The Last of Us Part II: Why Abby Deserves Your Empathy - Flickering Myth | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Tech

The Last of Us Part II: Why Abby Deserves Your Empathy – Flickering Myth

Published

 on


Kate Harrold on The Last of Us Part II and why Abby might not be the villain she’s made out to be…

Major spoilers for The Last of Us Part II lie ahead so proceed with caution…

The Last of Us Part II has been divisive to say the least.  Naughty Dog’s long-awaited sequel was released in June to rave critic reviews earning itself an impressive score of 94 on Metacritic but just days later, the game was panned by fans. Writer and director Neil Druckmann must’ve anticipated some form of backlash as – and this is where the spoilers come in – he killed fan-favourite and lead character Joel (Troy Baker) in the first act. It’s brand new character, Abby (Laura Bailey), who did the deed – someone you’re then forced to play as for half of the game. Detractors even sent actress Bailey death threats stating, ‘I’m going to find where you live and slaughter you for what you did to Joel.’ Part of The Last of Us‘ major success is how the game challenges our morals. As the player, we become complicit in almost every action – every kill. Joel and Ellie (Ashley Johnson) relentlessly kill both clickers and non-infected alike yet we root for them. Nothing justifies what Abby did to Joel, but why shouldn’t we lend her the same kind of empathy.

Abby has a rough time in The Last of Us Part II – and that’s before fans tore her to shreds. No one in this game has it easy, but it’s clear that Abby suffers more than others. We learn that Joel killed Abby’s father. OK, so loss isn’t new but this is only the very beginning of Abby’s misfortune. In their quest to find Abby, neither Ellie nor Tommy (Jeffrey Pierce) have any hesitation in killing her friends which includes Manny, Owen, Mel, Nora, Leah, and Danny. Unlike Ellie, Abby doesn’t have somewhere like Jackson to call home. Western Liberation Front leader, Isaac (Jeffrey Wright), is clearly just using Abby and is all too happy to cast her aside. In addition to all this loss, Abby is no stranger to physical pain. She’s almost hung and disembowelled by the Seraphites and then is later captured and tortured by the Rattlers – a slaver cult. Abby is left a broken women both mentally and physically. Thematically, we also leave Ellie in a similar place but she chose to leave Dina just like she chose to leave Jackson. Abby didn’t have that choice.

Some may argue that this is all Abby’s comeuppance for killing Joel, but would we wish the same kind of suffering upon Ellie in a potential The Last of Us Part III for her actions? No way. Abby’s arc is one of redemption which is a fact that feels hugely overlooked. Despite spending much of the game hunting Abby down, Ellie ultimately lets her live – cue outrage – but by this point in the game, Abby is on a clear path of redemption. She’s no longer the villain we assumed her to be in the first act. Abby holds her cards close to her chest but it isn’t a push to assume that she might on some level be thinking, ‘maybe I do deserve this.’ After all, why else would she save Seraphite outcast’s Yara and Lev, if not to redeem herself. Seraphites are the Western Liberation Front’s mortal enemies but this section of the game seeks to test Abby’s perception of who the enemy is. In saving their lives, she takes a step towards ending the cycle of violence. Many credit Ellie with doing this when she lets Abby live, but didn’t Abby do this much sooner? She didn’t even want to partake in the fight. Abstaining is proof of Abby’s growth and redemption.

So much of the hate directed towards Abby is simply to do with our pre-existing alliances. In The Last of Us, we become so attached to Ellie and Joel due to our complicity in both their journey and their relationship. We’re with them every step of the way and so it’s natural for us to grieve for Joel when he dies. Now this takes a little bit of imagination because there really wouldn’t be a The Last of Us without Joel and Ellie, but imagine if the first game centred around Abby and her father Jerry. Then, Part II comes along and Joel kill’s Jerry. By this point, Abby would be what Ellie is to us. We’d root for her to go after Joel and exact her revenge. We’d have no alliances to Joel whatsoever.

The point is, there are no heroes in The Last of Us. Regardless of who we’re playing as, the ‘other’ will always be the villain. This is a game of survival – a game that asks how far would you go to survive? We can’t justify Abby’s actions, but as we so intensely love and support the equally-guilty Joel and Ellie, isn’t it hypocritical for us to condemn Abby’s actions too? This isn’t a world of good vs evil. It’s a world of messy morals. Deeming Abby to be a villain only discredits the rich narrative that is certainly worth paying more attention to.

So what did you make of The Last of Us Part II? Let us know on Facebook and Twitter @FlickeringMyth…

Kate Harrold

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Ottawa orders TikTok’s Canadian arm to be dissolved

Published

 on

 

The federal government is ordering the dissolution of TikTok’s Canadian business after a national security review of the Chinese company behind the social media platform, but stopped short of ordering people to stay off the app.

Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne announced the government’s “wind up” demand Wednesday, saying it is meant to address “risks” related to ByteDance Ltd.’s establishment of TikTok Technology Canada Inc.

“The decision was based on the information and evidence collected over the course of the review and on the advice of Canada’s security and intelligence community and other government partners,” he said in a statement.

The announcement added that the government is not blocking Canadians’ access to the TikTok application or their ability to create content.

However, it urged people to “adopt good cybersecurity practices and assess the possible risks of using social media platforms and applications, including how their information is likely to be protected, managed, used and shared by foreign actors, as well as to be aware of which country’s laws apply.”

Champagne’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment seeking details about what evidence led to the government’s dissolution demand, how long ByteDance has to comply and why the app is not being banned.

A TikTok spokesperson said in a statement that the shutdown of its Canadian offices will mean the loss of hundreds of well-paying local jobs.

“We will challenge this order in court,” the spokesperson said.

“The TikTok platform will remain available for creators to find an audience, explore new interests and for businesses to thrive.”

The federal Liberals ordered a national security review of TikTok in September 2023, but it was not public knowledge until The Canadian Press reported in March that it was investigating the company.

At the time, it said the review was based on the expansion of a business, which it said constituted the establishment of a new Canadian entity. It declined to provide any further details about what expansion it was reviewing.

A government database showed a notification of new business from TikTok in June 2023. It said Network Sense Ventures Ltd. in Toronto and Vancouver would engage in “marketing, advertising, and content/creator development activities in relation to the use of the TikTok app in Canada.”

Even before the review, ByteDance and TikTok were lightning rod for privacy and safety concerns because Chinese national security laws compel organizations in the country to assist with intelligence gathering.

Such concerns led the U.S. House of Representatives to pass a bill in March designed to ban TikTok unless its China-based owner sells its stake in the business.

Champagne’s office has maintained Canada’s review was not related to the U.S. bill, which has yet to pass.

Canada’s review was carried out through the Investment Canada Act, which allows the government to investigate any foreign investment with potential to might harm national security.

While cabinet can make investors sell parts of the business or shares, Champagne has said the act doesn’t allow him to disclose details of the review.

Wednesday’s dissolution order was made in accordance with the act.

The federal government banned TikTok from its mobile devices in February 2023 following the launch of an investigation into the company by federal and provincial privacy commissioners.

— With files from Anja Karadeglija in Ottawa

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Here is how to prepare your online accounts for when you die

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — Most people have accumulated a pile of data — selfies, emails, videos and more — on their social media and digital accounts over their lifetimes. What happens to it when we die?

It’s wise to draft a will spelling out who inherits your physical assets after you’re gone, but don’t forget to take care of your digital estate too. Friends and family might treasure files and posts you’ve left behind, but they could get lost in digital purgatory after you pass away unless you take some simple steps.

Here’s how you can prepare your digital life for your survivors:

Apple

The iPhone maker lets you nominate a “ legacy contact ” who can access your Apple account’s data after you die. The company says it’s a secure way to give trusted people access to photos, files and messages. To set it up you’ll need an Apple device with a fairly recent operating system — iPhones and iPads need iOS or iPadOS 15.2 and MacBooks needs macOS Monterey 12.1.

For iPhones, go to settings, tap Sign-in & Security and then Legacy Contact. You can name one or more people, and they don’t need an Apple ID or device.

You’ll have to share an access key with your contact. It can be a digital version sent electronically, or you can print a copy or save it as a screenshot or PDF.

Take note that there are some types of files you won’t be able to pass on — including digital rights-protected music, movies and passwords stored in Apple’s password manager. Legacy contacts can only access a deceased user’s account for three years before Apple deletes the account.

Google

Google takes a different approach with its Inactive Account Manager, which allows you to share your data with someone if it notices that you’ve stopped using your account.

When setting it up, you need to decide how long Google should wait — from three to 18 months — before considering your account inactive. Once that time is up, Google can notify up to 10 people.

You can write a message informing them you’ve stopped using the account, and, optionally, include a link to download your data. You can choose what types of data they can access — including emails, photos, calendar entries and YouTube videos.

There’s also an option to automatically delete your account after three months of inactivity, so your contacts will have to download any data before that deadline.

Facebook and Instagram

Some social media platforms can preserve accounts for people who have died so that friends and family can honor their memories.

When users of Facebook or Instagram die, parent company Meta says it can memorialize the account if it gets a “valid request” from a friend or family member. Requests can be submitted through an online form.

The social media company strongly recommends Facebook users add a legacy contact to look after their memorial accounts. Legacy contacts can do things like respond to new friend requests and update pinned posts, but they can’t read private messages or remove or alter previous posts. You can only choose one person, who also has to have a Facebook account.

You can also ask Facebook or Instagram to delete a deceased user’s account if you’re a close family member or an executor. You’ll need to send in documents like a death certificate.

TikTok

The video-sharing platform says that if a user has died, people can submit a request to memorialize the account through the settings menu. Go to the Report a Problem section, then Account and profile, then Manage account, where you can report a deceased user.

Once an account has been memorialized, it will be labeled “Remembering.” No one will be able to log into the account, which prevents anyone from editing the profile or using the account to post new content or send messages.

X

It’s not possible to nominate a legacy contact on Elon Musk’s social media site. But family members or an authorized person can submit a request to deactivate a deceased user’s account.

Passwords

Besides the major online services, you’ll probably have dozens if not hundreds of other digital accounts that your survivors might need to access. You could just write all your login credentials down in a notebook and put it somewhere safe. But making a physical copy presents its own vulnerabilities. What if you lose track of it? What if someone finds it?

Instead, consider a password manager that has an emergency access feature. Password managers are digital vaults that you can use to store all your credentials. Some, like Keeper,Bitwarden and NordPass, allow users to nominate one or more trusted contacts who can access their keys in case of an emergency such as a death.

But there are a few catches: Those contacts also need to use the same password manager and you might have to pay for the service.

___

Is there a tech challenge you need help figuring out? Write to us at onetechtip@ap.org with your questions.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Google’s partnership with AI startup Anthropic faces a UK competition investigation

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — Britain’s competition watchdog said Thursday it’s opening a formal investigation into Google’s partnership with artificial intelligence startup Anthropic.

The Competition and Markets Authority said it has “sufficient information” to launch an initial probe after it sought input earlier this year on whether the deal would stifle competition.

The CMA has until Dec. 19 to decide whether to approve the deal or escalate its investigation.

“Google is committed to building the most open and innovative AI ecosystem in the world,” the company said. “Anthropic is free to use multiple cloud providers and does, and we don’t demand exclusive tech rights.”

San Francisco-based Anthropic was founded in 2021 by siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei, who previously worked at ChatGPT maker OpenAI. The company has focused on increasing the safety and reliability of AI models. Google reportedly agreed last year to make a multibillion-dollar investment in Anthropic, which has a popular chatbot named Claude.

Anthropic said it’s cooperating with the regulator and will provide “the complete picture about Google’s investment and our commercial collaboration.”

“We are an independent company and none of our strategic partnerships or investor relationships diminish the independence of our corporate governance or our freedom to partner with others,” it said in a statement.

The U.K. regulator has been scrutinizing a raft of AI deals as investment money floods into the industry to capitalize on the artificial intelligence boom. Last month it cleared Anthropic’s $4 billion deal with Amazon and it has also signed off on Microsoft’s deals with two other AI startups, Inflection and Mistral.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version