Governing Council members reflected on how recent economic developments could affect monetary policy. They revisited their discussion in September, when they decided to maintain the policy rate at 5%. At that time, the data received since July had shown more clearly that demand was slowing as monetary policy worked its way through the economy.
At the October meetings, members agreed that the evidence demonstrated further progress toward rebalancing the economy. Monetary policy continued to gain traction—excess demand was being absorbed, and price pressures were easing for many goods and services.
However, members acknowledged that the translation of weaker demand into lower price growth had been slow. The lack of downward momentum in underlying inflation was a source of considerable concern. They reflected again on the two possible explanations for this persistence: that the transmission of monetary policy actions through to inflation required more time, or that monetary policy was not yet restrictive enough to relieve price pressures.
Members discussed whether the stickiness in core inflation measures reflected the fact that excess demand remained in the system or that inflation could be becoming entrenched.
While the output gap indicated the economy was entering a period of excess supply, considerable uncertainty surrounds this estimate. Latent excess demand could explain why:
the labour market remained on the tight side
businesses continued to raise prices more often than normal
near-term inflation expectations remained elevated
Wage growth, if sustained at the current pace of 4% to 5%, would be inconsistent with restoring price stability. Members agreed they would be watching closely to see if higher labour costs began to be reflected in renewed inflationary pressures.
On corporate pricing behaviour, despite some progress toward normalization, many businesses were still reporting that they would raise prices more frequently than normal. Members expressed concern that businesses would:
be slower to pass on price decreases as input costs decline
increase their prices more rapidly in response to future shocks
Finally, members noted that while near-term inflation expectations remained elevated, they had been easing. Long-term inflation expectations remained well anchored. Thus, current household spending and business decisions more likely reflected recent experiences with inflation rather than an acceptance that high inflation was here to stay.
As excess demand continues to be absorbed, persistence in core inflation, elevated inflation expectations and wage growth, and atypical corporate pricing behaviour could be indications of high inflation becoming entrenched. In such a scenario, members acknowledged that further monetary policy tightening would likely be required to restore price stability.
Members also discussed the implications of elevated shelter price inflation for monetary policy. Given that increasing the supply of housing enough to substantially narrow the shortfall will take time, shelter price inflation could continue to contribute more than normal to overall inflation for some time.
Finally, Governing Council also discussed the risk that the economy could slow more than expected. The outlook for GDP had been revised down from the July MPR, in part due to tighter financial conditions globally. If global financial conditions tighten further or past increases in the policy interest rate restrain demand more than expected, the economy could be weaker and inflation lower than projected.
Overall, Governing Council members agreed that monetary policy was working to lower demand and ease price pressures for many goods and services. They also agreed that as the economy moved into excess supply, past monetary policy tightening should continue to translate into lower inflation. However, with a higher near-term forecast for inflation and persistent core inflation, as well as the risk that rising global tensions could lead to higher oil prices or renewed supply chain disruptions, they agreed that overall inflationary risks had increased.
OTTAWA – The Canadian economy was flat in August as high interest rates continued to weigh on consumers and businesses, while a preliminary estimate suggests it grew at an annualized rate of one per cent in the third quarter.
Statistics Canada’s gross domestic product report Thursday says growth in services-producing industries in August were offset by declines in goods-producing industries.
The manufacturing sector was the largest drag on the economy, followed by utilities, wholesale and trade and transportation and warehousing.
The report noted shutdowns at Canada’s two largest railways contributed to a decline in transportation and warehousing.
A preliminary estimate for September suggests real gross domestic product grew by 0.3 per cent.
Statistics Canada’s estimate for the third quarter is weaker than the Bank of Canada’s projection of 1.5 per cent annualized growth.
The latest economic figures suggest ongoing weakness in the Canadian economy, giving the central bank room to continue cutting interest rates.
But the size of that cut is still uncertain, with lots more data to come on inflation and the economy before the Bank of Canada’s next rate decision on Dec. 11.
“We don’t think this will ring any alarm bells for the (Bank of Canada) but it puts more emphasis on their fears around a weakening economy,” TD economist Marc Ercolao wrote.
The central bank has acknowledged repeatedly the economy is weak and that growth needs to pick back up.
Last week, the Bank of Canada delivered a half-percentage point interest rate cut in response to inflation returning to its two per cent target.
Governor Tiff Macklem wouldn’t say whether the central bank will follow up with another jumbo cut in December and instead said the central bank will take interest rate decisions one a time based on incoming economic data.
The central bank is expecting economic growth to rebound next year as rate cuts filter through the economy.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 31, 2024
