adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Investment

Single-use plastic ban could impact Alberta's ability to attract investment, industry group warns – Sherwood Park News

Published

 on


The end of next year will be the end of the road for plastic straws, stir sticks, carry-out bags, cutlery, dishes and takeout containers and six-pack rings for cans and bottles. GETTY IMAGES

The head of the Chemistry Industry Association of Canada (CIAC) says Ottawa’s decision to ban six single-use plastic items could impact Alberta’s ability to attract investment — a key part of the province’s economic recovery plan.

On Wednesday, the federal government announced plastic straws, stir sticks, carry-out bags, cutlery, Styrofoam dishes and takeout containers and six-pack rings for cans and bottles will be banned by the end of 2021 if new regulatory changes are approved as planned.

The announcement came the day after the Alberta government unveiled its natural gas strategy, which includes seeking investment in petrochemicals — used to make plastic — and making the province “the western North America centre of excellence for plastics recycling by 2030.”

300x250x1

Bob Masterson, president and CEO of the CIAC, said Alberta is doing all the right things to get the global industry to invest in the province but the federal decision doesn’t help build Alberta’s case.

“I can tell you we’ve heard from global companies and the premier of Alberta has heard from global companies, that this will make them think carefully about their plans, any plans, they might have to invest Alberta. So it’s a pretty real concern,” Masterson said Wednesday.

The province has said that attracting investment will be key to recovering from the economic crisis born from the COVID-19 pandemic and the oil price crash, which has put it on track for a deficit of $24.2 billion.

In July, the UCP accelerated its promised reduction to the corporate tax rate to eight per cent from 10 per cent. It has also earmarked $75 million for an “investment and growth strategy” and created a new Crown corporation dubbed Invest Alberta, all in the name of attracting investment to the province.Masterson said that while the items to be banned account for less than one per cent of the demand for plastic, there are small and medium-sized companies in Canada that only create those products and no analysis has been done on how this change will impact them.“The big chemical business in Alberta will survive this, they can transition. But if you’re a small manufacturer, and this is what you’ve done, and all your equipment is based on producing these materials, you’re in for a world of pain,” he said.


Disposable cutlery for sale at a Real Canadian Superstore in Calgary are seen on Wednesday, Oct. 7. Canada is banning plastic bags, straws, cutlery and other single-use items by the end of 2021. Gavin Young/Postmedia

At Calgary-based resin manufacturer Nova Chemicals Corp., director of sustainability Sarah Marshall said the ban will have a very small impact on its business and while the company is supportive of the federal government’s overall plan for zero plastic waste, it believes there are better ways to achieve that.

“The government’s talking, for example, about harmonizing extended producer responsibility across Canada,” she said.“And what that means is that the industry that puts plastic products on the market also takes responsibility for those plastic products after they are used. And then that way, what we see across different geographies, like British Columbia, like the EU, is you can get much higher collection and recycling rates for plastics.”Marshall said as governments work to increase collection, recycling rates and scale, there are opportunities to invest in petrochemicals.

“Those are the big opportunities where I think when you look at that from an investment perspective, there’s still lots of strengths and opportunity in petrochemicals,” she said.

At a press conference Wednesday, Alberta Energy Minster Sonya Savage accused the federal government of “proceeding in a direction that suits their agenda and their purpose.”

She said part of Alberta’s economic recovery plan is to bring in more petrochemical activity, including the manufacturing of plastics.

“So we would just say that is Alberta’s jurisdiction. It’s a key part of our economic recovery strategy,” she said.

“So we’ll be following that announcement from the federal government and each and every announcement to ensure that it doesn’t infringe on our constitutional jurisdiction and to ensure that it doesn’t infringe on our ability to recover our economy and doesn’t infringe on our ability to diversify our economy.”

Federal Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said he thinks Alberta’s plan for recycling dovetails nicely with Ottawa’s plastics plan, which he stressed is not zero plastics, but rather zero-plastic waste.

He stressed repeatedly bans are only going to be applied to a small number of products which are really hard to recycle.

“Plastics are very useful and we all use them,” he said. “We just need to make sure that we’re not throwing them in the landfill or dumping them in the ocean. We need to ensure that they stay in the economy and that is exactly what this plan is aiming to do.”

To allow for the ban, the federal government is listing plastics as toxic under Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA).

Masterson said the association is concerned about the message that label would send but added Wilkinson has expressed willingness to consider renaming it.

– With files from The Canadian Press

ajoannou@postmedia.com

twitter.com/ashleyjoannou

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Private equity gears up for potential National Football League investments – Financial Times

Published

 on

By


Standard Digital

Weekend Print + Standard Digital

$75 per month

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

300x250x1

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Investment Opportunities With Hot Inflation, Higher-for-Longer Interest Rates – Bloomberg

Published

 on

By


Like a bad houseguest, hotter-than-expected inflation continues to linger in the US.

Traders had hoped by now the Federal Reserve would be free to start cutting interest rates — boosting rate-sensitive stocks and unlocking a largely frozen real estate market. Instead, stubborn price growth has some on Wall Street rethinking whether the central bank will lower rates at all this year.

Adblock test (Why?)

300x250x1

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Want to Outperform 88% of Professional Fund Managers? Buy This 1 Investment and Hold It Forever. – The Motley Fool

Published

 on

By


You don’t have to be a stock market genius to outperform most pros.

You might not think it’s possible to outperform the average Wall Street professional with just a single investment. Fund managers are highly educated and steeped in market data. They get paid a lot of money to make smart investments.

But the truth is, most of them may not be worth the money. With the right steps, individual investors can outperform the majority of active large-cap mutual fund managers over the long run. You don’t need a doctorate or MBA, and you certainly don’t need to follow the everyday goings-on in the stock market. You just need to buy a single investment and hold it forever.

300x250x1

That’s because 88% of active large-cap fund managers have underperformed the S&P 500 index over the last 15 years thru Dec. 31, 2023, according to S&P Global’s most recent SPIVA (S&P Indices Versus Active) scorecard. So if you buy a simple S&P 500 index fund like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO -0.23%), chances are that your investment will outperform the average active mutual fund in the long run.

Image source: Getty Images.

Why is it so hard for fund managers to outperform the S&P 500?

It’s a good bet that the average fund manager is hardworking and well-trained. But there are at least two big factors working against active fund managers.

The first is that institutional investors make up roughly 80% of all trading in the U.S. stock market — far higher than it was years ago when retail investors dominated the market. That means a professional investor is mostly trading shares with another manager who is also very knowledgeable, making it much harder to gain an edge and outperform the benchmark index.

The more basic problem, though, is that fund managers don’t just need to outperform their benchmark index. They need to beat the index by a wide enough margin to justify the fees they charge. And that reduces the odds that any given large-cap fund manager will be able to outperform an S&P 500 index fund by a significant amount.

The SPIVA scorecard found that just 40% of large-cap fund managers outperformed the S&P 500 in 2023 once you factor in fees. So if the odds of outperforming fall to 40-60 for a single year, you can see how the odds of beating the index consistently over the long run could go way down.

What Warren Buffett recommends over any other single investment

Warren Buffett is one of the smartest investors around, and he can’t think of a single better investment than an S&P 500 index fund. He recommends it even above his own company, Berkshire Hathaway.

In his 2016 letter to shareholders, Buffett shared a rough calculation that the search for superior investment advice had cost investors, in aggregate, $100 billion over the previous decade relative to investing in a simple index fund.

Even Berkshire Hathaway holds two small positions in S&P 500 index funds. You’ll find shares of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEMKT: SPY) in Berkshire’s quarterly disclosures. Both are great options for index investors, offering low expense ratios and low tracking errors (a measure of how closely an ETF price follows the underlying index). There are plenty of other solid index funds you could buy, but either of the above is an excellent option as a starting point.

Adam Levy has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending