We asked: What do city politicians make of Coun. Susan Stevenson's social media posts? - CBC.ca | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Media

We asked: What do city politicians make of Coun. Susan Stevenson's social media posts? – CBC.ca

Published

 on


Four months after a London city councillor was formally reprimanded for social media posts she made about homeless people, most of her political colleagues say they have concerns about her ongoing online behaviour. 

Social service agencies that operate within Ward 4 Coun. Susan Stevenson’s ward have also expressed uneasiness with the councillor’s posts on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook, saying she undermines the work they are trying to do to help Londoners struggling with mental health and addiction issues. 

“Social media is definitely not the best platform to have these types of complex, nuanced conversations because it has the potential to stoke division, anger, misunderstanding and is often directed toward marginalized members of our community,” said London Mayor Josh Morgan. “It’s definitely causing division.” 

Stevenson can advocate for the people in her ward but the way she’s going about it isn’t constructive, added Ward 11 Coun. Skylar Franke.

“I don’t think we need to vilify the social service agencies that provide support to people who are living unhoused,” Franke said. 

Despite the criticism Stevenson, who is serving her first term on council, is doubling down on her comments, saying she is representing her ward the best way she knows how, and that she is giving voice to the “deep pain and despair” of many who live there. 

“People are dying on the street in my ward. Businesses are dying and families are crying. If other councillors are concerned about my social media posts, I am concerned about the people in my ward and the harm that’s being done,” Stevenson said. 

Recently, Stevenson posted pictures of people sleeping on the street at Dundas and Elizabeth streets in the heart of Old East Village. She calls Ward 4 “Ground zero for our city’s drug crisis.” 

It’s a harsh sentiment but one that’s supported by the Old East Village BIA, which represents small businesses in the neighbourhood.

“We’re hearing a lot of support for her. She’s the only one doing anything, the only one willing to talk about it, to put it out there that we need to solve the problem,” said Kevin Morrison, the BIA’s general manager. 

“Does everyone agree with her approach? Maybe not. But she’s doing something instead of nothing.” 

‘I definitely have concerns’

“There are people sleeping in tents outside of a city funded shelter for sex workers. A public school is in the photo. Is this truly the best we can do? I cannot accept the unacceptable. What about you?” Stevenson wrote in one post. 

“This is not normal and it is a warning,” she posted in another, taken of a large tent set up along Dundas Street outside a storefront. A third post is a video of a fire in an Old East Village parking lot. “Meth lab in the lawn. Human poop in a french fry box on the trampoline. 20+ people sleeping back there at night, yelling cussing arguing in or near parking lot of city funded 24/7 homeless shelter. Well-run city? Equitable? Safe? Good Neighbour Agreements?” (sic). 

Many critics of the posts say Stevenson shows the problem caused by poverty, homelessness and substance use, but offers no solutions. 

“I definitely have concerns. It’s not what I would expect from a public official,” said Ward 13 Coun. David Ferreira, adding that while Stevenson is entitled to her vote and opinion, her posts undermine the work that city council, staff and social agencies are doing. 

Stevenson hasn’t asked the social service agencies she targets for a meeting, including SafeSpace, a support centre for sex workers and women in crisis. 

“My concern with the posts she makes is that she omits information that she knows to be true,” said the organization’s head, Jenna Rose Sands. “It’s not helpful. If she is concerned about people, I’d like to see her plan. Criticism without solutions that are rooted in reality just wastes collective capacity and time.” 

The agency’s mission goes against the city’s desire to keep women and girls safe, Stevenson contends. Her issue, she said, is with “council and city administration” for funding SafeSpace, not with the organization itself.

“I disagree that we should be funding them and I disagree that we should be funding them in that location. As a city, what is our stance on sex work and how do they fit in to our commitment to a safe landing for girls and women?”

Previous reprimand

Councillors voted in December to reprimand Stevenson over social media posts she made in the fall, following through on a recommendation by the city’s integrity commissioner, which found she breached council’s code of conduct. Pictures of people on a sidewalk in Old East Village were “unnecessary and insensitive” because they also included complaints about criminal activity, the integrity commissioner ruled. 

Stevenson rejected the reprimand, saying the integrity commissioner didn’t follow the proper protocol when investigating a complaint against her. 

The code of conduct states that councillors “shall serve and be seen to serve their constituents in a conscientious, accountable, transparent and diligent manner,” and perform their functions “with integrity, independence and impartiality” and accurately communicate decisions of council “even if they disagree with council’s decision.” 

“I always have concerns when information is shared about votes of council and a colleagues says they don’t understand something even after a committee voted on that,” said Ward 12 Coun. Elizabeth Peloza. “I’ve heard from community members concerned about their safety and the harm that’s being done, especially when we have partners that are trying to move forward with initiatives.” 

Council’s code of conduct is mum on social media posts and how councillors should conduct themselves online. Ward. 2 Coun. Shawn Lewis, along with Stevenson, will ask that the code of conduct be reviewed to see if that should be added. 

“The code of conduct is out-of-date and we have to ask ourselves some questions about what standards we’re going to hold ourselves to,” Lewis said. “The Ontario ombudsman actually recommends there be specific language around social media if you’re going to apply your code of conduct that way, so I think we need to have a discussion about that.” 

Lewis said there have been “concerning posts” by councillors besides Stevenson, namely Ward. 6 Coun. Sam Trosow, who questioned why councillors were allocating a large amount of money to the police budget but not the Housing Stability Bank or the library. 

What your councillor said

CBC News reached out to every city councillor over the last few days to ask them if they have concerns about social media posts. Councillors Hadleigh McAllister, Sam Trosow, Steve Lehman and Paul Van Meerbergen didn’t reply to interview requests. 

Here’s what the others had to say: 

Mayor Josh Morgan: If you look at the engagements that are happening in the comments, I can’t possibly see how they would be perceived as constructive dialogue. We’re facing significant challenges in the city and we’re working toward solutions with the mindset of bringing together and I think social media, and particularly X (formerly Twitter) is not the best place to have nuanced discussions on complex issues.” 

Ward 2 Coun. Shawn Lewis: “I think we have to be really cautious when we’re posting online about implying motives to the decisions of other council members or imply that work isn’t being done or the work being done isn’t valuable on any particular issue.” 

Ward 3 Coun. Peter Cuddy: “Coun. Stevenson is a colleague and close friend. We don’t always agree but we always respect one another. Respect means a lot to me. Integrity is not something you can buy.” 

Ward 4 Coun. Susan Stevenson: “I’m not doing this to please everybody and I’m not doing this to cause trouble. I’m doing it because there is deep, deep pain in my ward, on the streets, in the businesses, in the neighbourhoods. There is despair. People need leadership in city council to get them the help they need and deserve.” 

Ward 5 Coun. Jerry Pribil: “For me, social media is a distraction and any distraction is a lack of focus and concentration. If I didn’t get emails from some London residents telling me they don’t agree with some of the stuff that’s posted by fellow councillors, I wouldn’t even know about it.” 

Ward 7 Coun. Corrine Rahman: I think councillors may have their own individual perspectives and the community should be following along with council directions because that’s how we communicate as a council. I don’t follow certain councillors on social media.”

Ward 9 Coun. Anna Hopkins: “I wish we could be more respectful and as elected officials, set that example.We have to do a better job and not be divisive and instead do what’s best for the community.” 

Ward 11 Coun. Skylar Franke: “I’ve heard from various individuals that there is some trepidation now within our social service sector to put your hand up and volunteer to do something, so I do think that some of the commentary from council in general is not helping us achieve our health and homelessness outcomes.” 

Ward 12 Coun. Elizabeth Peloza: “Yes, I have concerns. I always have concerns when information is shared about votes of council and a colleagues says they don’t understand something even after a committee voted on that.”

Ward 13 Coun. David Ferreira: “I definitely have concerns. I’m worried about possible violence. I not pleased to see her comments, because it’s not what I would expect out of a public official. It’s not the image of London we should be putting out there. It’s not who we are.” 

Ward 14. Coun. Steven Hillier: “I make a point not to comment on other councillors. That’s the way she’s doing her job and it’s not how I would do it.” 

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

It’s time for a Halloween movie marathon. 10 iconic horror films

Published

 on

 

Sometimes, you just have to return to the classics.

That’s especially true as Halloween approaches. While you queue up your spooky movie marathon, here are 10 iconic horror movies from the past 70 years for inspiration, and what AP writers had to say about them when they were first released.

We resurrected excerpts from these reviews, edited for clarity, from the dead — did they stand the test of time?

“Rear Window” (1954)

“Rear Window” is a wonderful trick pulled off by Alfred Hitchcock. He breaks his hero’s leg, sets him up at an apartment window where he can observe, among other things, a murder across the court. The panorama of other people’s lives is laid out before you, as seen through the eyes of a Peeping Tom.

James Stewart, Grace Kelly, Thelma Ritter and others make it good fun.

— Bob Thomas

“Halloween” (1978)

At 19, Jamie Lee Curtis is starring in a creepy little thriller film called “Halloween.”

Until now, Jamie’s main achievement has been as a regular on the “Operation Petticoat” TV series. Jamie is much prouder of “Halloween,” though it is obviously an exploitation picture aimed at the thrill market.

The idea for “Halloween” sprang from independent producer-distributor Irwin Yablans, who wanted a terror-tale involving a babysitter. John Carpenter and Debra Hill fashioned a script about a madman who kills his sister, escapes from an asylum and returns to his hometown intending to murder his sister’s friends.

— Bob Thomas

“The Silence of the Lambs” (1991)

“The Silence of the Lambs” moves from one nail-biting sequence to another. Jonathan Demme spares the audience nothing, including closeups of skinned corpses. The squeamish had best stay home and watch “The Cosby Show.”

Ted Tally adapted the Thomas Harris novel with great skill, and Demme twists the suspense almost to the breaking point. The climactic confrontation between Clarice Starling and Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine) is carried a tad too far, though it is undeniably exciting with well-edited sequences.

Such a tale as “The Silence of the Lambs” requires accomplished actors to pull it off. Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins are highly qualified. She provides steely intelligence, with enough vulnerability to sustain the suspense. He delivers a classic portrayal of pure, brilliant evil.

— Bob Thomas

“Scream” (1996)

In this smart, witty homage to the genre, students at a suburban California high school are being killed in the same gruesome fashion as the victims in the slasher films they know by heart.

If it sounds like the script of every other horror movie to come and go at the local movie theater, it’s not.

By turns terrifying and funny, “Scream” — written by newcomer David Williamson — is as taut as a thriller, intelligent without being self-congratulatory, and generous in its references to Wes Craven’s competitors in gore.

— Ned Kilkelly

“The Blair Witch Project” (1999)

Imaginative, intense and stunning are a few words that come to mind with “The Blair Witch Project.”

“Blair Witch” is the supposed footage found after three student filmmakers disappear in the woods of western Maryland while shooting a documentary about a legendary witch.

The filmmakers want us to believe the footage is real, the story is real, that three young people died and we are witnessing the final days of their lives. It isn’t. It’s all fiction.

But Eduardo Sanchez and Dan Myrick, who co-wrote and co-directed the film, take us to the edge of belief, squirming in our seats the whole way. It’s an ambitious and well-executed concept.

— Christy Lemire

“Saw” (2004)

The fright flick “Saw” is consistent, if nothing else.

This serial-killer tale is inanely plotted, badly written, poorly acted, coarsely directed, hideously photographed and clumsily edited, all these ingredients leading to a yawner of a surprise ending. To top it off, the music’s bad, too.

You could forgive all (well, not all, or even, fractionally, much) of the movie’s flaws if there were any chills or scares to this sordid little horror affair.

But “Saw” director James Wan and screenwriter Leigh Whannell, who developed the story together, have come up with nothing more than an exercise in unpleasantry and ugliness.

— David Germain

Germain gave “Saw” one star out of four.

“Paranormal Activity” (2009)

The no-budget ghost story “Paranormal Activity” arrives 10 years after “The Blair Witch Project,” and the two horror movies share more than a clever construct and shaky, handheld camerawork.

The entire film takes place at the couple’s cookie-cutter dwelling, its layout and furnishings indistinguishable from just about any other readymade home constructed in the past 20 years. Its ordinariness makes the eerie, nocturnal activities all the more terrifying, as does the anonymity of the actors adequately playing the leads.

The thinness of the premise is laid bare toward the end, but not enough to erase the horror of those silent, nighttime images seen through Micah’s bedroom camera. “Paranormal Activity” owns a raw, primal potency, proving again that, to the mind, suggestion has as much power as a sledgehammer to the skull.

— Glenn Whipp

Whipp gave “Paranormal Activity” three stars out of four.

“The Conjuring” (2013)

As sympathetic, methodical ghostbusters Lorraine and Ed Warren, Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson make the old-fashioned haunted-house horror film “The Conjuring” something more than your average fright fest.

“The Conjuring,” which boasts incredulously of being their most fearsome, previously unknown case, is built very in the ’70s-style mold of “Amityville” and, if one is kind, “The Exorcist.” The film opens with a majestic, foreboding title card that announces its aspirations to such a lineage.

But as effectively crafted as “The Conjuring” is, it’s lacking the raw, haunting power of the models it falls shy of. “The Exorcist” is a high standard, though; “The Conjuring” is an unusually sturdy piece of haunted-house genre filmmaking.

— Jake Coyle

Coyle gave “The Conjuring” two and half stars out of four.

Read the full review here.

“Get Out” (2017)

Fifty years after Sidney Poitier upended the latent racial prejudices of his white date’s liberal family in “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner,” writer-director Jordan Peele has crafted a similar confrontation with altogether more combustible results in “Get Out.”

In Peele’s directorial debut, the former “Key and Peele” star has — as he often did on that satirical sketch series — turned inside out even supposedly progressive assumptions about race. But Peele has largely left comedy behind in a more chilling portrait of the racism that lurks beneath smiling white faces and defensive, paper-thin protestations like, “But I voted for Obama!” and “Isn’t Tiger Woods amazing?”

It’s long been a lamentable joke that in horror films — never the most inclusive of genres — the Black dude is always the first to go. In this way, “Get Out” is radical and refreshing in its perspective.

— Jake Coyle

Coyle gave “Get Out” three stars out of four.

Read the full review here.

“Hereditary” (2018)

In Ari Aster’s intensely nightmarish feature-film debut “Hereditary,” when Annie (Toni Collette), an artist and mother of two teenagers, sneaks out to a grief-support group following the death of her mother, she lies to her husband Steve (Gabriel Byrne) that she’s “going to the movies.”

A night out with “Hereditary” is many things, but you won’t confuse it for an evening of healing and therapy. It’s more like the opposite.

Aster’s film, relentlessly unsettling and pitilessly gripping, has carried with it an ominous air of danger and dread: a movie so horrifying and good that you have to see it, even if you shouldn’t want to, even if you might never sleep peacefully again.

The hype is mostly justified.

— Jake Coyle

Coyle gave “Hereditary” three stars out of four.

Read the full review here. ___

Researcher Rhonda Shafner contributed from New York.

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Sutherland House Experts Book Publishing Launches To Empower Quiet Experts

Published

 on

Sutherland House Experts is Empowering Quiet Experts through
Compelling Nonfiction in a Changing Ideas Landscape

TORONTO, ON — Almost one year after its launch, Sutherland House Experts is reshaping the publishing industry with its innovative co-publishing model for “quiet experts.” This approach, where expert authors share both costs and profits with the publisher, is bridging the gap between expertise and public discourse. Helping to drive this transformation is Neil Seeman, a renowned author, educator, and entrepreneur.

“The book publishing world is evolving rapidly,” publisher Neil Seeman explains. “There’s a growing hunger for expert voices in public dialogue, but traditional channels often fall short. Sutherland House Experts provides a platform for ‘quiet experts’ to share their knowledge with the broader book-reading audience.”

The company’s roster boasts respected thought leaders whose books are already gaining major traction:

• V. Kumar Murty, a world-renowned mathematician, and past Fields Institute director, just published “The Science of Human Possibilities” under the new press. The book has been declared a 2024 “must-read” by The Next Big Ideas Club and is receiving widespread media attention across North America.

• Eldon Sprickerhoff, co-founder of cybersecurity firm eSentire, is seeing strong pre-orders for his upcoming book, “Committed: Startup Survival Tips and Uncommon Sense for First-Time Tech Founders.”

• Dr. Tony Sanfilippo, a respected cardiologist and professor of medicine at Queen’s University, is generating significant media interest with his forthcoming book, “The Doctors We Need: Imagining a New Path for Physician Recruitment, Training, and Support.”

Seeman, whose recent and acclaimed book, “Accelerated Minds,” explores the entrepreneurial mindset, brings a unique perspective to publishing. His experience as a Senior Fellow at the University of Toronto’s Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and academic affiliations with The Fields Institute and Massey College, give him deep insight into the challenges faced by people he calls “quiet experts.”

“Our goal is to empower quiet, expert authors to become entrepreneurs of actionable ideas the world needs to hear,” Seeman states. “We are blending scholarly insight with market savvy to create accessible, impactful narratives for a global readership. Quiet experts are people with decades of experience in one or more fields who seek to translate their insights into compelling non-fiction for the world,” says Seeman.

This fall, Seeman is taking his insights to the classroom. He will teach the new course, “The Writer as Entrepreneur,” at the University of Toronto, offering aspiring authors practical tools to navigate the evolving book publishing landscape. To enroll in this new weekly night course starting Tuesday, October 1st, visit:
https://learn.utoronto.ca/programs-courses/courses/4121-writer-entrepreneur

“The entrepreneurial ideas industry is changing rapidly,” Seeman notes. “Authors need new skills to thrive in this dynamic environment. My course and our publishing model provide those tools.”

About Neil Seeman:
Neil Seeman is co-founder and publisher of Sutherland House Experts, an author, educator, entrepreneur, and mental health advocate. He holds appointments at the University of Toronto, The Fields Institute, and Massey College. His work spans entrepreneurship, public health, and innovative publishing models.

Follow Neil Seeman:
https://www.neilseeman.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/seeman/

Follow Sutherland House Experts:

https://sutherlandhouseexperts.com/
https://www.instagram.com/sutherlandhouseexperts/

Media Inquiries:
Sasha Stoltz | Sasha@sashastoltzpublicity.com | 416.579.4804
https://www.sashastoltzpublicity.com

Continue Reading

Media

What to stream this weekend: ‘Civil War,’ Snow Patrol, ‘How to Die Alone,’ ‘Tulsa King’ and ‘Uglies’

Published

 on

 

Hallmark launching a streaming service with two new original series, and Bill Skarsgård out for revenge in “Boy Kills World” are some of the new television, films, music and games headed to a device near you.

Also among the streaming offerings worth your time as selected by The Associated Press’ entertainment journalists: Alex Garland’s “Civil War” starring Kirsten Dunst, Natasha Rothwell’s heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone” and Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts.

NEW MOVIES TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

Alex Garland’s “Civil War” is finally making its debut on MAX on Friday. The film stars Kirsten Dunst as a veteran photojournalist covering a violent war that’s divided America; She reluctantly allows an aspiring photographer, played by Cailee Spaeny, to tag along as she, an editor (Stephen McKinley Henderson) and a reporter (Wagner Moura) make the dangerous journey to Washington, D.C., to interview the president (Nick Offerman), a blustery, rising despot who has given himself a third term, taken to attacking his citizens and shut himself off from the press. In my review, I called it a bellowing and haunting experience; Smart and thought-provoking with great performances. It’s well worth a watch.

— Joey King stars in Netflix’s adaptation of Scott Westerfeld’s “Uglies,” about a future society in which everyone is required to have beautifying cosmetic surgery at age 16. Streaming on Friday, McG directed the film, in which King’s character inadvertently finds herself in the midst of an uprising against the status quo. “Outer Banks” star Chase Stokes plays King’s best friend.

— Bill Skarsgård is out for revenge against the woman (Famke Janssen) who killed his family in “Boy Kills World,” coming to Hulu on Friday. Moritz Mohr directed the ultra-violent film, of which Variety critic Owen Gleiberman wrote: “It’s a depraved vision, yet I got caught up in its kick-ass revenge-horror pizzazz, its disreputable commitment to what it was doing.”

AP Film Writer Lindsey Bahr

NEW MUSIC TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

— The year was 2006. Snow Patrol, the Northern Irish-Scottish alternative rock band, released an album, “Eyes Open,” producing the biggest hit of their career: “Chasing Cars.” A lot has happened in the time since — three, soon to be four quality full-length albums, to be exact. On Friday, the band will release “The Forest Is the Path,” their first new album in seven years. Anthemic pop-rock is the name of the game across songs of love and loss, like “All,”“The Beginning” and “This Is the Sound Of Your Voice.”

— For fans of raucous guitar music, Jordan Peele’s 2022 sci-fi thriller, “NOPE,” provided a surprising, if tiny, thrill. One of the leads, Emerald “Em” Haywood portrayed by Keke Palmer, rocks a Jesus Lizard shirt. (Also featured through the film: Rage Against the Machine, Wipers, Mr Bungle, Butthole Surfers and Earth band shirts.) The Austin noise rock band are a less than obvious pick, having been signed to the legendary Touch and Go Records and having stopped releasing new albums in 1998. That changes on Friday the 13th, when “Rack” arrives. And for those curious: The Jesus Lizard’s intensity never went away.

AP Music Writer Maria Sherman

NEW SHOWS TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

— Hallmark launched a streaming service called Hallmark+ on Tuesday with two new original series, the scripted drama “The Chicken Sisters” and unscripted series “Celebrations with Lacey Chabert.” If you’re a Hallmark holiday movies fan, you know Chabert. She’s starred in more than 30 of their films and many are holiday themed. Off camera, Chabert has a passion for throwing parties and entertaining. In “Celebrations,” deserving people are surprised with a bash in their honor — planned with Chabert’s help. “The Chicken Sisters” stars Schuyler Fisk, Wendie Malick and Lea Thompson in a show about employees at rival chicken restaurants in a small town. The eight-episode series is based on a novel of the same name.

Natasha Rothwell of “Insecure” and “The White Lotus” fame created and stars in a new heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone.” She plays Mel, a broke, go-along-to-get-along, single, airport employee who, after a near-death experience, makes the conscious decision to take risks and pursue her dreams. Rothwell has been working on the series for the past eight years and described it to The AP as “the most vulnerable piece of art I’ve ever put into the world.” Like Mel, Rothwell had to learn to bet on herself to make the show she wanted to make. “In the Venn diagram of me and Mel, there’s significant overlap,” said Rothwell. It premieres Friday on Hulu.

— Shailene Woodley, DeWanda Wise and Betty Gilpin star in a new drama for Starz called “Three Women,” about entrepreneur Sloane, homemaker Lina and student Maggie who are each stepping into their power and making life-changing decisions. They’re interviewed by a writer named Gia (Woodley.) The series is based on a 2019 best-selling book of the same name by Lisa Taddeo. “Three Women” premieres Friday on Starz.

— Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts Sunday on Paramount+. Stallone plays Dwight Manfredi, a mafia boss who was recently released from prison after serving 25 years. He’s sent to Tulsa to set up a new crime syndicate. The series is created by Taylor Sheridan of “Yellowstone” fame.

Alicia Rancilio

NEW VIDEO GAMES TO PLAY

— One thing about the title of Focus Entertainment’s Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 — you know exactly what you’re in for. You are Demetrian Titus, a genetically enhanced brute sent into battle against the Tyranids, an insectoid species with an insatiable craving for human flesh. You have a rocket-powered suit of armor and an arsenal of ridiculous weapons like the “Chainsword,” the “Thunderhammer” and the “Melta Rifle,” so what could go wrong? Besides the squishy single-player mode, there are cooperative missions and six-vs.-six free-for-alls. You can suit up now on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S or PC.

— Likewise, Wild Bastards isn’t exactly the kind of title that’s going to attract fans of, say, Animal Crossing. It’s another sci-fi shooter, but the protagonists are a gang of 13 varmints — aliens and androids included — who are on the run from the law. Each outlaw has a distinctive set of weapons and special powers: Sarge, for example, is a robot with horse genes, while Billy the Squid is … well, you get the idea. Australian studio Blue Manchu developed the 2019 cult hit Void Bastards, and this Wild-West-in-space spinoff has the same snarky humor and vibrant, neon-drenched cartoon look. Saddle up on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S, Nintendo Switch or PC.

Lou Kesten

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version