Like a premium buffet, this sporty-yet-luxurious hybrid offers you a little bit of everything
Author of the article:
The Lexus UX F Sport Hybrid 250h is a mouthful of a name for a buffet of a vehicle. It has a little something for everybody. Since it’s a Lexus, you can imagine it’s got luxury in the bag, but a buffet has more than just crab legs and quiche, and the UX does as well.
And since this is the F Sport Series 2 model, you’ve got paddle shifters, an exclusive three-spoke steering wheel, and 18-inch alloy wheels — that’s like putting a piece of cake on top of your roast beef.
But UX doesn’t stop at F Sport. That’s because this is also the hybrid model, which is the sensible side of broccoli to an otherwise hedonistic plate. It’s also a rarity in this segment. These days, it’s tough to tell what a crossover is actually crossing over, and the Lexus UX seems to be trying to cross just about everything: SUV, hatchback, sports car, hyper-miler. The only thing that’s missing is pickup truck.
The UX already rides the line between subcompact crossover and hatchback, but when you add the F Sport upgrades, this is the luxury hot hatch you didn’t know existed.
Inside the Lexus you are presented with accessories right to the brim. A suite of safety features is also included, as are driver assistance systems. Eight-way power-adjustable heated/vented seats, heated steering wheel, heads-up display, dual-zone climate control, and a handsome two-tone interior are just the appetizer, while the real meat is in the quality of construction. The switches on the dash for the climate control have a unique look, and remind me of something you might find in an airplane.
Because it’s a hybrid, the first thing you feel when you press the accelerator is the torque of the electric motor. This aids with wafting away gently from a stop, and effectively eliminating rubber-band effect from the CVT.
Being a luxury car I do find that nobody wants to let you merge, but that’s not a problem that’s exclusive to the Lexus. However, a vehicle that combines luxury, sports, and hybrid, is merging poison. The turn signals sound like the ticking of a grandfather clock, which matches the analog clock in the infotainment. Little touches like that are why you buy a Lexus.
The F Sport
Lexus doesn’t want to say, but zero-to-100-km/h happens in a little more than 8.0 seconds. That’s more than a second-and-a-half slower than a Golf GTI, but we are talking about a luxury CUV here. Its 2.0-litre four-cylinder produces 181 horsepower, 13 of those coming from an electric motor mounted in the rear, which also provides all-wheel-drive. What seems on the surface a luxury feature is quickly realized as a performance addition.
Ride quality is a little bit firm for a luxury car, but for a sports car you might call it soft, so the UX is once again riding the line. The weighty progressive steering feels good: it’s more powered at low speeds, but firms up at higher speeds. Unfortunately, it doesn’t make a nice noise really, but that’s just Lexus not letting the gravy touch the peas. Above all, a Lexus has to be comfortable, and quiet.
When it all boils down to it, this is really just Prius technology in a filet mignon package. It’s not a plug-in, so you can’t drive it fully electrically, but the UX is smart enough to know when you need to use the ICE engine and when you don’t. On the highway, you can expect 6.2 litres per 100 km, while in the city it’ll be more like 5.7 litres. Yes, it gets better mileage in the city, because the electric motor kicks in to do the work instead of the internal-combustion engine.
What can be improved?
The rear-seat legroom isn’t good enough in this segment. I was also really disappointed in the cargo space; there’s a two-tiered floor system, but it’s still much less space than competitors.
When’s the last time you saw a CD player and an aux cord? It’s nice to know you can drive around your friends who still carry around an iPod, I guess. The infotainment is actually okay, but the interface to access it is complete garbage — the goofy touchpad is terrible. Even if you were to get used to it, it requires way too much concentration to operate while driving.
It also took me on some wacky routes that I would never logically use, and almost made me turn the wrong way down a one-way street a few times. Luckily, Lexus finally introduced a new infotainment system on another model, so we’ll be seeing this disappear soon.
Yeah, the outside doesn’t look the best, but Lexus is sticking with its spindle grille for the foreseeable future. This is a vibrant colour, though, and I’ve gotta give Lexus props for offering this vehicle in something other than grey and white, although the hue does cost extra.
Much like a buffet, however, you’ve gotta pay to get a seat, and since the Lexus UX F Sport Hybrid is a black-tie affair, that seat is gonna cost you $51,921.70 when you add in all the cocktails.
So just like the buffet, the Lexus UX F Sport Hybrid has a little something for everybody. If you’ve got pockets deep enough for the entry fee, and a few extra cupcakes, the UX has plenty to offer.
Google consistently publishes a new Android Security Bulletin on the first Monday of every month, and they’ve done so for nearly every month in the last few years. Thus, it’s no surprise that today, Google published the Android Security Bulletin for August 2021, though the company did have one big surprise for us that’s separate from its monthly Android security update.
August 2021 Security Update Bulletin
You can view the Android Security Bulletin for the month of August 2021 here, but as always, don’t expect to find detailed write-ups of every patched vulnerability. The latest Android security update fixes numerous bugs ranging in severity from high to critical, with many of the bugs affecting closed-source vendor components from Qualcomm, MediaTek, and others. Devices running patch level 2021-08-01 do not contain fixes for these closed-source vendor components, but those devices running patch level 2021-08-05 do. For more information on how the monthly Android security update process works, we recommend reading our explainer available here.
Pixel Update Bulletin/Functional Update
In addition to patching the vulnerabilities affecting all Android devices, the August 2021 Android security update also patches a few issues exclusively affecting Google’s own Pixel phones. These are documented in the Pixel Update Bulletin for the month of August 2021, which can be viewed here.
Today’s update doesn’t bring the Android 12 codebase to Pixel phones, but we can expect that next month’s update will be the big one. The update rolling out to supported Pixel phones today will feature the 2021-08-05 patch level and has the following build number:
Pixel 3 (XL): RQ3A.210805.001.A1
Pixel 3a (XL): RQ3A.210805.001.A1
Pixel 4 (XL): RQ3A.210805.001.A1
Pixel 4a: RQ3A.210805.001.A1
Pixel 4a (5G): RQ3A.210805.001.A1
Pixel 5: RQ3A.210805.001.A1
Besides the security issues mentioned in the Pixel Update Bulletin, the August 2021 update also includes a fix to prevent the accidental triggering of the Google Assistant.
If you own another device, you’ll have to wait for your device OEM or carrier to roll out the update. That could take days or weeks depending on the OEM, though some like Samsung have already begun to roll out the update.
Apple’sMacBook laptops are on a tear, with record sales announced in the recent earnings call. The move to its own ARM-based processor has unlocked a flurry of purchases. But if you’re thinking of buying a MacBook Pro, you might want to look at what Apple has planned for the next step before getting out your wallet.
Putting aside the apparent design flaw that has users of the 2020 MacBook Pro and MacBook Air update reporting spontaneous display cracks, there are some significant reasons to hold off on buying a new MacBook Pro, no matter the special offers and back to school bundles that are no doubt on their way.
The first is to realise that, for all of the inclusion of the Apple Silicon processor, the current MacBook Pro M1 laptops are the low-end laptops. Just as with the recent Intel MacBook Pros, the line has a clear division between ‘top-end’ and ‘low-end’ specs. The Pro laptops that went on sale at the end of last year are squarely in the ‘low-end’ of the market.
If you’re looking for the ‘high-end’ models, they are still to be launched. The nebulous “in the next few months” is suggested by many, which puts them in the traditional late October slot Tim Cook’s team have become fond of for the laptop launches.
Then there’s the design. The current MacBook Pro is using a design that, while current, is expected to be depreciated with the launch of the new laptops. The first Apple Silicon machines maintained exactly the same look and feel on the outside, no doubt to help consumers stay comfortable with the brand as the architecture change took place under the keyboard.
Now Apple has the chance to bring new design trends to the platform, to rework the bezels, the keyboard, the trackpad, the external dimensions, and no doubt try and make it all a little bit thinner.
Of course that’s not the biggest visual change. More than the new design, the next MacBook Pro discussions are going to be about the screen. The switch to miniLED should offer more vivid colours, deeper blacks, and all with lower power consumption. The smaller (and more popular) MacBook is expected to bump the screen size up to 14 inches – which likely means much smaller bezels as part of the new design discussed above.
Finally of course is the processor. Befitting the status as the ‘top-end’ MacBook Pro machines, the new macOS laptops will ship with an uprated M1 processor; the presumptively-named M1X should feature more cores to offer more processing and graphical power.
A new refreshed design; a clearer and improved display; and a little bit more processing power. All that for waiting a few months. Why would you by a new MacBook Pro now when Apple has something better around the corner?
Activision Blizzard, the company behind some of the biggest franchises in all of gaming, has been rocked by an explosive lawsuit. The gaming giant is being sued by the state of California, which accuses it of workplace discrimination against its female workforce.
The suit didn’t take long to make an impact. Many employees have spoken out in support of the claims, over 2,000 have signed an open letter calling for action by the company, and a walkout protest was staged last Wednesday. After initially rejecting many of the DFEH’s allegations, Activision Blizzard has said it’ll launch a full probe — and its games will be changed to reflect values of diversity and inclusion.
Activision Blizzard is one of the biggest gaming companies in the world. It owns Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, Diablo, Crash Bandicoot and many more hugely popular franchises and last year recorded $2.2 billion in profit. Here’s everything you need to know about this colossal lawsuit.
What is Activision Blizzard accused of?
The DFEH’s suit accuses Activision Blizzard of workplace discrimination. It alleges women are compensated unfairly — paid less for the same job, scrutinized more heavily than their male peers — and subject to considerable harassment. The agency called Activision Blizzard a “breeding ground for harassment and discrimination,” in which women are subject to regular sexual advances by (often high-ranking) men who largely go unpunished.
Illustrative of the claims DFEH is making against Activision is an office ritual referred to as “cube crawls,” in which men allegedly drink “copious” amounts of alcohol, crawl through the office cubicles and engage in “inappropriate behavior” including groping. The lawsuit describes incidents including allegations that a female employee died by suicide during a business trip as a result of a toxic relationship with a supervisor.
“Women and girls now make up almost half of gamers in America, but the gaming industry continues to cater to men,” the suit reads. “Activision-Blizzard’s double-digit percentage growth, 10-figure annual revenues and recent diversity marketing campaigns have unfortunately changed little.”
And then employees reacted?
After DFEH filed its suit, Activision Blizzard responded with a lengthy statement that said the department had filed a rushed, inaccurate report with “distorted, and in many cases false, descriptions of [Activision Blizzard’s] past.” In an email sent to staff, published by Bloomberg’s Jason Schreier, vice president of corporate affairs Frances Townsend said the site presented “a distorted and untrue picture of our company, including factually incorrect, old, and out of context stories — some from more than a month ago.”
These statements evidently didn’t satisfy employees, neither current nor former. Over 2,000 of them signed an open letter to Activision Blizzard leadership in which they criticized the company’s response. (Activision Blizzard currently has around 10,000 employees.)
“To put it clearly and unequivocally, our values as employees are not accurately reflected in the words and actions of our leadership,” the open letter reads, according to Bloomberg. “To claim this is a ‘truly meritless and irresponsible lawsuit’ while seeing so many current and former employees speak out about their own experiences regarding harassment and abuse is simply unacceptable.”
The letter signed by employees made three demands. First, that the company issue statements that acknowledge the severity of the allegations. Second, that Townsend resign from her role as executive sponsor of the ABK Employee Women’s Network. Third, that Activision Blizzard’s executive leadership collaborate with employees to ensure a safe workspace to “speak out and come forward.”
How did Activision Blizzard respond?
After Activision Blizzard’s first statement, along with the one made by Townsend, was so thoroughly rejected by employees, the company appears to be taking the suit more seriously. Last Tuesday the company’s CEO, Bobby Kotick, issued a letter addressing the suit, and the concerns of employees.
“Our initial responses to the issues we face together, and to your concerns, were, quite frankly, tone deaf,” it reads. “We are taking swift action to be the compassionate, caring company you came to work for and to ensure a safe environment. There is no place anywhere at our Company for discrimination, harassment, or unequal treatment of any kind.”
Kotick announced that a law firm, WilmerHale, will be hired to evaluate the company’s “policies and procedures.”
Beyond the probe, Kotick outlined several changes that would be made effective immediately. The company would be investigating “each and every claim” of discrimination and harassment being made, and will host listening sessions to collaborate with employees on how to improve the workplace culture. Activision Blizzard will also be “evaluating managers and leaders” across the company and making personnel changes as appropriate. Finally, changes will be made to in-game content.
“We have heard the input from employee and player communities that some of our in-game content is inappropriate. We are removing that content,” Kotick wrote.
What about the walkout?
Alongside the open letter signed by over 2,000 employees, workers at the company planned a strike last Wednesday morning. Seeking now to be more collaborative with aggrieved workers, Activision Blizzard sent an email to staff saying they would get paid time off for attending the protest.
Hundreds of employees took up the offer, as they set up a picket line outside of Activision Blizzard’s Irvine, California headquarters. Employees held signs that read “every voice matters”, “fight bad guys in game, fight bad guys IRL” and “nerf male priviledge.” (When developers weaken characters in games like Overwatch it’s known as “nerfing” them.)
Over 350 employees took up the offer, reports The Washington Post. The walkout participants acknowledged Kotick’s letter, but had four additional demands, as seen in the tweet above. These include greater pay transparency and employee participation in hiring and promotion policies.
What has the industry reaction been?
On Aug. 30 Strauss Zelnick, the CEO of Take-Two Interactive, the studio behind Grand Theft Auto and Red Dead Redemption, assured investors that his company wouldn’t tolerate a workplace environment like the one allegedly seen within Activision Blizzard.
“We will not tolerate harassment or discrimination or bad behavior of any kind. We never have,” he said. “Is there more we can do? I’m certain there is. Do we feel like we’re in a pretty good place? We’re grateful that we do feel that way right now.”
Zelnick is the latest industry figure to weigh in on the lawsuit.
“It’s our responsibility to ensure this type of behavior is not tolerated at Bungie at any level,” developer Bungie, owned by Activision Blizzard, tweeted, “and that we never excuse it or sweep it under the rug. While the accounts in this week’s news are difficult to read, we hope they will lead to justice, awareness, and accountability.”
Chris Metzen, a co-creator of Blizzard franchise Diablo who left the company in 2016, said: “We failed, and I’m sorry… to all of you at Blizzard — those of you I know and those of you whom I’ve never met — I offer you my very deepest apologies for the part I played in a culture that fostered harassment, inequality, and indifference.”
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.