Breakthroughs in artificial intelligence are making investors see many tech companies in a new light, but the advancements could soon spread, boosting sectors and ETFs without direct ties to AI. The recent boom in AI has driven up some of the biggest tech stocks on the market, including Microsoft , Alphabet and chip maker Nvidia . The boost to those companies has helped the broader market hold up well so far in 2023 despite growing concerns about the economic outlook and the banking system. But while the focus of new tools such as ChatGPT and Bard AI has so far mostly been on the future of internet search and office communications, the AI breakthroughs will soon crop up in other industries, said Jay Jacobs, U.S. Head of Thematics and Active Equity ETFs at Blackrock. “Now that we have hundreds of millions of people interacting with generative AI, people are discovering new use cases for it,” Jacobs said. Those use cases might mean that AI does not replace other areas as the market’s new growth sector, as much as it instead helps accelerate their growth. “Anywhere where there’s data, AI is going to be useful,” Jacobs said. Genomics and health care One area where AI should be useful is health care, where the traditionally painstaking process of drug development may be supercharged and patients can potentially get more individualized care. “Genomics is an area where you’ve seen an explosion of data, and a lot of that has coincided with the fact that genetic testing is cheaper than it’s ever been. We’ve actually seen a massive price deflation in genetic testing,” Jacobs said. “The very first human genome project cost like $3 billion, and now it costs a couple hundred dollars to get your genetic testing.” Artificial intelligence can be used by companies developing drugs or other treatments to speed up the discovery process for potential successes, Jacobs said. “Now we have these new data sets popping up in these different areas, and you just set it loose on it,” he added. Blackrock’s offering in this space includes the iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) . The fund has an expense ratio of 0.47% and $140 million in assets under management. Its biggest competitor in the space is the ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) , from growth investor Cathie Wood. That fund has about $2 billion in assets under management but a higher expense ratio at 0.75%. ARKG YTD mountain Genomics ETFs like ARKG are down this year. Both funds are down so far this year. Cybersecurity Another growth area where the ability to analyze data quickly is a key part of the business is cybersecurity, and breakthroughs at AI might be coming at just the right time, Jacobs said. “We’ve seen a lot of M & A in the cybersecurity space, and I think that’s positive because it means there’s more data in place under one roof,” he said. AI can help these companies improve at recognizing patterns and trends for hackers in order to strengthen defenses, Jacobs said. “Increasingly, the cyber defense companies are using AI to try to do more predictive analytics around when and where and how those cyber attacks are going to happen,” he said. The notable funds in this space include the iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) . The biggest competitors include the ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) . All three funds are up for the year, but BUG has been the best performer with a total return above 8% year to date.
John Ivison: The blowback to Trudeau's investment tax hike could be bigger than he thinks – National Post
Published
1 hour ago
on
April 19, 2024
By
The numbers from the Department of Finance suggest they have struck taxation gold. But they’ve been wrong before
Get the latest from John Ivison straight to your inbox
Published Apr 19, 2024 • Last updated 8 hours ago • 5 minute read
Article content
“99.87 per cent of Canadians will not pay a cent more,” the prime minister said this week, in reference to the budget announcement that his government will raise the inclusion rate on capital gains tax in June.
The move will be limited to 40,000 wealthy taxpayers. “We’re going to make them pay a little bit more,” Justin Trudeau said.
Article content
But it’s hard to see how that number can be true when the budget document also says 307,000 corporations will also be caught in the dragnet that raises the inclusion rate on capital gains to 66 per cent from 50 per cent.
Advertisement 2
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay, Rex Murphy and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay, Rex Murphy and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Many of those corporations are holding companies set up by professionals and small-business owners who are relying on their portfolios for their retirement.
The budget offers the example of the nurse earning $70,000 who faces a combined federal-provincial marginal rate of 29.7 per cent on his or her income. “In comparison, a wealthy individual in Ontario with $1 million in income would face a marginal rate of 26.86 per cent on their capital gain,” it says.
Policy wonks argue that the change improves the efficiency and equity of the tax system, meaning capital gains are now taxed at a similar level to dividends, interest and paid income. The Department of Finance is an enthusiastic supporter of this view, which should have set alarm bells ringing on the political side.
That’s not to say it’s not a valid argument. But against it you could put forward the counterpoint that capital gains tax is a form of double taxation, the income having already been taxed at the individual and corporate level, which explains why the inclusion rate is not 100 per cent.
The prospect of capital gains is an incentive to invest particularly for people who, unlike wage earners, usually do not have pensions or other employment benefits.
Platformed
This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
That was recognized by Bill Morneau, Trudeau’s former finance minister, who said increasing the capital gains rate was proposed when he was in politics but he resisted the proposal.
Morneau criticized the new tax hike as “a disincentive for investment … I don’t think there’s any way to sugar-coat it.”
Regardless of the high-minded policy explanations that are advanced about neutrality in the tax system, it is clear that the impetus for the tax increase was the need to raise revenues by a government with a spending addiction, and to engage in wedge politics for one with a popularity problem.
The most pressing question right now is: how many people are affected — or, just as importantly, think they might be affected?
One recent Leger poll said 78 per cent of Canadians would support a new tax on people with wealth over $10 million.
But what about those regular folks who stand to make a once-in-a-lifetime windfall by selling the family cottage? We will need to wait a few weeks before it becomes clear how many people feel they might be affected.
Advertisement 4
Article content
The numbers supplied to Trudeau by the Department of Finance suggest they have struck taxation gold: plucking the largest amount of feathers ($21.9 billion in new revenues over five years) with the least amount of hissing (impacting just 0.13 per cent of taxpayers).
The worry for Trudeau and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland is that Finance has been wrong before.
Political veterans recall former Conservative finance minister Jim Flaherty’s volte face in 2007, when he was forced to drop a proposal to cancel the ability of Canadian companies to deduct the interest costs on money they borrowed to expand abroad.
“Tax officials vastly underestimated the number of taxpayers affected when it came to corporations,” said one person who was there, pointing out that such miscalculations tend to happen when Finance has been pushing a particular policy for years.
Trudeau’s government has some experience of this phenomenon, having been obliged to reverse itself after introducing a range of measures in 2017, aimed at dissuading professionals from incorporating in order to pay less tax. It was a defensible public policy objective but the blowback from small-business owners and professionals who felt they were unfairly being labelled tax cheats precipitated an ignoble retreat.
Advertisement 5
Article content
Speaking after the budget was delivered, Freeland was unperturbed about the prospect of blowback. “No one likes to pay more tax, even — or perhaps more particularly — those who can afford it the most,” she said.
She’d best hope such sanguinity is justified: failure to raise the promised sums will blow a hole in her budget and cut loose her fiscal anchors of declining deficits and a tumbling debt-to-GDP ratio.
That probably won’t be apparent for a year or so: the government projected that $6.9 billion in capital gains revenue will be recorded this fiscal year, largely because the implementation date has been delayed until the end of June. We are likely to see a flood of transactions before then, so that investors can sell before the inclusion rate goes up.
After that, you can imagine asset sales will be minimized, particularly if the Conservatives promise to lower the rate again (though on that front, it was noticeable that during question period this week, not one Conservative raised the new $21 billion tax hike).
The calculated nature of the timing is in line with the surreptitious nature of the narrative: presenting a blatant revenue grab as a principled fight for “fairness.” The move has the added attraction of inflicting pain on the highest earners, a desirable end in itself for an ultra-progressive government that views wealth creation as a wrong that should be punished.
Advertisement 6
Article content
Trudeau’s biggest problem is that not many voters still associate him with principles, particularly after he sold out his own climate policy with the home heating oil exemption.
The tax hike smacks of a shift inspired by polling that indicates that Canadians prefer that any new taxes only affect the people richer than them.
Success or failure may depend on the number of unaffected Canadians being close to the 99.87-per-cent number supplied by the Finance Department.
History suggests that may be a shaky foundation on which to build a budget.
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.
Article content
Share this article in your social network
Get the latest from John Ivison straight to your inbox
Traders had hoped by now the Federal Reserve would be free to start cutting interest rates — boosting rate-sensitive stocks and unlocking a largely frozen real estate market. Instead, stubborn price growth has some on Wall Street rethinking whether the central bank will lower rates at all this year.
Comments