The week in charts - Treating the world economy for covid-19 | Graphic detail - The Economist | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

The week in charts – Treating the world economy for covid-19 | Graphic detail – The Economist

Published

 on


Biden’s bounce • Syria’s endless tragedy • The glass ceiling, and worse • Democracy in Africa

Graphic detail

Although China still accounts for four-fifths of covid-19 cases, most new occurrences are now in other countries. As the coronavirus spreads worldwide, it threatens an economic crisis as well as a health emergency. Both need fixing. Our briefing this week notes that many countries are ill-prepared. Low case numbers (eg, in America) should not be taken to signify successful containment; they are often a measure of ignorance. Our cover leader considers the right medicine for the world economy. Most economic efforts in rich countries, such as this week’s interest-rate cuts in America and elsewhere, have been directed towards calming financial markets—though they are likely to stay jittery. But this is not a textbook downturn. Cheap credit will not stop people falling ill or repair broken supply chains. Better to support the economy directly, by helping affected people and firms to pay bills and borrow money if they need it.


On Super Tuesday, March 3rd, Joe Biden pulled off a remarkable political comeback in his bid for the White House. After a dreadful start to his campaign the former vice-president won Democratic primaries in ten states, from Maine to Texas, and is now favourite to secure his party’s nomination. Bernie Sanders, the self-described “democratic socialist” senator from Vermont, won just three—although one was the biggest prize, California. The race for the party’s nomination has become a two-horse affair between the septuagenarians, now that other contenders have dropped out (and mostly endorsed the rejuvenated front-runner). Mr Biden’s victory this week, we argue in a leader, suggests that the Democratic Party has not yet wandered off into the wilderness. But the contest is not over yet.


After The Economist went to press, Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Vladimir Putin brokered a ceasefire in Idlib, in northern Syria. Rebels supported by Mr Erdogan’s Turkey have been battling Syrian forces backed by Mr Putin’s Russia. At least 36 Turkish soldiers were killed in a recent air strike; Turkey hit back, killing perhaps hundreds of Syrian soldiers. A ceasefire may stanch the fighting, but will only delay an eventual reckoning. No one has a real solution for Idlib, or the desperate civilians trapped there. Nor, indeed, for the tens of thousands of Syrian (and other) refugees now trying to enter Greece from Turkey, after Mr Erdogan opened the border. Greek guards are repelling them, leaving them trapped in an international standoff.


To mark International Women’s Day on March 8th, we have updated our glass-ceiling index, which ranks 29 countries on ten indicators of inequality for women in the workplace. Iceland has overtaken other Nordic neighbours to take the top slot. Our Bartleby column reviews two new books on obstacles women face at work. Elsewhere, we report on discrimination against women of a more grisly type. On Sunday women in Mexico City will march in protest against two brutal murders last month; the event is expected to be Mexico’s biggest-ever feminist demonstration. Women make up 10-15% of Mexican murder victims (typically, one male gangster shoots another) against half in Switzerland. But feminists argue that murders of women are especially vicious. Mexico is one of 15 countries that recognise “femicide”, the killing of a woman, as a distinct crime. We also report on abortion around the world. This week America’s Supreme Court heard arguments for a law that could lead to the closure of two of the three abortion clinics in Louisiana. Yet worldwide abortion is becoming more widely available, and safer.


Most Africans, like people anywhere, want to choose their own rulers. But a smaller, more powerful group—autocrats and their supporters—is determined to thwart them. Over the past 30 years, democracy has gained ground on the continent, but there has been some backsliding since 2008. Of the 21 countries that switched off the internet last year, 12 were African. On the autocrats’ side is Chinese money with no questions asked, plus lack of interest from within the White House. But the forces of democracy are strong, too. They include urbanisation (protest is easier in cities), a probing press, vigorous NGOs, assertive courts and reformers in ruling parties. The battle for democracy will be won or lost by Africans themselves, but the rest of the world can—and should—choose a side.

Reuse this contentThe Trust Project

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version