“Most artists have an obsession that defines their work. Monet had light, Hockney has color, I’ve got police response time.” — Banksy
Once seen as a vandal, he’s now revered for his work, which sells for millions. But the famously anonymous street artist’s most ambitious masterpiece may be keeping his identity hidden. Banksy is now the subject of his first authorized exhibition in 14 years – and not even the man responsible for hosting the exhibition has ever met or spoken to the artist. “This is one of, I suppose, the great mysteries,” said Gareth James.
Putting together the exhibition, “Banksy: Cut and Run – 25 Years Card Labour,” required extensive planning, and a cover story. James, who manages the Gallery of Modern Art in Glasgow, Scotland, was telling people they’d be “refurbishing the windows.” “Had to keep it secret from colleagues, family and friends,” he said. “We just didn’t want to risk it getting out.”
And yes, there was a non-disclosure agreement.
The idea, James said, was for this show to just “appear” unannounced, like Banksy’s work.
“Cut and Run” features the stencils from some of his best-known images, and work from as far back as the late ’90s. Banksy recreates his desk, and his childhood bedroom. In his own words, he explains how a scene from the movie “Jaws,” where a graffiti artist paints a shark on an advertising billboard, inspired him: “It showed me everything I needed to know about graffiti. It should be audacious and funny.”
Banksy’s captions are a big part of the exhibition. James said, “You really maybe come away with a feeling of having an insight or maybe even trying to get to know Banksy a bit, because that voice is there.”
Banksy’s political voice has always been there in his art. In Ukraine last year, ruins were the canvas for his commentary on a conflict he paints as David vs. Goliath.
Banksy often champions the underdog, be it migrants, or Palestinians in the West Bank, where, in the shadow of Israel’s separation barrier, he created “The Walled-Off Hotel.”
His art is coveted, but of course graffiti is not exactly legal. Videos posted to his Instagram reveal his guerrilla-style tactics to avoid detection.
The artist’s anonymity was, according to Steve Lazarides, all about avoiding problems with the police, and nothing to do with it being a promotional tool. “Quite quickly, it became the best promotional tool anyone could ever invent,” he said.
Lazarides was an early associate of Banksy’s in the working-class English town of Bristol. When asked what kind of guy Banksy is, Lazarides replied, “Difficult.”
In what way? “Just in that way that sometimes people that are a genius at what they’re doing [are]. There’s no taking away from the fact that the guy is a legend. He was making images and messages that everyone could understand. And I think that was what was the game-changer, like, suddenly someone was making art that you didn’t feel stupid looking at.”
Doane said, “He’s sometimes criticized for that, too, that it’s too simplistic?”
“Yeah, but he’s only criticized, by, and I’m going to swear, by a**holes in the art world,” Lazarides said. “They never liked him. They never liked the movement. It’s been at the fore now for almost 30 years. And all of that without any help from the art world.”
But now? “Oh now, but now the art world want it!”
Lazarides said he has thousands of photos of Banksy working; some he’s published. Though they’ve parted ways, he has not publicly revealed the artist’s identity.
But listen to this story from Lazarides about Banksy searching for inspiration: “He was on my computer, and I looked and I went, ‘Rob – Robin, you’re looking up, like, child sex dolls on my computer.’ And he was like, ‘Yeah, yeah, I just want to get something I can fill with helium and put up in the air.'”
Doane said, “Now, you know you’re saying a name, yeah, when you say, told me that story?”
“Yeah,” said Lazarides. “That name’s out there. Who says it’s true?”
“But you said Robin? Robert?”
“Robin, Robert, Robbie,” he mused.
People have been speculating about Banksy’s identity for decades. Among the names tossed around are Bristol artist Robin Gunningham and Robert Del Naja, from the band Massive Attack, also from Bristol.
Lazarides said, “Mr. Del Naja is a graffiti artist. And I would say arguably way better than Banksy.”
“And there’s a lot of talk that that’s the same person?” asked Doane.
“Yeah. I mean, I’ve heard the stories, and it ain’t ‘D’.”
“These Banksy artworks pop up pretty much along the lines of a Massive Attack tour in this city, in that city?”
“So, maybe the artist had been at the gig and then done a piece of art?” Lazarides laughed. “Stop it. Yes. It’s Robert Del Naja. And me, and a few other people!”
“You have to dance this very fine line. You know this information people want to know, and I don’t know if you’re being serious or not.”
“Maybe I’m being serious and maybe I’m not. That’s as much as you’re getting from me.”
“It’s a tough world to get into, Banksy’s World,” said Doane.
“It’s not tough, it’s impossible!‘
Acoris Andipa is one of the biggest collectors and dealers of Banksy’s work out of his London gallery. “I deal in very important artworks by major museum artists, from Picasso to Damien Hirst,” he said. “And there is nowhere near this level of secrecy or gamesmanship almost. It’s a bit Wild West, dealing in Banksy artwork.
“Rather exclusively, Banksy has managed to create a new set of rules within the art world, which is, if it doesn’t have a certificate of authenticity, you should not sell it, you should not buy it. And that’s astonishing. It also opens a quagmire of problems. What happens if the artist doesn’t like an early work?”
Doane asked, “What happens if the artist doesn’t like the person seeking the authenticity?”
“Yeah. Problem, right?”
“Phew. The art world is interesting.”
“Wild West!”
And it seems Banksy’s people can play sheriff. The auction house Christie’s stopped responding to emails regarding our interview request. Sotheby’s pulled out of a scheduled interview at the last minute, after telling us they were going to “check” with Banksy’s team. Andipa said, “It’s a closed shop. I mean, I’ve been dealing in his work for almost 20 years now, and it’s a closed shop to me.”
It was Banksy’s 2004 work “Napalm” which first piqued his interest: “I was so taken by it, the perfect balance of frivolity with serious elements, and a message. And then you discover, as you get to know his work more and more, that, you know, you have a little snigger first, a little laugh, because it’s light-hearted, but then you kind of suck your teeth a little. Actually, there’s some weight to it.”
Doane asked, “How much is it Banksy’s message, how much is it his pure skill as an artist?”
“He is actually quite painterly. But he’s chosen to execute his work through stencils, much like Andy Warhol did through screen prints.”
But there was no precedent in the art world for this: shredding a piece seconds after it was sold at auction for $1.4 million.
For all that’s on display here, there’s one essential implement Banksy uses which is not: the non-disclosure agreement. James said, “I still struggle to say the artist’s name. I spent years absolutely not saying the artist’s name for fear that I would give something away.”
And those who do know the artist’s identity are bound, or choose, not to expose him. Steve Lazarides said, “Am I going to reveal it? Probably not.”
Acoris Andipa said, “There are institutions, including U.K. papers, that would pay a lot of money for him to be unmasked. Not one person has stepped up to take the bounty.”
Doane asked, “How can that be?”
“At the risk of overly romanticizing, one has to assume that he’s a good person,” Andipa replied. “He knows how to look after the people around him.”
When asked if something would change if Banksy’s true identity were known, Gareth James said, “I’m not sure, and I really hope we never find out.”
For more info:
Story produced by Mikaela Bufano. Editor: Brian Robbins.
LONDON (AP) — With a few daubs of a paintbrush, the Brontë sisters have got their dots back.
More than eight decades after it was installed, a memorial to the three 19th-century sibling novelists in London’s Westminster Abbey was amended Thursday to restore the diaereses – the two dots over the e in their surname.
The dots — which indicate that the name is pronounced “brontay” rather than “bront” — were omitted when the stone tablet commemorating Charlotte, Emily and Anne was erected in the abbey’s Poets’ Corner in October 1939, just after the outbreak of World War II.
They were restored after Brontë historian Sharon Wright, editor of the Brontë Society Gazette, raised the issue with Dean of Westminster David Hoyle. The abbey asked its stonemason to tap in the dots and its conservator to paint them.
“There’s no paper record for anyone complaining about this or mentioning this, so I just wanted to put it right, really,” Wright said. “These three Yorkshire women deserve their place here, but they also deserve to have their name spelled correctly.”
It’s believed the writers’ Irish father Patrick changed the spelling of his surname from Brunty or Prunty when he went to university in England.
Raised on the wild Yorkshire moors, all three sisters died before they were 40, leaving enduring novels including Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” and Anne’s “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”
Rebecca Yorke, director of the Brontë Society, welcomed the restoration.
“As the Brontës and their work are loved and respected all over the world, it’s entirely appropriate that their name is spelled correctly on their memorial,” she said.
In a case that has sent shockwaves through the Vancouver Island art community, a local art dealer has been charged with one count of fraud over $5,000. Calvin Lucyshyn, the former operator of the now-closed Winchester Galleries in Oak Bay, faces the charge after police seized hundreds of artworks, valued in the tens of millions of dollars, from various storage sites in the Greater Victoria area.
Alleged Fraud Scheme
Police allege that Lucyshyn had been taking valuable art from members of the public under the guise of appraising or consigning the pieces for sale, only to cut off all communication with the owners. This investigation began in April 2022, when police received a complaint from an individual who had provided four paintings to Lucyshyn, including three works by renowned British Columbia artist Emily Carr, and had not received any updates on their sale.
Further investigation by the Saanich Police Department revealed that this was not an isolated incident. Detectives found other alleged victims who had similar experiences with Winchester Galleries, leading police to execute search warrants at three separate storage locations across Greater Victoria.
Massive Seizure of Artworks
In what has become one of the largest art fraud investigations in recent Canadian history, authorities seized approximately 1,100 pieces of art, including more than 600 pieces from a storage site in Saanich, over 300 in Langford, and more than 100 in Oak Bay. Some of the more valuable pieces, according to police, were estimated to be worth $85,000 each.
Lucyshyn was arrested on April 21, 2022, but was later released from custody. In May 2024, a fraud charge was formally laid against him.
Artwork Returned, but Some Remain Unclaimed
In a statement released on Monday, the Saanich Police Department confirmed that 1,050 of the seized artworks have been returned to their rightful owners. However, several pieces remain unclaimed, and police continue their efforts to track down the owners of these works.
Court Proceedings Ongoing
The criminal charge against Lucyshyn has not yet been tested in court, and he has publicly stated his intention to defend himself against any pending allegations. His next court appearance is scheduled for September 10, 2024.
Impact on the Local Art Community
The news of Lucyshyn’s alleged fraud has deeply affected Vancouver Island’s art community, particularly collectors, galleries, and artists who may have been impacted by the gallery’s operations. With high-value pieces from artists like Emily Carr involved, the case underscores the vulnerabilities that can exist in art transactions.
For many art collectors, the investigation has raised concerns about the potential for fraud in the art world, particularly when it comes to dealing with private galleries and dealers. The seizure of such a vast collection of artworks has also led to questions about the management and oversight of valuable art pieces, as well as the importance of transparency and trust in the industry.
As the case continues to unfold in court, it will likely serve as a cautionary tale for collectors and galleries alike, highlighting the need for due diligence in the sale and appraisal of high-value artworks.
While much of the seized artwork has been returned, the full scale of the alleged fraud is still being unraveled. Lucyshyn’s upcoming court appearances will be closely watched, not only by the legal community but also by the wider art world, as it navigates the fallout from one of Canada’s most significant art fraud cases in recent memory.
Art collectors and individuals who believe they may have been affected by this case are encouraged to contact the Saanich Police Department to inquire about any unclaimed pieces. Additionally, the case serves as a reminder for anyone involved in high-value art transactions to work with reputable dealers and to keep thorough documentation of all transactions.
As with any investment, whether in art or other ventures, it is crucial to be cautious and informed. Art fraud can devastate personal collections and finances, but by taking steps to verify authenticity, provenance, and the reputation of dealers, collectors can help safeguard their valuable pieces.