The Politics Of Discrimination | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

The Politics Of Discrimination

Published

 on


“Politicians have long used racism as a finely honed tool of political persuasion,” writes Bill Lueders, editor of The Progressive, a self-described voice for peace, social justice and the common good.

Before the 2016 election, Donald Trump built his platform on exiling unauthorized Mexicans and building a wall to keep them out. Most recently, he threatened to use military force to subdue protestors after a white police officer killed George Floyd by asphyxiation. Floyd’s death, captured by cellphone video and seen around the world, proves what we’ve known all along – the U.S. has a problem with racism.

And yet many prominent conservatives “insist it’s a lie to describe racial discrimination as a pervasive problem,” writes CNN’s Ronald Brownstein. “While some polls conducted amid the upsurge of protest hint that more Republicans may see discrimination as a problem, generally the surveys have documented the persistence of a huge gap between the parties on the issue.”

Recommended For You

The Political Middle Finger

But it’s not just issues around race that plague the Trump administration. Most recently, the administration finalized a regulation that erases protections for transgender patients in healthcare settings, including discrimination by doctors, hospitals and insurance companies. The announcement was made on the fourth anniversary of the massacre at a gay nightclub in Orlando and in the middle of Pride Month. The equivalent of the political middle-finger directed at the LGBTQ community.

In a surprise volley just three days later, the Supreme Court ruled six to three that employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or for being transgender violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In Title VII, Congress extends discrimination protections in the workplace on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

In his opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote, “The answer is clear. An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids.”

From 29 May through 2 June, PollingReport.com asked the question, “Do you think gay, lesbian or bisexual people should be protected under civil rights laws, or should they not be protected under these laws?”

Of the 1,309 polled, 82 percent answered: “Yes, they should be protected.”

Perhaps the tides are turning.

The latest Gallop report suggests American pride is at the lowest point in its two decades of measurement, and CNN polling shows that support for Republicans continues to shrink–especially since the protests began. Former Vice President Joe Biden has a 55 percent favorable rating compared to Donald Trump’s 41 percent — Biden’s strongest position yet.

Biden, who sharply criticized Trump’s response to protestors, said, “the moment has come for our nation to deal with systemic racism.” Earlier in the year he confirmed his support for transgender rights saying there was “no room for compromise” in the policy debate surrounding transgender people.

People Want Equality

Equality is a rallying cry across a host of disenfranchised groups. As protests continue for Black Lives Matter, women raise their voices for #MeToo. In addition to killing over a hundred thousand Americans and hospitalizing thousands more, the coronavirus has, in the words of age-activist Ashton Applewhite, exposed the underbelly of ageism and ableism. “We are engaged in a massive collective experiment to protect the vulnerable, whoever they turn out to be. It’s high stakes, and it’s as intersectional as it can get.”

Whoever becomes the 46th President of the United States must be willing to protect the vulnerable. That means taking assertive measures to create political, economic and social equity for those who are targets of discrimination. It means making healthcare and education more accessible. It means ensuring fair pay. It means protecting older workers and those who have a disability from hiring and other employment discrimination.

This is the new America where it’s not enough to be a passive observer of discrimination. It’s time to take necessary actions to ease our country’s suffering and promote recovery and healing.

It’s time to vote.

Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version