The dysfunction on Capitol Hill is a regular element of Republican politics, not a departure of custom | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

The dysfunction on Capitol Hill is a regular element of Republican politics, not a departure of custom

Published

 on

Open this photo in gallery:

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), a prime contender in the race to be the next Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, speaks to reporters during a break in a House Republican Conference meeting on Capitol Hill on Oct. 13.ELIZABETH FRANTZ/Reuters

Americans watching the chaos on Capitol Hill – the ouster of a House speaker followed by two weeks of fruitless struggle to agree on a replacement, at a time of military tumult abroad and economic uneasiness at home – are discovering a fundamental lesson of politics that is not taught in civics classes.

They are learning that dysfunction is not an event, but a process. They are finding that it has no single cause – not simply the yawning wealth gap; not only the bedlam around Donald Trump; not merely restiveness among blue-collar Americans; not just an insurgency on the right accompanied by a lurch to extremes on the left – nor a single effect.

Four major economic indicators have been on the decline in this past fortnight: a Congress paralyzed while vital questions of the role of the United States in the Middle East go unanswered; the possibility of a government shutdown looming; the threat of a downgrading of U.S. bonds by credit rating agencies remaining; and one of the country’s major political parties – the one regarded only a generation ago as the sturdy, dependable safeguard of stability – in upheaval. It has become clear that the dysfunction has deep roots and cannot be extirpated easily.

All of these factors are contributing to the mayhem on Capitol Hill that results in a phenomenon that troubles its participants as much as its observers: A Republican House that set out to make disruptive policy is instead merely making disruptive history.

The new week begins with one of the candidates who withdrew from the Speaker’s race only days earlier, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, now with the most votes in the House Republican Conference, as the party’s caucus is called. But he is clearly without sufficient support among Republicans to prevail in a vote on the House floor.

The wrangling is set to continue with no clear route ahead for the other candidate, Rep. Jim Jordan. To resolve the impasse in a legislative body that itself is so evenly split that a few members – either the rebels who are holding the chamber hostage or the moderates who view the entire spectacle with mouth-agape horror – have the capacity not to resolve the matter but instead to plunge the House into even more immobility.

So much so that some Democrats are even weighing the possibility of a bipartisan deal to bring the chaos to a conclusion. One of the impetuses is the decline in the past two weeks in four measures of economic confidence, as measured by the Penta-CivicScience Economic Sentiment Index: in the overall American economy, in buying a new house, in finding a new job and in making a major purchase.

None of this moves in a straight line of logic.

Mr. Jordan has close ties to both Mr. Trump and Kevin McCarthy, the speaker who lost his gavel when the GOP rebels prompted his removal. Those mutineers have now lined up behind Mr. Jordan, who in January had nominated Mr. McCarthy for speaker on the second round of the entropy that surrounded his selection in the first place.

A party that once personified order has, for the second time in a quarter-century, toppled the order when the speakership became vacant.

For decades, the House moved methodically to honour seniority and to move with the precision that ordinarily characterizes a political hierarchy. A majority leader – the second-highest position in the House and the one Mr. McCarthy occupied when he finally prevailed after 15 ballots nine months ago – ordinarily moves seamlessly to the speakership when it becomes vacant.

Democrats Carl Albert of Oklahoma, Thomas “Tip” O’Neill of Massachusetts, Jim Wright of Texas, and Tom Foley of Washington state all moved directly from majority leader to speaker. Nancy Pelosi, who had served as minority leader, twice became speaker when the Democrats regained power, first in 2007 and again in 2019.

Even so, Mr. Scalise, the current Majority Leader and the early frontrunner in the current Speaker sweepstakes, withdrew from the race. He ascertained he could not win after he ran afoul of ultra-conservatives who believed he was too much a supplicant to the old Republican ways and of members loyal to Mr. McCarthy. The speaker and the majority leader barely spoke, itself a measure of dysfunction and a cause for more dysfunction.

These kinds of internecine battles have become regular elements of Republican politics rather than departures from custom.

Four GOP figures of disruption became important figures in the party: The commentator, Patrick Buchanan, who challenged the renomination of the fellow Republican George H.W. Bush for president in 1992; Newt Gingrich, the political guerrilla who tormented the leader of his own conference, Rep. Bob Michel, before becoming speaker in 1995; governor Sarah Palin, who as the party’s vice-presidential nominee in 2008, prided herself as a maverick; and Mr. Trump.

The ascendancy of the four set the predicate for this month’s upheaval in the House Republican Conference.

“This is a symptom of a chronic problem that should not be surprising,” said Victor Menaldo, a University of Washington political scientist. “The Republican Party has had a very strong tension between the populist elements and the regulars since the end of the Cold War. It has reached the point of open conflict.

“Now the mavericks who are uncompromising are holding everyone hostage.”

 

Source link

Politics

NDP declares victory in federal Winnipeg byelection, Conservatives concede

Published

 on

 

The New Democrats have declared a federal byelection victory in their Winnipeg stronghold riding of Elmwood—Transcona.

The NDP candidate Leila Dance told supporters in a tearful speech that even though the final results weren’t in, she expected she would see them in Ottawa.

With several polls still to be counted, Conservative candidate Colin Reynolds conceded defeat and told his volunteers that they should be proud of what the Conservatives accomplished in the campaign.

Political watchers had a keen eye on the results to see if the Tories could sway traditionally NDP voters on issues related to labour and affordability.

Meanwhile in the byelection race in the Montreal riding of LaSalle—Émard—Verdun the NDP, Liberals and Bloc Québécois remained locked in an extremely tight three-way race as the results trickled in slowly.

The Liberal stronghold riding had a record 91 names on the ballot, and the results aren’t expected until the early hours of the morning.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Another incumbent BC United MLA to run as Independent as Kirkpatrick re-enters race

Published

 on

 

VANCOUVER – An incumbent BC United legislative member has reversed her decision not to seek re-election and has announced she’ll run as an Independent in the riding of West Vancouver-Capilano in the upcoming British Columbia election.

Karin Kirkpatrick has been a vocal critic of BC United Leader Kevin Falcon’s decision last month to suspend the party’s campaign and throw support behind the B.C. Conservatives under John Rustad.

Kirkpatrick announced her retirement this year, but said Monday that her decision to re-enter the race comes as a direct result of Falcon’s actions, which would force middle-of-the-road voters to “swing to the left” to the NDP or to move further right to the Conservatives.

“I did hear from a lot of constituents and a lot of people who were emailing me from across B.C. … that they didn’t have anybody to vote for,” she said. “And so, I looked even at myself, and I looked at my riding, and I said, ‘Well, I no longer have anybody to vote for in my own riding.’ It was clearly an issue of this missing middle for the more moderate voter.”

She said voters who reached out “don’t want to vote for an NDP government but felt deeply uncomfortable” supporting the provincial Conservatives, citing Rustad’s tolerance of what she calls “extreme views and conspiracy theorists.”

Kirkpatrick joins four other incumbent Opposition MLAs running as Independents, including Peace River South’s Mike Bernier, Peace River North’s Dan Davies, Prince George-Cariboo’s Coralee Oakes and Tom Shypitka in Kootenay-Rockies.

“To be honest, we talk just about every day,” Kirkpatrick said about her fellow BC United incumbents now running as Independents. “We’re all feeling the same way. We all need to kind of hold each other up and make sure we’re doing the right thing.”

She added that a number of first-time candidates formerly on the BC United ticket are contacting the group of incumbents running for election, and the group is working together “as good moderates who respect each other and lift each other up.”

But Kirkpatrick said it’s also too early to talk about the future of BC United or the possibility of forming a new party.

“The first thing we need to do is to get these Independent MLAs elected into the legislature,” she said, noting a strong group could play a power-broker role if a minority government is elected. “Once we’re there then we’re all going to come together and we’re going to figure out, is there something left in BC United, BC Liberals that we can resurrect, or do we need to start a new party that’s in the centre?”

She said there’s a big gap left in the political spectrum in the province.

“So, we just have to do it in a mindful way, to make sure it’s representing the broadest base of people in B.C.”

Among the supporters at Kirkpatrick’s announcement Monday was former longtime MLA Ralph Sultan, who held West Vancouver-Capilano for almost two decades before retiring in 2020.

The Metro Vancouver riding has been a stronghold for the BC Liberals — the former BC United — since its formation in 1991, with more than half of the votes going to the centre-right party in every contest.

However, Kirkpatrick’s winning margin of 53.6 per cent to the NDP’s 30.1 per cent and the Green’s 15.4 per cent in the 2020 election shows a rising trend for left-leaning voters in the district.

Mike McDonald, chief strategy officer with Kirk and Co. Consulting, and a former campaign director for the BC Liberals and chief of staff under former Premier Christy Clark, said Independent candidates historically face an uphill battle and the biggest impact may be splitting votes in areas where the NDP could emerge victorious.

“It really comes down to, if the NDP are in a position to get 33 per cent of the vote, they might have a chance of winning,” McDonald said of the impact of an Independent vote-split with the Conservatives in certain ridings.

He said B.C. history shows it’s very hard for an Independent to win an election and has been done only a handful of times.

“So, the odds do not favour Independents winning the seats unless there is a very unique combination of circumstances, and more likely that they play a role as a spoiler, frankly.”

The B.C. Conservatives list West Vancouver School District Trustee Lynne Block as its candidate in West Vancouver-Capilano, while the BC NDP is represented by health care professional Sara Eftekhar.

Kirkpatrick said she is confident that her re-entry to the race will not result in a vote split that allows the NDP to win the seat because the party has always had a poor showing in the riding.

“So, even if there is competition between myself and the Conservative candidate, it is highly unlikely that anything would swing over to the NDP here. And I believe that I have the ability to actually attract those NDP voters to me, as well as the Conservatives and Liberals who are feeling just lost right now.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Blinken is heading back to the Middle East, this time without fanfare or a visit to Israel

Published

 on

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State Antony Blinken heads to Egypt on Tuesday for his 10th trip to the Middle East since the war in Gaza began nearly a year ago, this one aimed partly at refining a proposal to present to Israel and Hamas for a cease-fire deal and release of hostages.

Unlike in recent mediating missions, America’s top diplomat this time is traveling without optimistic projections from the Biden administration of an expected breakthrough in the troubled negotiations.

Also unlike the earlier missions, Blinken has no public plans to go to Israel to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on this trip. The Israeli leader’s fiery public statements — like his declaration that Israel would accept only “total victory” when Blinken was in the region in June — and some other unbudgeable demands have complicated earlier diplomacy.

Blinken is going to Egypt for talks Wednesday with Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and others, in a trip billed as focused both on American-Egyptian relations and Gaza consultations with Egypt.

The tamped-down public approach follows months in which President Joe Biden and his officials publicly talked up an agreement to end the war in Gaza as being just within reach, hoping to build pressure on Netanyahu’s far-right government and Hamas to seal a deal.

The Biden administration now says it is working with fellow mediators Egypt and Qatar to come up with a revised final proposal to try to at least get Israel and Hamas into a six-week cease-fire that would free some of the hostages held by Hamas in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel. Americans believe public attention on details of the talks now would only hurt that effort.

American, Qatari and Egyptian officials still are consulting “about what that proposal will contain, and …. we’re trying to see that it’s a proposal that can get the parties to an ultimate agreement,” State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said Monday.

The State Department pointed to Egypt’s important role in Gaza peace efforts in announcing last week that the Biden administration planned to give the country its full $1.3 billion in military aid, overriding congressional requirements that the U.S. hold back some of the funding if Egypt fails to show adequate progress on human rights. Blinken told Congress that Egypt has made progress on human rights, including in freeing political prisoners.

Blinken’s trip comes amid the risk of a full-on new front in the Middle East, with Israel threatening increasing military action against the Hezbollah militant organization in Lebanon. Biden envoy Amos Hochstein was in Israel on Monday to try to calm tensions after a stop in Lebanon.

Hezbollah has one of the strongest militaries in the Middle East, and like Hamas and smaller groups in Syria and Iraq it is allied with Iran.

Hezbollah and Israel have exchanged strikes across Israel’s northern border with Lebanon since the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas started the war in Gaza. Hezbollah says it will ease those strikes — which have uprooted tens of thousands of civilians on both sides of the border — only when there’s a cease-fire in Gaza.

Hochstein told Netanyahu and other Israeli officials that intensifying the conflict with Hezbollah would not help get Israelis back in their homes, according to a U.S. official. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private talks, said Hochstein stressed to Netanyahu that he risked sparking a broad and protracted regional conflict if he moved forward with a full-scale war in Lebanon.

Hochstein also underscored to Israeli officials that the Biden administration remained committed to finding a diplomatic solution to the tensions on Israel’s northern border in conjunction with a Gaza deal or on its own, the official said.

Netanyahu told Hochstein that it would “not be possible to return our residents without a fundamental change in the security situation in the north.” The prime minister said Israel “appreciates and respects” U.S. support but “will do what is necessary to maintain its security and return the residents of the north to their homes safely.”

Israel Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, meanwhile, warned in his meeting with Hochstein that “the only way left to ensure the return of Israel’s northern communities to their homes will be via military action,” his office said.

In Gaza, the U.S. says Israel and Hamas have agreed to a deal in principle and that the biggest obstacles now include a disagreement on details of the hostage and prisoner swap and control over a buffer zone on the border between Gaza and Egypt. Netanyahu has demanded in recent weeks that the Israeli military be allowed to keep a presence in the Philadelphi corridor. Egypt and Hamas have rejected that demand.

The Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7 killed about 1,200 people. Militants also abducted 250 people and are still holding around 100 hostages. About a third of the remaining hostages are believed to be dead.

Israel’s offensive in Gaza has killed more than 41,000 Palestinians, said Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and militants in its count. The war has caused widespread destruction, displaced a majority of Gaza’s people and created a humanitarian crisis.

Netanyahu says he is working to bring home the hostages. His critics accuse him of slow-rolling a deal because it could bring down his hardline coalition government, which includes members opposed to a truce with the Palestinians.

Asked earlier this month if Netanyahu was doing enough for a cease-fire deal, Biden said, simply, “no.” But he added that he still believed a deal was close.

___

Associated Press writer Aamer Madhani contributed to this report.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version