The American Economy And The 'Biden Boom' - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

The American Economy And The 'Biden Boom' – Forbes

Published

 on


Reactions to President Biden’s State of the Union address focused on his call to action against Russian aggression in Ukraine.  But the President also emphasized the economy, and while noting where we need to do more, he emphasized the economy’s strength since he took office—what economist Noah Smith has called the “Biden boom.”

Biden told us “Our economy grew at a rate of 5.7% last year, the strongest growth in nearly 40 years.” Recent data show applications to start new small businesses shot up in 2021, not only rebounding from the pandemic but “up about 30 percent compared to before the pandemic” and well above the trend of the past decade.

What about jobs and unemployment?  The President told us “our economy created over 6.5. million new jobs just last year, more jobs created in one year than ever before in the history of America.”  The unemployment rate hit 3.9% in December (ticking up to 4% in January), down from the pandemic high of 14.7% in April 2020.  Smith said “If you told me in April 2020” that unemployment would be this low now, “I’d have laughed in your face.”

Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH), chair of the Senate Banking Committee, noted at a recent hearing that wages are going up “particularly for hourly workers who have been left behind in past economic recoveries.”  And economic forecasters see continued growth, with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s surveypredicting real GDP growth of 3.7% this year and an unemployment rate of 3.4% by the start of 2023.

Our overall strong economic performance shows up in many ways.  CEPR (the Center for Economic and Policy Research) observes that “the US is the only G7 country back to its pre-pandemic GDP,” further underscoring the role of significant federal spending in bringing the economy back.

The one bad stream of news is inflation.  Prices have gone up at rates we haven’t seen since the 1980s, leading the Federal Reserve to signal interest rate increases to cool things off.  The President recognized inflationary pressures, due to disruptions in supply chains and faster job creation than many anticipated.  But it remains the biggest threat to the boom.

The inflation we’re seeing is caused by in part by pandemic supply chain disruptions and also faster growth. But economists learn a lot by disaggregating inflation, and when we do that, we see a picture that’s less troublesome than some fear.

We are coming out of a period of sustained low inflation.  In such a period, a new paper by Claudio Bori of the Bank for International Settlements and his colleagues argues that “once inflation settles at a low level…measured inflation is largely the result of idiosyncratic (relative) price changes.”  They underscore this is not “a generalized increase in prices,” but rather the impact of how monetary policy works through a “remarkably narrow set of prices.”

The implications for monetary policy come from the difference between a “common component” for inflation in all sectors and “idiosyncratic” inflationary factors for particular sectors.  If inflation is driven primarily by the latter—as Bori and his colleagues argue we are seeing now—then generalized monetary policy and higher interest rates will have “limited traction” and could hurt the economy.

Economist Stephanie Kelton reviews arguments that government spending caused the inflationary spike, and convincingly rejects them. Her comprehensive analysis includes a reference to a Moody’s Analytics report finding the American Rescue Plan (ARP) added 0.35% to inflation.

Not all economists accept this scenario. The biggest danger to the boom is more generalized and persistent inflation.  Some fear rising energy costs, enhanced by isolation of Russia and its energy sector, will push up prices across the board.  And the supply chain tangle caused by the pandemic isn’t over, and those impacts can put further upward pressure on prices.

Both the Federal Reserve and the Administration are very alert to these worries, but as of now we’re not seeing generalized inflation.  Especially because the Biden Boom hasn’t fully reached lower-paid, non-white, and excluded workers (as the President recognizes), it would be a mistake to choke off growth due to generalized inflation fears.

So while keeping a watchful eye on inflation, the President is right to tout America’s economic recovery (driven in significant part by federal spending and by judicious actions from the Fed).  Even if the President is too modest to call it the “Biden boom,” it deserves our attention and applause.

But many Americans don’t seem to notice the boom, with many polls reporting gloomy attitudes about the economy.  In my next blog, we’ll take a closer look at the disconnection between negative polls on the economy and the strong economic growth we’re actually seeing.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version