Surgical delays due to COVID-19 could lead to shorter life spans for cancer patients: study - CTV News Toronto | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Health

Surgical delays due to COVID-19 could lead to shorter life spans for cancer patients: study – CTV News Toronto

Published

 on


Longer wait times due to the slowdowns of cancer surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario will likely lead to decreased long-term survival for many patients with cancer, a new study has found.

As the province quickly pulls back pandemic restrictions and the health-care system steams ahead, a research paper published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal on Monday revealed the impact of the Ontario government’s decision to reduce the number of cancer surgeries, along with other elective surgeries, performed in the province during the first COVID-19 wave.

“This research paper used real world data, combined with a simulated model, to demonstrate that delays in surgery in our health-care system in Ontario are likely going to lead to changes in survival for cancer patients in the future,” said Dr. Tony Eskander, a surgical oncologist at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and a lead author of the report.

The province’s decision to reduce the number of elective surgeries was made in anticipation of a potential surge of patients with COVID-19. The study states that while necessary at the time, the strategy resulted in a backlog of cancer surgeries, and some patients faced longer wait times for surgical treatment.

The study focused on patients receiving non-emergent cancer surgery in Ontario. It included patients with breast, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecological, head and neck, hepatobiliary, lung and prostate cancers.

The study uses a microsimulation to analyze the long-term consequences of the pandemic-related surgical delays. It looks at the 22,799 patients who were waiting for cancer surgery before the pandemic, and then looks at the waitlist of 20,177 patients during the pandemic, and the research team subjects them to different wait times.

“We subject them to what the regular wait times are, which on average prior to the pandemic, was about 25 days, and then the pandemic wait times, which on overage when the pandemic started was about 32 days,” Eskander said.

“Seven day difference seems like a very small difference, but when we took those patients and we put them through out health system in the model, we identified that those additional waits actually led to changes in survival.”

Eskander noted that all patients with cancer in Ontario, overall, lost a combined 843 life years due to surgery delays in the first wave of the pandemic.

“And, we only really modeled the first wave. We only really focused on the first six months of the pandemic so that number is probably much greater because we have subsequent waves with subsequent slowdowns,” he added.

The study also highlights that the results reported in the research paper are likely conservative estimates of the true impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes of patients with cancer.

The study noted while de-escalation of cancer surgeries during pandemics may be required, the slowdowns are associated with a risk of “unintended harm.”

“Careful management of health-care resources is critical during times of resource constraint to mitigate unintended consequences,” the study concluded.

Looking at the big picture, Eskander added the Ontario government should focus on a “holistic approach” that builds capacity in the health-care system, such that “even when our health-care system is pressed, we have the ability to continue with life saving and absolutely needed surgery.”

“In reality, in Ontario, our hospitals prior to the pandemic were already running at 100 per cent,” he said. “We’re still stuck trying to catch up and prioritize patients … What we really want to do is to create capacity in the system, where patients who need surgery should have free and open and equal access to it.”

“The only way to do that is to build more hospitals, build more operating rooms and provide more access to surgery in the health-care system.”

CANCER DIAGNOSIS FALLING THROUGH THE CRACKS

Eskander stated that another issue recognized in the study is many individuals are not even getting their cancer diagnosed in the first place due to pandemic-related issues.

“We’re behind even on picking up on cancers and even getting them through to treatment,” he said. “We know that there’s a number of cancers that are being diagnosed at a far lower rate than we would expect from prior to the pandemic.”

He said that often times cancers are diagnosed by accident on scans, including CT scans, MRIs and ultrasounds, but during the pandemic this imaging was not used as frequently as before due to disruptions in the health-care system.

He added that screening programs, which are meant to pick up on cancers during an early phase, were also disrupted during the pandemic.

“We still have a backlog. We haven’t quite caught up on our screening, but presumably as we catch up, we’re going to have a massive wave of cancer patients coming through the system,” he said.

Eskander added the final, and probably most important reason why cancer diagnoses are not happening as often as usual, is the lack of in-person medical appointments.

“I think virtual care is important and it’s here to stay, but I think seeing physicians virtually only, or predominantly, is a problem,” he said. “Because a lot of cancers that otherwise would be seen by a physician or felt on physical examination are missed and caught at a later time.” 

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Older patients, non-English speakers more likely to be harmed in hospital: report

Published

 on

 

Patients who are older, don’t speak English, and don’t have a high school education are more likely to experience harm during a hospital stay in Canada, according to new research.

The Canadian Institute for Health Information measured preventableharmful events from 2023 to 2024, such as bed sores and medication errors,experienced by patients who received acute care in hospital.

The research published Thursday shows patients who don’t speak English or French are 30 per cent more likely to experience harm. Patients without a high school education are 20 per cent more likely to endure harm compared to those with higher education levels.

The report also found that patients 85 and older are five times more likely to experience harm during a hospital stay compared to those under 20.

“The goal of this report is to get folks thinking about equity as being a key dimension of the patient safety effort within a hospital,” says Dana Riley, an author of the report and a program lead on CIHI’s population health team.

When a health-care provider and a patient don’t speak the same language, that can result in the administration of a wrong test or procedure, research shows. Similarly, Riley says a lower level of education is associated with a lower level of health literacy, which can result in increased vulnerability to communication errors.

“It’s fairly costly to the patient and it’s costly to the system,” says Riley, noting the average hospital stay for a patient who experiences harm is four times more expensive than the cost of a hospital stay without a harmful event – $42,558 compared to $9,072.

“I think there are a variety of different reasons why we might start to think about patient safety, think about equity, as key interconnected dimensions of health-care quality,” says Riley.

The analysis doesn’t include data on racialized patients because Riley says pan-Canadian data was not available for their research. Data from Quebec and some mental health patients was also excluded due to differences in data collection.

Efforts to reduce patient injuries at one Ontario hospital network appears to have resulted in less harm. Patient falls at Mackenzie Health causing injury are down 40 per cent, pressure injuries have decreased 51 per cent, and central line-associated bloodstream infections, such as IV therapy, have been reduced 34 per cent.

The hospital created a “zero harm” plan in 2019 to reduce errors after a hospital survey revealed low safety scores. They integrated principles used in aviation and nuclear industries, which prioritize safety in complex high-risk environments.

“The premise is first driven by a cultural shift where people feel comfortable actually calling out these events,” says Mackenzie Health President and Chief Executive Officer Altaf Stationwala.

They introduced harm reduction training and daily meetings to discuss risks in the hospital. Mackenzie partnered with virtual interpreters that speak 240 languages and understand medical jargon. Geriatric care nurses serve the nearly 70 per cent of patients over the age of 75, and staff are encouraged to communicate as frequently as possible, and in plain language, says Stationwala.

“What we do in health care is we take control away from patients and families, and what we know is we need to empower patients and families and that ultimately results in better health care.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Alberta to launch new primary care agency by next month in health overhaul

Published

 on

 

CALGARY – Alberta’s health minister says a new agency responsible for primary health care should be up and running by next month.

Adriana LaGrange says Primary Care Alberta will work to improve Albertans’ access to primary care providers like family doctors or nurse practitioners, create new models of primary care and increase access to after-hours care through virtual means.

Her announcement comes as the provincial government continues to divide Alberta Health Services into four new agencies.

LaGrange says Alberta Health Services hasn’t been able to focus on primary health care, and has been missing system oversight.

The Alberta government’s dismantling of the health agency is expected to include two more organizations responsible for hospital care and continuing care.

Another new agency, Recovery Alberta, recently took over the mental health and addictions portfolio of Alberta Health Services.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 15, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Experts urge streamlined, more compassionate miscarriage care in Canada

Published

 on

 

Rana Van Tuyl was about 12 weeks pregnant when she got devastating news at her ultrasound appointment in December 2020.

Her fetus’s heartbeat had stopped.

“We were both shattered,” says Van Tuyl, who lives in Nanaimo, B.C., with her partner. Her doctor said she could surgically or medically pass the pregnancy and she chose the medical option, a combination of two drugs taken at home.

“That was the last I heard from our maternity physician, with no further followup,” she says.

But complications followed. She bled for a month and required a surgical procedure to remove pregnancy tissue her body had retained.

Looking back, Van Tuyl says she wishes she had followup care and mental health support as the couple grieved.

Her story is not an anomaly. Miscarriages affect one in five pregnancies in Canada, yet there is often a disconnect between the medical view of early pregnancy loss as something that is easily managed and the reality of the patients’ own traumatizing experiences, according to a paper published Tuesday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

An accompanying editorial says it’s time to invest in early pregnancy assessment clinics that can provide proper care during and after a miscarriage, which can have devastating effects.

The editorial and a review of medical literature on early pregnancy loss say patients seeking help in emergency departments often receive “suboptimal” care. Non-critical miscarriage cases drop to the bottom of the triage list, resulting in longer wait times that make patients feel like they are “wasting” health-care providers’ time. Many of those patients are discharged without a followup plan, the editorial says.

But not all miscarriages need to be treated in the emergency room, says Dr. Modupe Tunde-Byass, one of the authors of the literature review and an obstetrician/gynecologist at Toronto’s North York General Hospital.

She says patients should be referred to early pregnancy assessment clinics, which provide compassionate care that accounts for the psychological impact of pregnancy loss – including grief, guilt, anxiety and post-traumatic stress.

But while North York General Hospital and a patchwork of other health-care providers in the country have clinics dedicated to miscarriage care, Tunde-Byass says that’s not widely adopted – and it should be.

She’s been thinking about this gap in the Canadian health-care system for a long time, ever since her medical training almost four decades ago in the United Kingdom, where she says early pregnancy assessment centres are common.

“One of the things that we did at North York was to have a clinic to provide care for our patients, and also to try to bridge that gap,” says Tunde-Byass.

Provincial agency Health Quality Ontario acknowledged in 2019 the need for these services in a list of ways to better manage early pregnancy complications and loss.

“Five years on, little if any progress has been made toward achieving this goal,” Dr. Catherine Varner, an emergency physician, wrote in the CMAJ editorial. “Early pregnancy assessment services remain a pipe dream for many, especially in rural Canada.”

The quality standard released in Ontario did, however, prompt a registered nurse to apply for funding to open an early pregnancy assessment clinic at St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton in 2021.

Jessica Desjardins says that after taking patient referrals from the hospital’s emergency room, the team quickly realized that they would need a bigger space and more people to provide care. The clinic now operates five days a week.

“We’ve been often hearing from our patients that early pregnancy loss and experiencing early pregnancy complications is a really confusing, overwhelming, isolating time for them, and (it) often felt really difficult to know where to go for care and where to get comprehensive, well-rounded care,” she says.

At the Hamilton clinic, Desjardins says patients are brought into a quiet area to talk and make decisions with providers – “not only (from) a physical perspective, but also keeping in mind the psychosocial piece that comes along with loss and the grief that’s a piece of that.”

Ashley Hilliard says attending an early pregnancy assessment clinic at The Ottawa Hospital was the “best case scenario” after the worst case scenario.

In 2020, she was about eight weeks pregnant when her fetus died and she hemorrhaged after taking medication to pass the pregnancy at home.

Shortly after Hilliard was rushed to the emergency room, she was assigned an OB-GYN at an early pregnancy assessment clinic who directed and monitored her care, calling her with blood test results and sending her for ultrasounds when bleeding and cramping persisted.

“That was super helpful to have somebody to go through just that, somebody who does this all the time,” says Hilliard.

“It was really validating.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 15, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version