Transcript for CDC Media Telebriefing: COVID-19 Vaccination and Pregnancy | CDC Online Newsroom - COVID-19 | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Media

Transcript for CDC Media Telebriefing: COVID-19 Vaccination and Pregnancy | CDC Online Newsroom – COVID-19

Published

 on


Operator:

Welcome and thank you for standing by. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode until the question and answer portion of today’s call. During that time, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one. Today’s conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect this time. We now would like to turn the meeting over to Benjamin Haynes. You may now begin.

Benjamin Haynes:

Thank you, Brandon and thank you all for joining us for this briefing to discuss today’s MMWR. We are joined by Dr. Dana Meaney-Delman, Chief of Infant Outcomes Monitoring Research and Prevention Branch, who will provide opening remarks. Following her opening remarks, she and senior author, Dr. Manish Patel, will be available to take your questions. I’ll now turn the call over to Dr. Meaney-Delman.

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to talk about a subject that is near and dear to me as a practicing obstetrician, gynecologist: vaccination during pregnancy. Today’s news provides pregnant people and their families with critical information about COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy and the effects on young infants. A new study in MMWR adds to the growing evidence CDC has released on the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines during pregnancy. To date, what we know about the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, has primarily focused on health outcomes for the pregnant person. Data have clearly shown that receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy reduces the risk for infection, severe illness and death from COVID-19 among people who are pregnant. For other diseases like flu and whooping cough, vaccination during pregnancy provides protection for infants during the first six months of their lives.

A period when infants are at high-risk for severe illness, but when they’re not yet old enough to get vaccinated. When people receive an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy, their bodies build antibodies to protect against COVID-19 and these antibodies have been found in umbilical cord blood, indicating that the antibodies have transferred from the pregnant person to the developing infant. And while we know that these antibodies cross the placenta, until this study, we have not yet had data to demonstrate whether these antibodies might provide protection for the baby against COVID-19. The data CDC is publishing today provides real world evidence that getting a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy might help protect infants less than six months of age from hospitalization due to COVID-19. And these findings continue to emphasize the importance of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy to protect people who are pregnant and also to protect their babies from being hospitalized with COVID. Using data from the overcoming COVID-19 network of 20 children’s hospitals across 17 states from July 2021 through mid-January of this year, the authors examined the odds of COVID-19 vaccination, among mothers, whose babies were hospitalized with COVID-19 and compared that with the odds of COVID-19 vaccination among mother, whose babies were hospitalized for other reasons, and did not have COVID.

The study found that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was 61% protective. Meaning that babies less than six months old, whose mothers were vaccinated, were 61% less like to be hospitalized with COVID-19. And in fact, the majority of babies, actually 84% who were hospitalized with COVID-19, were born to people who were not vaccinated during pregnancy. And most concerning, they found that among babies with COVID-19, who were admitted to the ICU, the sickest babies, 88% were born to mothers who were not vaccinated before or during pregnancy. And the one baby who died in the study was born to a mother who was not vaccinated. The bottom line is that maternal vaccination is a really important way to help protect these young infants. Today’s news is highly welcome, particularly in the backdrop of the recent increase in hospitalizations among very young children. This has been the highest of the entire pandemic. Unfortunately, vaccination of infants younger than six months old is not currently on the horizon highlighting, while why vaccination during pregnancy is so important for young infant. COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy has been and continues to be strongly recommended by CDC and by many medical organizations serving pregnant people.

I personally counsel all my pregnant patients that they are more likely to get severely ill and experience pregnancy complications, such as preterm delivery, or even stillbirth from COVID-19 and I strongly encourage them to be vaccinated. They often ask me whether the vaccine protects the baby and this new study will undoubtedly factor into my future counseling sessions. I cannot emphasize enough how today’s findings reinforce the importance of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, both to protect the people who are pregnant and to help protect their babies. CDC recommends that people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now or might become pregnant in the future, get vaccinated and stay up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines through recommended booster doses. Thank you for attention then I will turn it back to you so we can take questions.

Benjamin Haynes:

Thank you, Dr. Meaney-Delman. Brandon, we are ready for questions, please.

Operator:

Thank you. At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one. Please unmute your phone and record your first and last name clearly when prompted your name is required to introduce your question. To withdraw your question, you may press star two. Once again, at this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press star. One moment, please. For our first question, our first question is from Issam Ahmed with AFP, your line is open.

Issam Ahmed:

Thank you for doing this. I saw in the study that the vaccine efficacy appeared to be higher when it was carried out later in the course of the pregnancy might not form the basis for a recommendation for potentially a booster that might would benefit the newborn baby in the future. What are your thoughts on that?

Dr. Patel:

Hey, yes, Issam this is Manish Patel. I can take that question. Yeah. So I think, you know, that’s a good observation. Yeah, first I think I would point out, you know, that the good news is protection was high throughout that vaccination throughout pregnancy at any point in pregnancy and we did look at it by early versus late. We were not able to look at it by trimesters per se, because the numbers were too small, but we did look at it early versus late and noted that point estimates were higher later in pregnancy versus early. And the reason we to do that was to test, you know, the strength of our findings in our study, as you note is an epidemiologic study. And so we try to take as many precautions as we can to reduce bias, but you never can be sure. So this is a good way to test the data. And we know you know, while we can’t be about the biology of how protection happens. If you look at the antibody data, the higher antibody closer to delivery would theoretically lead to higher levels of protection to the baby as the antibody gets transferred from mother to baby. And that’s consistent with what we found. Now I think back to your question of the timing of vaccination, I think that has broader considerations. One being the point you made about boosters, and I’ll let Dr. Meaney-Delman comment on that.

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

So, as we talked about, when thinking about the timing of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, it’s really important that we remember that the benefits of vaccination are both to the mom and we know severe illness can occur with COVID as well as, based on this study to the baby. And while there are some vaccines that are given primarily to protect the baby, COVID-19 vaccines are critical to protect the pregnant individual, the pregnancy, and might actually help protect the baby as well. So we recommend, as do many other medical organizations, to give COVID vaccine at any point during pregnancy. But if we have a woman who comes in in the first trimester and is vaccinated, she can actually be eligible for a booster vaccine later in pregnancy. We still need to study that and how much antibody is conferred with a booster vaccination. And that’s certainly something we’re looking into, but for right now, we want to that we are protecting both the mom and the infant. And so as soon as a pregnant woman is willing to be vaccinated we recommend that she go ahead and do so.

Issam Ahmed:

Thank you.

Benjamin Haynes:

Next question, please.

Operator:

Our next question is from Dennis Thompson with HealthDay, your line is open.

Dennis Thompson:

Yeah, I kind of wanted to follow up on that point regarding the protection apparently being stronger later in pregnancy. You know, I take it that at this point, you guys don’t really want to put forth any recommendations on getting back vaccinated later in pregnancy, because there’s a lot of other health risks that can crop up during pregnancy if you aren’t vaccinated. Is that right? Could you go into that a little bit more in detail?

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

Absolutely. So you’re correct. We are not changing our recommendations to make a recommendation based on timing during pregnancy. And I want to call out, on our CDC data tracker, you can see that we had the highest number of deaths among pregnant people in August and September of 2021. So very recently we had pregnant people in the ICU, very, very sick. We have yet to see what will happen with Omicron and the reduction in cases, but right now we are not changing our recommendation, given that it’s really critically important that pregnant people are protected. So hopefully that clarifies for you.

Benjamin Haynes:

Next question.

Operator:

Next question is from Peter Sullivan with The Hill. Your line is open.

Peter Sullivan:

Hi, thanks. I just had two clarifying questions. First, I noticed the study phrases that as vaccination might help prevent COVID hospitalization and infants. I mean, are you saying it’s, there’s still some uncertainty what that might language, or are you saying it full on does? And secondly, is this only for women who got vaccinated during pregnancy that these results are looking at? Or what if you were vaccinated before you became pregnant? Does that still confer protection to your baby? Thanks.

Dr. Patel:

Yeah. Hey Peter, I can take that question. This is Manish. So your first point on the use of the term, might, you know, it’s really a technical term. This is an epidemiologic study and these aren’t, this is not a clinical trial where you randomize mothers and then follow them and look at their babies, which allows the strongest evidence to say that vaccine is protecting the baby. So the technical jargon really an EPI data is that vaccination was associated with reduced risk of protection. And, you know, that gives us a really a truth check as these data are evolving. And it’s the full body of evidence on the EPI, you know, the biological science, and then of course all the data on protecting the mothers. So if that gives you some background on that question. The second question with regard to whether we looked at vaccination prior to pregnancy. We did not look at vaccination prior to pregnancy because we wanted to isolate the effects of vaccination during pregnancy. The completion of the series, a few mothers did get vaccinated with their first dose prior to pregnancy, but they finished their series with the second dose during pregnancy. But those were small.

Benjamin Haynes:

Next question, please.

Operator:

Our next question is from Amy Ducharme with Time Magazine, your line is open.

Amy Ducharme:

Hi, thank you. I wanted to ask about the historically or traditionally, fairly low vaccination rates against COVID among pregnant people in the U.S. And what the CDC is doing to try to get those rates up as the pandemic continues.

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

Thank you so much for that question. So some exciting news, and you’ll see again, on our data tracker pregnancy page, that in our vaccine safety data link analysis that is on our data tracker. We are seeing increases in vaccination among pregnant persons and persons prior to pregnancy as well. So the numbers are encouraging. They’re not quite where we need them to be, and they do differ by race and ethnicity. We still see about a 53% vaccine coverage rate for non-Hispanic pregnant persons, whereas overall, for all race ethnicities, it’s about 67%. Now, I will say there’s a caveat associated with that, which is this is not national but it is from seven participating academic institutions. So the trend is really, what’s most important that the amount or the number of pregnant women who are being is increasing.

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

So that’s positive. We still have a lot of work to do to get these numbers where we’d like them to be. And there have been tremendous efforts with clinical professional organizations, with hospitals with community based organizations and I think we’re making a difference. I can say when the pandemic, early in the pandemic, I was having trouble convincing pregnant women of the benefits of vaccination. And I think it’s getting easier because they’re hearing it, not only from me, but from their family members who are encouraging them to be vaccinated as well. So really taking a whole of community approach and not just for vaccination during pregnancy, but taking advantage of any opportunity where an individual accesses the medical system, or even the pharmacies. So a whole of community approaches is how we’re approaching this.

Benjamin Haynes:

Next question, please.

Operator:

Our next question is from Lindsey Tanner with Associated Press, your line is open.

Lindsey Tanner:

Thank you. I just need some clarification on whether this data includes, whether this involves breakthrough infections or how these infants became infected.

Dr. Patel:

Hey, Lindsey. Yeah, so your point on breakthrough infections. So, you know, by definition, a breakthrough infection as you know, would be in a person who’s vaccinated ends up getting infected. So here, or infants whose mothers were vaccinated during pregnancy, but did end up getting infected. And so that’s why you get a point estimate of protection of 60%. So some proportion of infants did go on to get Infection and get hospitalized. Does that answer your question?

Lindsey Tanner:

Yes, I guess, I mean, is that how you presume all of them got infected?

Dr. Patel:

Well, some were fully protected and that would be the risk reduction of 60%. So another way to look at it is that 60% of the kids were never infected and hospitalized, 40%. It’s not an easy way to explain that, but some percentage of those infants did get infected and get hospitalized. And that by definition is just a breakthrough infection. If you had a vaccine that protected a hundred percent of the infants, then you would have no breakthrough infections.

Lindsey Tanner:

Right. I meant among the hospitalized infants, I’m wondering if it was the mothers who probably infected them.

Dr. Patel:

I see. Lindsey, we cannot be sure the source of the infection, sorry about that.

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

And Lindsey, this is Dana Meaney-Delman. We know that perinatal transmission is very rare with COVID. So we don’t know how these particular infants were infected, but I will say perinatal transmission of the virus is very rare.

Benjamin Haynes:

Next question, please.

Operator:

Our next question is from Cheyenne Heslett with ABC news. Your line is now open.

Cheyenne Heslett:

Hi, thank you. I know this is a bit beyond the scope of the study, maybe, but I’m curious what you would recommend. Once vaccines for kid over six months are authorized, how that would pair with a mother being vaccinated or boosted while pregnant? Would that play at all into the recommendations for an infant then getting vaccinated once they reach six months?

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

I think it’s, to really make any recommendations, we would need to really look at a lot of different elements of data before we’d make any recommendations on that in general. With vaccinations, there isn’t a relationship between maternal vaccination and vaccination of children. But again, we’d need to look at the data since we follow the science.

Benjamin Haynes:

Brandon, we have time for two more questions.

Operator:

Sure. Our next question is from Lauren Gardner with Politico. Your line is open.

Lauren Gardner:

Hi, thanks for taking my question. Given the limitations in this study on looking at how boosters might have might affect vaccine effectiveness and also pregnant people who might have gotten Johnson and Johnson and then boosted with another vaccine, is that something CDC is planning to look at, or are the sample sizes on that too small? And kind of going off of that, what would you recommend at this moment to those mothers who or mothers to be who have been vaccinated but, you know, aren’t currently eligible for an additional dose because that hasn’t been recommended yet? Like they’re already boosted, waiting to see what more recommendations for more boosters are going to come out.

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

So maybe I’ll take the last question. Oh, sorry. Maybe I’ll take the last question first. And maybe I can ask Dr. Patel if he has comments on the first, but I think it’s premature to, based on these data alone to indicate after someone is fully up to date on their vaccines, meaning they’ve received the primary series and the booster, if they’re eligible, I think it’s premature to make any recommendations for an additional booster. But it’s certainly something we’re continuing to look at. There are large trials that are funded to look at these vaccines in pregnancy. So I do think we need to wait until we have additional data, but this is the first exciting news related to that. In terms of the J&J and the boosting with other vaccines, I mean, we are following up on women who voluntarily enroll in the V-Safe pregnancy registry, and that is a registry that allows women to enroll and then we follow them their infants through the first year of life. We have about 15, almost 16,000, enrolled in the V-Safe registry. And they’re of course other registries that exist. So I think that the issue of boosters is one that we do need more information about, and I think we will have more information upcoming months. I don’t know, Dr. Patel, if you have more to add.

Dr. Patel:

I think I definitely agree with you on your comments. Laura, in terms of the sample size. Yes, you’re absolutely right. I think we just did not have enough mothers with boosters. I think we had 10. We will continue to look at that as we accumulate and accrue the data on boosters. I think it’s fair to say from all of the evidence on boosters, increasing protection and antibody levels, that we should see higher protection, definitely not lower protection with boosters. In terms of J&J, we have too few to look at it. I think only four women had received J&J. So it’s tough to comment on that.

Benjamin Haynes:

Hi, Brandon, we can open it up for a few more questions.

Operator:

Sure. Our next question is from Eliana Block with WUSA9, your line is open.

Eliana Block:

Hello and thank you for taking my call. Yeah, so my question is about, do we know anything about pregnant women who had COVID-19 and recovered and whether or not any of their antibodies transferred to the fetus?

Dr. Patel:

Hey so in this study, we were unable to look at that because we were looking at infants who were hospitalized and did not have the data back on the mother’s history of infections. I don’t know if Dr. Meaney-Delman has other evidence from other places on that.

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

So I think it’s a really great question and it’s one where certain very interested in. We do have the surveillance of emerging threats to moms and babies network at CDC, which is a collaboration with jurisdictions that identify pregnant women who have COVID. And then we follow both the mothers and the infants out to see what happens in terms of health outcomes. So I think we’ll have more data on this specific issue specifically around protection to the infant, but it’s premature at the moment. And as I said, there are some ongoing studies as well when they did compare some antibody levels, not protection, but when they did compare antibody levels in some studies they did show that there was higher antibody levels in when women who are vaccinated compared to women who had COVID. But again, what’s the impact on the infant, we don’t know yet.

Benjamin Haynes:

Next question, please.

Operator:

Our next question is from Brittany Shammas with Washington Post, your line is open.

Brittany Shammas:

Hi, thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to circle back on one thing. I know this particular study didn’t look at people who were vaccinated before pregnancy, but I’m just wondering, is there any other evidence out there to suggest that vaccination prior to pregnancy helps protect the infant? Just wondering if you could talk more about that and whether that’s something the CDC is looking at or has looked at.

Dr. Patel:

So this is Manish. No, you’re right. We, were unable to look at this and part of it is just timing. You know, we enrolled for six months and the vaccine was available prior to that for a few months. So most women were vaccinated during pregnancy in this cohort. I don’t think there’s other data that have looked at vaccination prior to pregnancy and their effects on infants. Dr. Meaney-Delman, are you aware of any?

Dr. Meaney-Delman:

So I’m not aware of specifically immune protection of infants from women who are vaccinated prior to pregnancy, but I do want take this moment to emphasize one point, which is getting COVID during pregnancy is associated with severe illness. So there’s a huge benefit to the pregnancy and to having a healthy mother of getting vaccinated prior to pregnancy. So I don’t want us to lose sight of that piece. While we don’t know that there’s actual immune protection conferred, we know that might protect a mom from getting COVID during pregnancy, which is associated, as I mentioned, with preterm birth, with stillbirth with pregnancy complications. So it’s really a good idea.

Benjamin Haynes:

And our last question, please.

Operator:

Our last question is from Damian McNamara with WebMD and Medscape, your line is open.

Damian McNamara:

Yeah. My question is whether you were able to control for breastfeeding, which might offer some sort of protection during the first six months.

Dr. Patel:

Hey, Damien. So we did ask the question about breastfeeding in the paper itself. However, we did have a lot of non-responses. So a lot of what we call missing data to look at the issue of breastfeeding and its interaction with protection in this study.

Benjamin Haynes:

Thank you, Dr. Meaney-Delman and Dr. Patel, and thank you all for joining us today. If you have further questions, please contact the main media line at 404-639-3286 or email media@cdc.gov. Thank you.

Operator:

Thank you for participating in today’s conference. All lines may disconnect at this time.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Bayo Onanuga battles yet another media – Punch Newspapers

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Bayo Onanuga battles yet another media  Punch Newspapers



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Blood In The Snow Film Festival Celebrates 13 Years!

Published

 on

Blood in the Snow FILM FESTIVAL

Celebrates

13 YEARS

Be Afraid.  Be Very Afraid”

Toronto, on – Blood in the Snow Film Festival (BITS), a unique and imaginative showcase of contemporary Canadian genre films are pleased to announce the popular Festival is back for its 13th exciting year.  The highly anticipated Horror Film festival presented by Super Channel runs November 18th– 23rd at Toronto’s Isabel Bader Theatre  The successful, long running festival takes on many different faces this year that include Scary, Action Horror, Horror Comedy, Sci-Fi and Thrillers.  Festival goers will be kept on the edge of their seats with this year’s powerful line-up.

Blood in the Snow Festival begins with the return of alumni (Wolf Cop) Lowell Deans action horror feature Dark Match featuring wrestling veteran Chris Jericho followed by the mysterious Hunting Mathew Nichols. The unexpected thrills continue with Blood in the Snow World Premiere of Pins and Needles and the Fantasia Best First Feature Award winner, Self Driver.  The festival ends this year on a fun note with the Toronto Premiere of Scared Sh*tless (featuring Kids in the Halls Mark McKinney).  Other titles include the horror anthology series Creepy Bits and Zoom call shock of Invited by Blood in the Snow alumni Navin Ramaswaran (Poor Agnes). The festival will also include five feature length short film programs including the festivals comedy horror program Funny Frights and Unusual Sights and the highly anticipated Dark Visions program, part of opening night festivities.  Blood in the Snow Film Festival Director and Founder, Kelly Michael Stewart anticipates this year’s festival to be its strongest.  This was the first time in our 13 year history, all our programmers agreed on the exact same eight feature programs we have selected.”

Below is this year’s horror fest’s exciting lineup of features and shorts scheduled to screen, in-person at the Isabel Bader theatre. 

**All festival features will be preceded by a short film and followed by a Q&A with filmmakers.

Tickets for the Isabel Bader Theatre lineup on sale now and can be purchased  https://www.bloodinthesnow.ca

Super Channel is pleased to once again assume the role of Presenting Sponsor for the Blood in the Snow Film Festival. We extend our sincere appreciation to the entire BITS team for their unwavering commitment to amplifying the voices of diverse filmmakers and providing a platform for the celebration of Canadian genre content. – Don McDonald, the CEO of Super Channel

Blood in the Snow Festival 2024 Full screening schedule:

Monday November 18th
7pm – Dark Visions

Shiva (13:29) dir. Josh Saltzman

Shiva is an unnerving tale about a recently widowed woman who breaks with a long-held Jewish mourning ritual in hopes of connecting with her deceased husband.

How to Stay Awake (5:30) dir. Vanessa Magic

A woman fights to stay awake, to avoid battling the terrifying realm of sleep paralysis, but as she risks everything to break free, will she be released from the grip of her nocturnal tormentor?

Pocket Princess (9:45) dir. Olivia Loccisano

A young girl must take part in a dangerous task in order to complete her doll collection in this miniature fairytale.

For Rent (10:33) dir. Michèle Kaye

In her new home, Donna unravels a sinister truth—her landlord is a demon with a dark appetite. As her family mysteriously vanishes, Donna confronts the demonic landlord, only to plunge into a shadowy game where the house hungers for more than just occupants. An ominous cycle begins, shrouded in mystery.

Lucys Birthday (9:29) dir. Peter Sreckovic

A father struggles to enjoy his young daughter’s birthday despite a series of strange and disturbing disruptions.

Parasitic (10:00) dir. Ryan M Andrews

Last call at a dive bar, a writer struggling to find his voice gets more than he bargains for.

 Naualli (6:00) dir. Adrian Gonzalez de la Pena

A grieving man seeks revenge, unwittingly awakening a mystical creature known as the Nagual.

The Saint and The Bear (6:34) dir. Dallas R Soonias

Two strangers cross paths on an ominous park bench.

The Sorrow (13:00) dir. Thomas Affolter

A retired army general and his live-in nurse find they are not alone in a house filled with dark secrets.

Cadabra (6:00) dir. Tiffany Wice

An amateur magician receives more than he anticipated when he purchases a cursed hat from the estate of his deceased hero.

9:30 – Dark Match dir. Lowell Dean Horror / Action

A small time WRESTLING COMPANY accepts a well-paying but too good to be true gig.

 

Tuesday November 19th
7pm – Mournful Mediums

Night Lab (15:00) dir. Andrew Ellinas

When a mysterious package arrives from one of the lab’s field research stations, a promising young researcher uncovers a conspiracy against her masterminded by her jealous boss. She soon finds herself having to grapple with her conscience before making a life-or-death decision.

Dirty Bad Wrong (14:40) dir. Erica Orofino

Desperate to keep her promise to host the best superhero party for her 6-year-old, young mother Sid, a sex worker, takes extreme measures and books a last-minute client with a dark fetish.

Midnight at the lonely river (17:00) dir. Abraham Cote

When the lights go out at a seedy little motel bar, at the crossroads of a seedy little town, nefarious happenings are taking place, and three predators are enacting their evil deeds. Enter Vicky, a drifter who quickly realizes whats happening right under everyones nose. After midnight, In the shadows of this dim establishment, evil begets evil, and the predator becomes the prey.

Mean Ends (14:58) dir. Émile Lavoie

A buried body, a missing sister and an inquisitive neighbour makes for a hell of an evening. And the sun isnt close to settling on Erics sh*tty day.

Stuffy (18:26) dir. Dan Nicholls

A young couple sets off in the middle of the night to bury their kid’s stuffed bunny, as one of them is convinced that the stuffy might be cursed.

Dungeon of Death (18:33) dir. Brian P. Rowe

Torturer Raullin loves a work challenge, especially if that challenge involves hurting people to extract information from them.

9:30 – Hunting Matthew Nichols (96 mins) dir. Markian Tarasiuk

Twenty-three years after her brother mysteriously disappeared, a documentary filmmaker sets out to solve his missing person’s case. But when a disturbing piece of evidence is revealed, she comes to believe that her brother might still be alive.

w/ short: Josephine (6:15) dir. John Francis Bregar

A man haunted by his past seeks forgiveness from his deceased wife, but a session with two spirit mediums leads to an unsettling encounter.

Wednesday November 20th
7pm – BITS and BYTES

Ezra (10:57) dirs. Luke Hutchie, Mike Mildon, Marianna Phung

After fleeing the dark and demonic chains of his shadowy old home, Ezra, a killer gay vampire, takes a leap of faith and enters the modern world.

Head Shop (18:14 episode 1-3) dir. Namaï Kham Po

In a post-apocalyptic world, Annas life and work are dominated by her father Sylvestre, a short-tempered mechanic with a terrible reputation for tearing the head off anyone who dares cross him. He decides that shes old enough to follow in his footsteps, much to her dismay. To prove herself, she must now decapitate her first victim. Can she find a way to defy fate?

D dot H (18 :15 episodes 1-2) dirs. Meegwun Fairbrother, Mary Galloway

Struggling artist Doug is visited by the beautiful and enigmatic H, who claims he holds the power to visiting inconceivable places.” Still half-asleep, Doug is shocked when H vanishes suddenly and her doppelganger, Hannah, strides past.

Creepy Bits: Last Sonata (21:08) dir.

Adrian Bobb, Ashlea Wessel, David J. Fernandes, Sid Zanforlin and Kelly Paoli.

Set among forests, lakes, and small towns, Creepy Bits is a horror anthology series helmed by five innovative filmmakers exploring themes of human vs. nature, the invasion and destruction of the natural world by outsiders, and isolation within a vast, eerie landscape that is not afraid to fight back.

Tales from the Void: Whistle in the Woods” (24:36) dir. Francesco Loschiavo

Horror anthology TV series based on stories from r/NoSleep. Each tale blends genre thrills & social commentary exploring the dark side of the human psyche.

9:30 – Self Driver dir. Michael Pierro Thriller

Facing mounting expenses and the unrelenting pressure of modern living, a down-on-his-luck cab driver is lured on to a mysterious new app that promises fast, easy money. As his first night on the job unfolds, he is pulled ever deeper into the dark underbelly of society, embarking on a journey that will test his moral code and shake his understanding of what it means to have freewill. The question becomes not how much money he can make, but what he’ll be compelled to do to make it.
 

w/ short: Northern Escape (10:38) dirs. Lucy Sanci, Alexis Korotash

A couple on a cottage getaway tries to work on their relationship but ends up getting more than they bargained for when they discover something sinister lurking beneath the surface.

Thursday November 21st
7pm – Funny Frights

Midnight Snack (1:41) dir. Sandra Foisy

Hunger always strikes in the dead of night.

Hell is a Teenage Girl (15:00) dir. Stephen Sawchuk

Every Halloween, the small town of Springboro is terrorized by its resident SLASHER – a masked serial killer who targets sinful teenagers that break The Rules of Horror’ – dont drink, dont do drugs, and dont have sex!

Gaslit (10:36) dir. Anna MacLean

A woman goes to dangerous lengths to prove she wasn’t responsible for a fart.

Bath Bomb (9:55) dir. Colin G Cooper

A possessive doctor prepares an ostensibly romantic bath for his narcissistic boyfriend, but after an accusation of infidelity, things take a deeply disturbing turn.

Any Last Words (14:22) dir. Isaac Rathé

A crook trying to flee town is paid an untimely visit by some of his former colleagues. What would you say to save your life if you were staring down the barrel of a gun?

Papier mâché (4:30) dir. Simon Madore

A whimsical depiction of the hard and tumultuous life of a piñata.

The Living Room (9:59) dir. Joslyn Rogers

After an unexpected call from Lady Luck, Ms. Valentine must choose between her sanity and her winnings – all before the jungle consumes her.

A Divine Comedy: What the Hell (8:55) dir. Valerie Lee Barnhart
 Dante’s classic Hell is falling into oblivion. Charlotte,

sharp-witted Harpy, navigates the chaos and sets out despite the odds for a new life and destiny.

Mr Fuzz (2:30) dir. Christopher Walsh

A long-limbed, fuzzy-haired creature will do whatever it takes to keep you watching his show.

Out of the Hands of the Wicked (5:00) dirs. Luke Sargent, Benjamin Hackman

After a harrowing journey home from hell, old Pa boasts of his triumph over evil, and how he came to lock the devil in his heart.

The Shitty Ride (9:13) dir. Cole Doran

Hoping to impress the girl of his dreams, Cole buys a used car but gets more than he bargained for with his shitty ride.

9:30 – Invited dir. Navin Ramaswaran Horror

When a reluctant mother attends her daughter’s Zoom elopement, she and the rest of the family in attendance quickly realize the groom is part of a Russian cult with deadly intentions.

w/ shorts: Defile dir. Brian Sepanzyk

A couple’s secluded getaway is suddenly interrupted by a strange family who exposes them to the horrors that lie beyond the tree line.

 A Mother’s Love dir. Lisa Ovies

A young girl deals with the consequences of trusting someone online.

Friday November 22nd
7:00 pm – Creepy Bits (anthology horror series)

Creepy Bits is a short horror anthology series that explores pandemic age themes of isolation, paranoia and distrust of authority, serving them up in bite-sized chunks. Directed by Adrian Bobb, Ashlea Wessel, David J. Fernandes, Sid Zanforlin and Kelly Paoli.

9:30 – Pins and Needles (81 min) dir. James Villeneuve Horror / Thriller

Follows Max, a diabetic, biology grad student who is entrapped in a devilish new-age wellness experiment and must escape a lethal game of cat and mouse to avoid becoming the next test subject to extend the lives of the rich and privileged.

w/ short: Adjoining (11:42) dirs. Harrison Houde, Dakota Daulby

A couple’s motel stay takes a chilling turn when they discover they’re being observed, leading to unexpected consequences.

Saturday November 23rd
4pm – Emerging Screams (94 mins)

Apnea (14:58) dir. David Matheson

A single, working mother finds her career and her offbeat sons safety in jeopardy when she discovers that her late mother is possessing her in her sleep.

Nereid (7:48) dir. Lori Zozzolotto

A mysterious woman escapes from an abusive relationship with earth shattering results.

BedLamer (15:00) dir. Alexa Jane Jerrett

On the shores of a small fishing village lives a lonely settlement of men – capturing and domesticating otherworldly creatures that were never meant to be tamed.

Blocked (6:30) dir. Aisha Alfa

A new mom is literally consumed with the futility of cleaning up after her kid.

Dance of the Faery (10:23) dir. Kaela Brianna Egert

A young woman cleans up her estranged, great aunt’s home after her death. Upon inspection, she soon realizes that her eccentric obsession with fairies was not born out of love, but of fear.

Deep End (7:36) dir. Juan Pablo Saenz

A gay couple’s heated argument during a hike spiral into a nightmare when one of them vanishes, leading the other to a mysterious cave that could reveal the chilling truth.

Ojichaag – Spirit Within (11:21) dir. Rachel Beaulieu

An emotionally devastated woman seeks comfort in her choice to end her life. As she faces death in the form of a spirit, she must decide to let herself go to fight to stay alive.

Lure (9.56) dir. Jacob Phair

A tormented father awaits the return of the man who saved his son’s life.

Let Me In (10:00) dirs. Joel Buxton, Charles Smith

A reluctant man interviews an unusual immigration candidate: himself from a doomed dimension

7:00 pm –The Silent Planet (95 mins) dir. Jeffrey St. Jules Sci-fi

An aging convict serving out a life sentence alone on a distant planet is forced to confront his past when a new prisoner shows up and pushes him to remember his life on earth

w/ short: Ascension (3:57) dir. Kenzie Yango

Deep in a remote forest, two friends, Mia and Riley, embark on a leisurely hike. As tensions run high between the two, a strange humming noise appears that seems to be coming from somewhere in the woods.

9:30 – Scared Shitless (73 mins) dir. Vivieno Caldinelli Horror / Comedy

A plumber and his germophobic son are forced to get their hands dirty to save the residents of an apartment building, when a genetically engineered, blood-thirsty creature escapes into the plumbing system.
 

w/ short: Oh…Canada (6:20) dir. Vincenzo Nappi

Oh, Canada. Such a wonderful place to live – WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT. A musical look into the artifice surrounding Canadian identity.

 

Tickets for the Isabel Bader Theatre lineup on sale now and can be purchased https://www.bloodinthesnow.ca/#festival

 

Follow “Blood In The Snow” Film Festival:

https://www.instagram.com/bitsfilmfest/

 

Media Inquiries:

Sasha Stoltz Publicity:

Sasha Stoltz | Sasha@sashastoltzpublicity.com | 416.579.4804
https://www.sashastoltzpublicity.com

Continue Reading

Media

It’s time for a Halloween movie marathon. 10 iconic horror films

Published

 on

 

Sometimes, you just have to return to the classics.

That’s especially true as Halloween approaches. While you queue up your spooky movie marathon, here are 10 iconic horror movies from the past 70 years for inspiration, and what AP writers had to say about them when they were first released.

We resurrected excerpts from these reviews, edited for clarity, from the dead — did they stand the test of time?

“Rear Window” (1954)

“Rear Window” is a wonderful trick pulled off by Alfred Hitchcock. He breaks his hero’s leg, sets him up at an apartment window where he can observe, among other things, a murder across the court. The panorama of other people’s lives is laid out before you, as seen through the eyes of a Peeping Tom.

James Stewart, Grace Kelly, Thelma Ritter and others make it good fun.

— Bob Thomas

“Halloween” (1978)

At 19, Jamie Lee Curtis is starring in a creepy little thriller film called “Halloween.”

Until now, Jamie’s main achievement has been as a regular on the “Operation Petticoat” TV series. Jamie is much prouder of “Halloween,” though it is obviously an exploitation picture aimed at the thrill market.

The idea for “Halloween” sprang from independent producer-distributor Irwin Yablans, who wanted a terror-tale involving a babysitter. John Carpenter and Debra Hill fashioned a script about a madman who kills his sister, escapes from an asylum and returns to his hometown intending to murder his sister’s friends.

— Bob Thomas

“The Silence of the Lambs” (1991)

“The Silence of the Lambs” moves from one nail-biting sequence to another. Jonathan Demme spares the audience nothing, including closeups of skinned corpses. The squeamish had best stay home and watch “The Cosby Show.”

Ted Tally adapted the Thomas Harris novel with great skill, and Demme twists the suspense almost to the breaking point. The climactic confrontation between Clarice Starling and Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine) is carried a tad too far, though it is undeniably exciting with well-edited sequences.

Such a tale as “The Silence of the Lambs” requires accomplished actors to pull it off. Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins are highly qualified. She provides steely intelligence, with enough vulnerability to sustain the suspense. He delivers a classic portrayal of pure, brilliant evil.

— Bob Thomas

“Scream” (1996)

In this smart, witty homage to the genre, students at a suburban California high school are being killed in the same gruesome fashion as the victims in the slasher films they know by heart.

If it sounds like the script of every other horror movie to come and go at the local movie theater, it’s not.

By turns terrifying and funny, “Scream” — written by newcomer David Williamson — is as taut as a thriller, intelligent without being self-congratulatory, and generous in its references to Wes Craven’s competitors in gore.

— Ned Kilkelly

“The Blair Witch Project” (1999)

Imaginative, intense and stunning are a few words that come to mind with “The Blair Witch Project.”

“Blair Witch” is the supposed footage found after three student filmmakers disappear in the woods of western Maryland while shooting a documentary about a legendary witch.

The filmmakers want us to believe the footage is real, the story is real, that three young people died and we are witnessing the final days of their lives. It isn’t. It’s all fiction.

But Eduardo Sanchez and Dan Myrick, who co-wrote and co-directed the film, take us to the edge of belief, squirming in our seats the whole way. It’s an ambitious and well-executed concept.

— Christy Lemire

“Saw” (2004)

The fright flick “Saw” is consistent, if nothing else.

This serial-killer tale is inanely plotted, badly written, poorly acted, coarsely directed, hideously photographed and clumsily edited, all these ingredients leading to a yawner of a surprise ending. To top it off, the music’s bad, too.

You could forgive all (well, not all, or even, fractionally, much) of the movie’s flaws if there were any chills or scares to this sordid little horror affair.

But “Saw” director James Wan and screenwriter Leigh Whannell, who developed the story together, have come up with nothing more than an exercise in unpleasantry and ugliness.

— David Germain

Germain gave “Saw” one star out of four.

“Paranormal Activity” (2009)

The no-budget ghost story “Paranormal Activity” arrives 10 years after “The Blair Witch Project,” and the two horror movies share more than a clever construct and shaky, handheld camerawork.

The entire film takes place at the couple’s cookie-cutter dwelling, its layout and furnishings indistinguishable from just about any other readymade home constructed in the past 20 years. Its ordinariness makes the eerie, nocturnal activities all the more terrifying, as does the anonymity of the actors adequately playing the leads.

The thinness of the premise is laid bare toward the end, but not enough to erase the horror of those silent, nighttime images seen through Micah’s bedroom camera. “Paranormal Activity” owns a raw, primal potency, proving again that, to the mind, suggestion has as much power as a sledgehammer to the skull.

— Glenn Whipp

Whipp gave “Paranormal Activity” three stars out of four.

“The Conjuring” (2013)

As sympathetic, methodical ghostbusters Lorraine and Ed Warren, Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson make the old-fashioned haunted-house horror film “The Conjuring” something more than your average fright fest.

“The Conjuring,” which boasts incredulously of being their most fearsome, previously unknown case, is built very in the ’70s-style mold of “Amityville” and, if one is kind, “The Exorcist.” The film opens with a majestic, foreboding title card that announces its aspirations to such a lineage.

But as effectively crafted as “The Conjuring” is, it’s lacking the raw, haunting power of the models it falls shy of. “The Exorcist” is a high standard, though; “The Conjuring” is an unusually sturdy piece of haunted-house genre filmmaking.

— Jake Coyle

Coyle gave “The Conjuring” two and half stars out of four.

Read the full review here.

“Get Out” (2017)

Fifty years after Sidney Poitier upended the latent racial prejudices of his white date’s liberal family in “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner,” writer-director Jordan Peele has crafted a similar confrontation with altogether more combustible results in “Get Out.”

In Peele’s directorial debut, the former “Key and Peele” star has — as he often did on that satirical sketch series — turned inside out even supposedly progressive assumptions about race. But Peele has largely left comedy behind in a more chilling portrait of the racism that lurks beneath smiling white faces and defensive, paper-thin protestations like, “But I voted for Obama!” and “Isn’t Tiger Woods amazing?”

It’s long been a lamentable joke that in horror films — never the most inclusive of genres — the Black dude is always the first to go. In this way, “Get Out” is radical and refreshing in its perspective.

— Jake Coyle

Coyle gave “Get Out” three stars out of four.

Read the full review here.

“Hereditary” (2018)

In Ari Aster’s intensely nightmarish feature-film debut “Hereditary,” when Annie (Toni Collette), an artist and mother of two teenagers, sneaks out to a grief-support group following the death of her mother, she lies to her husband Steve (Gabriel Byrne) that she’s “going to the movies.”

A night out with “Hereditary” is many things, but you won’t confuse it for an evening of healing and therapy. It’s more like the opposite.

Aster’s film, relentlessly unsettling and pitilessly gripping, has carried with it an ominous air of danger and dread: a movie so horrifying and good that you have to see it, even if you shouldn’t want to, even if you might never sleep peacefully again.

The hype is mostly justified.

— Jake Coyle

Coyle gave “Hereditary” three stars out of four.

Read the full review here. ___

Researcher Rhonda Shafner contributed from New York.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version