adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

The Hydrogen Economy: Reality And Hype – Forbes

Published

 on


It’s been more than four decades since the Hindenburg disaster slammed the brakes on the era of hydrogen-fueled dirigibles. But nature’s lightest element continues to capture the world’s imagination as a clean, plentiful and potentially cheap energy source.

Hydrogen’s current burst of popularity is the result of global action to combat climate change. Solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and electric vehicles can provide carbon emissions-free sources for generating electricity and fueling most transport. But they’re not close to powering furnaces hot enough for major industrial processes like manufacturing steel.

Hydrogen also offers a potential emission

300x250x1

s-free solution for running household appliances, such as providing natural gas-level heat for cooking and furnaces. And hydrogen fuel cells have potential to move heavy industrial equipment, trucking fleets and ships at a competitive cost as well. 

The key questions for investors are:

  • Can the cost of hydrogen be reduced enough to match up to fossil fuels, how will that take and what’s the risk competing technology will derail its rise, as has happened with every previous cycle of hydrogen hype?
  • What companies potentially benefiting from hydrogen development can be purchased now at good entry points?

Virtually all hydrogen currently used now is considered “gray,” meaning it’s extracted from natural gas. Turning it “blue” requires infrastructure to capture the greenhouse gasses emitted in that process. In contrast, “green” hydrogen is produced emissions-free by electrolysis, with electric current sent through water to separate hydrogen from oxygen.

The challenge for all three is cost, especially for green hydrogen. According to Bloomberg New Energy Finance data, green hydrogen costs from $1.84 to $10.09 a kilogram to make now. That would have to fall to a range of at least $1 to $2 a kilogram just to be competitive with blue hydrogen, and much further still to match up with conventional energy.

Water is the only raw material needed to manufacture green hydrogen. So the Holy Grail is making the process itself economic. The most important element of that is securing sufficient, low-cost sources of electricity, followed closely by developing infrastructure to handle and integrate hydrogen with existing systems, including appliances.

The efforts to get there are underway. Earlier this month, Chinese energy giant Sinopec began construction on the world’s largest green hydrogen production plant announced to date: A facility with 260 megawatts of electrolyzer capacity expected to enter service by mid-2023, at a projected cost of $470 million.

The plant is projected to have a 48.8 percent annual utilization rate. Nearly half the needed electricity to run it will come from a 300 MW solar facility, with the rest from nearby wind farms. And it includes a hydrogen transportation pipeline with takeaway capacity of 2.5 tons per hour.

The CEO of Italian power company Snam SpA (SRG, SNMRY) has written a book entitled “The Hydrogen Revolution,” in which he projects green hydrogen costs will be competitive within five years with fossil fuels. That likely depends on offshore wind hitting projections of an 11-fold lift in global capacity to 400 gigawatts by 2035.

As for transportation and integration, oil and gas midstream and natural gas distribution companies, including Southwest Gas (SWX) in the US southwest, are testing blending hydrogen in existing infrastructure with already promising results. And British super major oil BP Plc (BP) last month announced plans for an electrolysis hub to provide hydrogen fuel for trucks and other forms of heavy transport starting in 2025, with an anticipated production capacity of 1.5 gigawatts by 2030.

The UK government has set a target of 5 GW of hydrogen production capacity by 2030 to cut the transport’s sector’s 29.8 percent share of the country’s CO2 emissions. If it succeeds, the plan would overcome hydrogen’s biggest current disadvantage versus increased use of batteries, which is a lack of infrastructure. And hydrogen-powered trucks can be fueled far more quickly with much wider range than vehicles running purely on electricity. 

Bottom line: We’re still years from anything resembling a hydrogen economy. But development is nonetheless real in several areas. And it’s not hard to envision potential beneficiaries.

Ironically, at the same time we’re seeing increasingly bullish developments for hydrogen, the stocks investors currently consider bets on the trend are sinking deeper into the red for 2021. I see two major reasons for that.

First, the vast majority of these companies are still years from turning a profit. In fact, several of the most hyped are bleeding massive amounts of cash. That includes Plug Power (NSDQ: PLUG), a fuel cell company with a huge market cap of over $17 billion and included in 153 separate stock indexes and associated ETFs.

The company has some promising ventures, including one announced this month with South Korea’s Edison Motors to produce hydrogen-powered buses. But it also projects negative free cash flow this year of nearly $700 million, and almost $1 billion for next year. And Plug shares currently trade at barely one-third their January peak.

Bottom line: The best decision investors could have made this year on so-called pure play fuel cell/hydrogen stocks was to avoid them entirely. Like makers of solar panels and batteries, these companies are basically in a race to the bottom to increase efficiency of processes and reduce costs. The winners will reap the spoils of a massive new market. But there’s no guarantee any of the stocks investors are now betting on will survive to see it.

Don’t look for ETFs to cut risk. The number available has grown along with hydrogen hype. The Defiance Next Gen H2 ETF (HDRO)) has about $66 million in net asset value. Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) is a bit smaller at $27 million. And Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN) has $44 million.

Collectively, they’re down an average of about 20 percent this year. The Direxion fund is heavy on Asian companies, while the other two focus on the US and Europe. But the primary differentiator of performance appears to be when they were launched—as what they hold has been a continual decline in 2021.

Fortunately, there’s a much lower risk way to bet on hydrogen. In fact, the most promising players already have secure and growing earnings, and many pay generous and growing dividends as well.

Basically, they’re the same companies that today dominate “conventional” energy now. At the top of the list are the super major oils, which today are deploying windfall profits from oil and gas sales to launch hydrogen and carbon capture development.

Also up there are leading utilities and electricity generators. They’ll enjoy a massive potential new source of contracted and/or regulated power sales, magnified by the fact that energy needed for electrolysis is much greater than what’s in the hydrogen produced.

Not only do these companies have the scale and financial power to dominate hydrogen as they have energy in general the past century plus. But if the hydrogen dream is again derailed by inability to bring down costs enough, they’ll still prosper and reward investors with rising share prices and dividends.

That’s having your cake and eating it too, and without the risk of it being taken away by myriad factors that affect the earnings-less like Plug. Look for more on no-hype hydrogen in the upcoming January issue of Conrad’s Utility Investor.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

A June BoC cut 'seems unrealistic': Scotiabank's chief economist on where rates, the economy and housing prices are … – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


It’s been just over two years since the Bank of Canada began its aggressive tightening policy in March of 2022. With the Bank of Canada anticipated to soon pivot and start cutting the overnight rate, hopes and signs of an economic rebound are growing. In fact, in its April Monetary Policy Report, the bank lifted its real GDP growth forecast for 2024 to 1.5 per cent, from its prior estimate of 0.8 per cent, supported by a strong January GDP reading

Ahead of next week’s release of the February GDP data, The Globe and Mail spoke with Scotiabank’s chief economist Jean-François Perrault, who discussed his economic growth forecasts, perspectives on monetary policy, as well as key economic growth drivers and risks.

Does the U.S. Federal Reserve need to cut rates this year? When I look at the fundamentals, the economy is resilient, the labour market is strong, and inflation is still above their target.

300x250x1

We think U.S. inflation hovers around these levels this year and then gradually comes down next year, and that’s a little bit different than what we thought a few months ago when it looked like U.S. inflation was on a solid downward path. Now, the last few months it’s been the opposite issue, inflation has surprised on the upside.

As to whether or not the Fed actually does need to cut interest rates, you’ve got to think about monetary policy and the way monetary policy makers think about it, which is it takes a long time for their policies to impact activity. So, while we think the Fed cuts in the second half of this year, that’s really thinking about normalizing policy so that in 2025 and beyond inflation goes to where they need it to.

Our view assumes that U.S. growth doesn’t accelerate going forward and inflation doesn’t accelerate going forward. Now, if those things happen, if you get more surprises on the inflation side, you can easily rule out a rate cut in the U.S. this year and you might have to start thinking about rate increases.

What probability would you assign to rate increases?

Pretty low.

Your U.S. GDP growth forecast for this year is 2.4 per cent. However, in one of your notes you said you wouldn’t be surprised to see growth near 3 per cent.

The pace at which data are coming in and the revisions that we are seeing to the outlook, if we continue on this surprise pace, it doesn’t take that many surprises to bring you up closer to 3 per cent as opposed to 2.25, 2.5.

I think of it in this really simple way. One of the big shocks we have to the U.S., for instance, is retail sales, which are extremely strong and that’s the rate sensitive part of the economy. Household spending is one of the things the Fed would expect to see being weak when they’re having an impact on the economy. We’re seeing the opposite of that – a sharp pickup in retail sales. That suggests that there’s this risk going forward that growth is going to surprise to the upside again.

What’s your 2024 economic outlook for Canada?

We have been revising growth up progressively in Canada, not to the extent that we’re seeing in the U.S. We’ve got 1.5 per cent growth for Canada, in the U.S. you’re well over 2 per cent growth. But, the data are coming in stronger than expected.

On the flip side though, in Canada, is the inflation data have been coming in and surprising to the downside. There is this different inflation dynamic between Canada and the U.S. Canadian inflation is slowing, U.S. inflation is accelerating. So even though growth is being revised up in Canada, it does suggest that there is more likeliness to a rate cut in Canada than in the U.S. at this point or certainly more rate cuts in Canada this year than in the U.S.

You’re anticipating 75 basis points of cuts this year by the Bank of Canada. When do you have the first rate cut occurring?

Our official call is September. We’re starting to waffle between September and July because the inflation data are a little bit better than we thought. To us, it seems unrealistic at this point for the Bank of Canada to cut in June.

I’m sure you speak to many CEO’s of companies. If my assumption is correct, what are you hearing from business leaders regarding capital spending plans, labour plans surrounding hiring and firing, costs, and supply issues. What main themes or insights into economic activity are you hearing from business executives?

We talk to CEO’s and boards pretty regularly in most sectors.

We’re at a point in time when monetary policy hurts the most as it takes 18 to 24 months for monetary policy to have a full impact on the economy. This is around the time, in principle, the economy is the weakest, maybe it was last quarter, maybe this quarter. As a result, it’s normal for businesses to be a little more cautious.

On the labour side, it’s a little bit different. You’re still seeing companies complain about labour shortages, you’re still seeing significant wage gains being offered. You’re still seeing companies hoard workers. It’s unusual in the sense that typically when the central bank raises interest rates, you get a slowdown in economic activity that lowers employment growth, in fact, lowers employment levels and you get some downward pressure on wages. We haven’t really seen that.

But, there is a certain degree of optimism with respect to how the economy responds to lower interest rates because those are coming so that’s impacting how people approach decisions. Once interest rates start to come down, it’s pretty clear that we’re going to get a significant turnaround in the economy and that will carry business investment with it and higher consumer spending, which is in part why we think the government needs to be cautious because if you do that too soon, you create a growth problem, which from a Bank of Canada perspective is an issue, from a business perspective, of course, we all want.

How great of a risk do you see rising commodity prices filtering through the supply chain and lifting inflation?

It’s 100 per cent a risk. The fact that commodity prices are by and large performing well in an environment where monetary policy is still tight around the world, where growth is being suppressed by central banks, where China is in a pretty weak economic situation – that’s the type of environment you would normally see commodity prices being pulled down in. The fact that we haven’t seen it that much really makes you question as the global economy starts to rebound, say in the second part of this year as central banks start to cut rates, what kind of a commodity price response do you get then? For us, this is a really significant issue in terms of inflation control, you’ve got to keep this in mind.

When you consider we may be in an environment of higher for longer interest rates, do investors have to lower or moderate their earnings growth expectations?

I would say no. You’ve got to keep in mind why would interest rates not come down this year and figure out what that means for the economy. Say we end up with 3 per cent growth in the U.S. this year and the Fed doesn’t cut or the Fed has to raise further. Well, that’s occurring because growth is strengthening. That means earnings are probably rising. That means there’s more business to be done. So, if rates are higher for longer because the economy is strong, it’s a different thing than rates are higher for longer for no other reason than central banks are really aggressive in bringing things down.

What about in Canada where rates may be higher for longer, but that’s not because of a strong economy but because the Fed is holding rates steady.

For Canada, it’s a little bit more tricky because you have exactly that going on.

We’ve revised our growth forecast up, but not to the extent that we’re seeing in the U.S. So, it does suggest that there’s a little bit of a differential between how Canadian and U.S. stock markets would adapt to that. But you also got to keep in mind though that if you’re revising your U.S. growth forecast up, you’ve got to revise your Canadian growth forecast up as well, three quarters of exports go to the U.S. So, if we find ourselves with an unbelievably strong U.S. economy, we’re going to have a stronger economy. So, there will be an earnings lift that comes from that in Canada.

Where it gets a little bit tricky though is higher for longer interest rates then impacts multiples because discount rates change. You’ve got the impact of higher interest rates, which depresses stock market valuations to some extent.

There’s been a lot of surprises or turn of events. Not too long ago, we were talking about the risk of a recession. At the beginning of 2023, there were talks about rate cuts but instead, after a pause, there were two rate hikes mid-year. At the start of this year, people were talking about six rate cuts by the Bank of Canada starting potentially as early as March and now those expectations have been scaled back. What do you think may be the next surprise to investors?

We’ll see if it’s a surprise or not, but I think the thing to worry about over the next several months is the result of the U.S. election. We might get some growth surprises between now and then, maybe we get some inflation surprises, which will be meaningful in terms of the timing of monetary policy. The outcome of the U.S. election, for instance, if Trump wins and he does some of the things that he says he’s going to do on the tariff side then you end up in a potentially very different economic space this time next year, or two years from now, or whenever, if he wins and he does the things that he says he wants to do. That will overhang markets for a while until we get clarity on that in November.

In the short run, what we’ve observed and the reason we’ve been scaling back rate cuts in Canada and in the U.S. has largely been because growth has been more resilient than anticipated. If you find yourself in a world where growth isn’t slowing down as much as you thought it was, there’s no recession, then you have to rethink the pace at which you were going to unwind policy because the economy is turning out to be better than you thought, better able to handle those rate increases.

You led me into my next question. Trump has pledged to impose 60 per cent or higher tariffs on goods from China, which would ignite inflation. How do you see this impacting the economy?

It’s broader than that. He’s threatened at least 60 per cent on China and 10 per cent for everybody else so that’s a trade war. That is the Americans declaring a trade war on the rest of the world. Now, would we be included in that or not? I don’t know, it depends on the range of things.

That does two really nasty things. One, it reduces economic activity in the U.S. because you’re paying more for inputs, it’s a supply shock so it reduces growth a little bit or a lot depending on what exactly he does, but also boosts inflation because the cost of goods is rising. So, you have this awful situation where you’re revising your growth forecast down, you’re revising your inflation forecast up and you’re probably raising your rate forecast as well because at the end of the day, central banks have got to manage the inflation side of things. Now, that’s true in the U.S. and it’s also true elsewhere.

What do you see as significant tailwinds and headwinds for the Canadian economy?

Obviously, the commodity sector has been beneficial to us. We’re going to have the Trans Mountain start operating very soon as well so we’re going to benefit from that. There still are relatively strong household and corporate balance sheets in Canada. And then there’s the population dimension, which has been a really powerful tailwind the last couple of years that seems to still be a very powerful tailwind.

On the headwind side, setting aside the election, politics, I think by far the most important is low productivity. It hits our standard of living, it hits our competitiveness, which makes it even more important, say in a Trump tariff world. If we cannot improve productivity in any meaningful way then you have a gradual erosion of competitiveness, a gradual erosion of standard of living, a gradual erosion of well-being in the country and that is a big deal.

Speaking about erosion, I was thinking about housing affordability when you were talking about that. What’s your outlook for home prices?

The market is so undersupplied pretty well across the country. There’s such a large imbalance between supply and demand that it’s very difficult to believe that house prices are going to do anything but rise over the next several years. It’s very difficult to see affordability improving in the next five years.

Will Bitcoin ever be included in your currency analysis?

No. It’s honestly a very difficult thing to analyze. It’s not a currency. There’s no intrinsic value to it. It’s just a financial asset whose value moves up and down on the basis of how many people want to buy and sell it.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Japanese government maintains view that economy is in moderate recovery – ForexLive

Published

 on


300x250x1

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Can falling interest rates improve fairness in the economy? – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


The ‘poor borrower’ narrative rules in media coverage of the Bank of Canada and high interest rates, and that’s appropriate.

A lot of people have been financially slammed by the rate hikes of the past couple of years, which have made it much more expensive to carry a mortgage, lines of credit and other borrowing. The latest from the Bank of Canada suggests rate cuts will come as soon as this summer, which on the whole would be a welcome development. It’s not just borrowers who need relief – the boarder economy has slowed to a crawl because of high borrowing costs.

But high rates are also a big win for some people. Specifically, those who have little or no debt and who have a significant amount of money sitting in savings products and guaranteed investment certificates. The country’s most well-off people, in other words.

300x250x1

Lower rates will mean diminished returns for savers and less interest paid by borrowers. It’s a stretch to say lower rates will improve financial inequality, but they do add a little more fairness to our financial system.

Wealth inequality is often presented as the chasm between well-off people able to pay for houses, vehicles, trips and high-end restaurant meals and those who are driving record use of food banks and living in tent cities. High interest rates and inflation have given us more nuance in wealth inequality. People fortunate enough to have bought houses in recent years are staggering as they try to manage mortgage payments that have risen by hundreds of dollars a month. You can see their struggles in rising numbers of late payments and debt defaults.

Rates are expected to fall in a measured, gradual way, which means their impact on financial inequality won’t be an instant gamechanger. But if the Bank of Canada cuts 0.25 of a percentage point off the overnight rate in June and again in July, many borrowers will start noticing how much less interest they’re paying, and savers will find themselves earning less.


Subscribe to Carrick on Money

Are you reading this newsletter on the web or did someone forward the e-mail version to you? If so, you can sign up for Carrick on Money here.


Rob’s personal finance reading list

Snowballs and avalanches

A look at two strategies for paying off debt – the debt avalanche and the debt snowball. I’ll go with the avalanche.

How not to ruin your kitchen countertop

Anyone who has renovated a kitchen lately knows how expensive stone countertops can be. Look after yours by protecting it from a few common kitchen items.

What you need to know about stock market corrections

A helpful explanation of stock market corrections. It seems an opportune time to look at corrections, given how volatile stocks have been lately. Like scouts, investors should always be prepared.

Put that snack back

Food inflation requires more careful grocery shopping. Here’s a roundup of food products – cookies, snacks, ice cream – that don’t taste as good as they used to. Food companies have always adjusted their recipes from time to time. Is this happening more because of inflation’s impact on raw material prices? A U.S. list – most products are available are familiar to Canadians, too.


Ask Rob

Q: I have Tangerine children’s accounts for my kids. Can you suggest a better alternative?

A: The rate on the Tangerine children’s account is 0.8 per cent, which actually compares well to the big banks and their comparable accounts. For kids aged 13 and up, check out something new called the JA Money Card.

Do you have a question for me? Send it my way. Sorry I can’t answer every one personally. Questions and answers are edited for length and clarity.


Tools and guides

A comprehensive guide on how to build a good credit score.


In the social sphere

Social Media: An offbeat way of fighting high food costs

Watch: Is now the hardest time ever to buy a home?

Money-Free Zone: Singer-songwriter Maggie Rogers has a new album called Don’t Forget Me and it’s generating some buzz because it’s a great listen. Smooth vocals and a laid back countryish vibe that hits a faster pace on one of my favourite cuts, Drunk.


More PF from The Globe

– He keeps ‘a few thousand in crisp new bills’ at home – is that a good idea?

– The pension pivot: Employers recognizing that workers need help with debt as much as retirement

– Her bond ETF is ‘a dud and not promising at all’ – should she sell?

– Despite high fees, Canadians remain perplexingly loyal to mutual funds. Here’s why


More Rob Carrick and money coverage

Subscribe to Stress Test on Apple podcasts or Spotify. For more money stories, follow me on Instagram and Twitter, and join the discussion on my Facebook page. Millennial readers, join our Gen Y Money Facebook group.

Even more coverage from Rob Carrick:

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending