Social media platforms are fighting coronavirus misinformation | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Media

Social media platforms are fighting coronavirus misinformation

Published

 on

The novel coronavirus, COVID-19, has put pressure on social media platforms to try to deal with floods of misinformation.

Even getting a handle on the size of the problem is tricky because while social platforms are publicly keen to tackle the problem, they’re less forthcoming with numbers that might show how much false information is circulating and how they’re working on the problem.

It’s clear that coronavirus is a hot topic. In a blog post on Jan. 29, Twitter revealed it had seen over 15 million tweets on coronavirus over the previous four weeks. A brief look at Google Trends shows that coronavirus searches began to grow in Canada around Jan. 18 and spiked on Jan. 31, though it’s not possible to determine exact numbers.

One way to get an idea how much false and misleading information is circulating is by looking at what the fact-checkers are facing.

An internal spreadsheet compiled by the International Fact-Checking Network documents over 370 coronavirus-related debunks done by fact-checkers and journalists around the world since Jan. 22. The IFCN was started in 2015 by the Poynter Institute, a non-profit journalism training organization, and brings together fact-checkers around the world to share information and establish best practices.

Louis Baudoin-Laarman, a fact-checking journalist with the wire service Agence France-Presse who focuses on Canada and the U.S., says he estimates the wire service has already done between 30 and 40 debunks around the world in just the past two weeks.

AFP is one of the third-party fact-checkers partnering with Facebook, which means once an AFP journalist has written a story and flagged that a particular piece of information is false to Facebook, the platform will take steps to limit that information’s spread and to surface correct information instead.

 

Louis Baudoin-Laarman is a fact-checking journalist who works for Agence France-Presse. (CBC)

 

Baudoin-Laarman says he finds that COVID-19 misinformation falls under four main categories:

  • false information about cures;
  • false information about where new cases are being discovered;
  • images or videos purportedly showing people who are sick or falling over from coronavirus;
  • false information about the origin of the virus.

Removing content

In a blog post on Jan. 30, Facebook said it would begin to remove content containing conspiracies or false claims that had the potential to cause physical harm to users, such as incorrect medical information.

When contacted by CBC News, a Facebook Canada spokesperson was unable to reveal any figures about how much content may have been removed.

In Twitter’s Jan. 29 blog post, the service noted it had taken steps to ensure the platform was protected from “malicious behaviours” and that it would remove accounts engaging in those behaviours.

The most high-profile instance came when Twitter permanently suspended the account of Zero Hedge, a far-right site that purports to share finance and economic information, for circulating a theory blaming one Chinese scientist, without evidence, for creating COVID-19.

Buzzfeed reported that Zero Hedge had posted the personal contact information of the scientist online, a practice known as doxxing, and encouraged others to get in touch.

Twitter hasn’t revealed how many accounts it may have banned. A week after the coronavirus post, Twitter also announced it would remove or label deepfakes — videos altered using AI to make it seem as if someone said or did something they didn’t — and other deceptively altered content that could cause harm. (Facebook announced at the start of January it would ban deepfakes.)

Google and YouTube did not provide information about removing content or altering search results but did provide information about a special search alert set up for the novel coronavirus.

 

An image from the World Health Organization, debunking claims that eating garlic can protect people from contracting COVID-19. (World Health Organization)

 

Partnerships with health organizations

Facebook, Twitter and Google have prioritized links, pop-ups or search results directing users to information from official health partners like the World Health Organization and the Public Health Agency of Canada.

The WHO itself has a page dedicated to myth-busting claims about the virus. Some of the claims on the WHO site include whether hand dryers can kill the virus (they can’t), if it’s safe to get a letter or package from China (yes) and if putting sesame oil on your skin will protect you from coronavirus (no).

When Canadians search Twitter in either official language for coronavirus information, the first result they’ll see is a tweet from Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada’s chief public health officer, directing users to a page with up-to-date health information.

 

 

Anna Maddison, a spokesperson for Public Health, told CBC News that the agency worked with Twitter in May 2019 on a  #KnowTheFacts notification to direct Canadians to factual information on vaccines.

“The government of Canada applauds efforts by social media and technology companies to increase access to evidence-based information on their platforms,” Maddison wrote in an email.

On YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook, users who search for coronavirus information may see search results or pop-ups directing them to the World Health Organization.

 

An example of a flag YouTube is attaching to coronavirus videos. The tag gives viewers information about the organization and links to a Wikipedia page with more information. (YouTube)

 

However, Facebook still may surface information that is less relevant to users. A recent search by CBC News included results from news organizations, but also links to an event listing called ‘Carnaval Coronavirus’  Brazil that appears to be a joke, and a link to a public health event in Sweden.

On Instagram, users may first be directed to accounts that purport to aggregate coronavirus news but aren’t associated with any media organization, or even virus meme accounts, without seeing a pop-up directing them to the WHO.

On Google, users first see recent news related to COVID-19 but are also directed to the World Health Organization for more.

What you see when you search for coronavirus:

On Google:

Google’s search liaison, Danny Sullivan, announced on Twitter on Jan. 30 that the search giant had put in an SOS Alert on coronavirus searches. The alert surfaces the latest news on the topic as well as relevant local news. It will also link to safety tips and health information.

A look at Google Canada Trends shows searches for coronavirus started around Jan. 18 and spiked at the end of January, though it was not possible to determine exact numbers.

On YouTube:

Underneath coronavirus videos, YouTube now may include a disclaimer about the media organization and a link to Wikipedia, or a link to the World Health Organization’s information page about coronavirus.

For example, under a CBC News video, there’s a note that the organization is a Canadian public broadcaster, while a CGTN video is accompanied by a note saying it is funded “in whole or in part by the Chinese government.”

On Facebook:

Facebook says it limits information flagged by third-party fact checkers as false, and instead shows the correct information from the fact-checkers. Facebook also says it sends notifications to users who have shared or are trying to share the content, to let them know it has been fact-checked.

 

On Instagram:

Facebook says it is blocking or restricting hashtags used to spread misinformation on Instagram. And, when users search for coronavirus, they may see a pop-up directing them back to the World Health Organization.

 

On Twitter:

Canadians searching Twitter in both French and English for coronavirus will see is a tweet from Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada’s chief public health officer, directing users to a page with up-to-date health information.

 

On Reddit: 

A thread started on Jan. 31 from the subreddit Ask Science was featured on the main page of Reddit, helping users find information about the novel coronavirus. The thread has since been moved off the main page but is still available at the top of the Ask Science page.

A spokesperson for Reddit says one subreddit has been quarantined related to coronavirus misinformation. A quarantine means the page won’t show up in search results, and when users to try access it directly, they’ll be shown a warning message.

Source link

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Media & Technology Group Faces Declining Stock Amid Financial Struggles and Increased Competition

Published

 on

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock has taken a significant hit, dropping more than 11% this week following a disappointing earnings report and the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the rival social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This decline is part of a broader downward trend for the parent company of Truth Social, with the stock plummeting nearly 43% since mid-July. Despite the sharp decline, some investors remain unfazed, expressing continued optimism for the company’s financial future or standing by their investment as a show of political support for Trump.

One such investor, Todd Schlanger, an interior designer from West Palm Beach, explained his commitment to the stock, stating, “I’m a Republican, so I supported him. When I found out about the stock, I got involved because I support the company and believe in free speech.” Schlanger, who owns around 1,000 shares, is a regular user of Truth Social and is excited about the company’s future, particularly its plans to expand its streaming services. He believes Truth Social has the potential to be as strong as Facebook or X, despite the stock’s recent struggles.

However, Truth Social’s stock performance is deeply tied to Trump’s political influence and the company’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, which has proven challenging. An earnings report released last Friday showed the company lost over $16 million in the three-month period ending in June. Revenue dropped by 30%, down to approximately $836,000 compared to $1.2 million during the same period last year.

In response to the earnings report, Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes emphasized the company’s strong cash position, highlighting $344 million in cash reserves and no debt. He also reiterated the company’s commitment to free speech, stating, “From the beginning, it was our intention to make Truth Social an impenetrable beachhead of free speech, and by taking extraordinary steps to minimize our reliance on Big Tech, that is exactly what we are doing.”

Despite these assurances, investors reacted negatively to the quarterly report, leading to a steep drop in stock price. The situation was further complicated by Trump’s return to X, where he posted for the first time in a year. Trump’s exclusivity agreement with Trump Media & Technology Group mandates that he posts personal content first on Truth Social. However, he is allowed to make politically related posts on other social media platforms, which he did earlier this week, potentially drawing users away from Truth Social.

For investors like Teri Lynn Roberson, who purchased shares near the company’s peak after it went public in March, the decline in stock value has been disheartening. However, Roberson remains unbothered by the poor performance, saying her investment was more about supporting Trump than making money. “I’m way at a loss, but I am OK with that. I am just watching it for fun,” Roberson said, adding that she sees Trump’s return to X as a positive move that could expand his reach beyond Truth Social’s “echo chamber.”

The stock’s performance holds significant financial implications for Trump himself, as he owns a 65% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group. According to Fortune, this stake represents a substantial portion of his net worth, which could be vulnerable if the company continues to struggle financially.

Analysts have described Truth Social as a “meme stock,” similar to companies like GameStop and AMC that saw their stock prices driven by ideological investments rather than business fundamentals. Tyler Richey, an analyst at Sevens Report Research, noted that the stock has ebbed and flowed based on sentiment toward Trump. He pointed out that the recent decline coincided with the rise of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, which may have dampened perceptions of Trump’s 2024 election prospects.

Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, offered a grim long-term outlook for Truth Social, suggesting that the stock would likely remain volatile, but with an overall downward trend. “What’s lacking for the true believer in the company story is, ‘OK, where is the business strategy that will be generating revenue?'” Ritter said, highlighting the company’s struggle to produce a sustainable business model.

Still, for some investors, like Michael Rogers, a masonry company owner in North Carolina, their support for Trump Media & Technology Group is unwavering. Rogers, who owns over 10,000 shares, said he invested in the company both as a show of support for Trump and because of his belief in the company’s financial future. Despite concerns about the company’s revenue challenges, Rogers expressed confidence in the business, stating, “I’m in it for the long haul.”

Not all investors are as confident. Mitchell Standley, who made a significant return on his investment earlier this year by capitalizing on the hype surrounding Trump Media’s planned merger with Digital World Acquisition Corporation, has since moved on. “It was basically just a pump and dump,” Standley told ABC News. “I knew that once they merged, all of his supporters were going to dump a bunch of money into it and buy it up.” Now, Standley is staying away from the company, citing the lack of business fundamentals as the reason for his exit.

Truth Social’s future remains uncertain as it continues to struggle with financial losses and faces stiff competition from established social media platforms. While its user base and investor sentiment are bolstered by Trump’s political following, the company’s long-term viability will depend on its ability to create a sustainable revenue stream and maintain relevance in a crowded digital landscape.

As the company seeks to stabilize, the question remains whether its appeal to Trump’s supporters can translate into financial success or whether it will remain a volatile stock driven more by ideology than business fundamentals.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version