Connect with us


The Hydrogen Economy: Reality And Hype – Forbes



It’s been more than four decades since the Hindenburg disaster slammed the brakes on the era of hydrogen-fueled dirigibles. But nature’s lightest element continues to capture the world’s imagination as a clean, plentiful and potentially cheap energy source.

Hydrogen’s current burst of popularity is the result of global action to combat climate change. Solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and electric vehicles can provide carbon emissions-free sources for generating electricity and fueling most transport. But they’re not close to powering furnaces hot enough for major industrial processes like manufacturing steel.

Hydrogen also offers a potential emission

s-free solution for running household appliances, such as providing natural gas-level heat for cooking and furnaces. And hydrogen fuel cells have potential to move heavy industrial equipment, trucking fleets and ships at a competitive cost as well. 

The key questions for investors are:

  • Can the cost of hydrogen be reduced enough to match up to fossil fuels, how will that take and what’s the risk competing technology will derail its rise, as has happened with every previous cycle of hydrogen hype?
  • What companies potentially benefiting from hydrogen development can be purchased now at good entry points?

Virtually all hydrogen currently used now is considered “gray,” meaning it’s extracted from natural gas. Turning it “blue” requires infrastructure to capture the greenhouse gasses emitted in that process. In contrast, “green” hydrogen is produced emissions-free by electrolysis, with electric current sent through water to separate hydrogen from oxygen.

The challenge for all three is cost, especially for green hydrogen. According to Bloomberg New Energy Finance data, green hydrogen costs from $1.84 to $10.09 a kilogram to make now. That would have to fall to a range of at least $1 to $2 a kilogram just to be competitive with blue hydrogen, and much further still to match up with conventional energy.

Water is the only raw material needed to manufacture green hydrogen. So the Holy Grail is making the process itself economic. The most important element of that is securing sufficient, low-cost sources of electricity, followed closely by developing infrastructure to handle and integrate hydrogen with existing systems, including appliances.

The efforts to get there are underway. Earlier this month, Chinese energy giant Sinopec began construction on the world’s largest green hydrogen production plant announced to date: A facility with 260 megawatts of electrolyzer capacity expected to enter service by mid-2023, at a projected cost of $470 million.

The plant is projected to have a 48.8 percent annual utilization rate. Nearly half the needed electricity to run it will come from a 300 MW solar facility, with the rest from nearby wind farms. And it includes a hydrogen transportation pipeline with takeaway capacity of 2.5 tons per hour.

The CEO of Italian power company Snam SpA (SRG, SNMRY) has written a book entitled “The Hydrogen Revolution,” in which he projects green hydrogen costs will be competitive within five years with fossil fuels. That likely depends on offshore wind hitting projections of an 11-fold lift in global capacity to 400 gigawatts by 2035.

As for transportation and integration, oil and gas midstream and natural gas distribution companies, including Southwest Gas (SWX) in the US southwest, are testing blending hydrogen in existing infrastructure with already promising results. And British super major oil BP Plc (BP) last month announced plans for an electrolysis hub to provide hydrogen fuel for trucks and other forms of heavy transport starting in 2025, with an anticipated production capacity of 1.5 gigawatts by 2030.

The UK government has set a target of 5 GW of hydrogen production capacity by 2030 to cut the transport’s sector’s 29.8 percent share of the country’s CO2 emissions. If it succeeds, the plan would overcome hydrogen’s biggest current disadvantage versus increased use of batteries, which is a lack of infrastructure. And hydrogen-powered trucks can be fueled far more quickly with much wider range than vehicles running purely on electricity. 

Bottom line: We’re still years from anything resembling a hydrogen economy. But development is nonetheless real in several areas. And it’s not hard to envision potential beneficiaries.

Ironically, at the same time we’re seeing increasingly bullish developments for hydrogen, the stocks investors currently consider bets on the trend are sinking deeper into the red for 2021. I see two major reasons for that.

First, the vast majority of these companies are still years from turning a profit. In fact, several of the most hyped are bleeding massive amounts of cash. That includes Plug Power (NSDQ: PLUG), a fuel cell company with a huge market cap of over $17 billion and included in 153 separate stock indexes and associated ETFs.

The company has some promising ventures, including one announced this month with South Korea’s Edison Motors to produce hydrogen-powered buses. But it also projects negative free cash flow this year of nearly $700 million, and almost $1 billion for next year. And Plug shares currently trade at barely one-third their January peak.

Bottom line: The best decision investors could have made this year on so-called pure play fuel cell/hydrogen stocks was to avoid them entirely. Like makers of solar panels and batteries, these companies are basically in a race to the bottom to increase efficiency of processes and reduce costs. The winners will reap the spoils of a massive new market. But there’s no guarantee any of the stocks investors are now betting on will survive to see it.

Don’t look for ETFs to cut risk. The number available has grown along with hydrogen hype. The Defiance Next Gen H2 ETF (HDRO)) has about $66 million in net asset value. Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) is a bit smaller at $27 million. And Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN) has $44 million.

Collectively, they’re down an average of about 20 percent this year. The Direxion fund is heavy on Asian companies, while the other two focus on the US and Europe. But the primary differentiator of performance appears to be when they were launched—as what they hold has been a continual decline in 2021.

Fortunately, there’s a much lower risk way to bet on hydrogen. In fact, the most promising players already have secure and growing earnings, and many pay generous and growing dividends as well.

Basically, they’re the same companies that today dominate “conventional” energy now. At the top of the list are the super major oils, which today are deploying windfall profits from oil and gas sales to launch hydrogen and carbon capture development.

Also up there are leading utilities and electricity generators. They’ll enjoy a massive potential new source of contracted and/or regulated power sales, magnified by the fact that energy needed for electrolysis is much greater than what’s in the hydrogen produced.

Not only do these companies have the scale and financial power to dominate hydrogen as they have energy in general the past century plus. But if the hydrogen dream is again derailed by inability to bring down costs enough, they’ll still prosper and reward investors with rising share prices and dividends.

That’s having your cake and eating it too, and without the risk of it being taken away by myriad factors that affect the earnings-less like Plug. Look for more on no-hype hydrogen in the upcoming January issue of Conrad’s Utility Investor.

Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


Canadian dollar rises as selloff in U.S. bonds ebbs



The Canadian dollar strengthened against the greenback on Thursday as U.S. bond yields stabilized and Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, said it would soon ease restrictions to curb the spread of the Omicron coronavirus variant.

The loonie was trading 0.3% higher at 1.2472 to the greenback, or 80.18 U.S. cents, after trading in a range of 1.2454 to 1.2516.

Among G10 currencies, only the Australian dollar notched a bigger gain. Both Canada and Australia are major producers of commodities.

“Interest rate differentials are tilting against the (U.S.)dollar, lifting the appeal of currencies leveraged to rest-of-world growth,” said Karl Schamotta, chief market strategist at Corpay.

U.S. Treasury yields have pulled back from 2-year highs as data showed that the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits unexpectedly rose last week.

Ontario has blunted transmission of the Omicron variant and it will gradually ease restrictions on businesses from end-January, Premier Doug Ford said.

Despite the prospect of slower economic growth due to restrictions, investors have raised bets that the Bank of Canada will hike interest rates on Jan. 26. It would be the first hike since October 2018.

Data from payroll services provider ADP showed that Canada added 19,200 jobs in December, the fifth straight month of gains

Canadian retail sales data, due on Friday, could offer more clues on the strength of the domestic economy.

The price of oil, one of Canada’s major exports, settled 0.1% lower at $86.90 a barrel as U.S. crude inventories rose for the first time in eight weeks and investors took profits after a recent rally.

Canadian government bond yields were mixed across a flatter curve. The 10-year eased 2.4 basis points to 1.857%, after touching on Wednesday its highest intraday level since March 2019 at 1.905%.


(Reporting by Fergal Smith; Editing by Jonathan Oatis and Sandra Maler)

Continue Reading


Toronto market hits 2-week low as rate hike angst weighs



Canada’s main stock index on Thursday fell to its lowest level in more than two weeks as worries about the inflation outlook and prospects for higher interest rates weighed on investor sentiment.

The Toronto Stock Exchange’s S&P/TSX composite index ended down 146.98 points, or 0.7%, at 21,058.18, its lowest closing level since Jan. 5.

“The non-stop inflation headlines, talk about interest rates have scared the market,” said Barry Schwartz, a portfolio manager at Baskin Financial Services.

Data on Wednesday showed that Canadian inflation climbed in December to a 30-year high.

Investors have raised bets on the Bank of Canada hiking interest rates at a policy announcement next week and are also concerned the Federal Reserve could become aggressive in controlling inflation.

The TSX gained 22% in 2021, its best yearly performance since 2009, supported by massive stimulus, vaccine rollouts and hopes of global economic recovery.

“The markets are deciding that the last few years people have made way too much money and it is time to give some of that back,” Schwartz said.

Broad-based gains included a 2.2% decline for consumer discretionary shares, while the basic materials group, which includes precious and base metals miners and fertilizer companies, ended 1.8% lower.

Energy was down 0.7% as an uptick in U.S. crude inventories arrested the recent move higher in oil prices. U.S. crude oil futures settled 0.1% lower at $86.90 a barrel.

Heavily weighted financials fell 0.4%.

Among 11 major sectors, utilities was the only one to end higher, gaining 0.2%.


(Reporting by Fergal Smith; Additional reporting by Amal S in Bengaluru; editing by Jonathan Oatis)

Continue Reading


Any sanctions on Russia would not widely impact global, U.S. economy -White House – National Post



Article content

WASHINGTON — Any sanctions imposed on Russia over its aggression toward Ukraine would not particularly expose the U.S. economy, although the Biden administration is focused on any possible impact on oil, White House National Economic Council Director Brian Deese said on Thursday.

“The actions that we have ready and that we are working closely with our allies to deploy would impose very significant costs across time on the Russian economy, and it would do so in a way that mitigates the impact on the global economy and the American economy,” he told CNN. (Reporting by Susan Heavey Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)

Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading