Tesla AI Day: An Investor’s Perspective | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Business

Tesla AI Day: An Investor’s Perspective

Published

 on

Key Takeaways

  • It’s worth mentioning that Tesla has generated much of its revenue from regulatory credits.
  • The self-driving cars along with a retail version of the humanoid robot – a logical extension of the tech required of their cars – could change the business model of the company entirely.
  • Elon Musk predicted that the humanoid robot would be ready within 3-5 years for less than $20,000 and that it would transform civilization.
  • Musk reiterated many times how the public owns Tesla and that he can’t simply do whatever he wants, he could be fired, and the shareholding public always has a voice.

Tesla has been in the financial news for a variety of reasons over the last few months. There was a Tesla stock split, the company announced a recall, and the CEO Elon Musk is a constant source of buzz, a substantive Kardashian of science capable of space travel.

The celebrity CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, enjoys putting on a show and garnering interest for the company. Unfortunately, the Tesla stock often feels the impact of Musk’s actions. However, Tesla just made some announcements that could change the landscape of artificial intelligence forever.

We’re going to look at what happened at Tesla AI Day 2022 to see what the news coming out of this event likely means for Tesla stockholders.

What was announced at Tesla AI Day?

They started the session off by having the humanoid robot come out to dance on stage. The Optimus is designed to be a highly capable robot ready for fully scaled production, and it could sell for less than $20,000 according to Musk. While this robot is still some years away from hitting the market, it appears that the company is optimistic about its potential. Tesla is already working on the next version of the humanoid robot.

The day was mainly produced to draw the world’s best minds in AI to join the team. Since the company is actively recruiting, the event got fairly technical and some of the information likely went over the heads of most investors.

The fully self-driving car is not yet ready for the market, but the company continues to work on it, including a computing framework that has moved the computing world forward with new chips and racks. The FSD Beta has many challenges, but the company is intent on making this happen. Once the fully self-driving car is ready for the market, the company can introduce its robot taxi service which would be a mix of Airbnb and Uber.

You can read our full recap from Tesla AI Day here if you’re interested in more.

What does this Tesla AI Day mean for investors really?

Investors paid close attention to Tesla AI Day to see what’s on the horizon for the electric vehicle maker. Tesla has been criticized in the past by some analysts for how much the company relies on regulatory credits for turning a profit. The company strives to be known for more than just “cool cars” as they bring continuous innovation to the AI space.

Here are a few key takeaways for Tesla investors…

Optimus has the potential to drastically change the market

Musk predicted that this robot could sell for less than $20,000 and be ready within 3-5 years. The robot would be an additional source of income along with changing the operations of the business, if it can perform advanced tasks for the company, from technical work to administrative duties.

Musk went as far as to say that the humanoid robot would be a “fundamental transformation for civilization,” which would undoubtedly bring more efficiency and attention to Tesla if it happens. We can only predict that bringing a humanoid robot to the market would increase shareholder value.

Additional revenue streams

Suppose the company is able to add a humanoid robot and a self-driving taxi service to its business model. In that case, we can only assume that this will significantly increase the company’s revenue. Adding new revenue streams that are profitable is always good news for investors.

There’s just no guarantee that the market, and general public, will be ready for a robot taxi service, assuming the company can get past the safety and regulatory hurdles.

Tesla also brought detailed insight into how it could lend its Dojo super chip to other companies for AI training, similar to Amazon Web Service, Tesla could sell compute time on a Dojo. We will be paying attention to see how this plays out but it’s a potential multi-billion dollar byproduct of building better AI that also drives an established industry forward faster.

Investors in Tesla stock would clearly benefit from new revenue streams. While many of us know Tesla for its electric vehicles, the company generates substantial revenue from selling its regulatory credits and energy storage. A big play in cloud computing could more than replace Tesla’s revenue from selling carbon credits. For context, Tesla didn’t turn a profit until 2022, largely kept afloat by selling its emissions credits. Recently, the energy side of the business has brought in more revenue with total energy revenue for Tesla reaching $2.78 billion for 2021. Unfortunately, this revenue stream had expenses of $2.91 billion which led to a $129 million loss for the sector.

The self-driving car could change the industry

The team at Tesla has come a long way with the full self-driving car as they have 160,000 beta testers, but the company still faces many regulatory hurdles and safety issues. If fully self-driving cars and a robot taxi service can hit the market, then this would sharply increase the company’s revenue.

Elon Musk could be fired

Musk made it clear that they could fire him since Tesla is publicly traded. This is important for investors because the CEO of a company plays a major role in the share price. While it doesn’t appear that Tesla will move forward without Elon Musk any time soon, it’s important for investors to be reminded of their role in deciding on the management team of the company. There’s no telling to what would happen to the share price of Tesla if Musk were to no longer be its public face.

With all of that being said, we have to stress that most of these innovations aren’t ready for the market yet. Companies like Apple use these showcase events to launch new products that are ready for market. In contrast, Tesla discusses products that are years away from being market-ready to recruit talent and build hype.

How should we be investing?

As an investor, it’s challenging to buy or sell based on hype and speculation, though it is a core capability of the best AI investing technology. Tesla’s AI Day certainly gave us a lot to get excited about AI across the board, but the company has a long way to go with many of these innovations.

This year has also been a rough one in the stock market as soaring inflation, persistent rate hikes from the Fed, and the fears of a recession have led to extreme volatility. The S&P 500 was down 9.3% for September, the largest monthly decline since March of 2020. This news is unsettling as a tumbling stock market impacts every company. We’re also going to see how Tesla’s demand changes during this time of high inflation where many folks are thinking twice about discretionary spending.

Another way to make money from Tesla and innovations in the AI space is to invest in one of our Kits. AI-powered Investment Kits take the guesswork out of investing. Our artificial intelligence searches the markets for the best investments for all manner of risk tolerances and economic situations.

Bottom Line

Musk is a controversial figure, to say the least, from announcing that he’s buying Twitter to then changing his mind on the deal with private text messages becoming public. All of this could impact Tesla stock, so you must pay attention to company-related news as an investor.

It’s no secret that Tesla believes in the future of artificial intelligence. It’s going to be worth watching to see how the company monetizes these future products when they’re ready to launch. A humanoid robot that’s available to regular citizens would certainly change the labor market and, in a very real way, the world. That’s not just hype if the team we saw at AI day delivers, but it’s difficult to get excited about something that has such a long way to go. In addition, we’re going to be tracking the financial performance of Tesla as the company has to deal with soaring inflation and global concerns of a recession.

Download Q.ai today for access to AI-powered investment strategies. When you deposit $100, we’ll add an additional $100 to your account.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Natural gas producers await LNG Canada’s start, but will it be the fix for prices?

Published

 on

 

CALGARY – Natural gas producers in Western Canada have white-knuckled it through months of depressed prices, with the expectation that their fortunes will improve when LNG Canada comes online in the middle of next year.

But the supply glut plaguing the industry this fall is so large that not everyone is convinced the massive facility’s impact on pricing will be as dramatic or sustained as once hoped.

As the colder temperatures set in and Canadians turn on their furnaces, natural gas producers in Alberta and B.C. are finally starting to see some improvement after months of low prices that prompted some companies to delay their growth plans or shut in production altogether.

“We’ve pretty much been as low as you can go on natural gas prices. There were days when (the Alberta natural gas benchmark AECO price) was essentially pennies,” said Jason Feit, an advisor at Enverus Intelligence Research, in an interview.

“As a producer, it would not be economic to have produced that gas . . . It’s been pretty worthless.”

In the past week, AECO spot prices have hovered between $1.20 and $1.60 per gigajoule, a significant improvement over last month’s bottom-barrel prices but still well below the 2023 average price of $2.74 per gigajoule, according to Alberta Energy Regulator figures.

The bearish prices have come due to a combination of increased production levels — up about six per cent year-over-year so far in 2024 —as well as last year’s mild winter, which resulted in less natural gas consumption for heating purposes. There is now an oversupply of natural gas in Western Canada, so much so that natural gas storage capacity in Alberta is essentially full.

Mike Belenkie, CEO of Calgary-headquartered natural gas producer Advantage Energy Ltd., said companies have been ramping up production in spite of the poor prices in order to get ahead of the opening of LNG Canada. The massive Shell-led project nearing completion near Kitimat, B.C. will be Canada’s first large-scale liquefied natural gas export facility.

It is expected to start operations in mid-2025, giving Western Canada’s natural gas drillers a new market for their product.

“In practical terms everyone’s aware that demand will increase dramatically in the coming year, thanks to LNG Canada . . . and as a result of that line of sight to increased demand, a lot of producers have been growing,” Belenkie said in an interview.

“And so we have this temporary period of time where there’s more gas than there is places to put it.”

In light of the current depressed prices, Advantage has started strategically curtailing its gas production by up to 130 million cubic feet per day, depending on what the spot market is doing.

Other companies, including giants like Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. and Tourmaline Oil Corp., have indicated they will delay gas production growth plans until conditions improve.

“We cut all our gas growth out of 2024, once we’d had that mild winter. We did that back in Q2, because this is not the right year to bring incremental molecules to AECO,” said Mike Rose, CEO of Tourmaline, which is Canada’s largest natural gas producer, in an interview this week.

“We moved all our gas growth out into ’25 and ’26.”

LNG Canada is expected to process up to 2 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas per day once it reaches full operations. That represents what will be a significant drawdown of the existing oversupply, Rose said, adding that is why he thinks the future for western Canadian natural gas producers is bright.

“That sink of 2 Bcf a day will logically take three-plus years to fill. And then if LNG Canada Phase 2 happens, then obviously that’s even more positive,” Rose said.

While Belenkie said he agrees LNG Canada will lift prices, he’s not as convinced as Rose that the benefits will be sustained for a long period of time.

“Our thinking is that markets will be healthy for six months, a year, 18 months — whatever it is — and then after that 18 months, because prices will be healthy, supply will grow and probably overshoot demand again,” he said, adding he’s frustrated that more companies haven’t done what Advantage has done and curtailed production in an effort to limit the oversupply in the market.

“Frankly, we’ve been very disappointed to see how few other producers have chosen to shut in with gas prices this low. . . you’re basically dumping gas at a loss,” Belenkie said.

Feit, the analyst for Enverus, said there’s no doubt LNG Canada’s opening will be a major milestone that will help to support natural gas pricing in Western Canada. He added there are other Canadian LNG projects in the works that would also provide a boost in the longer-term, such as LNG Canada’s proposed Phase 2, as well as potential increased demand from the proliferation of AI-related data centres and other power-hungry infrastructure.

But Feit added that producers need to be disciplined and allow the market to balance in the near-term, otherwise supply levels could overshoot LNG Canada’s capacity and periods of depressed pricing could reoccur.

“Obviously selling gas at pennies on the dollar is not a sustainable business model,” Feit said.

“But there’s an old industry saying that the cure for low gas prices is low gas prices. You know, eventually companies will have to curtail production, they will have to make adjustments.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 25, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TOU; TSX:AAV, TSX:CNQ)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Corus Entertainment reports Q4 loss, signs amended debt deal with banks

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Corus Entertainment Inc. reported a fourth-quarter loss compared with a profit a year ago as its revenue fell 21 per cent.

The broadcaster says its net loss attributable to shareholders amounted to $25.7 million or 13 cents per diluted share for the quarter ended Aug. 31. The result compared with a profit attributable to shareholders of $50.4 million or 25 cents per diluted share in the same quarter last year.

Revenue for the quarter totalled $269.4 million, down from $338.8 million a year ago.

On an adjusted basis, Corus says it lost two cents per share for its latest quarter compared with an adjusted loss of four cents per share a year earlier.

The company also announced that it has signed an deal to amend and restate its existing syndicated, senior secured credit facilities with its bank group.

The restated credit facility was changed to reduce the total limit on the revolving facility to $150 million from $300 million and increase the maximum total debt to cash flow ratio required under the financial covenants.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 25, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:CJR.B)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Hiring Is a Process of Elimination

Published

 on

Job seekers owe it to themselves to understand and accept; fundamentally, hiring is a process of elimination. Regardless of how many applications an employer receives, the ratio revolves around several applicants versus one job opening, necessitating elimination.

Essentially, job gatekeepers—recruiters, HR and hiring managers—are paid to find reasons and faults to reject candidates (read: not move forward) to find the candidate most suitable for the job and the company.

Nowadays, employers are inundated with applications, which forces them to double down on reasons to eliminate. It’s no surprise that many job seekers believe that “isms” contribute to their failure to get interviews, let alone get hired. Employers have a large pool of highly qualified candidates to select from. Job seekers attempt to absolve themselves of the consequences of actions and inactions by blaming employers, the government or the economy rather than trying to increase their chances of getting hired by not giving employers reasons to eliminate them because of:

 

  • Typos, grammatical errors, poor writing skills.

 

“Communication, the human connection, is the key to personal and career success.” ― Paul J. Meyer.

The most vital skill you can offer an employer is above-average communication skills. Your resume, LinkedIn profile, cover letters, and social media posts should be well-written and error-free.

 

  • Failure to communicate the results you achieved for your previous employers.

 

If you can’t quantify (e.g. $2.5 million in sales, $300,000 in savings, lowered average delivery time by 6 hours, answered 45-75 calls daily with an average handle time of 3 and a half minutes), then it’s your opinion. Employers care more about your results than your opinion.

 

  • An incomplete LinkedIn profile.

 

Before scheduling an interview, the employer will review your LinkedIn profile to determine if you’re interview-worthy. I eliminate any candidate who doesn’t have a complete LinkedIn profile, including a profile picture, banner, start and end dates, or just a surname initial; anything that suggests the candidate is hiding something.  

 

  • Having a digital footprint that’s a turnoff.

 

If an employer is considering your candidacy, you’ll be Google. If you’re not getting interviews before you assert the unfounded, overused excuse, “The hiring system is broken!” look at your digital footprint. Employers are reading your comments, viewing your pictures, etc. Ask yourself, is your digital behaviour acceptable to employers, or can it be a distraction from their brand image and reputation? On the other hand, not having a robust digital footprint is also a red flag, particularly among Gen Y and Gen Z hiring managers. Not participating on LinkedIn, social media platforms, or having a blog or website can hurt your job search.

 

  • Not appearing confident when interviewing.

 

Confidence = fewer annoying questions and a can-do attitude.

It’s important for employers to feel that their new hire is confident in their abilities. Managing an employee who lacks initiative, is unwilling to try new things, or needs constant reassurance is frustrating.

Job searching is a competition; you’re always up against someone younger, hungrier and more skilled than you.

Besides being a process of elimination, hiring is also about mitigating risk. Therefore, being seen as “a risk” is the most common reason candidates are eliminated, with the list of “too risky” being lengthy, from age (will be hard to manage, won’t be around long) to lengthy employment gaps (raises concerns about your abilities and ambition) to inappropriate social media postings (lack of judgement).

Envision you’re a hiring manager hiring for an inside sales manager role. In the absence of “all things being equal,” who’s the least risky candidate, the one who:

  • offers empirical evidence of their sales results for previous employers, or the candidate who “talks a good talk”?
  • is energetic, or the candidate who’s subdued?
  • asks pointed questions indicating they’re concerned about what they can offer the employer or the candidate who seems only concerned about what the employer can offer them.
  • posts on social media platforms, political opinions, or the candidate who doesn’t share their political views?
  • on LinkedIn and other platforms in criticizes how employers hire or the candidate who offers constructive suggestions?
  • has lengthy employment gaps, short job tenure, or a steadily employed candidate?
  • lives 10 minutes from the office or 45 minutes away?
  • has a resume/LinkedIn profile that shows a relevant linear career or the candidate with a non-linear career?
  • dressed professionally for the interview, or the candidate who dressed “casually”?

An experienced hiring manager (read: has made hiring mistakes) will lean towards candidates they feel pose the least risk. Hence, presenting yourself as a low-risk candidate is crucial to job search success. Worth noting, the employer determines their level of risk tolerance, not the job seeker, who doesn’t own the business—no skin in the game—and has no insight into the challenges they’ve experienced due to bad hires and are trying to avoid similar mistakes.

“Taking a chance” on a candidate isn’t in an employer’s best interest. What’s in an employer’s best interest is to hire candidates who can hit the ground running, fit in culturally, and are easy to manage. You can reduce the odds (no guarantee) of being eliminated by demonstrating you’re such a candidate.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers “unsweetened” job search advice. You can send Nick your questions to artoffindingwork@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version