There have been many discussions recently about the ability for
real estate agents to now incorporate themselves, including a recent article penned by my colleagues. As
part of the discourse, it’s important to explore certain tax
benefits derived from Personal Real Estate Corporations
(“PRECs”). In this first part of a multi-article series,
I explore the ability to defer taxes by having a PREC retain all or
a portion of the income earned by the real estate agent.
In Ontario, the top marginal tax rate for income for individuals
is 53.53% in 2020. A PREC, however, may only have to pay up to
26.5% tax on such income in the first instance, while additional
tax is only owing when the individual takes that money out of the
PREC for his/her personal use. The different tax rates in the first
instance (53.53% to 26.5%) results in the ability to defer tax so
long as funds are retained in the PREC.
So, for example, if a real estate agent were earning $400,000
each year, he/she would be paying taxes in the aggregate of
~$180,000 (~45%) on such income. Every additional dollar of income
would attract 53.53 cents of tax. If, alternatively, he/she earned
that income in a PREC, taxes of up to only ~$105,000 would be owing
in the first instance. (Assuming the real estate agent has no other
sources of income, personal taxes in the amount of ~$78,000 would
be owing if the ~$295,000 was subsequently taken out of the PREC by
way of dividend.) Rather than paying the Canada Revenue Agency
immediately, the $75,000 of deferred taxes ($105,000 vs $180,000)
could be re-invested by the PREC.
The analysis doesn’t stop there. Many people rely on their
income to support their everyday living expenses. If the real
estate agent needs $220,000 to personally live off (i.e., the
aftertax income he/she was previously earning), the use of a PREC
would actually be detrimental to the agent. The aggregate tax paid
by the agent and the PREC in a year would exceed that which he/she
would have otherwise paid had he/she earned the income personally.
(The Canadian corporate tax system is based on perfect integration,
but the integration is never perfect and right now there is
over-integration, meaning more aggregate corporate and personal tax
is paid if all of the income earned by a corporation in a year is
distributed to its shareholder(s) in the same year. In the example
above, aggregate corporate and personal taxes of ~$183,000 would be
owing instead of the $180,000 if nothing had been done at all.)
But what if the agent only needed a portion of his/her income to
support his/her everyday living expenses? If, for example, he/she
only required $100,000 of after-tax income, he/she would only need
to receive a dividend in the amount of $110,000 from the $295,000
aftercorporate-tax dollars in the PREC, allowing him/her to retain
a significant portion of his/her income in the PREC and take
advantage of that lower corporate tax rate.
In conclusion, if a real estate agent doesn’t require any or
all of his/her annual income to fund his/her personal living
expenses, the use of a PREC can have a significant impact in terms
of personal finances. The other articles in this series will
discuss additional tax benefits associated with the use of a
PREC.
Originally Published by Minden Gross, December 2020
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
