President Donald Trump is poised to sign a deal with China on Wednesday that leaves significant tariffs in place and for the first time would punish Beijing if it fails to deliver on pledges related to its currency, intellectual property and the trade balance.
But the question set to dog Trump the moment the ink dries is whether the pact will rewire the relationship between the world’s biggest economies. For many in Washington, U.S.-China economic ties have become an example of the evils of globalization, the tensions of 21st century technology and geopolitics, and the missteps of past presidents.
The “phase-one” deal that Trump recently called a “big, beautiful monster” is by no means a standard trade agreement: At 86 pages, it’s thinner than most on substance and commitments. The U.S. agreed to halve 15 per cent duties on US$120 billion of imports and delay others in return for Chinese promises to make structural reforms and purchase an additional US$200 billion in American goods and services over the next two years. The full text will be released Wednesday.
Still, it avoids major issues at the heart of China’s model of state capitalism, such as restraining industrial subsidies and state-owned companies, to future phases. Punitive tariffs are expected to remain on almost two-thirds of U.S. imports from China — some US$360 billion in goods — until at least November’s election: Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Tuesday the U.S. would only consider more tariff relief if China signs a phase-two trade deal.
“This is an enormous achievement for the president and the economic team,” Mnuchin told reporters in Washington, adding that no firm date was set for phase-two trade talks to begin. Vice Premier Liu He, China’s top trade negotiator and President Xi Jinping’s main economic adviser, will be leading the Chinese delegation at the signing ceremony.
Different By Design
The deal also embraces a level of Socialist-style central planning that would have made past American presidents wince.
While trade pacts traditionally set the rules and leave the details of actual commerce to markets, the one that Trump’s team has negotiated includes a classified annex that details the US$200 billion Chinese buying spree. That includes some US$32 billion in additional purchases of American farm exports and $50 billion in natural gas and crude oil, according to people briefed on its contents.
The administration insists the different nature of the deal is by design and that it won’t need the approval of Congress. “This is not a free trade agreement,” it told supporters in a memo last month. “Its purpose is to rectify unfair trade practices.”
The failure to address issues like industrial subsidies prompted some China experts to insist the deal falls short of Trump’s promises and raise questions over whether the economic pain it has yielded in some sectors of the U.S. economy was worth it.
“I’m prepared to be disappointed by underwhelming details, but I’d love to be surprised with previously unreported major Chinese concessions that would make this long and windy trade conflict feel worth it,” said Scott Kennedy, an expert on U.S.-China economic relations at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Read: Questions remain over whether Beijing will live the deal
Supporters of the president and former aides argue Trump has been able to accomplish many of the goals he set when he began to push China to embrace a new round of economic reforms in 2017.
Victory for Trump, Xi?
“It’s a major victory for the president,” said Stephen Vaughn, who until last year helped oversee Trump’s trade policies as the general counsel and right-hand man to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer. “He has gotten China to make stronger commitments than it has made in previous agreements.”
For Xi, the deal stops the bleeding on a nearly two-year trade war at a time when he’s facing an economy growing at the slowest pace in three decades and unprecedented protests in Hong Kong. He struck an optimistic tone at the start of 2020, touting “extraordinary Chinese splendor and Chinese strength.”
“In the face of severe and complex domestic and foreign situations and various risks and challenges, we have been able to move forward firmly,” Xi told party leaders last week.
But a host of complications remain. The U.S. and China are poised for heightened confrontation on industrial policies, geopolitical hot spots like Taiwan and the South China Sea, and Beijing’s detention camps for ethnic Uighur Muslims in China’s far western region of Xinjiang — all areas that Xi’s critics say could’ve been handled better.
The most likely immediate flash point is the future of 5G and the fate of Huawei Technologies Co., China’s flagship tech company. The Trump administration is considering steps to further limit the ability of U.S. companies to supply Huawei, in addition to pressuring countries around the world to avoid using its equipment for 5G mobile networks.
Huawei isn’t a “chess piece,” and questions on its access to U.S. markets won’t be dealt with in this or any subsequent trade deals, Mnuchin said Wednesday on CNBC.
Trump Economy
Trump, meanwhile, is marching defiantly into an election year despite his impeachment by focusing on an economy that is continuing to grow robustly, albeit at a slower pace. A majority of Americans – 51 per cent – for the first time credited Trump for having either “strongly” or “somewhat” helped the U.S. economy, according to results of a survey released last week by the Financial Times and the Peter G Peterson Foundation.
That represents a seven-point jump from the same survey conducted in November, ahead of the Dec. 13 announcement of a finalized trade deal. The survey also showed voters were attuned to the trade war, with more than three-quarters of Americans saying it had a “very strong” or “somewhat strong” impact on the economy.
The president has also used the deal as a cudgel to attack Democratic rivals, frequently arguing that the Chinese got the better of former President Barack Obama when leading Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden served as his vice president. During the same campaign rally last week in Toledo at which he hailed his “beautiful monster,” Trump mocked South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg as unable to confront China.
“Can you believe Mayor Pete? This is going to be the President of the United States? How would he be against negotiating against President Xi of China?” Trump said. “And we just made one hell of a deal.”
TORONTO – Cineplex Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year ago as it was hit by a fine for deceptive marketing practices imposed by the Competition Tribunal.
The movie theatre company says it lost $24.7 million or 39 cents per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with a profit of $29.7 million or 40 cents per diluted share a year earlier.
The results in the most recent quarter included a $39.2-million provision related to the Competition Tribunal decision, which Cineplex is appealing.
The Competition Bureau accused the company of misleading theatregoers by not immediately presenting them with the full price of a movie ticket when they purchased seats online, a view the company has rejected.
Revenue for the quarter totalled $395.6 million, down from $414.5 million in the same quarter last year, while theatre attendance totalled 13.3 million for the quarter compared with nearly 15.7 million a year earlier.
Box office revenue per patron in the quarter climbed to $13.19 compared with $12 in the same quarter last year, while concession revenue per patron amounted to $9.85, up from $8.44 a year ago.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.
TORONTO – Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported net income of US$357 million for its third quarter, down from US$364 million in the same quarter last year.
The company, which keeps its books in U.S. dollars, says its profit amounted to 79 cents US per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with 79 cents US per diluted share a year earlier.
Revenue for the parent company of Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes and Firehouse Subs, totalled US$2.29 billion, up from US$1.84 billion in the same quarter last year.
Consolidated comparable sales were up 0.3 per cent.
On an adjusted basis, Restaurant Brands says it earned 93 cents US per diluted share in its latest quarter, up from an adjusted profit of 90 cents US per diluted share a year earlier.
The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 95 cents US per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.
ST. JOHN’S, N.L. – Fortis Inc. reported a third-quarter profit of $420 million, up from $394 million in the same quarter last year.
The electric and gas utility says the profit amounted to 85 cents per share for the quarter ended Sept. 30, up from 81 cents per share a year earlier.
Fortis says the increase was driven by rate base growth across its utilities, and strong earnings in Arizona largely reflecting new customer rates at Tucson Electric Power.
Revenue in the quarter totalled $2.77 billion, up from $2.72 billion in the same quarter last year.
On an adjusted basis, Fortis says it earned 85 cents per share in its latest quarter, up from an adjusted profit of 84 cents per share in the third quarter of 2023.
The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 82 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.