Student Loan Cancellation Won’t Stimulate The Economy, According To New Research - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Student Loan Cancellation Won’t Stimulate The Economy, According To New Research – Forbes

Published

 on


Student loan cancellation won’t stimulate the economy, according to new research.

Here’s what you need to know.

Student Loans

Supporters of student loan cancellation say student loan cancellation is a perfect financial stimulus: cancel $50,000 of student loans, and student loan borrowers will have more money to spend on local businesses. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) have been vocal supporters of student loan cancellation as a means of financial stimulus. However, according to new research from the Committee for a Reponsible Budget, both total student loan cancellation and partial student loan cancellation will have a minimal effect on the economy. Here’s what they found:

  • Total student loan cancellation: only $0.08 to $0.23 of economic activity for every dollar of student loans cancelled.
  • Partial student loan cancellation: $0.02 to $0.27 of economic activity for every dollar of student loans cancelled.
  • Student loan cancellation of $10,000: results in an economic multiplier of only 0.13x.
  • Student loan cancellation of $50,000: results in an economic multiplier of 0.10x.

This means that if you cancel all student loans, then only 8% to 23% of the amount of student loan debt cancelled would stimulate the economy. If you cancel some student loans, then only 2% to 27% of the amount of student loan debt cancelled would stimulate the economy.

3 Reasons student loan cancellation doesn’t stimulate the economy:

  1. Due to income-driven repayment plans, student loan cancellation has minimal impact on impact cash flow;
  2. Student loan cancellation is poorly targeted to those less likely to spend; and
  3. The current state of the macroeconomy given supply and demand constraints

Here are the details.


Student loan cancellation and stimulus

Here’s how much partial student loan cancellation would impact the economy, according to research:

Student loan cancellation: $10,000

  • completely eliminate student loans for 15 million borrowers
  • partially cancel student loans for 28 million would cost $210 to $280 billion.
  • would reduce annual student loan payments by $18 billion per year (after temporary student loan forbearance ends)
  • even after three years, the savings would be $54 billion, which is about 20% – 25% of the amount of student loans cancelled

Student loan cancellation: $50,000

  • completely eliminate student loans for 36 million borrowers
  • partially cancel student loans for 7 million would cost more than $950 billion.
  • would reduce annual student loan payments by $55 billion per year (after temporary student loan forbearance ends)
  • even after three years, the savings would be $165 billion, which is about 17% of the amount of student loans cancelled

Why student loan cancellation doesn’t really impact cash flow

According to the research, student loan cancellation doesn’t really impact cash flow. Here’s why:

  • $50,000 of student loan cancellation doesn’t mean that a student loan borrower now has $50,000 to spend in the economy.
  • Instead, a student loan borrower would save their student loan payment each month, which could range based on their student loan balance, but could be several hundred dollars (not $50,000).
  • Here’s a surprising statistic: nearly 50% of all student loan dollars are connected to non-repaying borrowers either in school, student loan delinquency, student loan forbearance (separate from the current temporary student loan forbearance ddue to the Covid-19 pandemic), student loan deferment or student loan default.
  • And among those student loan borrowers in student loan repayment, approximately 40% of the dollars come from income-driven repayment plans. Unless their student loan debt is completely or mostly cancelled, these student loan borrowers would continue to make student loan payments each month based on their income.
  • Almost 90% student loan borrowers in an income-driven repayment plan have student loan balances above $10,000, while approximately 40% have student loan balances over $50,000.

Biden has supported financial stimulus, but hasn’t cancelled student loan debt

President Joe Biden has been a proponent of stimulus to help Americans in the response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Through measures such as stimulus checks and enhanced unemployment benefits, Biden has championed providing direct checks to those most in need. The researchers found that “fiscal stimulus is most effective when it goes to those most likely to spend, such as individuals with low incomes or those who recently experienced a loss in income.” However, they argue that student debt cancellation does the exact opposite by distributing money mainly to those most likely to save and least likely to spend. How does student loan cancellation compare to stimulus checks and enhanced unemployment benefits? The researchers estimate savings from a student loan borrower having lower debt repayment will only be about 50% as effective at boosting demand as expanded unemployment benefits and 20% less effective than stimulus checks. “Given high levels of savings, massive stimulus in the pipeline, pent-up demand, supply constraints, inflation pressures, and expectations of a strong economic recovery, additional cash injected into the economy will have few places to go. To the extent that it leads to new spending – as opposed to saving – it is likely to result in additional inflation pressures (especially in the near term).”

As Biden and Congress debate the future of student loan cancellation, the good news is that Biden has cancelled $3 billion of student loans. It’s likely that Biden will continue to pursue targeted student loan cancellation, but there is no guarantee that there will be any wide-scale student loan cancellation. Therefore, make sure you have a clear strategy for student loan repayment. Here are some popular options:


Student Loans: More Reading

Is this a game changer for student loan cancellation?

Are you read to pay student loans again? Elizabeth Warren says your student loan servicer isn’t ready

Biden has now cancelled $40 billion of student loans this way

Biden may extend the student loan relief beyond September 30, 2021, even if unemployment benefits and the eviction moratorium end

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Construction wraps on indoor supervised site for people who inhale drugs in Vancouver

Published

 on

 

VANCOUVER – Supervised injection sites are saving the lives of drug users everyday, but the same support is not being offered to people who inhale illicit drugs, the head of the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS says.

Dr. Julio Montaner said the construction of Vancouver’s first indoor supervised site for people who inhale drugs comes as the percentage of people who die from smoking drugs continues to climb.

The location in the Downtown Eastside at the Hope to Health Research and Innovation Centre was unveiled Wednesday after construction was complete, and Montaner said people could start using the specialized rooms in a matter of weeks after final approvals from the city and federal government.

“If we don’t create mechanisms for these individuals to be able to use safely and engage with the medical system, and generate points of entry into the medical system, we will never be able to solve the problem,” he said.

“Now, I’m not here to tell you that we will fix it tomorrow, but denying it or ignoring it, or throw it under the bus, or under the carpet is no way to fix it, so we need to take proactive action.”

Nearly two-thirds of overdose deaths in British Columbia in 2023 came after smoking illicit drugs, yet only 40 per cent of supervised consumption sites in the province offer a safe place to smoke, often outdoors, in a tent.

The centre has been running a supervised injection site for years which sees more than a thousand people monthly and last month resuscitated five people who were overdosing.

The new facilities offer indoor, individual, negative-pressure rooms that allow fresh air to circulate and can clear out smoke in 30 to 60 seconds while users are monitored by trained nurses.

Advocates calling for more supervised inhalation sites have previously said the rules for setting up sites are overly complicated at a time when the province is facing an overdose crisis.

More than 15,000 people have died of overdoses since the public health emergency was declared in B.C. in April 2016.

Kate Salters, a senior researcher at the centre, said they worked with mechanical and chemical engineers to make sure the site is up to code and abidies by the highest standard of occupational health and safety.

“This is just another tool in our tool box to make sure that we’re offering life-saving services to those who are using drugs,” she said.

Montaner acknowledged the process to get the site up and running took “an inordinate amount of time,” but said the centre worked hard to follow all regulations.

“We feel that doing this right, with appropriate scientific background, in a medically supervised environment, etc, etc, allows us to derive the data that ultimately will be sufficiently convincing for not just our leaders, but also the leaders across the country and across the world, to embrace the strategies that we are trying to develop.” he said.

Montaner said building the facility was possible thanks to a single $4-million donation from a longtime supporter.

Construction finished with less than a week before the launch of the next provincial election campaign and within a year of the next federal election.

Montaner said he is concerned about “some of the things that have been said publicly by some of the political leaders in the province and in the country.”

“We want to bring awareness to the people that this is a serious undertaking. This is a very massive investment, and we need to protect it for the benefit of people who are unfortunately drug dependent.” he said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

N.B. election: Parties’ answers on treaty rights, taxes, Indigenous participation

Published

 on

 

FREDERICTON – The six chiefs of the Wolastoqey Nation in New Brunswick distributed a survey on Indigenous issues to political parties ahead of the provincial election, which is scheduled to kick off Thursday. Here are some of the answers from the Progressive Conservative, Liberal and Green parties.

Q: How does your party plan to demonstrate a renewed commitment to recognizing our joint treaty responsibilities and acknowledging that the lands and waters of this territory remain unceded?

Progressive Conservative: The party respectfully disagrees with the assertion that land title has been unceded. This is a legal question that has not been determined by the courts.

Liberal: When we form government, the first conversations the premier-designate will have is with First Nations leaders. We will publicly and explicitly acknowledge your treaty rights, and our joint responsibility as treaty people.

Green: The Green Party acknowledges that New Brunswick is situated on the unceded and unsurrendered territories of the Wolastoqiyik, Mi’kmaq and Peskotomuhkati peoples, covered by the Treaties of Peace and Friendship. Our party is committed to establishing true nation-to-nation relationships with First Nations, grounded in mutual respect and co-operation as the treaties intended.

Q: How does your party propose to approach the issue of provincial tax agreements with First Nations?

Progressive Conservative: The government of New Brunswick operates in a balanced and fair manner with all organizations, institutions and local governments that represent the citizens of this province, including First Nations. Therefore, we cannot offer tax agreements that do not demonstrate a benefit to all citizens.

Liberal: Recent discussions with First Nations chiefs shed light on the gaps that existed in the previous provincial tax agreements with First Nations. Our party is committed to negotiating and establishing new tax agreements with First Nations that address the local needs and priorities and ensure all parties have a fair deal.

Green: The Green Party is committed to fostering a respectful relationship with First Nations in New Brunswick and strongly opposes Premier Blaine Higgs’s decision to end tax-sharing agreements. We believe reinstating these agreements is crucial for supporting the economic development and job creation in First Nation communities.

Q: How will your party ensure more meaningful participation of Indigenous communities in provincial land use and resource management decision-making?

Progressive Conservative: The government of New Brunswick has invested significant resources in developing a robust duty to consult and engagement process. We are interested in fully involving First Nations in the development of natural resources, including natural gas development. We believe that the development of natural gas is better for the environment — because it allows for the shutdown of coal-fired power plants all over the globe — and it allows for a meaningful step along the path to reconciliation.

Liberal: Our party is focused on building strong relations with First Nations and their representatives based on mutual respect and a nation-to-nation relationship, with a shared understanding of treaty obligations and a recognition of your rights. This includes having First Nations at the table and engaged on all files, including land-use and resource management.

Green: We will develop a new Crown lands management framework with First Nations, focusing on shared management that respects the Peace and Friendship Treaties. We will enhance consultation by developing parameters for meaningful consultation with First Nations that will include a dispute resolution mechanism, so the courts become the last resort, not the default in the face of disagreements.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canadian Coast Guard crew member lost at sea off Newfoundland

Published

 on

 

ST. JOHN’S, N.L. – A crew member of a Canadian Coast Guard ship has been lost at sea off southern Newfoundland.

The agency said in a release Wednesday that an extensive search and rescue effort for the man was ended Tuesday evening.

He was reported missing on Monday morning when the CCGS Vincent Massey arrived in St. John’s, N.L.

The coast guard says there was an “immediate” search on the vessel for the crew member and when he wasn’t located the sea and air search began.

Wednesday’s announcement said the agency was “devastated to confirm” the crew member had been lost at sea, adding that decisions to end searches are “never taken lightly.”

The coast guard says the employee was last seen on board Sunday evening as the vessel sailed along the northeast coast of Newfoundland.

Spokeswoman Kariane Charron says no other details are being provided at this time and that the RCMP will be investigating the matter as a missing person case.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version