adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Sports

The future of the Toronto Maple Leafs franchise is at stake in these NHL playoffs

Published

 on

From the highest possible point of the organization, the Maple Leafs made it clear how they felt about the 2022-23 season when they declined to extend the contract of the general manager who had just overseen the most prolific regular season in franchise history (115 points).

Regular-season success would no longer be enough.

The Leafs went on to put together the second best regular season (111 points) in franchise history. And it won’t be enough to stave off major organizational change, not without some kind of step — even just winning a single round — in the postseason.

That’s what’s at stake here this spring. Things won’t be the same for the Leafs, perhaps drastically so, if they don’t find a way past Tampa, the team that’s won two of the last three Stanley Cups.

300x250x1

The future of the franchise is at stake, starting, of course, with Kyle Dubas’ future as GM.

The Leafs have been a process-driven machine under Dubas. But process is no longer enough it seems. After six straight playoff defeats, results must follow when it matters most. Right or wrong, that’s been made clear.

Kyle Dubas, left, has been Toronto’s general manager since 2018-19. (Bruce Bennett / Getty Images)

This will be Dubas’ fifth postseason running the show. Each of the previous four went the distance, all in losing efforts. The Leafs were favoured twice — against the Blue Jackets and Canadiens. And were slight underdogs twice — against the Bruins and Lightning.

They’re arguably slight favourites over the Lightning this time around. Slight because while the Leafs finished with the superior record, goal differential, and territorial advantage, the Lightning are the Lightning. They’ve made three straight Final appearances (four with this particular core). They’ve gotten it done again and again when it counts. They’ve earned the overwhelming benefit of the doubt, the benefit of the doubt the Leafs lack at the moment.

The Leafs were this close to beating the Lightning last spring. Another losing effort, even if this close yet again, may not be enough to forestall major change. The Leafs got that mulligan after last season, which followed a brutal loss to Montreal in 2021.

If upper management/ownership is serious, it’s Dubas who may not be around in another first-round defeat. It’s also possible he decides to leave for another opportunity. And without Dubas around, with another GM in charge, all bets about the future of the team are off.

Does Auston Matthews want to see what the future looks like under new leadership before he commits to the organization with a contract extension this summer? Does William Nylander, who can also extend his contract? Does a GM not named Kyle Dubas opt against keeping Nylander? Do they take a sledgehammer to Dubas’ top-heavy roster-building approach and decide that one big piece has to go? Does said GM consider moving Morgan Rielly, the longest-serving Leaf who has seven years left and a $7.5 million cap hit on his contract?

Do the Leafs make their team worse in the process?

What becomes of head coach Sheldon Keefe if the Leafs fail to win a round? Keefe was brought in to take the Leafs where Mike Babcock could not. He’s been at the helm of the last three playoff exits.

The Leafs might have a new GM and coach if they can’t get past the Lightning.

We’re talking about major change here, potentially, without a tangible step forward.

Is Brendan Shanahan, team president for almost 10 years now, still overseeing the operation from up top?

Maybe Dubas, a la Alex Anthopolous, decides he doesn’t want to stay if the Leafs fail to advance. Maybe he decides to stay and the organization agrees to keep him, but only under the condition that something substantial changes — a core piece, the coach, something.

Show some progress by winning a round, and maybe even forge deeper after that, and all that can be avoided.

We’re getting ahead of ourselves because the team Dubas has built, particularly after the trade deadline acquisitions of Ryan O’Reilly, Jake McCabe, Noel Acciari, Sam Lafferty, Luke Schenn, and Erik Gustafsson, has the goods to get it done. Especially against this particular Lightning team.

The forward group is as well-rounded as it’s been in the current era.

The Leafs can boast two No. 1-calibre lines if they want and round them out with a pair of useful, responsible, speedy, and energetic bottom-two units. Because of O’Reilly in particular, they can also shape-shift into different formations. They can move John Tavares over to the wing, or, keep him at centre and play O’Reilly as the 3C, or even as the left winger to Matthews and Mitch Marner.

More centre versatility — with Acciari and Lafferty also able to play the middle — means more versatility, period for Keefe.

The Leafs didn’t have that Lightning-like malleability last season, the ability to move parts in and around the lineup freely. In addition to O’Reilly, they have one more suddenly viable top-six option in Calle Järnkrok, who shot the lights out playing with Matthews in particular.

Unlike last year, there’s a strong case to be made that the Leafs are deeper up front than the Lightning, who lost Ondrej Palat to free agency last summer and deadline acquisition Tanner Jeannot to injury, while seeing Corey Perry and Patrick Maroon show their age.

This could be the series that Matthews completely takes over. He’s been trending up in recent weeks after an injury-plagued season that still saw him score 40 goals. Maybe it’s the series that Marner finally goes wild.

Tavares and Nylander might well break out with better help around them.

The crew on defence is not without questions, with Jake Muzzin unavailable to play after a strong showing against the Lightning last spring. In his place comes another Jake — Jake McCabe — who will be playing in his first NHL postseason and doing it in first-pairing duty (in all likelihood) with TJ Brodie. It remains to be seen whether McCabe can have a Muzzin-like effect playing every other night against Nikita Kucherov and Steven Stamkos.

He and Brodie showed well together during the regular season.

Just like the forward group, Keefe has options if the McCabe-Brodie combo struggles or if the Leafs need to tweak their look on the back end. More puck moving and mobility with Timothy Liljegren. More jam with Schenn. More power-play pop from Gustafsson.

The Tampa D, mind you, isn’t what it once was, not with Ryan McDonagh playing elsewhere and Victor Hedman having what for him counts as a down season.

The Lightning power play is still a problem. But the Leafs have a pretty good one, too. Winning the special teams’ battle is well within their capability.

The Leafs’ biggest potential liability is obviously in goal. Can Ilya Samsonov at least keep things close with Andrei Vasilevskiy?

Peek at the numbers between Jack Cambpell and Vasilevskiy in last year’s series and you might think Campbell did just that. However, Vasilevskiy took over in Games 6 and 7, stopping 60 of 64 shots, including all but one in the finale.

Vasilevskiy has had a down year, but even a down year from Vasilevskiy — a .915 save percentage, almost 27 goals saved above expected — looks pretty freakin’ good.

Mitch Marner skates with the puck towards Andrei Vasilevskiy. (Kim Klement / USA Today)

Samsonov doesn’t necessarily need to outduel him. He just can’t allow the kind of squeakers that doomed Campbell and Frederik Andersen in playoffs past.

Of course, the goal here for the Leafs isn’t to win one series. It’s to win four. And while beating the Lightning may well stave off major organizational change and chase away those playoff ghosts, lingering since 2004, it’s only with a Stanley Cup that this season will really qualify as a success.

The drought that really matters is at 56 years.

This Leafs team is built to win now.

There’s the contractual uncertainty with Matthews and Nylander. A much bigger contract isn’t far off for Marner. Samsonov will be due a richer deal this offseason. Tavares is 32. Brodie is 32. O’Reilly is 32 and a pending unrestricted free agent. Järnkrok is 31. So is Acciari, another pending UFA. McCabe and Rielly are both 29.

Mark Giordano will turn 40 in the fall.

Other pending UFAs include Michael Bunting, David Kämpf, Justin Holl, Alex Kerfoot, Zach Aston-Reese, and Schenn.

Regardless of how things shake out with Dubas, this team will almost certainly look a lot different next season. Potentially weaker.

Another consideration is all those draft picks the Leafs surrendered at the trade deadline. It was the right thing — the only thing — to do for a team with real championship potential, but it only serves to raise the stakes that much more.

The franchise will turn on what comes next.

(Top photo of Auston Matthews: China Wong / NHLI via Getty Images)

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

"Laugh it off": Evander Kane says Oilers won’t take the bait against Kings | Offside

Published

 on

The LA Kings tried every trick in the book to get the Edmonton Oilers off their game last night.

Hacks after the whistle, punches to the face, and interference with line changes were just some of the things that the Oilers had to endure, and throughout it all, there was not an ounce of retaliation.

All that badgering by the Kings resulted in at least two penalties against them and fuelled a red-hot Oilers power play that made them pay with three goals on four chances. That was by design for Edmonton, who knew that LA was going to try to pester them as much as they could.

That may have worked on past Oilers teams, but not this one.

300x250x1

“We’ve been in a series now for the third year in a row with these guys,” Kane said after practice this morning. “We know them, they know us… it’s one of those things where maybe it makes it a little easier to kind of laugh it off, walk away, or take a shot.

“That type of stuff isn’t gonna affect us.”

Once upon a time, this type of play would get under the Oilers’ skin and result in retaliatory penalties. Yet, with a few hard-knock lessons handed down to them in the past few seasons, it seems like the team is as determined as ever to cut the extracurriculars and focus on getting revenge on the scoreboard.

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, the longest-tenured player on this Oilers team, had to keep his emotions in check with Kings defender Vladislav Gavrikov, who punched him in the face early in the game. The easy reaction would be to punch back, but the veteran Nugen-Hopkins took his licks and wound up scoring later in the game.

“It’s going to be physical, the emotions are high, and there’s probably going to be some stuff after the whistle,” Nugent-Hopkins told reporters this morning. “I think it’s important to stay poised out there and not retaliate and just play through the whistles and let the other stuff just kind of happen.”

Oilers head coach Kris Knoblauch also noticed his team’s discipline. Playoff hockey is full of emotion, and keeping those in check to focus on the larger goal is difficult. He was happy with how his team set the tone.

“It’s not necessarily easy to do,” Knoblauch said. “You get punched in the face and sometimes the referees feel it’s enough to call a penalty, sometimes it’s not… You just have to take them, and sometimes, you get rewarded with the power play.

“I liked our guy’s response and we want to be sticking up for each other, we want to have that pack mentality, but it’s really important that we’re not the ones taking that extra penalty.”

There is no doubt that the Kings will continue to poke and prod at the Oilers as the series continues. Keeping those retaliations in check will only get more difficult, but if the team can continue to succeed on the scoreboard, it could get easier.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Thatcher Demko injured, out for Game 2 between Canucks and Predators – Vancouver Is Awesome

Published

 on


Thatcher Demko returned from injury just in time for the start of the Stanley Cup Playoffs but now is injured again.

After the Vancouver Canucks’ victory in Game 1, Demko was not made available to the media as he was “receiving treatment.” This is not unusual, so was not heavily reported at the time. Monday’s practice was turned into an optional skate — just nine players participated — so Demko’s absence did not seem particularly significant.

But when Demko was also missing from Tuesday’s gameday skate, alarm bells started going off.

300x250x1

According to multiple reports — and now the Canucks’ head coach, Rick Tocchet —Demko will not play in Game 2 and is in fact questionable for the rest of their series against the Nashville Predators.

Demko made 22 saves on 24 shots, none bigger — and potentially injury-inducing — than his first-period save on Anthony Beauvillier where he went into the full splits.

While this is not necessarily where Demko got injured, it would be understandable if it was. Demko still stayed in the game and didn’t seem to be experiencing any difficulties at the time.

Demko is a major difference-maker for the Canucks and his injury casts a pall over the team’s emotional Game 1 victory

Tocchet confirmed that Demko will not start in Game 2 but said Demko did skate on Monday on his own. He also said that Demko’s injury is unrelated to the knee injury he suffered during the season that caused him to miss five weeks. Instead, Tocchet suggested Demko was day-to-day, leaving open the possibility for his return in the first round. 

TSN’s Farhan Lalji, however, has reported that Demko’s injury could indeed be to the same knee, even if it is not the same exact injury.

If Demko does indeed miss the rest of the series, the pressure will be on Casey DeSmith, who had a strong season when called upon intermittently as the team’s backup but struggled when thrust into the number-one role when Demko was injured. Behind DeSmith is rookie Arturs Silovs, who has come through with heroic performances in international competition for Latvia but hasn’t been able to repeat those performances at the NHL level.

DeSmith played one game against the Predators this season, making 26 saves on 28 shots in a 5-2 victory in December.

While DeSmith has limited experience in the Stanley Cup Playoffs, his one appearance was spectacular.

On May 3, 2022, DeSmith had to step in for the injured Tristan Jarry for the Pittsburgh Penguins, starting their first postseason game against the New York Rangers. DeSmith made 48 saves on 51 shots before leaving the game in the second overtime with an injury of his own, with Louis Domingue stepping in to make 17 more saves for the win.

The Canucks will look to allow significantly fewer than 51 shots on Tuesday night.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Once again, business bumps ethics off the Olympic podium – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


Open this photo in gallery:

The Olympic rings are set up at Trocadero plaza that overlooks the Eiffel Tower in Paris.Michel Euler/The Associated Press

In the middle of a record haul at the Tokyo Olympics, Canada’s women’s swim team had one letdown – the 4×200-metre freestyle relay.

Canada had taken bronze in the event at Rio 2016 and again at the 2019 world aquatics championships. The team looked good for another medal.

On the day of the final, a Chinese team that was not considered a contender surprised everyone, winning in world-record time. Canada came fourth.

300x250x1

A battling result, but still disappointing. It looks a little worse than that now.

Over the weekend, the New York Times reported that nearly half the Chinese swim team failed a drug test seven months before the Tokyo Games. Twenty-three swimmers tested positive for trimetazidine, or TMZ.

TMZ is a synthetic substance. You’re not going to pick it up because you’ve chosen the wrong hot-dog vendor.

China was allowed to do its own investigation into the mass positive. That probe determined the athletes had been exposed to TMZ in tainted food at a team hotel. How exactly so many of them ingested it, while others did not, wasn’t explained.

Unusually, no announcement was made about the positive tests, and no one was suspended while the investigation was under way. The World Anti-Doping Agency knew what was going on, but decided the best way to determine if China had done anything wrong was to ask China to look into it. When China gave China the all clear, WADA signed off.

One of those who tested positive was Zhang Yufei. Zhang won three medals in Tokyo, one of them as part of the 4x200m relay team.

The swimming world is now playing doping leapfrog throughout those Games. The Canadian relay team is on a long list of unlucky losers. Had China’s violations stuck, the medal table would look very different.

It would also have pushed a Games that was on the edge closer to the drop. Few in Japan were super stoked about the world dropping by en masse during what would become that country’s first mass COVID wave.

The main reason the Tokyo Games happened was that so much money had been spent, much more was still owed, and insurers were not willing to write down 10 or 15 billion.

Picking a fight with China in that precarious moment could not have seemed like a great idea. Even more precarious – the next Games, to be held six months later in Beijing.

As an event, at absolute best, Beijing 2022 was going to be a very expensive bummer (which it absolutely was). That’s the sort of party that’s easy to call off.

You don’t need to be a Reddit obsessive to see what happened here. The Chinese swim team got caught mid-purge, and the people in charge had to prioritize their response.

Priority No. 1 – the Olympic business.

Priority No. 2 – the Olympic ideals.

They picked money over fairness.

It’s easy to lash them now, so plenty of people are. The head of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency called it “a devastating stab in the back of clean athletes.”

(Is it possible to be undevastatingly stabbed in the back?)

The stickiest criticism involves Russian figure skater Kamila Valieva. She also tested positive for trace amounts of TMZ before an Olympics. She also had one of those ‘maybe the dog gave me steroids’-type excuses.

But since everybody hates Russia, Valieva did not get the benefit of an in-house probe. She was dragged upside-down and backward through the global press and stripped of her medals. There’s your fairness.

It’s fitting that WADA take a reputational beating here. That is its most useful function – to absorb stakeholder rage after another own goal has been scored by the Doping Police.

But out in the real world, no one cares. Of course the Olympics is dirty. The Olympics has spent the last half century repeatedly reminding us of that.

Between Games, the Olympics makes news only two ways – ‘Upcoming host city X is having serious second thoughts’ and ‘So-and-so cheated their way to gold.’

These stories have become so numerous that the only people registering them are the ones who make their living in an Olympics-adjacent business, like sports administration or media.

Those people are happy to complain – complaining is good for trade – but they don’t want things to change. Change is dangerous. Who knows where change will land you?

In this specific instance, real change in the form of zero tolerance could have hobbled one Olympics and gotten the next one cancelled. Then what?

You start cancelling Olympics and people learn to live without them. Sponsors find new things to sponsor. Broadcasters move on.

Better to compromise. Chinese swimmers did a little TMZ. So what? Figure skaters, tennis players, breaststrokers – everybody’s doing it nowadays. It’s like weed for the Marx and Engels crowd.

With all that in mind, here’s something you won’t often read in this space – WADA made the right call.

It’s not like it was going to go swanning into Guangdong province in early 2021, right in the teeth of the pandemic, to figure out what was what. The only way to get any sort of answers was to rely on Chinese investigators. How do you know if they’re on the up and up? You don’t. WADA had two choices – take China’s word for it, or go scorched earth right before the two most tenuously assembled Games in history.

The proof that WADA made the correct choice is that those Games happened. Maybe it would make a different call now, and that might be right, too.

As far as fairness goes, it doesn’t belong in this conversation.

If a Belgian or a Tanzanian gets caught cheating, don’t even bother asking for consideration.

An American? Probably not.

An American everyone knows? Maybe.

A lot of Americans everybody knows? Let’s talk.

This can’t be discussed because once that discussion gets going, it points toward the sort of change no current stakeholder want to think about. If someone who tests positive can negotiate their way out of it and fairness is the goal, isn’t it fairer to stop testing altogether?

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending