Trudeau once again doubled-down on his party’s view, saying it would be “irresponsible” for lawmakers to sit amid the COVID-19 outbreak.
“We are in a situation where our public health authorities, our experts and common sense tells us we need to continue to limit our movements,” he told reporters on Sunday. “We need to continue to work from home, we need to continue to do everything we can to ensure that people are kept safe from further spread of this pandemic.”
Without unanimous consent from parties on an alternative arrangement, Parliament is scheduled resume on Monday, meaning up to 338 MPs and their staff would gather in Ottawa.
Coronavirus outbreak: Trudeau says Canada-U.S. land border closure extended by 30 days amid COVID-19 pandemic
Public health officials have advised all Canadians to avoid gathering in groups, and have urged against all non-essential travel.
According to Trudeau, his government has proposed meeting “in some fashion” once a week, and to hold virtual sittings once the technology is available.
Live updates: Coronavirus in Canada
“We have proposed and it’s been accepted — largely accepted by the other opposition parties that we should have accountability measures,” Trudeau said. “We should have parliament that functions, but we have to do it responsibly, and that’s why coming back every week for questions and for work on passing new legislation is something that I think is reasonable and is acceptable to most parties.”
Trudeau said he is “perfectly happy” to take questions from media each day, and is “looking forward to taking questions from opposition parties.”
“But it has to be done in a responsible way,” he said. “And right now, the Conservatives are not taking a responsible approach.”
What has the opposition said?
A spokesperson for NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said in a statement to Global News on Saturday that smaller meetings of Parliament — such as the ones held to pass the emergency COVID-19 aid packages — combined with some virtual meetings “likely give us a path forward.”
The party said there needs to be a way for opposition members to ask questions of the prime minister and cabinet.
“We will keep working with the other parties to get this done and make sure we can deliver for Canadians while respecting the best advice from public health experts,” the statement reads.
What’s more, in a tweet on Saturday Elizabeth May, former Green Party Leader and MP for Saanich-Gulf Islands, said the Greens would not give unanimous consent for calling Parliament together frequently “until Public Health advice says it makes sense.”
“Giving the Conservatives a spotlight in QP is not a reason to reconvene,” she wrote.
Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer told a briefing on Sunday that it is “disingenuous” to suggest all 338 MPs would be present on Monday.
“Only 20 MPs are required for quorum and pretending otherwise to try to force the opposition to accept a bad deal is wrong,” he said. “One sitting each week is unacceptable, even if it is eventually supplemented by a virtual sitting.”
Coronavirus outbreak: Canadian government to allocate over $306 million to Indigenous businesses
The Conservatives say several meetings a week are needed to hold the government to account.
Scheer said during the last two emergency sessions, 32 MPs were in attendance.
“This allowed us to follow public health advice and still carry out our duties,” he said. “Both times, Conservatives representing ridings from all over the country participated in the debate, and we got better results for Canadians because of it.”
He said his party is proposing that model be implemented three times a week to “ensure Canadians get the real help they need.”
“There must be oversight and accountability,” he said.
Asked by reporters on Sunday if a deal had been reached, Trudeau said no, but that he felt they were “very close.”
“I think it seems very, very reasonable that we can agree that there needs to be a Parliament that is functioning responsibly in this difficult time,” he said. “Most parties have responsible proposals forward, and I certainly hope that the Conservatives will agree to doing the responsible thing here.”
Coronavirus outbreak: Parliament should be considered an ‘essential service’ Scheer says
According to the latest numbers released by the Public Health Agency of Canada, as of Sunday at 11 a.m., 33,922 cases of COVID-19 had been confirmed across the country.
The majority of cases have been reported in Quebec and Ontario which have recorded 17,521 and 10,578 infections respectively.
So far, the virus has claimed 1,506 lives in Canada.
© 2020 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
COVID-19 has Canada’s banks worried about sickly loans
If Canada’s big banks are the canary in the coal mine for the economy as a whole, then there was some good news this week, and some less good news.
While the COVID-19 pandemic wreaked havoc on Canadian society, Canada’s five biggest lenders — Royal Bank, Bank of Montreal, Scotiabank, CIBC and TD — remained profitable even as they set aside billions of dollars to offset possible losses from loans that might go bad in the coming months.
It was expected that measures to contain the pandemic, such as school and business closures, border shutdowns and travel restrictions, would grind economic activity to a halt, but the banks’ quarterly financial results for the three-month period up to April 30 were hotly anticipated because they are a deep dive into just how bad the economy was really doing.
If businesses like manufacturers, oil and gas companies, retailers and tech startups are having trouble paying their bills, that tends to show up at the big banks, which lend them money.
Analysts say one of the best ways of gauging how companies are doing is by paying attention to a banking metric known as loan loss provisions. That’s a complicated-sounding term for a fundamentally simple concept: how much banks set aside to pay for loans on their books they think might not get paid back.
Not all those loans will turn into losses. But paying attention to how much the banks are setting aside just in case is an excellent proxy for how worried they are.
Combined, Canada’s big five lenders set aside almost $11 billion last quarter to cover loans that aren’t currently being paid off as planned. That’s almost five times as much as they had set aside for bad loans in the same three-month period last year.
That’s the bad news. The good news? “They were bad, but not as bad as feared,” said Jim Shanahan, an analyst with investment firm Edward Jones who covers Canada’s big banks.
Considering the massive number of layoffs, business closures and the glacial pace of trade flows across the Canada-U.S. border due to COVID-19, there were fears that loan losses could have been “at levels that we would never have contemplated,” Shanahan said.
But that didn’t happen.
It’s equally important to note that even in all this, the banks are still making money. Collectively, the banks raked in nearly $5 billion in profits over the three months. That’s well below their usual pace, but Shanahan said there was “almost a collective sigh of relief” that the banks were still profitable.
Art Johnson, the founder of Calgary-based SmartBe Wealth, is one of the few money managers in Canada who doesn’t think shares in Canadian bank stocks are always worth buying, but even he admits their week went a lot better than it could have gone.
“When I look at the numbers, they’re bad,” he said in an interview. “There’s no two ways around it, these numbers are bad, [but] markets don’t look at bad or good, they look at better or worse.”
That explains what the banks’ stock prices did this week. Typically lower profits would have sent bank shares tumbling, but shares in all five were sharply up as investors breathed that sigh of relief that Shanahan was talking about.
“People were expecting a lot worse, and they were better than worse in all facets,” Johnson said.
Not out of the woods yet
While he understands why the bank stocks rallied with relief, Johnson thinks that exhale may be premature as the real pain in the economy may not show up on the banks’ books for another few months, once mortgage payment deferrals run out, and massive government progams supplementing income to laid-off workers expire.
“We’ll start to see the real impact of this three [or] four months down the road, and that’ll be where … it’ll be interesting for markets,” he said.
One of the best ways of gauging how optimistic the banks are about their future is to look at their dividend payments.
Canada’s big banks are known as reliable dividend-paying machines, slowly and methodically nudging up their payments to shareholders every few quarters for more than a century. Those big bank dividends are so rock-solid that TD and Scotiabank somehow managed to hike theirs even in the middle of the financial crisis in 2009.
The banks love to hike their dividends because investors love that extra income. But banks won’t do it unless they are confident they’ll be able to sustain the higher level in perpetuity — a harsh lesson that Quebec-focused bank Laurentian learned this week when it cut its payout, the first dividend slash by a Canadian lender that big in almost 30 years.
If dividend payouts are the best barometer of the financial health of Canada’s big banks — and, by extension, the economy — then the fact that none of them saw the need to cut this time around is an encouraging sign.
Those quarterly payouts look as rock-solid as ever, but even the banks admit the future still looks uncertain.
The CEO of National Bank, a distant sixth in the five-horse race atop Canadian banking, phrased it in a, well, enterprising fashion.
“This is Star Trek finance,” Louis Vachon said on a conference call with analysts to discuss the bank’s quarter, in which it booked one-third less profit and set aside five times more money for bad loans.
“We would describe the current environment as going where no one has gone before.”
Canada’s economy has managed to live long and prosper for decades on the backs of its biggest lenders, but Vachon makes it clear that those same banks are still keeping their shields up for now.
“We’re still watching for the Klingons [because] we’re not out of this crisis yet.”
Edited BY Harry Miller
Planning a Canadian vacation? Some provinces may be off limits. Here's what you need to know – CBC.ca
This summer, many Canadians may choose to explore their own country due to closed borders and concerns about contracting COVID-19 while travelling abroad.
“People will be sticking closer to home, going out in the cars because they [have] control. It’s their bubble,” said Allison Wallace, spokesperson for travel agency Flight Centre.
But before hitting the road or booking a flight, it’s important to first check the rules of the province you want to visit.
Currently, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and the territories are banning visitors from other provinces.
Provinces in the rest of Canada are advising against non-essential travel, but their borders are still open to Canadian travellers.
Visitors to Manitoba and Nova Scotia, however, will first have to self-isolate for 14-days — a rule that’s likely to keep many people away.
Staying close to home safest bet
Provinces may ease — or tighten — their travel rules this summer, depending on their COVID-19 numbers, so it’s also important to stay up-to-date on your desired destination.
“Everybody is navigating this differently based on the situation they have locally, so we may see some provinces move at a different pace than others,” said Elliott Silverstein with CAA Insurance. The CAA — the Canadian Automobile Association — provides both auto and travel services.
And if the current restrictions and advisories remain, your safest bet this summer may be to stay close to home.
“If these barriers — if they’re not removed — it will effectively lead people … to travel within your own province,” said Silverstein.
The current travel rules for each province are listed below. Note that Canadians entering any province from another country must self-isolate for 14 days upon arrival.
N.B., N.L. and P.E.I.
In New Brunswick and P.E.I., peace officers stationed at land border crossings are authorized to turn travellers away if they attempt to enter.
“It goes against Islanders’ nature to not welcome visitors to the province, but it is what is needed at this time,” said P.E.I. government spokesperson Vickie Tse in an email.
However, the island is set to make an exception for some out-of-towners: Canadians with seasonal properties on P.E.I. can request entry by submitting an application on June 1. Those who get approval will be allowed to drive through New Brunswick to get to P.E.I.
New Brunswick may also let in cottage owners from other provinces sometime this summer.
Provinces shutting their borders to fellow Canadians has raised concerns from both legal experts and some travellers.
Kim Taylor of Halifax was devastated when Newfoundland and Labrador refused her request earlier this month to attend her mother’s funeral in the province. She was allowed in 11 days later — after speaking publicly about her case.
Last week, Taylor and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association launched a court challenge against Newfoundland and Labrador, alleging its border ban is unconstitutional.
The Newfoundland and Labrador government told CBC News it couldn’t comment on a case before the courts.
WATCH | Travel bubbles considered for regions with low COVID-19 cases:
Residents in Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick and P.E.I. can visit other parts of Canada, but must self-isolate for 14 days upon their return — a high price to pay for an out-of-province vacation.
Residents may also pay a high price if they break the rules. A New Brunswick doctor recently travelled to Quebec for personal reasons, didn’t self-isolate when he returned and wound up infecting at least eight other New Brunswickers with COVID-19. He has since been suspended from practising in the province.
Man. and N.S.
Anyone visiting Manitoba or Nova Scotia — or returning from a trip to another province — must self-isolate for 14 days. Travellers driving through Manitoba are asked to stop only when necessary to access essential services.
Manitoba has also banned non-essential travel to its northern and remote regions to help prevent the COVID-19 spread in the province.
Alta., B.C., Ont., Que. and Sask.
Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan aren’t banning travellers from other provinces or mandating that they self-isolate for 14 days. However, they all advise against non-essential travel at this time.
Don’t cross the border. We love our Quebec neighbours, but just wait until this is all over.– Ontario Premier Doug Ford
“Don’t cross the border. We love our Quebec neighbours, but just wait until this is all over,” Ontario Premier Doug Ford stated earlier this month when asked about Quebecers visiting Ontario.
If you do decide to visit Alberta, B.C. or Saskatchewan, don’t plan on pitching a tent at a provincially run campground; until further notice, their campsites will only be available to residents in their province.
Quebec and Saskatchewan have also restricted non-essential travel to certain remote northern regions in their province as a precautionary measure during the pandemic.
Anyone entering Saskatchewan from another part of Canada is advised to self-monitor their health for 14 days and to self-isolate at the first sign of any COVID-19 symptoms.
What about the territories?
Canada surpasses 7,000 coronavirus deaths – CKNW News Talk 980
The coronavirus pandemic has now claimed more than 7,000 lives in Canada.
The number of fatalities reached 7,073 on Saturday, after Quebec released its latest figures.
The province announced 76 deaths, along with 419 new cases of the virus.
COVID-19, the disease caused by the virus, has infected more than 90,000 people in Canada, with a little more than half of the cases diagnosed in Quebec. Nearly 1.7 million Canadians have been tested for the virus.
Public health officials have said that most of Canada’s deaths have occurred in long-term care facilities.
The Canadian Forces deployed members to Ontario and Quebec in order to help care for residents last month. The soldiers recently sounded the alarm over poor conditions in some homes.
Despite increasing death tolls and case counts, the rate of infection appears to be slowing in most provinces, and many have taken gradual steps toward reopening in recent weeks.
The new coronavirus was formally identified in January after Wuhan, China, saw a cluster of pneumonia cases that were not associated with any known virus. The illness caused by the virus was later dubbed COVID-19.
COVID-19 was declared a pandemic on March 11.
The disease has wrought havoc on economies around the world and prompted widespread shutdowns of non-essential businesses, schools and workplaces.
Coronavirus outbreak: United States officially passes 100,000 COVID-19 deaths
Earlier this week, the U.S. exceeded 100,000 deaths due to the pandemic. And overall, more than 5.9 million people around the world have been diagnosed, according to a tally kept by Johns Hopkins University.
The global death toll stands at more than 365,000.
© 2020 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
Bond Traders Glimpse Yields' Liftoff Potential as Economy Wakens – BNNBloomberg.ca
Birds that come by looking for real-estate (8 photos) – BradfordToday
Alberta's campers turn to public land due to COVID-19 – CBC.ca
- Science17 hours ago
After weather delay, SpaceX set for second try at first crewed launch Saturday
- Sports11 hours ago
Maple Leafs-Blue Jackets Qualifying Round debated
- Sports6 hours ago
UFC on ESPN 9 in tweets: Pros react to Gilbert Burns’ domination of ex-champ Tyron Woodley – MMA Fighting
- Health8 hours ago
344 new coronavirus cases, 41 deaths in Ontario as total cases rise to 27210
- Media11 hours ago
China media bristles at U.S. moves on Hong Kong over national security push
- Business21 hours ago
‘Final nail in the coffin’ of 2020 cruise ship season in Victoria due to COVID-19 – CHEK
- Science15 hours ago
Trump space speech in Florida likely to test apolitical nature of NASA – Ars Technica
- Health11 hours ago
COVID-19 outbreak declared at farm in Norfolk County