The greatest art sometimes makes us uncomfortable - Woodstock Sentinel Review | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Art

The greatest art sometimes makes us uncomfortable – Woodstock Sentinel Review

Published

 on


Article content

Well, it was a promising start to the New Year.

Article content

Our quintet did a little impromptu gig at the Civic Park in Wallaceburg a few days before Christmas. There was a plan for a winter artwalk in Chatham, the Wallaceburg Arts Council was looking at possible concerts in the coming months, theatres were inviting guests in … and now, once again, FULL STOP.

Doing a concert, or live performance of any kind cannot just ramp up, nor can it be cancelled without stress and probable negative financial consequences. It takes months to plan a live event and a great deal of effort. After the last series of lockdowns the live entertainment industry was finally released from restrictions that made planning impossible and was coming to life in time for the holiday season and optimistically planning events for the coming months.

Now those events are all once more suspended. I had a meeting tonight with the Chatham Kent Arts and Culture Network and the fatigue is palpable by our local artists and arts venues. If, and the past two years have confirmed that this is a big IF, but if the lockdown ends in late January as promised, arts venues and artists may be able to get things back in shape by late spring to offer live entertainment.

I understand that the ability to perform at or attend a live performance pales in comparison to the health of society and the overall well-being. I do.

But for the first time in three years of submitting this column I struggled to write tonight. I could just stop here and leave a blank page and argue that a blank page is actually art. But I doubt if the editor would find that a valuable use of this space.

Article content

I have been involved in the arts for most of my life and I have often had a discussion with colleagues, students, friends and people I have served on boards with about what is art, censorship and its role and the value of art. What constitutes art is a very difficult thing to identify as one person may look at a block of wood and see it as moving and powerful while another sees nothing more than a block of wood. To the second person it is not art, it is just an identifiable substance that cannot be creative or original, it is a thing, not art.

But censorship, well, that is a far more challenging topic to broach in the arts. Many great artists have had people or powers try to stop them from creating and getting exposure for their works because their work was so different from what was standard or common. Pushing the envelope often makes people uncomfortable and that can become a tricky dance for artists. Great artists often do not care if the work they create stirs deep emotions in society, many actually seek to mine this vein. I would argue that the greatest art often makes us uncomfortable as it challenges long held comfortable beliefs or the collective willingness to turn a blind eye.

Sometimes it is good to have your sense of what is normal exfoliated. Great art holds a mirror up to society and asks, “What do you see?” Maybe the editor will run that blank page and we can ponder what we see in the emptiness where words usually wander.

Stay safe, be kind, and when the arts return to our lives… get out there and support them any way you can.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Art

40 Random Bits of Trivia About Artists and the Artsy Art That They Articulate – Cracked.com

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

40 Random Bits of Trivia About Artists and the Artsy Art That They Articulate  Cracked.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Art

John Little, whose paintings showed the raw side of Montreal, dies at 96 – CBC.ca

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

John Little, whose paintings showed the raw side of Montreal, dies at 96  CBC.ca



Source link

Continue Reading

Art

A misspelled memorial to the Brontë sisters gets its dots back at last

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — With a few daubs of a paintbrush, the Brontë sisters have got their dots back.

More than eight decades after it was installed, a memorial to the three 19th-century sibling novelists in London’s Westminster Abbey was amended Thursday to restore the diaereses – the two dots over the e in their surname.

The dots — which indicate that the name is pronounced “brontay” rather than “bront” — were omitted when the stone tablet commemorating Charlotte, Emily and Anne was erected in the abbey’s Poets’ Corner in October 1939, just after the outbreak of World War II.

They were restored after Brontë historian Sharon Wright, editor of the Brontë Society Gazette, raised the issue with Dean of Westminster David Hoyle. The abbey asked its stonemason to tap in the dots and its conservator to paint them.

“There’s no paper record for anyone complaining about this or mentioning this, so I just wanted to put it right, really,” Wright said. “These three Yorkshire women deserve their place here, but they also deserve to have their name spelled correctly.”

It’s believed the writers’ Irish father Patrick changed the spelling of his surname from Brunty or Prunty when he went to university in England.

Raised on the wild Yorkshire moors, all three sisters died before they were 40, leaving enduring novels including Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” and Anne’s “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”

Rebecca Yorke, director of the Brontë Society, welcomed the restoration.

“As the Brontës and their work are loved and respected all over the world, it’s entirely appropriate that their name is spelled correctly on their memorial,” she said.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version