Shein Algorithmically Stole and Sold Art, Artists Say in Suit - Gizmodo | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Art

Shein Algorithmically Stole and Sold Art, Artists Say in Suit – Gizmodo

Published

 on


Image: PixieMe (Shutterstock)

Three independent artists are now suing ultra-cheap online retailer Shein, alleging that the company has been deploying an algorithm to identify trending art—including the artists’ own designs—and recreating it in sweatshops, all under the leadership of a mysterious tech tycoon.

Artists Krista Perry, Larissa Martinez, and Jay Baron filed the lawsuit against Shein in California federal court yesterday. The artists argue that Shein has sold nearly identical copies of work they have created and sold themselves, using an artificial intelligence that can identify and mimic pieces of art.

“The brand has made billions by creating a secretive algorithm that astonishingly determines nascent fashion trends—and by coupling it with a corporate structure, including production and fulfillment schemes, that are perfectly executed to grease the wheels of the algorithm, including its unsavory and illegal aspects,” the artists argue in the suit. Shein did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

The plaintiffs say that this algorithm is the brainchild of Chris Xu, the mysterious billionaire behind Shein, who “made Shein the world’s top clothing company through high technology, not high design,” according to the complaint. The AI behind the company is what makes Shein so able to stay on top of up-to-the-minute trends, enticing buyers with a constantly rotating catalogue of cutting-edge pieces of fast fashion, they say.

Perry created the “Make It Fun” graphic design (left), while Shein has a similar piece of art previously listed on its website for only $3 (right). The piece has since been removed from the online retailer.
Screenshot: Gizmodo

“Like TikTok, Shein’s business model depends on collecting a shocking amount of data from its customers—which it then reverse-engineers into fashion trends,” the plaintiffs write in their complaint. “Shein is actually a greater societal threat than TikTok—because it contributes mightily to serious problems beyond data security and privacy, such as environmental damage, sweatshop (or worse) labor conditions, tax avoidance, child safety, as well as the subject of this lawsuit, large-scale and systematic intellectual property theft from U.S. designers large and small.”

The artists recognize in their complaint that they face an uphill battle in holding Shein accountable for alleged copyright infringement and intellectual property theft. According to the lawsuit, they argue that Shein uses a “byzantine shell game of corporate structure” that makesit difficult for plaintiffs to figure out which party to sue. As such, the plaintiffs are citing the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, in order to target all of Shein’s corporate parties and subsidiaries in one fell swoop.

The lawsuit comes after a Shein-sponsored influencer trip made waves on the internet last month for all the wrong reasons. In a bid to create good press ahead of an anticipated IPO, the company invited several influencers on a brand trip to one of Shein’s “innovation centers” in China, which featured clean facilities, happy workers, and state-of-the-art technology that got products from the facility to consumers. Backlash quickly brewed, with viewers calling the influencers’ videos propaganda and pointing out that Shein has a history of shady business practices, specifically in regards to labor abuse.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Art

40 Random Bits of Trivia About Artists and the Artsy Art That They Articulate – Cracked.com

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

40 Random Bits of Trivia About Artists and the Artsy Art That They Articulate  Cracked.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Art

John Little, whose paintings showed the raw side of Montreal, dies at 96 – CBC.ca

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

John Little, whose paintings showed the raw side of Montreal, dies at 96  CBC.ca



Source link

Continue Reading

Art

A misspelled memorial to the Brontë sisters gets its dots back at last

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — With a few daubs of a paintbrush, the Brontë sisters have got their dots back.

More than eight decades after it was installed, a memorial to the three 19th-century sibling novelists in London’s Westminster Abbey was amended Thursday to restore the diaereses – the two dots over the e in their surname.

The dots — which indicate that the name is pronounced “brontay” rather than “bront” — were omitted when the stone tablet commemorating Charlotte, Emily and Anne was erected in the abbey’s Poets’ Corner in October 1939, just after the outbreak of World War II.

They were restored after Brontë historian Sharon Wright, editor of the Brontë Society Gazette, raised the issue with Dean of Westminster David Hoyle. The abbey asked its stonemason to tap in the dots and its conservator to paint them.

“There’s no paper record for anyone complaining about this or mentioning this, so I just wanted to put it right, really,” Wright said. “These three Yorkshire women deserve their place here, but they also deserve to have their name spelled correctly.”

It’s believed the writers’ Irish father Patrick changed the spelling of his surname from Brunty or Prunty when he went to university in England.

Raised on the wild Yorkshire moors, all three sisters died before they were 40, leaving enduring novels including Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” and Anne’s “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”

Rebecca Yorke, director of the Brontë Society, welcomed the restoration.

“As the Brontës and their work are loved and respected all over the world, it’s entirely appropriate that their name is spelled correctly on their memorial,” she said.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version