Solution to levelling the digital economy playing field may rest with Ottawa - Financial Post | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Solution to levelling the digital economy playing field may rest with Ottawa – Financial Post

Published

 on


The federal government is studying how Australia and France are levelling the playing field between news producers and global online aggregators such as Facebook Inc. and Google LLC, but grafting one of those models onto Canada may not be a simple endeavour.

Canada’s Commissioner of Competition Matthew Boswell said governments in Australia and the European Union have spent years laying significant groundwork.

“The Australian government has taken various steps … to give the Australian Competition Consumer Commission, the ACCC, various powers in the last few years to deal with multiple issues in the digital and data-driven economy,” he said.

As a result, the ACCC is rolling out a mandatory code of conduct that governs, among other things, payments Facebook and Google must make for news featured on their online platforms.

Canada’s competition authority does not have such powers.

“The bureau doesn’t have the authority to impose any type of code of conduct on a sector of business within Canada,” Boswell said. “That’s just not something that’s within the Competition Act or other laws that we administer and enforce.”

France, too, is building on government-laid groundwork, after the European Parliament approved a new copyright directive last year that includes a “link tax,” which requires publishers, including news producers, be paid for online use of their content.

“These are policy and legislative choices that aren’t in the bureau’s control in Canada,” Boswell said.

The bureau doesn’t have the authority to impose any type of code of conduct on a sector of business within Canada

Matthew Boswell

But changes could be forthcoming. Minister of Canadian Heritage Steven Guilbeault told an audience at the Banff World Media Festival this week that he thinks “those who benefit from the media content” of this country’s news and information agencies “should be paying their fair share.”

Guilbeault said the government’s current support of the domestic news industry through tax credits and other relief is simply a quick fix to an “emergency” or “crisis.”

He added that he is looking at the models in France and Australia to find a “longer-term” solution for the declining revenues that are challenging the domestic news and media sector as an increasing share of advertising goes to large online platforms such as Facebook and Google. 

The minister, who is responsible for a wide media portfolio including the federal broadcast regulator, said he has spoken with his counterpart in France and plans to contact Australian officials as well, with an eye to developing a plan by this fall to level the playing field for the Canadian news and information industry.


Minister of Canadian Heritage Steven Guilbeault.

Justin Tang/The Canadian Press files

Melanie Aitken, who was Canada’s Competition Commissioner from 2009 to 2012 and is now a global antitrust and competition lawyer at Bennett Jones LLP in Washington, D.C., suggested the road to a Canadian solution is likely to be much longer and more complicated. Most importantly, she said, it would require significant and widespread political will.

“There is many a slip between lip and cup,” Aitken said

Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa and Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law, said he was surprised to hear the Canadian government was looking at the French model, which is based on EU copyright reforms, since the most recent review of Canadian copyright law did not recommend adopting similar reforms.

He added the federal Liberal party might prefer large internet companies pay the domestic news industry, reducing the need for government support, but any move to force this is “risky” because it could lead to trade challenges, or the online platforms might simply stop linking to Canadian news media, “which would hurt both the media organizations and Canadians more broadly.”

Excluding news from a single country in online news feeds isn’t an idle threat, said Sarah Ganter, an assistant professor in the School of Communication at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, B.C.

“In Spain, where in 2014 (there was) the establishment of a strict law requiring payment of a daily fee, and where a violation of the law could result in fines of up to 600,000 euros per violation, Google News decided to leave the Spanish market,” she said.


Google News left Spain in 2014.

Denis Charlet/AFP via Getty Images files

Despite these risks, Australia and Europe aren’t alone in challenging the market power and revenue models of tech giants including Facebook and Google. Authorities in the United States, too, appear poised to take on the powerful platforms after taking a “more reserved” approach over the past decade, Ganter said.

News reports suggest U.S. authorities, including the Department of Justice, plan to go after the tech platforms — possibly including Amazon.com Inc. and Apple Inc. as well — through antitrust probes and litigation.

Such an approach would be different from the Australian and European models, which themselves differ in that the former focuses on a competition code of conduct and the latter on copyright enforcement.

“The approach towards these mega companies is changing towards a more proactive approach,” Ganter said, even though efforts to “cut back on the power that these companies were able to develop over the last decades are being diversified across different jurisdictions and policy fields.”

Canada’s Competition Bureau does not have the powers some regulators have elsewhere, but it can take action against companies for anti-competitive behaviour, including price fixing, deceptive marketing and abuse of market dominance.


Competition Bureau Commissioner Matthew Boswell.

James Park for Postmedia News

The latter “are among the most complex cases we investigate,” Boswell said. “But that is the tool we have, outside advocacy and competition promotion.”

The record on cases of market dominance abuse is mixed. Last year, the Competition Tribunal rejected the bureau’s application to stop the Vancouver Airport Authority from decreasing competition by restricting the number of in-flight catering companies given access to the airport.

The tech giants haven’t faced such a test in Canada, which requires the Competition Bureau to prove a particular practice has led to a substantial lessening or prevention of competition, but they have faced scrutiny from the competition authority in the past.

A wide-ranging investigation into Google probed allegations of anti‑competitive business practices related to online search, search advertising and display advertising services. However, the probe was discontinued in 2016 with Google agreeing to remove certain clauses from an advertising interface that the bureau concluded was intended to exclude rivals and negatively affected advertisers.

Boswell said he could not comment on whether there has been a subsequent investigation into the online search giant since then.

More recently, Facebook in May agreed to pay a $9-million penalty after the Competition Bureau concluded the company had made false or misleading claims about the privacy of Canadians’ personal information on the social media platform and its messaging system.


Facebook in May agreed to pay a $9-million penalty in Canada.

Dado Ruvic/Reuters files

The financial penalty was dwarfed by the fine meted out in a similar action taken by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, but Boswell pointed out that it came very close to the maximum $10 million allowed in this country.

He said he is keeping a close eye on what is going on in other jurisdictions, and has a “pick up the phone” relationship with a number of foreign enforcement agencies, including the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Postal Service.

Boswell could not comment on whether there is any current cooperation between the Canadian and U.S. authorities on investigations, but he has made policing the digital economy a priority.

Last fall, the Competition Bureau put out a call to businesses and others to report “potentially anti-competitive conduct” in areas including online search, social media, display advertising and online marketplaces.

The call drew 15 formal submissions outlining “various concerns,” Boswell said, as well as informal ones that continue to roll in from businesses, trade associations and consumers.

“We have identified some issues that we are looking at very closely from an enforcement perspective,” he said, adding the bureau is boosting its investigative powers by listening to those with a “very sophisticated understanding” of how the digital economy works.

We have identified some issues that we are looking at very closely from an enforcement perspective

Matthew Boswell

Boswell said much of the interplay between buyers, sellers, and third parties in the digital economy happens through complex dealings that aren’t as transparent as looking at the price of consumer goods such as bread or beer, which are easily compared.

Moreover, he added, the workings of online platforms can rapidly evolve, so it can take an “inside baseball understanding” to unravel moves and then counteract them if necessary.

In a paper published last month, Yale economics professor and Barack Obama-era competition expert Fiona Scott Morton suggested Google maintains a dominant position in search advertising and creates and maintains power in display advertising, in part, by keeping “key market information hidden.”

This is an element of the search giant’s strategy that allows it “to shield itself from scrutiny … suppressing otherwise natural competitive forces,” Morton argued in her paper with co-author David Dinielli, a senior adviser at the Omidyar Network.

Financial Post

• Email: bshecter@nationalpost.com | Twitter:

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Liberals announce expansion to mortgage eligibility, draft rights for renters, buyers

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland says the government is making some changes to mortgage rules to help more Canadians to purchase their first home.

She says the changes will come into force in December and better reflect the housing market.

The price cap for insured mortgages will be boosted for the first time since 2012, moving to $1.5 million from $1 million, to allow more people to qualify for a mortgage with less than a 20 per cent down payment.

The government will also expand its 30-year mortgage amortization to include first-time homebuyers buying any type of home, as well as anybody buying a newly built home.

On Aug. 1 eligibility for the 30-year amortization was changed to include first-time buyers purchasing a newly-built home.

Justice Minister Arif Virani is also releasing drafts for a bill of rights for renters as well as one for homebuyers, both of which the government promised five months ago.

Virani says the government intends to work with provinces to prevent practices like renovictions, where landowners evict tenants and make minimal renovations and then seek higher rents.

The government touts today’s announced measures as the “boldest mortgage reforms in decades,” and it comes after a year of criticism over high housing costs.

The Liberals have been slumping in the polls for months, including among younger adults who say not being able to afford a house is one of their key concerns.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Statistics Canada says manufacturing sales up 1.4% in July at $71B

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says manufacturing sales rose 1.4 per cent to $71 billion in July, helped by higher sales in the petroleum and coal and chemical product subsectors.

The increase followed a 1.7 per cent decrease in June.

The agency says sales in the petroleum and coal product subsector gained 6.7 per cent to total $8.6 billion in July as most refineries sold more, helped by higher prices and demand.

Chemical product sales rose 5.3 per cent to $5.6 billion in July, boosted by increased sales of pharmaceutical and medicine products.

Sales of wood products fell 4.8 per cent for the month to $2.9 billion, the lowest level since May 2023.

In constant dollar terms, overall manufacturing sales rose 0.9 per cent in July.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

S&P/TSX gains almost 100 points, U.S. markets also higher ahead of rate decision

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Strength in the base metal and technology sectors helped Canada’s main stock index gain almost 100 points on Friday, while U.S. stock markets climbed to their best week of the year.

“It’s been almost a complete opposite or retracement of what we saw last week,” said Philip Petursson, chief investment strategist at IG Wealth Management.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 297.01 points at 41,393.78. The S&P 500 index was up 30.26 points at 5,626.02, while the Nasdaq composite was up 114.30 points at 17,683.98.

The S&P/TSX composite index closed up 93.51 points at 23,568.65.

While last week saw a “healthy” pullback on weaker economic data, this week investors appeared to be buying the dip and hoping the central bank “comes to the rescue,” said Petursson.

Next week, the U.S. Federal Reserve is widely expected to cut its key interest rate for the first time in several years after it significantly hiked it to fight inflation.

But the magnitude of that first cut has been the subject of debate, and the market appears split on whether the cut will be a quarter of a percentage point or a larger half-point reduction.

Petursson thinks it’s clear the smaller cut is coming. Economic data recently hasn’t been great, but it hasn’t been that bad either, he said — and inflation may have come down significantly, but it’s not defeated just yet.

“I think they’re going to be very steady,” he said, with one small cut at each of their three decisions scheduled for the rest of 2024, and more into 2025.

“I don’t think there’s a sense of urgency on the part of the Fed that they have to do something immediately.

A larger cut could also send the wrong message to the markets, added Petursson: that the Fed made a mistake in waiting this long to cut, or that it’s seeing concerning signs in the economy.

It would also be “counter to what they’ve signaled,” he said.

More important than the cut — other than the new tone it sets — will be what Fed chair Jerome Powell has to say, according to Petursson.

“That’s going to be more important than the size of the cut itself,” he said.

In Canada, where the central bank has already cut three times, Petursson expects two more before the year is through.

“Here, the labour situation is worse than what we see in the United States,” he said.

The Canadian dollar traded for 73.61 cents US compared with 73.58 cents US on Thursday.

The October crude oil contract was down 32 cents at US$68.65 per barrel and the October natural gas contract was down five cents at US$2.31 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was up US$30.10 at US$2,610.70 an ounce and the December copper contract was up four cents US$4.24 a pound.

— With files from The Associated Press

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 13, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version