Teck quitting Frontier oilsands mine a failure of federal leadership: ex-B.C. premier Christy Clark - CBC.ca | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Business

Teck quitting Frontier oilsands mine a failure of federal leadership: ex-B.C. premier Christy Clark – CBC.ca

Published

 on


Read Story Transcript

Former B.C. Premier Christy Clark says that a failure of federal leadership led to Teck Resource Ltd.’s decision to walk away from building the $20-billion Tech Frontier oilsands mine in Alberta.

“They can’t seem to figure out if they’re on the side of of growing the economy and middle class jobs, or if they’re on the side of trying to stop all emissions from Canada,” said Clark, who was Liberal premier of the western province from 2011 to 2017. She is now a senior advisor at the law firm Bennett Jones.

“It really just means that there’s a lot of instability, and nobody wants to invest when they don’t know what the risk is going to be,” she told The Current’s Matt Galloway.

The federal government was due to decide this week whether the $20.6-billion, 260,000-barrel-per-day (39.7 million litres) mine could go ahead, but the Vancouver-based company withdrew its application in a surprise move Sunday. The company had estimated the mine would have created 7,000 construction jobs, and 2,500 operating jobs.

In an open letter about the decision, Teck CEO Don Lindsay cited the ongoing debate over climate policy in Canada.

A mining shovel fills a haul vehicle at the Shell Albian Sands oilsands mine near Fort McMurray, Alta. The Frontier oilsands mine would have been located between Fort McMurray and Fort Chipewyan (The Canadian Press/Jeff McIntosh)

“Unfortunately, the growing debate around this issue has placed Frontier and our company squarely at the nexus of much broader issues that need to be resolved. In that context, it is now evident that there is no constructive path forward for the project,” he wrote.

Clark said it was the “wrong debate” to try to choose between protecting the environment and promoting jobs and growth at home. She argued that resource development in Canada could also help the environment on a global scale — because it would be produced alongside efforts to minimise emissions. 

“What Teck would be offering the world with the Frontier project would be a whole heck of a lot better for the world, in displacing coal and dirty forms of energy in Asia,” she said. 

“Yes, it would raise emissions profiles in Canada, but overall, around the world, around the globe — which is what we really should be thinking about — it would really have a big impact in lowering that.” 

Teck’s Frontier oilsands project was planned for northern Alberta. The company pulled its application for the project on Sunday. (CBC News)

Decision to withdraw was ‘market-based’

Julia Levin, the climate and energy program manager for Environmental Defence, agreed that there is a lack of cohesion in the approach to fighting climate change at the provincial and federal level.

“It’s bad for Canadians, it’s bad for the environment, and it’s bad for the economy,” she told Galloway.

Chris Hall says the bigger question now is about Canada’s investment climate after a  major resource project is called off.    6:06

But she said Teck’s decision was primarily a market-based one, because “investors are just no longer willing to place their money into these expensive and high-carbon projects that are incompatible with climate action.”

She disagreed with Christy’s assertion, arguing that Canada has “spent years trying to both grow our fossil fuel sector, and also lead on climate, and those things are incompatible.” 

“But it’s not incompatible to have a thriving economy and a healthy climate,” she said.

“We just need to manage a transition into a low carbon economy.” 

She said Canadian businesses, and the public, needed a “climate test” to bring clarity to how decisions about resource extractions are made.

The projected emissions of a project could be judged against Canada’s climate targets, in the wider context of other projects, she explained.

“We map out that pathway, and then when we have project decisions, we know from the onset whether these are compatible with our climate goals,” she said. 

“And whether they’re economically viable in the world that actually does limit global warming to below 1.5 degrees.”


Written by Padraig Moran, with files from CBC News. Produced by Idella Sturino, Matt Meuse and Ines Colabrese.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Business

Transat AT reports $39.9M Q3 loss compared with $57.3M profit a year earlier

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – Travel company Transat AT Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year earlier as its revenue edged lower.

The parent company of Air Transat says it lost $39.9 million or $1.03 per diluted share in its quarter ended July 31.

The result compared with a profit of $57.3 million or $1.49 per diluted share a year earlier.

Revenue in what was the company’s third quarter totalled $736.2 million, down from $746.3 million in the same quarter last year.

On an adjusted basis, Transat says it lost $1.10 per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of $1.10 per share a year earlier.

Transat chief executive Annick Guérard says demand for leisure travel remains healthy, as evidenced by higher traffic, but consumers are increasingly price conscious given the current economic uncertainty.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TRZ)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Dollarama keeping an eye on competitors as Loblaw launches new ultra-discount chain

Published

 on

 

Dollarama Inc.’s food aisles may have expanded far beyond sweet treats or piles of gum by the checkout counter in recent years, but its chief executive maintains his company is “not in the grocery business,” even if it’s keeping an eye on the sector.

“It’s just one small part of our store,” Neil Rossy told analysts on a Wednesday call, where he was questioned about the company’s food merchandise and rivals playing in the same space.

“We will keep an eye on all retailers — like all retailers keep an eye on us — to make sure that we’re competitive and we understand what’s out there.”

Over the last decade and as consumers have more recently sought deals, Dollarama’s food merchandise has expanded to include bread and pantry staples like cereal, rice and pasta sold at prices on par or below supermarkets.

However, the competition in the discount segment of the market Dollarama operates in intensified recently when the country’s biggest grocery chain began piloting a new ultra-discount store.

The No Name stores being tested by Loblaw Cos. Ltd. in Windsor, St. Catharines and Brockville, Ont., are billed as 20 per cent cheaper than discount retail competitors including No Frills. The grocery giant is able to offer such cost savings by relying on a smaller store footprint, fewer chilled products and a hearty range of No Name merchandise.

Though Rossy brushed off notions that his company is a supermarket challenger, grocers aren’t off his radar.

“All retailers in Canada are realistic about the fact that everyone is everyone’s competition on any given item or category,” he said.

Rossy declined to reveal how much of the chain’s sales would overlap with Loblaw or the food category, arguing the vast variety of items Dollarama sells is its strength rather than its grocery products alone.

“What makes Dollarama Dollarama is a very wide assortment of different departments that somewhat represent the old five-and-dime local convenience store,” he said.

The breadth of Dollarama’s offerings helped carry the company to a second-quarter profit of $285.9 million, up from $245.8 million in the same quarter last year as its sales rose 7.4 per cent.

The retailer said Wednesday the profit amounted to $1.02 per diluted share for the 13-week period ended July 28, up from 86 cents per diluted share a year earlier.

The period the quarter covers includes the start of summer, when Rossy said the weather was “terrible.”

“The weather got slightly better towards the end of the summer and our sales certainly increased, but not enough to make up for the season’s horrible start,” he said.

Sales totalled $1.56 billion for the quarter, up from $1.46 billion in the same quarter last year.

Comparable store sales, a key metric for retailers, increased 4.7 per cent, while the average transaction was down2.2 per cent and traffic was up seven per cent, RBC analyst Irene Nattel pointed out.

She told investors in a note that the numbers reflect “solid demand as cautious consumers focus on core consumables and everyday essentials.”

Analysts have attributed such behaviour to interest rates that have been slow to drop and high prices of key consumer goods, which are weighing on household budgets.

To cope, many Canadians have spent more time seeking deals, trading down to more affordable brands and forgoing small luxuries they would treat themselves to in better economic times.

“When people feel squeezed, they tend to shy away from discretionary, focus on the basics,” Rossy said. “When people are feeling good about their wallet, they tend to be more lax about the basics and more willing to spend on discretionary.”

The current economic situation has drawn in not just the average Canadian looking to save a buck or two, but also wealthier consumers.

“When the entire economy is feeling slightly squeezed, we get more consumers who might not have to or want to shop at a Dollarama generally or who enjoy shopping at a Dollarama but have the luxury of not having to worry about the price in some other store that they happen to be standing in that has those goods,” Rossy said.

“Well, when times are tougher, they’ll consider the extra five minutes to go to the store next door.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:DOL)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. regulator fines TD Bank US$28M for faulty consumer reports

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has ordered TD Bank Group to pay US$28 million for repeatedly sharing inaccurate, negative information about its customers to consumer reporting companies.

The agency says TD has to pay US$7.76 million in total to tens of thousands of victims of its illegal actions, along with a US$20 million civil penalty.

It says TD shared information that contained systemic errors about credit card and bank deposit accounts to consumer reporting companies, which can include credit reports as well as screening reports for tenants and employees and other background checks.

CFPB director Rohit Chopra says in a statement that TD threatened the consumer reports of customers with fraudulent information then “barely lifted a finger to fix it,” and that regulators will need to “focus major attention” on TD Bank to change its course.

TD says in a statement it self-identified these issues and proactively worked to improve its practices, and that it is committed to delivering on its responsibilities to its customers.

The bank also faces scrutiny in the U.S. over its anti-money laundering program where it expects to pay more than US$3 billion in monetary penalties to resolve.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version