The phone doesn’t feature the best battery life out there, but it gets the job done.
One of the reasons why the Galaxy Note 20 is so expensive is its 865+ processor. The Snapdragon 865+ chipset is more powerful than the original Snapdragon 865 that’s available in devices like the Samsung Galaxy S20 series, OnePlus 8 series and the LG V60 ThinQ. Throughout the entire I’ve used the Note 20, the device has experienced absolutely no issues. It’s speedy and powerful, and whether I was multi-tasking, playing games or just scrolling through Instagram, I didn’t experience any lag.
However, I don’t think the Snapdragon 865+ processor is worth the price, and I didn’t notice a difference between the speed of this smartphone compared to the S20+ or LG V60 ThinQ. We ran a benchmark test with the Note 20 and the OnePlus 8 Pro with Geekbench. As you can see below, the OP8 Pro didn’t do as well as the Note 20, but unless you’re a major smartphone gamer, It’s unlikely you’ll push the Note 20 to its limits.
Although it’s a quicker processor, Samsung should have just went with the Snapdragon 865 or even a 765. These are fast and powerful enough chipsets and would have helped keep the cost of the smartphone down.
Picture almost perfect
When taking pictures with the 12-megapixel primary shooter, images were clear and detailed, but a bit oversaturated and too vibrant. A photo of the sun setting behind the clouds featured deep contrast comparable to the Galaxy S20+’s cameras or even the Pixel 4 XL. I think there’s a bit too much overexposing of the highlights, however.
Alongside the primary camera, the Note 20’s 12-megapixel ultra-wide shooter also takes impressive shots, offering a decent amount of detail. It’s barely noticeable that you’ve switched cameras. I think the main shooter is still preferable, but the ultra-wide is still quite great.
Last but not least, is the Note 20’s 64-megapixel telephoto lens with 3x zoom. The 3x zoom functionality works great, includes significant detail and is comparable to the Pixel 4’s and S20’s impressive zoom. Sitting down at a patio on Harbourfront, I was able to take a picture of the CN Tower, and while it was a bit grainy, the picture still looked great. The device also has 30x digital zoom, but pictures often looked blurry and lack detail.
Regarding low-light performance, I was impressed by the Note 20’s Night mode, and I think it could easily stand up to phones like the S20+, Pixel 4 XL and the P40 Pro.
The Note 20 images aren’t as detailed as Huawei’s P40 or Google’s Pixel 4 XL, but they still look impressive. For example, the photo I snapped of a motorboat on the water looks stellar.
Similar to most other smartphones launched by Asian manufacturers, selfie pictures with the Note 20 often overexpose my skin, making it lighter. Despite this, front-facing camera photos are otherwise pretty good.
To upgrade or not that’s the question
For those who are wondering if they should upgrade to the Note 20 from a recent Note device, the quick answer is no. The Note 20 isn’t a bad smartphone, but that doesn’t matter because there are more affordable, better options on the market.
If you’re someone with a Samsung Galaxy Note 8, it may be worth checking out the Note 10 that offers a Snapdragon 855 processor, 6.3-inch display, 8GB of RAM and a triple-camera rear setup. The phone is currently $1,059.99 CAD on sale right now. Even the Note 10+, which offers better specs, costs $1,259.99.
If you’re someone who’s concerned with 5G and don’t value the S Pen, take a look at the Samsung Galaxy S20+ — a phone that I personally consider absolutely phenomenal — which currently costs $1,329. And if money is not a problem, just upgrade to the Note 20 Ultra, which Patrick O’Rouke described as one of “one of the most solid smartphones Samsung has ever released.”
Samsung’s Galaxy Note 20 isn’t a bad smartphone, but it’s just not worth its expensive price tag.
While could probably say the same thing about most modern high-end smartphones, the Note 20 takes things to the extreme. If someone wanted a new Samsung flagship, I’d definitely tell them to purchase the S20+, especially now that it’s $70 cheaper and offers far better specs.
If Samsung launched the Note 20 with a Snapdragon 765G processor, a more high-quality rear and a camera array similar to the S20+’s, it would be a much better device. I hate to say it, but the Galaxy Note 20 is mostly a miss for the South Korean tech giant.
“I hate to say it, but the Galaxy Note 20 is mostly a miss for the South Korean tech giant”
One big benefit of iOS 14 is that you can set non-Apple-made apps as your default, including for email and web browsing. Hot on the heels of you being able to set Chrome and Gmail as your clients of choice, Firefox is enabling you to make its browser the default on iPhones and iPads. Naturally, you’ll need to have both the latest version of the operating system and the apps, and then just make the switch inside settings.
Naturally, you’ll be able to take advantage of all the benefits that iOS 14 conveys upon Firefox users, including being able to build iOS Widgets. Mozilla is also boasting about how its browser has the sort of intelligent tracking prevention that will reduce the number of people snooping on you. Plus, as with all versions of the browser, you’ll be easily able to switch to Private Browsing mode for even more privacy.
All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
“The timing on this announcement is absolutely fascinating,” Khan wrote on Monday. “The week after Sony solidifies their existing exclusivity with some Bethesda games but the day before Xbox opens up preorders.
He added: “FUN NOTE: Sony had been negotiating timed exclusivity on Starfield as recently as a few months ago. Going to guess either those talks are done or the price suddenly went way, way up.”
Notice: To display this embed please allow the use of Functional Cookies in Cookie Preferences.
Notice: To display this embed please allow the use of Functional Cookies in Cookie Preferences.
“I will say this. I like when you really see the game to when it’s out [to be] as short as possible. As short as people will let me,” he said.
Howard was speaking in an interview with IGN in June 2019, in which he said Starfield broke Bethesda’s development cycle of working on Elder Scrolls and Fallout.
“We had done so many things. We were going, ‘Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Elder Scrolls, Fallout’ and you have this Starfield game in your head and your sort of say, ‘when?’ It can be never – you could say never – but we’re creatives and we have to make this game, and this is the time.
“And so The Elder Scrolls 6 is going to have to wait a little bit. Plus again, The Elder Scrolls Online is doing so well.”
Researchers said that a tip from a child led them to discover aggressive adware and exorbitant prices lurking in iOS and Android smartphone apps with a combined 2.4 million downloads from the App Store and Google Play.
Posing as apps for entertainment, wallpaper images, or music downloads, some of the titles served intrusive ads even when an app wasn’t active. To prevent users from uninstalling them, the apps hid their icon, making it hard to identify where the ads were coming from. Other apps charged from $2 to $10 and generated revenue of more than $500,000, according to estimates from SensorTower, a smartphone-app intelligence service.
The apps came to light after a girl found a profile on TikTok that was promoting what appeared to be an abusive app and reported it to Be Safe Online, a project in the Czech Republic that educates children about online safety. Acting on the tip, researchers from security firm Avast found 11 apps, for devices running both iOS and Android, that were engaged in similar scams.
Many of the apps were promoted by one of three TikTok users, one of whom had more than 300,000 followers. A user on Instagram was also promoting the apps.
“We thank the young girl who reported the TikTok profile to us,” Avast threat analyst Jakub Vávra, said in a statement. “Her awareness and responsible action is the kind of commitment we should all show to make the cyberworld a safer place.”
The apps, Avast said, made misleading claims concerning app functionalities, served ads outside of the app, or hid the original app icon shortly after the app was installed—all in violation of the app markets’ terms of service. The links promoted on TikTok and Instagram led to either the iOS or Android versions of the apps depending on the device that accessed a given link.
Targeting “younger kids”
“It is particularly concerning that the apps are being promoted on social media platforms popular among younger kids, who may not recognize some of the red flags surrounding the apps and therefore may fall for them,” Vávra added.
Avast said it privately notified Apple and Google of the apps’ behaviors. Avast also alerted both TikTok and Instagram to the shill accounts doing the promotions.
A Google spokesman said the company has removed the apps, and Web searches appeared to confirm this. Several of the apps for iOS appeared to still be available in the App Store as this post was being prepared. Representatives from Apple and TikTok didn’t immediately have a comment for this post. Representatives with Facebook, which owns Instagram, didn’t respond to a request to comment.
Android users by now are well-acquainted with the Play Store serving apps that are either outright malicious or that perform unethical actions such as deliver a flood of ads, often with no easy way to curtail the deluge. Abusive apps from the App Store, by contrast, come to light much less often—not that such iOS apps are never encountered.
Last month, researchers discovered more than 1,200 iPhone and iPad apps that were snooping on URL requests users made within an app. This violates the App Store’s terms of service. Using a software developer kit for serving ads, the apps also forged click notifications to give the false appearance that an ad viewed by the user came from an ad network controlled by the app, even when that wasn’t the case. The behavior allowed the SDK developers to steal revenue that should have gone to other ad networks.
People considering installing an app should spend a few minutes reading ratings, reviewing prices, and checking permissions. In the case of the apps found by Avast, the average rating ranged from 1.3 to 3.0.
“This all is bad don’t buy,” an iOS user wrote in one review. “I accidentally bought it. 8 dollars wasted and it doesn’t work.”
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.