Texas's Business Allure Defies Abortion Politics, for Now - BNN | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Texas's Business Allure Defies Abortion Politics, for Now – BNN

Published

 on


(Bloomberg) — If Texas is a test for how socially conservative US states will fare economically in the post-Roe world, then they’ll hold up just fine.

More than a year after passing the country’s most restrictive abortion law, Texas boasts the largest number of Fortune 500 company headquarters of any state. In the latest sign of the Lone Star State’s enduring allure, Chevron Corp. announced plans to relocate workers to Houston just hours after the US Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade.

Other southern and Mountain states have been a magnet for Americans in recent years, a trend that accelerated during the pandemic and boosted growth in cities across Florida, Arizona, Idaho and Utah. These states, led by Republican governors, are now all trying to further restrict abortion — if not outright ban it.

“There will no doubt be people who won’t come to Texas or other southern states as a result of these policies, but, by and large, these things are determined by the dollars and cents,” said Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston. “Businesses are getting more or less what they want from Texas — that is low taxes, modest regulation and the freedom to influence their own destiny.”

Texas has for decades hung its hat on being a business-friendly state. Its population boom propelled it to the second-biggest economy, after California, and it’s among the fastest-growing in the past 20 years. None of the restricting laws passed by the state legislature and signed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott are threatening its prosperity in the foreseeable future. 

Even Austin, long a liberal bastion, hasn’t seen a brain drain. 

The economic risk is over the long term. Some state politicians, emboldened by a conservative Supreme Court, are already talking about punishing businesses that fund employees’ out-of-state travel for procedures. Reproductive-rights advocates have warned that in-vitro fertilization treatments could also be targeted. That would slowly chip away at the influx of people and companies willing to move to those places.

For now, low taxes on corporations and plenty of incentives outweigh any concerns about politics, reproductive rights and widening inequalities. 

Texans, whether newcomers or natives, are unlikely to leave. The state is the “stickiest” in the US, retaining more of its population than any other, according to a study by the Dallas Federal Reserve’s Pia Orrenius and Madeline Zavodny of the University of North Florida.

“Very few people leave Texas, largely because of abundant economic opportunities,” the economists wrote, adding that the state has an above-average business formation rate.

A low cost of living and plenty of space don’t hurt, either. Chevron specifically cited lower housing prices in its offer to relocate employees from California, where the median home price is more than double that of Texas. 

Diversified Economy

A relentless focus on growth has helped diversify the state’s economy beyond energy. 

The Metroplex, home to Dallas and Forth Worth, has seen an influx of financial services firms. Houston, once mainly an oil town, is home to the world’s largest children’s and cancer hospitals. Austin, Texas’s capital, has blossomed into a major tech hub — Telsa Inc. and Oracle Corp. are among the latest high-profile arrivals. 

But the fall of Roe may eventually become a deterrent. 

Cutting access to health care may pose challenges to businesses recruiting talent to the state, according to Shea Cuthbertson, president elect of Austin Women in Technology, a nonprofit networking organization. The state laws will add a financial burden on employers offering travel for care — something startups can hardly afford, she said. 

“The bottom line is that restrictive health-care policies significantly hurt people and will have a negative impact on the technology sector in Texas,” Cuthbertson said by email. “Ultimately, this will take away from diversity of thought, innovation, and equity in the workplace.”

The appeal of states like Texas may erode over time, according to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. 

“The overturn of Roe may also result in many smaller, but important, hard-to-see economic consequences,” Zandi said. Colleges in states that ban abortion could see fewer applicants from the rest of the country and world, who tend to be more socially liberal, he said.

Rising Inequality

Economists say bans will disproportionately hurt lower-income groups and minorities.

Professionals working for corporate giants like JPMorgan Chase & Co. or Walt Disney Co. will get travel expenses covered if they need out-of-state abortions — at least until states try to outlaw the practice. But the majority of women living in states with severe restrictions or bans don’t work for companies that provide that benefit — and Medicaid in most states doesn’t cover abortion.

Research shows that women forced to carry a child to term are four times as likely to live below the poverty line even years after the birth. They tend to have lower wages later in life. About 40% of Texas residents are Hispanic and the state has one of the biggest median-income gaps between White and Hispanic residents.

“There will be a negative macroeconomic effect,” said Sarah Miller, assistant professor of business economics and public policy at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business.

Miller was among more than 150 economists who submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court arguing to uphold Roe v. Wade, saying that access to reproductive care had a positive effect on women’s overall lives.

“This is going to increase inequality — we’re already seeing it,” she said.

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version