U.S. Economy Shows Another Decline, Fanning Recession Fears - The New York Times | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

U.S. Economy Shows Another Decline, Fanning Recession Fears – The New York Times

Published

 on


Gross domestic product, in an initial reading, fell 0.2 percent in the second quarter. President Biden said any troubles would be transitory.




#g-gdp-quarterly-change-box ,
#g-gdp-quarterly-change-box .g-artboard
margin:0 auto;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-box p
margin:0;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-box .g-aiAbs
position:absolute;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-box .g-aiImg
position:absolute;
top:0;
display:block;
width:100% !important;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-box .g-aiSymbol
position: absolute;
box-sizing: border-box;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-box .g-aiPointText p white-space: nowrap;
#g-gdp-quarterly-change-335
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-335 p
font-family:nyt-franklin,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;
font-weight:500;
line-height:12px;
height:auto;
opacity:1;
letter-spacing:0em;
font-size:12px;
text-align:left;
color:rgb(128,128,128);
top:1px;
position:static;
text-transform:none;
padding-bottom:0;
padding-top:0;
mix-blend-mode:normal;
font-style:normal;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-335 .g-pstyle0
height:12px;
text-align:right;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-335 .g-pstyle1
height:12px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-335 .g-pstyle2
font-weight:700;
line-height:15px;
height:15px;
font-size:14px;
text-align:center;
color:rgb(0,0,0);
top:1.1px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-335 .g-pstyle3
font-weight:700;
height:12px;
color:rgb(0,0,0);
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-335 .g-pstyle4
font-weight:300;
height:12px;
color:rgb(51,51,51);
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-335 .g-pstyle5
height:12px;
text-align:center;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-600
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-600 p
font-family:nyt-franklin,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;
font-weight:500;
line-height:14px;
height:auto;
opacity:1;
letter-spacing:0em;
font-size:13px;
text-align:left;
color:rgb(128,128,128);
top:1px;
position:static;
text-transform:none;
padding-bottom:0;
padding-top:0;
mix-blend-mode:normal;
font-style:normal;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-600 .g-pstyle0
height:14px;
text-align:right;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-600 .g-pstyle1
height:14px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-600 .g-pstyle2
font-weight:700;
line-height:18px;
height:18px;
font-size:16px;
text-align:center;
color:rgb(0,0,0);
top:1.3px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-600 .g-pstyle3
font-weight:700;
line-height:15px;
height:15px;
font-size:14px;
color:rgb(0,0,0);
top:1.1px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-600 .g-pstyle4
height:14px;
color:rgb(51,51,51);
position:relative;

#g-gdp-quarterly-change-600 .g-pstyle5
height:14px;
text-align:center;
position:relative;

+8

%

Gross domestic product

+6

+4

+2

0

–0.2%

2nd

quarter

2022

–2

–4

–6

–8

’06

’08

’10

’12

’14

’16

’18

’20

’22

+8

%

Gross domestic product

+6

+4

+2

0

–0.2%

2nd

quarter

2022

–2

–4

–6

–8

’06

’08

’10

’12

’14

’16

’18

’20

’22


Quarterly changes in real gross domestic product

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

By The New York Times

A key measure of economic output fell for the second straight quarter, raising fears that the United States could be entering a recession — or perhaps that one had already begun.

Gross domestic product, adjusted for inflation, fell 0.2 percent in the second quarter, the Commerce Department said Thursday. That drop followed a decline of 0.4 percent in the first quarter. The estimates for both periods will be revised in coming months as government statisticians get more complete data.

News of the back-to-back contractions heightened a debate in Washington over whether a recession had begun and, if so, whether President Biden was to blame. Economists largely say that conditions do not meet the formal definition of a recession but that the risks of one are rising.

For most people, though, a “recession” label matters less than the economic reality: Growth is slowing, businesses are pulling back and families are having a harder time keeping up with rapidly rising prices.

“We’re absolutely losing momentum,” said Tim Quinlan, a senior economist for Wells Fargo. “Income gains at minimum have struggled to keep pace with inflation, and that’s what is chipping away at people’s ability to spend.”

A deceleration, on its own, isn’t necessarily bad news. The Federal Reserve has been trying to cool the economy in a bid to tame inflation, and the White House has argued that the slowdown is part of an inevitable and necessary transition to sustainable growth after last year’s rapid recovery.

“Coming off of last year’s historic economic growth — and regaining all the private-sector jobs lost during the pandemic crisis — it’s no surprise that the economy is slowing down as the Federal Reserve acts to bring down inflation,” Mr. Biden said in a statement issued after the release of the G.D.P. report. “But even as we face historic global challenges, we are on the right path, and we will come through this transition stronger and more secure.”

President Biden said that the findings of the gross domestic product report were “consistent with the transition to a stable, steady growth.”Tom Brenner for The New York Times

Still, forecasters in recent weeks have become increasingly concerned that the Fed’s aggressive moves — including raising interest rates three-quarters of a percentage point on Wednesday for the second month in a row — will result in a recession.

Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chairman, acknowledged that the path to avoiding a downturn was “narrowing,” in part because of global forces, including the war in Ukraine and strict pandemic policies in China, that are beyond the central bank’s control.

“When you’re skating on thin ice, you wonder about what it would take to push you through, and we’re on thin ice right now,” said Diane Swonk, the chief economist for KPMG.

Matthew Martin, 32, is paying more for the butter and eggs that go into the intricately decorated sugar cookies he sells as part of a home business. At the same time, his sales are falling.

“I guess people don’t have as much money to toss at cookies right now,” he said.

Mr. Martin, a single father of two, is trying to cut back on spending, but it isn’t easy. He has replaced trips to the movies with day hikes, but that means spending more on gas. He is hoping to sell his house and move into a less expensive place, but finding a house he can afford to buy has proved difficult, especially as mortgage rates have risen. He has thought about finding a conventional 9-to-5 job to pay the bills, but he would then need to pay for child care for his 4-year-old twins.

“Honestly, I’m not 100 percent sure what I’m going to do,” he said.

When G.D.P. fell in the first three months of the year, some dismissed the decline as a fluke, the result of quirks in how the government accounts for spending and investment. Underlying measures of demand remained solid, and many economists thought it was likely that the first-quarter data would eventually be revised to show a modest gain.

The second-quarter decline, though milder, is harder to dismiss. Home building dropped sharply, business investment stalled and after-tax income, adjusted for inflation, fell. Consumer spending, the bedrock of the economy, grew, although at its slowest pace since the first months of the pandemic.

“The second quarter is really closer to the definition of a bona fide slowdown,” said Gary Schlossberg, a global strategist with Wells Fargo Investment Institute. “What we saw in this quarter was an outright decline in domestic spending.”




#g-gdp-consumer-spending-box ,
#g-gdp-consumer-spending-box .g-artboard
margin:0 auto;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-box p
margin:0;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-box .g-aiAbs
position:absolute;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-box .g-aiImg
position:absolute;
top:0;
display:block;
width:100% !important;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-box .g-aiSymbol
position: absolute;
box-sizing: border-box;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-box .g-aiPointText p white-space: nowrap;
#g-gdp-consumer-spending-335
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-335 p
font-family:nyt-franklin,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;
font-weight:500;
line-height:12px;
height:auto;
opacity:1;
letter-spacing:0em;
font-size:12px;
text-align:left;
color:rgb(128,128,128);
top:1px;
position:static;
text-transform:none;
padding-bottom:0;
padding-top:0;
mix-blend-mode:normal;
font-style:normal;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-335 .g-pstyle0
height:12px;
text-align:right;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-335 .g-pstyle1
height:12px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-335 .g-pstyle2
font-weight:700;
line-height:15px;
height:15px;
font-size:14px;
text-align:center;
color:rgb(0,0,0);
top:1.1px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-335 .g-pstyle3
font-weight:700;
height:12px;
color:rgb(0,0,0);
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-335 .g-pstyle4
font-weight:300;
height:12px;
color:rgb(51,51,51);
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-335 .g-pstyle5
height:12px;
text-align:center;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-600
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-600 p
font-family:nyt-franklin,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;
font-weight:500;
line-height:14px;
height:auto;
opacity:1;
letter-spacing:0em;
font-size:13px;
text-align:left;
color:rgb(128,128,128);
top:1px;
position:static;
text-transform:none;
padding-bottom:0;
padding-top:0;
mix-blend-mode:normal;
font-style:normal;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-600 .g-pstyle0
height:14px;
text-align:right;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-600 .g-pstyle1
height:14px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-600 .g-pstyle2
font-weight:700;
line-height:18px;
height:18px;
font-size:16px;
text-align:center;
color:rgb(0,0,0);
top:1.3px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-600 .g-pstyle3
font-weight:700;
line-height:15px;
height:15px;
font-size:14px;
color:rgb(0,0,0);
top:1.1px;
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-600 .g-pstyle4
height:14px;
color:rgb(51,51,51);
position:relative;

#g-gdp-consumer-spending-600 .g-pstyle5
height:14px;
text-align:center;
position:relative;

+8

%

Consumer spending

+6

+4

+2

0

+0.3%

2nd

quarter

2022

–2

–4

–6

–8

’06

’08

’10

’12

’14

’16

’18

’20

’22

+8

%

Consumer spending

+6

+4

+2

0

+0.3%

2nd

quarter

2022

–2

–4

–6

–8

’06

’08

’10

’12

’14

’16

’18

’20

’22


Quarterly changes in real personal consumption expenditures

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

By The New York Times

Economists often use two quarters of falling G.D.P. as a shorthand definition of a recession. In some countries, that is the formal definition.

But in the United States, declaring a recession falls to a private, nonprofit research organization, the National Bureau of Economic Research. The group defines a recession as “a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and lasts more than a few months,” and it bases its decisions on a variety of indicators — usually only months after the fact.

Some forecasters believe a recession can be avoided, if inflation cools enough that the Fed can slow interest rate increases before they take too much of a toll on hiring and spending.

The economy still has important areas of strength. Job growth has remained robust, and, despite a recent uptick in filings for unemployment insurance, there is little sign of a broad increase in job losses.

Households, in the aggregate, are sitting on trillions of dollars in savings built up earlier in the pandemic, which could allow them to weather higher prices and interest rates.

“What drives the U.S. consumer is the healthy labor market, and we should really focus on job growth to capture the turning point in this business cycle,” said Blerina Uruci, an economist at T. Rowe Price. The Labor Department will release data on July’s hiring and unemployment next week.

The lingering effects of the pandemic are making the economy’s signals harder to interpret. Americans bought fewer cars, couches and other goods in the second quarter, but forecasters had long expected spending on goods to fall as consumers shifted back toward prepandemic spending patterns. Indeed, economists argue that a pullback in spending on goods is needed to relieve pressure on overstretched supply chains.

At the same time, spending on services accelerated. That could be a sign of consumers’ resilience in the face of soaring airfares and rental car rates. Or it could merely reflect a temporary willingness to put up with high prices, which will fade along with the summer sun.

“There is going to be this element of, ‘We haven’t had a summer vacation in three years, so we’re just going to take one, no matter how much it costs,’” said Aditya Bhave, a senior economist for Bank of America. “The question is what happens after the summer.”

Avital Ungar is trying to interpret the conflicting signals in real time. Ms. Ungar operates a small business running food tours for tourists and corporate groups in San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York.

When restaurants closed and travel stopped early in the pandemic, Ms. Ungar had no revenue. She made it through by offering virtual happy hours and online cooking classes. When in-person tours came back, business was uneven, shifting with each new coronavirus variant. Ms. Ungar said demand remained hard to predict as prices rise and the economy slows.

“We’re in two different types of uncertainty,” she said. “There was the pandemic uncertainty, and then there’s the economic uncertainty right now.”

In response, Ms. Ungar has shifted her focus to higher-end tours, which she believes will hold up better than those aimed at more price-sensitive customers. And she is trying to avoid long-term commitments that could be difficult to get out of if demand cools.

“Every annual plan I’ve done in the past three years has not happened that way,” she said. “It’s really important to recognize that what worked yesterday isn’t going to work tomorrow.”

Lydia DePillis contributed reporting.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version