Taking hundreds of photos to find all major issues with new iPhone cameras; Android can help Apple! | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Tech

Taking hundreds of photos to find all major issues with new iPhone cameras; Android can help Apple!

Published

 on

One could say that the iPhone camera has many issues…

Apple uses small sensors; doesn’t give you a pro mode for better control over your images; the iPhone can sometimes make people look orange (or blue); the ultra-wide and zoom cameras aren’t as good as the primary one, and so on and so forth…

However, all of that aside, the beef I have with the iPhone camera is a bit more specific, or rather more “technical” but at the same time simply related to “how good a photo looks”, if I may say…

The way I see it is that what’s “wrong” with the iPhone camera goes all the way back to the very reason you decide to snap a photo. Then, it ends with, well… the end result, which, more often than not, doesn’t match the initial depiction of what you were looking at / the very reason you decided this was a moment worth capturing, storing, and celebrating.

If none of this makes sense now, I’ll get (way) more specific when we look at the photo samples I took (and then edited)! So, what are the “real” issues with the iPhone camera, and how can you solve them within seconds by hitting the edit button in your Photos app?

Here’s my take…

The real issues with the iPhone 13, iPhone 14 camera relate to Apple’s general philosophy on photography

 

As I hinted, the real problem with the iPhone camera (at least in my view) ultimately is the fact that Apple doesn’t let us take greater control over our photos (before snapping them)!

Instead, as an iPhone 13 mini and iPhone 14 Pro user (all photos you’re about to see are taken with the iPhone 13 mini, which I prefer carrying around), I get whatever comes with Apple’s understanding of a “good photo”, and I have to… deal with it.

 

  • iPhone photos are often too bright, which leads to a washed-out look and, therefore, false depiction of the scene – this is in no way exclusive to night photos (in fact, rather the opposite), but it’s way easier to spot when taking Night Mode images

 

  • Aggressive HDR can make iPhone photos look extremely flat and lifeless, lacking any “drama”, which “real” cameras often give us; technically, this is due to the fact that the iPhone wants to bring highlight (bright parts of the image) and shadows (the darker parts of the photo) closer together, instead of trying to separate them in an authentic fashion

 

  • Related to the last point and on the opposite end of the spectrum, the iPhone’s HDR often fails to stack images properly, which can lead to overblown highlights that are next to impossible to recover

 

  • Oversharpening – perhaps the easiest-to-grasp problem with the iPhone camera has existed for 2-3 generations now; unless you’re shooting in RAW/48MP mode (if you have that luxury), trees, branches, and buildings (or anything with well-defined texture) is bound to look way sharper than it’s supposed to

 

Take “real” photos with your iPhone 12, iPhone 13, iPhone 14! It takes 30 seconds of editing; I snapped hundreds of photos to make sure

How to take DSLR-like photos with your iPhone? It’s easy! Snap the photo and try fiddling with the settings after you hit the edit button in the Photos app. What usually makes my photos look way more realistic and “real” is:

 

  • Dial back Brilliance by some 30-60% (strongly recommend)
  • Dial down Brightness by some 20-40% (strongly recommend)
  • Reduce Noise by some 15-25% (recommended for photos with a lot of textures, which might look over-sharpened)
  • Add Vignette for a stylistic look (recommended for a more authentic “camera” look and where you need to bring back the “drama” in the scene)

 

I took hundreds of photos and edited them to look… better and more authentic (original photos on the left, edited on the right)

 

Apple, please give us a more authentic shooting mode; let us turn off HDR, and maybe change the lens supplier for iPhone 15

As you can see, the iPhone photo traits are as promised – high brightness, added sharpness, and inconsistent HDR. And as mentioned in the beginning, this usually leads to “lifeless” photos, which don’t just look different from reality but also often look… worse.

Just like the editing suggestions I gave towards the beginning, it was very rare that I had to add any vibrance to the iPhone’s photos. In 95% of the cases, I simply reduced the brightness and brilliance of the photos, which automatically helped restore some of the color of the photos. What’s interesting is that there is, in fact, a smartphone on the market right now that takes photos pretty much the way I like them or the way I think the iPhone should also do it, and this phone is the Xiaomi 13 Pro (also, the Xiaomi 12S Ultra which offers an identical experience). This isn’t a Xiaomi 13 Pro story, so I won’t be talking too much about it, but the Leica Authentic Mode within the camera app of this device is what separates it from the rest of the pack (Pixel 7, Galaxy S22, iPhone 14).

What Xiaomi is currently doing is exactly what I imagine the future of the smartphone camera to be – give users a few options for photo styles – which are very different from filters in that they aren’t laid out on top of your photo but are the photo you take.

New iPhone 15 camera rumors and Photographic Styles – the right direction

But wait, doesn’t the iPhone have… Photographic Styles?

Yes, it does, and yes, they do help! However, they are far from making photos look natural. For instance, photographic styles don’t allow you to tweak highlights and shadows individually or reduce the artificial sharpening of photos.

Anyway, the rumors for iPhone 15 say that Apple is about to switch to using newer/better Sony sensors that allow for improved HDR – something that current iPhones can often get wrong…

Better hardware and Photographic Styles are certainly the right direction, but I think Apple should double down and make Photographic Styles the centerpiece of the new-gen iPhone camera, similar to what Xiaomi, OnePlus, Oppo, and Vivo are doing with their Leica, Zeiss, and Hasselblad partnerships.

Giving people the option to take vivid or more natural/authentic photos could take the iPhone camera from really good to outstanding… for more people. Do you agree? And will you use some of the editing tricks I showed off here for your own photos? Let me know!

Source link

Continue Reading

News

The Internet is Littered in ‘Educated Guesses’ Without the ‘Education’

Published

 on

Although no one likes a know-it-all, they dominate the Internet.

The Internet began as a vast repository of information. It quickly became a breeding ground for self-proclaimed experts seeking what most people desire: recognition and money.

Today, anyone with an Internet connection and some typing skills can position themselves, regardless of their education or experience, as a subject matter expert (SME). From relationship advice, career coaching, and health and nutrition tips to citizen journalists practicing pseudo-journalism, the Internet is awash with individuals—Internet talking heads—sharing their “insights,” which are, in large part, essentially educated guesses without the education or experience.

The Internet has become a 24/7/365 sitcom where armchair experts think they’re the star.

Not long ago, years, sometimes decades, of dedicated work and acquiring education in one’s field was once required to be recognized as an expert. The knowledge and opinions of doctors, scientists, historians, et al. were respected due to their education and experience. Today, a social media account and a knack for hyperbole are all it takes to present oneself as an “expert” to achieve Internet fame that can be monetized.

On the Internet, nearly every piece of content is self-serving in some way.

The line between actual expertise and self-professed knowledge has become blurry as an out-of-focus selfie. Inadvertently, social media platforms have created an informal degree program where likes and shares are equivalent to degrees. After reading selective articles, they’ve found via and watching some TikTok videos, a person can post a video claiming they’re an herbal medicine expert. Their new “knowledge,” which their followers will absorb, claims that Panda dung tea—one of the most expensive teas in the world and isn’t what its name implies—cures everything from hypertension to existential crisis. Meanwhile, registered dietitians are shaking their heads, wondering how to compete against all the misinformation their clients are exposed to.

More disturbing are individuals obsessed with evangelizing their beliefs or conspiracy theories. These people write in-depth blog posts, such as Elvis Is Alive and the Moon Landings Were Staged, with links to obscure YouTube videos, websites, social media accounts, and blogs. Regardless of your beliefs, someone or a group on the Internet shares them, thus confirming your beliefs.

Misinformation is the Internet’s currency used to get likes, shares, and engagement; thus, it often spreads like a cosmic joke. Consider the prevalence of clickbait headlines:

  • You Won’t Believe What Taylor Swift Says About Climate Change!
  • This Bedtime Drink Melts Belly Fat While You Sleep!
  • In One Week, I Turned $10 Into $1 Million!

Titles that make outrageous claims are how the content creator gets reads and views, which generates revenue via affiliate marketing, product placement, and pay-per-click (PPC) ads. Clickbait headlines are how you end up watching a TikTok video by a purported nutrition expert adamantly asserting you can lose belly fat while you sleep by drinking, for 14 consecutive days, a concoction of raw eggs, cinnamon, and apple cider vinegar 15 minutes before going to bed.

Our constant search for answers that’ll explain our convoluted world and our desire for shortcuts to success is how Internet talking heads achieve influencer status. Because we tend to seek low-hanging fruits, we listen to those with little experience or knowledge of the topics they discuss yet are astute enough to know what most people want to hear.

There’s a trend, more disturbing than spreading misinformation, that needs to be called out: individuals who’ve never achieved significant wealth or traded stocks giving how-to-make-easy-money advice, the appeal of which is undeniable. Several people I know have lost substantial money by following the “advice” of Internet talking heads.

Anyone on social media claiming to have a foolproof money-making strategy is lying. They wouldn’t be peddling their money-making strategy if they could make easy money.

Successful people tend to be secretive.

Social media companies design their respective algorithms to serve their advertisers—their source of revenue—interest; hence, content from Internet talking heads appears most prominent in your feeds. When a video of a self-professed expert goes viral, likely because it pressed an emotional button, the more people see it, the more engagement it receives, such as likes, shares and comments, creating a cycle akin to a tornado.

Imagine scrolling through your TikTok feed and stumbling upon a “scientist” who claims they can predict the weather using only aluminum foil, copper wire, sea salt and baking soda. You chuckle, but you notice his video got over 7,000 likes, has been shared over 600 times and received over 400 comments. You think to yourself, “Maybe this guy is onto something.” What started as a quest to achieve Internet fame evolved into an Internet-wide belief that weather forecasting can be as easy as DIY crafts.

Since anyone can call themselves “an expert,” you must cultivate critical thinking skills to distinguish genuine expertise from self-professed experts’ self-promoting nonsense. While the absurdity of the Internet can be entertaining, misinformation has serious consequences. The next time you read a headline that sounds too good to be true, it’s probably an Internet talking head making an educated guess; without the education seeking Internet fame, they can monetize.

______________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a self-described connoisseur of human psychology, writes about what’s

on his mind from Toronto. You can follow Nick on Twitter and Instagram @NKossovan.

 

Continue Reading

Tech

Tight deadlines on software projects can put safety at risk: survey

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – A new survey says a majority of software engineers and developers feel tight project deadlines can put safety at risk.

Seventy-five per cent of the 1,000 global workers who responded to the survey released Tuesday say pressure to deliver projects on time and on budget could be compromising critical aspects like safety.

The concern is even higher among engineers and developers in North America, with 77 per cent of those surveyed on the continent reporting the urgency of projects could be straining safety.

The study was conducted between July and September by research agency Coleman Parkes and commissioned by BlackBerry Ltd.’s QNX division, which builds connected-car technology.

The results reflect a timeless tug of war engineers and developers grapple with as they balance the need to meet project deadlines with regulations and safety checks that can slow down the process.

Finding that balance is an issue that developers of even the simplest appliances face because of advancements in technology, said John Wall, a senior vice-president at BlackBerry and head of QNX.

“The software is getting more complicated and there is more software whether it’s in a vehicle, robotics, a toaster, you name it… so being able to patch vulnerabilities, to prevent bad actors from doing malicious acts is becoming more and more important,” he said.

The medical, industrial and automotive industries have standardized safety measures and anything they produce undergoes rigorous testing, but that work doesn’t happen overnight. It has to be carried out from the start and then at every step of the development process.

“What makes safety and security difficult is it’s an ongoing thing,” Wall said. “It’s not something where you’ve done it, and you are finished.”

The Waterloo, Ont.-based business found 90 per cent of its survey respondents reported that organizations are prioritizing safety.

However, when asked about why safety may not be a priority for their organization, 46 per cent of those surveyed answered cost pressures and 35 per cent said a lack of resources.

That doesn’t surprise Wall. Delays have become rampant in the development of tech, and in some cases, stand to push back the launch of vehicle lines by two years, he said.

“We have to make sure that people don’t compromise on safety and security to be able to get products out quicker,” he said.

“What we don’t want to see is people cutting corners and creating unsafe situations.”

The survey also took a peek at security breaches, which have hit major companies like London Drugs, Indigo Books & Music, Giant Tiger and Ticketmaster in recent years.

About 40 per cent of the survey’s respondents said they have encountered a security breach in their employer’s operating system. Those breaches resulted in major impacts for 27 per cent of respondents, moderate impacts for 42 per cent and minor impacts for 27 per cent.

“There are vulnerabilities all the time and this is what makes the job very difficult because when you ship the software, presumably the software has no security vulnerabilities, but things get discovered after the fact,” Wall said.

Security issues, he added, have really come to the forefront of the problems developers face, so “really without security, you have no safety.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:BB)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Beware of scams during Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days sales event: cybersecurity firm

Published

 on

 

As online shoppers hunt for bargains offered by Amazon during its annual fall sale this week, cybersecurity researchers are warning Canadians to beware of an influx of scammers posing as the tech giant.

In the 30 days leading up to Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days, taking place Tuesday and Wednesday, there were more than 1,000 newly registered Amazon-related web domains, according to Check Point Software Technologies, a company that offers cybersecurity solutions.

The company said it deemed 88 per cent of those domains malicious or suspicious, suggesting they could have been set up by scammers to prey on vulnerable consumers. One in every 54 newly created Amazon-related domain included the phrase “Amazon Prime.”

“They’re almost indiscernible from the real Amazon domain,” said Robert Falzon, head of engineering at Check Point in Canada.

“With all these domains registered that look so similar, it’s tricking a lot of people. And that’s the whole intent here.”

Falzon said Check Point Research sees an uptick in attempted scams around big online shopping days throughout the year, including Prime Days.

Scams often come in the form of phishing emails, which are deceptive messages that appear to be from a reputable source in attempt to steal sensitive information.

In this case, he said scammers posing as Amazon commonly offer “outrageous” deals that appear to be associated with Prime Days, in order to trick recipients into clicking on a malicious link.

The cybersecurity firm said it has identified and blocked 100 unique Amazon Prime-themed scam emails targeting organizations and consumers over the past two weeks.

Scammers also target Prime members with unsolicited calls, claiming urgent account issues and requesting payment information.

“It’s like Christmas for them,” said Falzon.

“People expect there to be significant savings on Prime Day, so they’re not shocked that they see something of significant value. Usually, the old adage applies: If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.”

Amazon’s website lists a number of red flags that it recommends customers watch for to identify a potential impersonation scam.

Those include false urgency, requests for personal information, or indications that the sender prefers to complete the purchase outside of the Amazon website or mobile app.

Scammers may also request that customers exclusively pay with gift cards, a claim code or PIN. Any notifications about an order or delivery for an unexpected item should also raise alarm bells, the company says.

“During busy shopping moments, we tend to see a rise in impersonation scams reported by customers,” said Amazon spokeswoman Octavia Roufogalis in a statement.

“We will continue to invest in protecting consumers and educating the public on scam avoidance. We encourage consumers to report suspected scams to us so that we can protect their accounts and refer bad actors to law enforcement to help keep consumers safe.”

Falzon added that these scams are more successful than people might think.

As of June 30, the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre said there had been $284 million lost to fraud so far this year, affecting 15,941 victims.

But Falzon said many incidents go unreported, as some Canadians who are targeted do not know how or where to flag a scam, or may choose not to out of embarrassment.

Check Point recommends Amazon customers take precautions while shopping on Prime Days, including by checking URLs carefully, creating strong passwords on their accounts, and avoiding personal information being shared such as their birthday or social security number.

The cybersecurity company said consumers should also look for “https” at the beginning of a website URL, which indicates a secure connection, and use credit cards rather than debit cards for online shopping, which offer better protection and less liability if stolen.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version