adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Sports

Scoring chances are no fluke

Published

 on

Which is why so many coaches put an onus on smart defensive play. Not just to prevent goals — reactionary defensive play, like plugging holes on a boat. I’m talking about preventative play, where you avoid the rocks that caused holes in the first place. That’s the kind of defensive play we saw from the third line on Wednesday night. The type of play that keeps opposing forwards to the outside of high-danger areas, forcing turnovers and creating counter rushes.

We recently discussed the impact of the third line in the Penguins series, and I’m happy to report they’re still the best 5-on-5 line in the series.

Despite some necessary line shuffling, the trio finished the night by controlling 100 percent of shots, as well as 100 percent of high-danger chances when they were on the ice. Yes, you read that correctly. 100 percent. Now, they didn’t spend as much time together as they had in previous games, and we must be mindful of their usage, but some analysts would suggest that controlling 100 percent of the shots is a fairly good outcome. Some would even say it’s excellent. Others would offer up the term ridiculous.

And some would even go as far as telling me to put down the thesaurus.

300x250x1

And it’s no fluke. Throughout the series, that line has controlled over 70 percent of shots, 85 percent of shots on net, 100 percent of high-danger chances, and they’ve yet to allow a goal against.

As per usual, it all starts with smart, defensive hockey. That’s exactly what we saw from Artturi Lehkonen and Jesperi Kotkaniemi, the former forcing a turnover after the latter supported his defensemen by dropping deep into the defensive zone and applying pressure on the puck carrier.

Full marks to Shea Weber for generating not one, not two, but three high-danger chances on the same play, including the one that gave the Canadiens an early 1-0 lead.

It’s worth noting that Kotkaniemi leads all Canadiens forwards in shot share, high-danger shot share, and goal share. Some would say that’s…well, you probably know where I’m going with this.

He also leads all forwards in hits, which is a very encouraging sign given his line has controlled the puck during the vast majority of his shifts. He’s not chasing, he’s creating turnovers.

The good news is his confidence seems to be at an all-time high. The bad news is Canadiens fans will have to wait a few more years until he actually hits his statistical prime. Woe is us.

Speaking of Kotkaniemi, his work on the second Canadiens goal was yet another example of his ability to improve on perceived weaknesses. He has the size and the reach, but in his first two seasons, he did not always show the kind of speed needed to quickly pounce on loose pucks and avoid intense 1-on-1 battles.

Not only did he win a faceoff cleanly, a crucial offensive zone faceoff against Evgeni Malkin, he also used his foresight to predict where the puck would end up, quickly corralling the puck and keeping the play alive for the Canadiens.

Three Penguins converged on the young Finn, but it was much too little, much too late, as Weber, Ben Chiarot, and Jonathan Drouin combined for a goal shortly thereafter. It’s also worth mentioning Drouin had his best game of the series, by a significant margin.

 

You won’t find Kotkaniemi’s name on the scoresheet on this play, but make no mistake, he was a crucial element in the Canadiens’ comeback win, particularly on this play.

Meep Meep 

When it came to the Canadiens’ offensive prowess in the first two games, one of the biggest mitigating factors was the Penguins’ ability to clog the neutral zone and slow down the Habs’ puck carriers.

But you don’t slow down a roadrunner like Paul Byron. Sure, you can spend hours planning against him, perusing the ACME catalog for safes that can be dropped from a cliff or pianos that can be airlifted into position, but in the end, you’re usually left holding a cartoon “help” sign as Byron flies by, as was the case just prior to the Canadiens’ third goal of the game.

Full marks to Byron, who has been one of the best players in the series, and Nick Suzuki, who decided to forgo the fancy play and simply put the puck on net.

 

But I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Max Domi in this play because he also did something that didn’t show up on the scoresheet, but surely helped his team’s cause.

Take a look at the flight path Domi chose on the play.

Now take a closer look at the player he tied up, the space he created, and where Byron ended up scoring.

Any time you can keep a certain Sidney Crosby out of the play, you’re probably on the right track.

The epitome of clutch

“Petry was never a showman. He never sought attention.[…] While others were getting press and magazine articles and huge contracts, Petry simply did his job. […] He was serious about his craft and worked hard.”

While that certainly applies to Jeff, it’s actually an excerpt from the Society of Baseball Research’s website on Dan Petry, Jeff’s father.

But I may venture that even Dan would be impressed with just how good his son is at picking the perfect corner at the perfect time.

 

Petry’s wrist shot is one of the best offensive weapons on the blue line, any blue line, and he’s not afraid to use it, as we saw in Game 1 of the series, but to me, the most important aspect of the play, aside from the quick, crisp passing that led to the shot, was the patience displayed by Petry in evaluating his options prior to the shot.

It was his 15th career game-winning goal and his second in as many playoff wins.

Dan was a starter, but Jeff is clearly a closer.

Final Word

There was a lot to like on Wednesday night. Not only did the Canadiens do a better job controlling the play and generating quality chances, we saw yet another amazing performance from Carey Price.

Chiarot had his best game of the series, as did Weber, but there’s one defenseman who really impressed me with his defensive play; Brett Kulak.

He shut down Crosby 1-on-1 on at least three occasions, frustrating one of the best players in the world while providing the type of offensive support the Canadiens need from the blue line in order to generate enough goals to win the series.

The Canadiens aren’t done yet, there’s still a lot of work to do, especially against a team loaded with superstars, but if we see a full-team effort on Friday like the one we saw on Wednesday night, particularly in the last half of the game, there are pretty good odds we’ll be seeing more Canadiens hockey in the bubble.

(all statistics are 5-on-5 unless otherwise specified, via NaturalStatTrick.com) 
Source:-nhl-com

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

"Laugh it off": Evander Kane says Oilers won’t take the bait against Kings | Offside

Published

 on

The LA Kings tried every trick in the book to get the Edmonton Oilers off their game last night.

Hacks after the whistle, punches to the face, and interference with line changes were just some of the things that the Oilers had to endure, and throughout it all, there was not an ounce of retaliation.

All that badgering by the Kings resulted in at least two penalties against them and fuelled a red-hot Oilers power play that made them pay with three goals on four chances. That was by design for Edmonton, who knew that LA was going to try to pester them as much as they could.

That may have worked on past Oilers teams, but not this one.

300x250x1

“We’ve been in a series now for the third year in a row with these guys,” Kane said after practice this morning. “We know them, they know us… it’s one of those things where maybe it makes it a little easier to kind of laugh it off, walk away, or take a shot.

“That type of stuff isn’t gonna affect us.”

Once upon a time, this type of play would get under the Oilers’ skin and result in retaliatory penalties. Yet, with a few hard-knock lessons handed down to them in the past few seasons, it seems like the team is as determined as ever to cut the extracurriculars and focus on getting revenge on the scoreboard.

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, the longest-tenured player on this Oilers team, had to keep his emotions in check with Kings defender Vladislav Gavrikov, who punched him in the face early in the game. The easy reaction would be to punch back, but the veteran Nugen-Hopkins took his licks and wound up scoring later in the game.

“It’s going to be physical, the emotions are high, and there’s probably going to be some stuff after the whistle,” Nugent-Hopkins told reporters this morning. “I think it’s important to stay poised out there and not retaliate and just play through the whistles and let the other stuff just kind of happen.”

Oilers head coach Kris Knoblauch also noticed his team’s discipline. Playoff hockey is full of emotion, and keeping those in check to focus on the larger goal is difficult. He was happy with how his team set the tone.

“It’s not necessarily easy to do,” Knoblauch said. “You get punched in the face and sometimes the referees feel it’s enough to call a penalty, sometimes it’s not… You just have to take them, and sometimes, you get rewarded with the power play.

“I liked our guy’s response and we want to be sticking up for each other, we want to have that pack mentality, but it’s really important that we’re not the ones taking that extra penalty.”

There is no doubt that the Kings will continue to poke and prod at the Oilers as the series continues. Keeping those retaliations in check will only get more difficult, but if the team can continue to succeed on the scoreboard, it could get easier.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Thatcher Demko injured, out for Game 2 between Canucks and Predators – Vancouver Is Awesome

Published

 on


Thatcher Demko returned from injury just in time for the start of the Stanley Cup Playoffs but now is injured again.

After the Vancouver Canucks’ victory in Game 1, Demko was not made available to the media as he was “receiving treatment.” This is not unusual, so was not heavily reported at the time. Monday’s practice was turned into an optional skate — just nine players participated — so Demko’s absence did not seem particularly significant.

But when Demko was also missing from Tuesday’s gameday skate, alarm bells started going off.

300x250x1

According to multiple reports — and now the Canucks’ head coach, Rick Tocchet —Demko will not play in Game 2 and is in fact questionable for the rest of their series against the Nashville Predators.

Demko made 22 saves on 24 shots, none bigger — and potentially injury-inducing — than his first-period save on Anthony Beauvillier where he went into the full splits.

While this is not necessarily where Demko got injured, it would be understandable if it was. Demko still stayed in the game and didn’t seem to be experiencing any difficulties at the time.

Demko is a major difference-maker for the Canucks and his injury casts a pall over the team’s emotional Game 1 victory

Tocchet confirmed that Demko will not start in Game 2 but said Demko did skate on Monday on his own. He also said that Demko’s injury is unrelated to the knee injury he suffered during the season that caused him to miss five weeks. Instead, Tocchet suggested Demko was day-to-day, leaving open the possibility for his return in the first round. 

TSN’s Farhan Lalji, however, has reported that Demko’s injury could indeed be to the same knee, even if it is not the same exact injury.

If Demko does indeed miss the rest of the series, the pressure will be on Casey DeSmith, who had a strong season when called upon intermittently as the team’s backup but struggled when thrust into the number-one role when Demko was injured. Behind DeSmith is rookie Arturs Silovs, who has come through with heroic performances in international competition for Latvia but hasn’t been able to repeat those performances at the NHL level.

DeSmith played one game against the Predators this season, making 26 saves on 28 shots in a 5-2 victory in December.

While DeSmith has limited experience in the Stanley Cup Playoffs, his one appearance was spectacular.

On May 3, 2022, DeSmith had to step in for the injured Tristan Jarry for the Pittsburgh Penguins, starting their first postseason game against the New York Rangers. DeSmith made 48 saves on 51 shots before leaving the game in the second overtime with an injury of his own, with Louis Domingue stepping in to make 17 more saves for the win.

The Canucks will look to allow significantly fewer than 51 shots on Tuesday night.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Once again, business bumps ethics off the Olympic podium – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


Open this photo in gallery:

The Olympic rings are set up at Trocadero plaza that overlooks the Eiffel Tower in Paris.Michel Euler/The Associated Press

In the middle of a record haul at the Tokyo Olympics, Canada’s women’s swim team had one letdown – the 4×200-metre freestyle relay.

Canada had taken bronze in the event at Rio 2016 and again at the 2019 world aquatics championships. The team looked good for another medal.

On the day of the final, a Chinese team that was not considered a contender surprised everyone, winning in world-record time. Canada came fourth.

300x250x1

A battling result, but still disappointing. It looks a little worse than that now.

Over the weekend, the New York Times reported that nearly half the Chinese swim team failed a drug test seven months before the Tokyo Games. Twenty-three swimmers tested positive for trimetazidine, or TMZ.

TMZ is a synthetic substance. You’re not going to pick it up because you’ve chosen the wrong hot-dog vendor.

China was allowed to do its own investigation into the mass positive. That probe determined the athletes had been exposed to TMZ in tainted food at a team hotel. How exactly so many of them ingested it, while others did not, wasn’t explained.

Unusually, no announcement was made about the positive tests, and no one was suspended while the investigation was under way. The World Anti-Doping Agency knew what was going on, but decided the best way to determine if China had done anything wrong was to ask China to look into it. When China gave China the all clear, WADA signed off.

One of those who tested positive was Zhang Yufei. Zhang won three medals in Tokyo, one of them as part of the 4x200m relay team.

The swimming world is now playing doping leapfrog throughout those Games. The Canadian relay team is on a long list of unlucky losers. Had China’s violations stuck, the medal table would look very different.

It would also have pushed a Games that was on the edge closer to the drop. Few in Japan were super stoked about the world dropping by en masse during what would become that country’s first mass COVID wave.

The main reason the Tokyo Games happened was that so much money had been spent, much more was still owed, and insurers were not willing to write down 10 or 15 billion.

Picking a fight with China in that precarious moment could not have seemed like a great idea. Even more precarious – the next Games, to be held six months later in Beijing.

As an event, at absolute best, Beijing 2022 was going to be a very expensive bummer (which it absolutely was). That’s the sort of party that’s easy to call off.

You don’t need to be a Reddit obsessive to see what happened here. The Chinese swim team got caught mid-purge, and the people in charge had to prioritize their response.

Priority No. 1 – the Olympic business.

Priority No. 2 – the Olympic ideals.

They picked money over fairness.

It’s easy to lash them now, so plenty of people are. The head of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency called it “a devastating stab in the back of clean athletes.”

(Is it possible to be undevastatingly stabbed in the back?)

The stickiest criticism involves Russian figure skater Kamila Valieva. She also tested positive for trace amounts of TMZ before an Olympics. She also had one of those ‘maybe the dog gave me steroids’-type excuses.

But since everybody hates Russia, Valieva did not get the benefit of an in-house probe. She was dragged upside-down and backward through the global press and stripped of her medals. There’s your fairness.

It’s fitting that WADA take a reputational beating here. That is its most useful function – to absorb stakeholder rage after another own goal has been scored by the Doping Police.

But out in the real world, no one cares. Of course the Olympics is dirty. The Olympics has spent the last half century repeatedly reminding us of that.

Between Games, the Olympics makes news only two ways – ‘Upcoming host city X is having serious second thoughts’ and ‘So-and-so cheated their way to gold.’

These stories have become so numerous that the only people registering them are the ones who make their living in an Olympics-adjacent business, like sports administration or media.

Those people are happy to complain – complaining is good for trade – but they don’t want things to change. Change is dangerous. Who knows where change will land you?

In this specific instance, real change in the form of zero tolerance could have hobbled one Olympics and gotten the next one cancelled. Then what?

You start cancelling Olympics and people learn to live without them. Sponsors find new things to sponsor. Broadcasters move on.

Better to compromise. Chinese swimmers did a little TMZ. So what? Figure skaters, tennis players, breaststrokers – everybody’s doing it nowadays. It’s like weed for the Marx and Engels crowd.

With all that in mind, here’s something you won’t often read in this space – WADA made the right call.

It’s not like it was going to go swanning into Guangdong province in early 2021, right in the teeth of the pandemic, to figure out what was what. The only way to get any sort of answers was to rely on Chinese investigators. How do you know if they’re on the up and up? You don’t. WADA had two choices – take China’s word for it, or go scorched earth right before the two most tenuously assembled Games in history.

The proof that WADA made the correct choice is that those Games happened. Maybe it would make a different call now, and that might be right, too.

As far as fairness goes, it doesn’t belong in this conversation.

If a Belgian or a Tanzanian gets caught cheating, don’t even bother asking for consideration.

An American? Probably not.

An American everyone knows? Maybe.

A lot of Americans everybody knows? Let’s talk.

This can’t be discussed because once that discussion gets going, it points toward the sort of change no current stakeholder want to think about. If someone who tests positive can negotiate their way out of it and fairness is the goal, isn’t it fairer to stop testing altogether?

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending