Connect with us


The fight to protect consumers against bad investment advice is advancing, but slowly – CNBC



William F. Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at a press conference on Sep. 10, 2018. Galvin championed a state rule governing investment advice, which a judge invalidated in March 2022.
Michael Swensen for The Boston Globe via Getty Images

The fight to protect consumers from bad investment advice has been a multi-year saga.

At first blush, it may seem a losing battle: In March, a judge struck down a Massachusetts rule that aimed to clamp down on unscrupulous investment brokers. The holy grail for consumer advocates — an Obama-era U.S. Department of Labor rule to protect retirement investors — also died in court in 2018.


Since then, consumer groups have bemoaned a lackluster roster of federal and state oversight.

A number of them say recent measures from the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Insurance Commissioners — which outline rules for brokers to give financial advice that’s in the “best interest” of clients — are basically straw men.

More from Your Money Your Future:

However, there is broad disagreement on this point.

NAIC President Dean Cameron, for example, said its measure was “bipartisan” and a “significant advancement” for retirees. And proponents of the SEC rule call it a monumental leap forward, the culmination of a Dodd-Frank Act directive in 2010 for the regulator to study more stringent rules for brokers.

In addition, many financial industry players who fought the Obama-era advice rule thought it would have negative effects for consumers.

“I think we’re in a much better place with the receipt of investment advice for investors,” said Lisa Bleier, associate general counsel at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), a trade group that represents brokerage firms.

Meanwhile, many legal experts acknowledge that there has been positive change for consumers, despite the debate over how quickly reforms have happened and a granular focus on wins and losses.

“It is two steps forward, one step back,” said Fred Reish, an investment-advice expert and partner at the law firm Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath. “But if you ignore those back steps and look at this over a five- or 10-year period, the trend line is definitely toward greater protection for investors, and [especially] for retiree investors.

“You can see a better world developing in the marketplace,” Reish added.

A web of rules

Investment advice may not sound like a complex concept. Yet underneath that “simplicity” is a web of rules and regulations.

For example, financial advisors, insurance agents and brokers are beholden to different rules about how they can treat customers when giving advice.

Further, one advisor might have different obligations based on the financial product they recommend to a client (a variable annuity, fixed annuity, life insurance or mutual fund, for example). The rules can also differ based on the type of account in which that investment is bought (perhaps an individual retirement account or a taxable brokerage account).

Advisors and brokers are supposed to disclose all of this (and, in some cases, avoid it outright), but clients may not have the wherewithal to make sense of the legal jargon and rules.

They’re sort of tightening the screws.
Andrew Oringer
partner at Dechert

Basically, there are many shades of gray. The perpetual concern of consumer advocates is that loose rules permit advisors to enrich themselves at customers’ expense.

This is the thicket into which regulators have waded and intervened. To varying degrees, they’ve tried placing more of a burden on “salespeople” (advisors, brokers and their firms) to give good advice to clients rather than on consumers to figure out if they can trust that advice. That might involve reducing conflicts of interest relative to the broker’s compensation, for example.

The gold standard, for consumer advocates, is a “fiduciary” standard of care.

The fiduciary standard of care requires that a financial advisor act solely in the client’s best interest when offering personalized financial advice.

“You have an increasingly complex financial world, and you have consumers who by and large receive no education, who have no basis for reading 30-page documents and fine print and understanding what the industry terminology means,” Reish said. “It’s a hard world where consumers have to rely on their advisors.

“It’s too complicated and too dense not to do that.”

SEC chairman Gary Gensler testifies before a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on Sept. 14, 2021 in Washington.
Evelyn Hockstein-Pool/Getty Images

This is happening against the backdrop of a huge demographic shift in the U.S., as thousands of baby boomers hurtle into retirement every day.

Many are making important decisions that will have a bearing on their financial stability over a decades-long retirement: Should I roll money out of my 401(k) plan? Should I use those funds to buy an annuity?

“There have been some wins and some losses, but the trajectory is positive in terms of strengthening standards and not weakening them, by and large,” Micah Hauptman, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America, an advocacy group, said of investment-advice rules.

“[But] we have a long way to go to get to where investors are getting high-quality, unbiased advice they expect,” he cautioned.

Recent developments

General optimism from consumer advocates piggybacks on two recent developments from the Labor Department and the SEC.

The Trump-era labor bureau issued a rule in December 2020 that, most importantly, reflected a change in attitude around the action of recommending a “rollover.”

This is when an advisor or broker tells an investor to liquidate savings in a workplace retirement plan like a 401(k) and reinvest those funds in an individual retirement account. This can prove lucrative for brokers (depending on the IRA investment) since they often earn a commission for that sale.

Around $534 billion was rolled from workplace plans to IRAs in 2018 — more than seven times the $70 billion of new contributions to IRAs that year, according to the Investment Company Institute, citing most recent IRS data. In 2016, 84% of traditional (pre-tax) IRAs were opened only with money from rollovers.  

Xinhua News Agency | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

For decades, brokers have been able to avoid a “fiduciary” duty relative to those rollover recommendations due to certain workarounds available under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

The Labor Department’s 2020 update restricts those workarounds in some cases, according to legal experts.

Rollover advice is now fiduciary (and therefore held to a higher legal standard) if the broker continues to give “regular” advice to that client afterward, financial experts said.

That might include a quarterly or even annual check-in to say that a client’s investments look good and to hold steady, or to recommend some buying and selling. (The Labor Department doesn’t define what constitutes “regular.”)

This Labor Department interpretation is more stringent than its earlier framework and will likely impact how the bulk of brokers give rollover advice, legal experts said.

“The tone of the authority is, ‘[brokerage firms seeking rollovers had] better be concerned about this,'” said Andrew Oringer, a partner at Dechert who leads the law firm’s national fiduciary practice.

“[Brokers’ rollover] solicitations will probably look different,” Oringer added. “Instead of one that says to a customer, ‘Hey, do this,’ it’ll be one that says, ‘Hey, we want you to consider doing this, here’s some information, pros and cons, and other available options.”

While an improvement, it’s still not a strong-enough protection for retirement investors, Hauptman said.

The rollover rules take effect June 30. Many brokerage firms are still determining how best to put these rules into practice and have reached different conclusions, SIFMA’s Bleier said.

“There are a variety of ways firms are choosing to interpret it, and I think they have that flexibility to do so,” she said.

The SEC and Regulation Best Interest

The Trump-era SEC issued an investment-advice rule — Regulation Best Interest — in 2019 that consumer advocates thought fell short in many respects.  

At the time, SEC Commissioner Robert Jackson Jr., the lone dissenting vote against the measure, said the rule “exposes millions of Americans to the costs of conflicted advice.” Not all agreed, though; Commissioner Hester Peirce, for example, said “the balance we have struck is a good one.”

“[Regulation Best Interest] is the improvement,” Kevin Carroll, associate general counsel at SIFMA, the securities industry trade group, said of the pace of investment-advice reform. “I think it’s a wholesale rewriting of the standard of conduct,” he added.

Firms had to comply with the new rules by June 2020. The SEC issued a bulletin in March this year that explains how agency staff will investigate certain violations of the regulation among brokerage firms.

The memo outlined conduct the Biden administration will and won’t frown upon during its examinations, specifics that weren’t present in the original rule and could have been left open to interpretation, according to legal experts.

You can see a better world developing in the marketplace.
Fred Reish
partner at Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath

For example, the SEC memo outlines cost factors a broker must weigh in any advice, including investment fees, transaction costs, tax considerations and distribution fees. The agency also outlines distinct issues brokers must consider for rollovers, among other things.

“They’re sort of tightening the screws,” Oringer said. “They’re putting additional color on the rules that exist.”

He offered this explanation: Let’s say a particular rule tells individuals to “be good” in their everyday lives, with an open-ended definition of “good”; but guidance later defines “good” as avoiding more than two glasses of alcohol with each meal and getting home before 9 p.m. each night.

Carroll pointed to language in the SEC bulletin as evidence of the overall strength of Regulation Best Interest.

In it, agency staff write that the rule’s updated rules for broker behavior, when compared to a fiduciary standard for advisors, “generally yield[s] substantially similar results in terms of the ultimate responsibilities owed to retail investors.” (The staff caveats that the rules may “differ in some respects and [can] be triggered at different times.”)

“That’s the SEC saying Reg BI is working,” Carroll said.

“It is young [and] I’m sure there will be further enhancements,” said Carroll, adding: “[The rule] is doing what it’s supposed to do, and has a lot of eyes on it.”

The strength or weakness of the Labor Department and SEC actions depend on how the agencies oversee these standards — and those are liable to change based on the whims of new presidential administrations.

“Ultimately, [success] really depends on how these rules are enforced and it’s too early to tell how enforcement will move the ball forward for investors,” Hauptman said.

Further, last month’s ruling against Massachusetts’ investment advice rule likely won’t have a chilling effect on other states that hope to change their own standards, legal experts said. The judge invalidated the rule for a fairly narrow procedural reason instead of a larger one dealing with the rule’s substance, experts said.

William Galvin, secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, championed the state investment rule.

“I do not think any general conclusions can be drawn from the decision of the Massachusetts Court invalidating the Secretary’s fiduciary duty rule,” Marcia Wagner, founder of The Wagner Law Group, said in an e-mail.

Galvin’s office hasn’t yet decided whether it will appeal the decision, according to spokeswoman Debra O’Malley.

Adblock test (Why?)


Source link

Continue Reading


Tense diplomatic relations may not impact trade, investment ties between India, Canada: Experts



NEW DELHI: The tense diplomatic relations between India and Canada are unlikely to impact trade and investments between the two countries as economic ties are driven by commercial considerations, according to experts. Both India and Canada trade in complementary products and do not compete on similar products.
“Hence, the trade relationship will continue to grow and not be affected by day-to-day events,” Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) Co-Founder Ajay Srivastava said.
Certain political developments have led to a pause in negotiations for a free trade agreement between the two countries.
On September 10, Prime Minister Narendra Modi conveyed to his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau India’s strong concerns about the continuing anti-India activities of extremist elements in Canada that were promoting secessionism, inciting violence against its diplomats and threatening the Indian community there.
India on Tuesday announced the expulsion of a Canadian diplomat hours after Canada asked an Indian official to leave that country, citing a “potential” Indian link to the killing of a Khalistani separatist leader in June.
Srivastava said these recent events are unlikely to affect the deep-rooted people-to-people connections, trade, and economic ties between the two nations.
Bilateral trade between India and Canada has grown significantly in recent years, reaching USD 8.16 billion in 2022-23.
India’s exports (USD 4.1 billion) to Canada include pharmaceuticals, gems and jewellery, textiles, and machinery, while Canada’s exports to India (USD 4.06 billion) include pulses, timber, pulp and paper, and mining products.
On investments, he said that Canadian pension funds will continue investing in India on grounds of India’s large market and good return on money invested.
Canadian pension funds, by the end of 2022, had invested over USD 45 billion in India, making it the fourth-largest recipient of Canadian FDI in the world.
The top sectors for Canadian pension fund investment in India include infrastructure, renewable energy, technology, and financial services.
Mumbai-based exporter and Chairman of Technocraft Industries Sharad Kumar Saraf said the present frosty relations between India and Canada are certainly a cause for concern.
“However, the bilateral trade is entirely driven by commercial considerations. Political turmoil is of a temporary nature and should not be a reason to affect trade relations,” Saraf said.
He added that even with China, India has acrimonious relations but bilateral trade continues to remain healthy.
“In fact, bilateral trade is an effective tool to improve political relations. India must make special efforts to increase our bilateral trade with Canada,” Saraf said.
India and Canada have a strong education partnership. There are over 200 educational partnerships between Indian and Canadian institutions.
In addition, over 3,19,000 Indian students are enrolled in Canadian institutions, making them the largest international student cohort in Canada, according to GTRI.
According to the Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE), Indian students contributed USD 4.9 billion to the Canadian economy in 2021.
Indian students are the largest international student group in Canada, accounting for 20 per cent of all international students in 2021.
Benefits of educational partnerships are mutual and hence the current situation may have no impact on the relationship, Srivastava said.



Source link

Continue Reading


Apple supplier Foxconn aims to double India jobs and investment



Apple supplier Foxconn aims to double its workforce and investment in India by next year, a company executive said on Sunday.

Taiwan-based Foxconn, the world’s largest contract manufacturer of electronics, has rapidly expanded its presence in India by investing in manufacturing facilities in the south of the country as the company seeks to move away from China.

V Lee, Foxconn’s representative in India, in a LinkedIn post to mark Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 73rd birthday, said the company was “aiming for another doubling of employment, FDI (foreign direct investment), and business size in India” by this time next year.

He did not give more details.


Foxconn already has an iPhone factory employing 40,000 people in the state of Tamil Nadu.


Foxconn dangles incentives for workers as iPhone shortages plague holiday season

Foxconn dangles incentives for workers as iPhone shortages plague holiday season

In August, the state of Karnataka said the firm will invest US$600 million for two projects to make casing components for iPhones and chip-making equipment.


The company’s Chairman Liu Young-way said in an earnings briefing last month that he sees a lot of potential in India, adding: “several billion dollars in investment is only a beginning”.

Taiwan election: Foxconn’s Terry Gou taps star-powered running mate


Last month, Foxconn’s billionaire founder Terry Gou said he would run for the Taiwanese presidency in next year’s election, as an independent candidate.

He said the ruling and independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was unable to offer a bright future for the island and left Foxconn’s board following his decision to run.

The firm operates the world’s largest iPhone plant, in the city of Zhengzhou in Henan province.



Source link

Continue Reading


Foxconn to double workforce, investment in India by ‘this time next year’



Foxconn, Taiwan-based Apple supplier, has said that they are planning to double their investment and workforce in India within the next twelve months, according to V Lee’s LinkedIn post on the occasion of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 73rd birthday.

Taiwan-based Foxconn, the world’s largest contract manufacturer of electronics, has rapidly expanded its presence in India by investing in manufacturing facilities in the south of the country as the company seeks to move away from China.

Notably, Foxconn already has an iPhone factory in the state of Tamil Nadu, which employs 40,000 people.

V Lee, Foxconn‘s representative in India, in a LinkedIn post to mark Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 73rd birthday, said the company was “aiming for another doubling of employment, FDI (foreign direct investment), and business size in India” by this time next year.


In August this year, Karnataka governments had said that Foxconn has planned to invest $600 million for two projects in the state to make casing components for iPhones and chip-making equipment.

Earlier this month, Young Liu, Chairman and CEO of Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) had said, ‘India will be an important country in terms of manufacturing in future’.

In the past, it took 30 years to build the entire supply chain ecosystem in China, he noted, adding that while it will take an “appropriate amount of time in India” and the process will be shorter given the experience. The environment too is not quite the same, he said pointing to the advent of new technologies like AI and generative AI.

Meanwhile, Apple Inc. has announced plans to make the India-built iPhone 15 available in the South Asian country and some other regions on the global sales debut day, according to a Bloomberg report.

While the vast majority of iPhone 15s will come from China, that would be the first time a latest generation, India-assembled device is available on the first day of sale, they said, asking not to be identified as the matter is private.

Apple introduced the iPhone 15, updated watches and AirPods at a gala event at its US headquarters. Sales of new products begin typically around 10 days after the unveiling.



Source link

Continue Reading