adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

What happened in the economy in 2021 – Yahoo Canada Finance

Published

 on


The pandemic remained a major force influencing growth in the U.S. economy in 2021.

But as vaccinations picked up and stay-in-place orders began getting lifted, the economy made notable strides in recovering throughout the year, albeit while remaining below pre-pandemic levels on many major metrics. But on other metrics — and notably on inflation — the economy has handily exceeded its pre-virus trends.

“We’re not going back to the same economy we had in February of 2020,” Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said during his post-FOMC meeting press conference on Dec. 15. “And I think early on … the sense was that that’s where we were headed. The post-pandemic labor market and the economy, in general, will be different.”

300x250x1

And indeed, many aspects of economic activity have shifted since the rapid spread of the coronavirus in the U.S. in early 2020. Extraordinary monetary and fiscal policies during the crisis provided stimulus for more than a year, helping buoy economic activity and bolster consumption. And as demand for goods, services and venturing out roared back, all of these factors have coalesced to drive up prices at multi-decade high rates.

Still, concerns about the coronavirus have lingered. The discovery of the Omicron variant in late November spurred a renewed wave of restrictions globally in recent weeks. And it has raised the specter that Americans may also begin to stay home more frequently and curb spending on services.

But so far, economic growth as a whole has increased at a solid clip in 2021. U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) grew at a real annualized rate of 6.4% in the first quarter, then 6.7% in the second and 2.1% in the third, based on the latest estimate for the quarter. The size of the economy as measured by GDP surpassed pre-pandemic levels in the second quarter this year, following 2020’s brief but rapid plunge into recession.

Heading into the new year, here’s a look back at how the U.S. economy evolved throughout 2021.

Labor market

The labor market has been one of the areas of the economy most profoundly impacted by the pandemic.

Jobs have come back at a steady pace throughout this year, after more than 22 million jobs were lost between March 2020 and April 2020 alone at the height of stay-in-place orders.

U.S. employers have added back payrolls in every single month so far in 2021, according to the Labor Department’s monthly jobs reports. As many as nearly 1.1 million jobs were added back in July alone, while as few as 210,000 jobs were added back as of the latest jobs report for November.

The unemployment rate has also come down. It last improved to a reading of 4.2% in November, but still held above the 50-year low of 3.5% seen before the pandemic in February 2020. The jobless rate began the year at 6.3% in January.

“In one sentence, what surprised me is how quickly we have recovered,” Betsey Stevenson, former Labor Department chief economist and current professor of public policy and economics at the University of Michigan, told Yahoo Finance.

“If you talked to people when this pandemic first started, they were worried that employers would be looking to automate and to replace workers with technology because technology doesn’t get COVID,” she added. “And in fact, what we’ve seen is just record job openings. If we filled every single job opening that’s out there right now, we’d have employment that was not just well above where we were pre-pandemic, but well above what anyone predicted pre-pandemic.”

Even with the continued job growth throughout the year, employment remains below levels from February 2020, and job openings remain near record levels. This has especially shown up in the size of the civilian labor force, which is still much smaller than it was before the virus. As of November, the civilian labor force was down by 2.4 million workers, compared to February 2020. And the labor force participation rate was last at 61.8% — short of February 2020’s 63.3%.

And while more Americans are on the sidelines of the labor force than before the pandemic, job vacancies have soared, especially in the second half of this year.

As vaccinations began ramping up in the U.S. in the spring and summer, demand for goods and services and going back out again began to surge — and hiring employers struggled to keep pace with that demand. That has especially been true for the service economy, which had already been hit hard during the pandemic with stay-in-place orders and layoffs, and was struggling to bring back enough workers to keep up with the pick-up in dining out, traveling on airplanes and shopping in stores.

In July, job openings hit a record high of nearly 11.1 million in the U.S. And as of the latest data for October, those vacancies were again above the 11 million mark. The quits rate has also remained elevated, suggesting workers have been feeling confident about their ability to leave their current jobs and find new ones. This rate came in at 2.9% in October, or just a tick below September’s all-time high of 3.0%.

The fact that labor supply has been the biggest concern than demand has also shown up in the Labor Department’s weekly jobless claims report. These hit the lowest level since 1969 in early December at 188,000.

“Conflicting signals about slack that have plagued the labor market should become more harmonious by late 2022. Early on, pandemic-induced constraints on labor supply should linger, keeping wage growth firm and helping the unemployment rate to match pre-pandemic lows next year,” wrote Deutsche Bank economists led by Matthew Luzzetti in a note last week. The firm expects the unemployment rate to reach 3.5% by the end of 2022, and then drop to as low as about 3.25% in 2023.

“Beyond, a more convincing return of labor supply should help to ease wage pressures and moderate the decline in measures of slack,” they added. “Even so, our forecast for strong growth momentum pushes the unemployment rate to the lowest level in almost seven decades by 2023.”

Inflation

Inflation became a central focus for Wall Street and Main Street alike in 2021.

Outsized demand and persistent supply-side snarls throughout the second half of the year especially contributed to rising price pressures across the broad economy.

Most recently, consumer prices surged at their fastest pace since 1982 in November, with the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index (CPI) jumping by 6.8% over the same month last year. Year-over-year increases in CPI had averaged just 1.8% throughout 2019 before the pandemic.

Producer prices have also risen sharply. Wholesale prices posted their fastest jump on record last month, surging 9.6% over November 2020. This Producer Price Index (PPI) began 2021 by posting just 1.6% 12-month price growth.

Core personal consumption expenditures (PCE), or the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge stripping out volatile food and energy prices, last posted a 4.5% year-on-year increase in November, coming in well above the central bank’s 2% target and reaching the fastest pace since 1991. Prior to the pandemic, core inflation had consistently undershot the Fed’s benchmark, and averaged just a 1.7% year-on-year increase throughout 2019.

While supply-side constraints including labor shortages, port congestion and supply shortages have been major drivers of the increases in inflation, many economists pointed out that the more than year-long regime of ultra-accommodative monetary policy also prevented there from being a lid on price increases this year.

“Inflation jumped in 2021 on the back of supply and demand mismatches. We see inflation settling at levels higher than pre-COVID whenever these supply bottlenecks ease,” BlackRock Investment Institute strategists led by Philipp Hildebrand and Jean Boivin wrote in the firm’s 2022 Global Outlook published on Dec. 13. “One driver of this: Major central banks are living with more inflation than they would have in the past, showing a much more muted policy reaction.”

Earlier during the year, the Fed had maintained inflation would prove “transitory,” and ultimately dissipate as supply-side constraints began to attenuate and as the economic data lapped last year’s pandemic-depressed levels. This term to describe the lingering price increases was retired in late November, however, as Fed Chair Powell acknowledged the prospects of more persistent inflation.

Consumer spending and confidence

Strength in U.S. consumer spending was one of the driving features of the recovery this year.

Personal consumption, which comprises about two-thirds of U.S. economy activity, soared by 11.4% in the third quarter before accelerating to a 12.0% jump in the second quarter, and then pulling back to a just 1.7% annualized rise in the third quarter, according to data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. 

Stimulus from the U.S. government was one critical component of the surge in consumption at the beginning of this year, as multiple rounds of direct checks to most Americans authorized under Congress’s coronavirus relief bills helped bolster spending.

The surge and then moderation in spending has also been evident in the Commerce Department’s monthly retail sales figures. At their peak rate this year, retail sales grew 11.3% month-on-month in March alone. However, these month-over-month increases have decelerated markedly, and retail sales last grew just 0.3% in November. On a year-over-year basis, however, retail sales remained higher by 18.2%.

People wear facemasks as they walk through Herald Square on January 8, 2021 in New York City. (Photo by Angela Weiss / AFP) (Photo by ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images)People wear facemasks as they walk through Herald Square on January 8, 2021 in New York City. (Photo by Angela Weiss / AFP) (Photo by ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images)

People wear facemasks as they walk through Herald Square on January 8, 2021 in New York City. (Photo by Angela Weiss / AFP) (Photo by ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images)

According to some economists, the slowdown in retail sales is likely to continue into next year after an initial surge in consumer demand gets further unwound.

“Evidence of accelerated holiday spending, which lifted fourth quarter consumer spending, will likely yield to a post-holiday sales vacuum as supply constraints limit the incentive to offer the deep discounting typically associated with sales activity post-holiday,” wrote Steven Ricchiuto, U.S. chief economist for Mizuho Securities, in a note. “The slowing in November retail sales, after a robust September and October, is very consistent with our overall economic assessment as supply chain concerns pulled sales forward and with little, if any, pent-up demand left in the economy.”

And while consumer spending has held up for now, prospects that persistent inflation and concerns over new coronavirus variants could curb spending going forward have also been looming. The University of Michigan’s closely watched Surveys of Consumers showed an only modest uptick in consumer sentiment in December after reaching a decade low in November. And one-year inflation expectations among consumers were unchanged at 4.9% from November to December, holding at the highest level since 2008.

The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index also last posted a decrease in November to reverse course from October. The index came in at 109.5 for last month, dipping well below the 2021 high of 128.9 in June, but still rising compared to the reading of 87.1 posted in January this year. Lynn Franco, senior director of economic indicators at The Conference Board, cited “concerns about rising prices — and, to a lesser degree, the Delta variant” as cause for the most recent drop in confidence.

Ultimately, the trajectory for both the virus and inflation will be key in determining the path forward for consumer confidence and spending, some economists said.

“Even though people are making more [as] their wages have risen, they’re not rising as fast as prices are,” Megan Greene, global chief economist at Kroll Institute, told Yahoo Finance Live. “And so I think this will start to bite into demand.”

“I think we could continue to have supply chain disruptions through next year,” she added. “That means we’ll have higher prices for sure — that will drag on consumer demand. I think we’ll still grow above potential in the U.S.”

Emily McCormick is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Twitter

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Yellen Sounds Alarm on China ‘Global Domination’ Industrial Push – Bloomberg

Published

 on


US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen slammed China’s use of subsidies to give its manufacturers in key new industries a competitive advantage, at the cost of distorting the global economy, and said she plans to press China on the issue in an upcoming visit.

“There is no country in the world that subsidizes its preferred, or priority, industries as heavily as China does,” Yellen said in an interview with MSNBC Wednesday — highlighting “massive” aid to electric-car, battery and solar producers. “China’s desire is to really have global domination of these industries.”

Adblock test (Why?)

300x250x1

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Opinion: The future economy will suffer if Canada axes the carbon tax – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


Open this photo in gallery:

Poilievre holds a press conference regarding his “Axe the Tax” message from the roof a parking garage in St. John’s on Oct.27, 2023.Paul Daly/The Canadian Press

Kevin Yin is a contributing columnist for The Globe and Mail and an economics doctoral student at the University of California, Berkeley.

The carbon tax is the single most effective climate policy that Canada has. But the tax is also an important industrial strategy, one that bets correctly on the growing need for greener energy globally and the fact that upstart Canadian companies must rise to meet these needs.

That is why it is such a shame our leaders are sacrificing it for political gains.

300x250x1

The fact that carbon taxes address a key market failure in the energy industry – polluters are not incentivized to consider the broader societal costs of their pollution – is so well understood by economists that an undergraduate could explain its merits. Experts agree on the effectiveness of the policy for reducing emissions almost as much as they agree on climate change itself.

It is not just that pollution is bad for us. That a patchwork of policies supporting clean industries is proliferating across the United States, China and the European Union means that Canada needs its own hospitable ecosystem for clean-energy companies to set up shop and eventually compete abroad. The earlier we nurture such industries, the more benefits our energy and adjacent sectors can reap down the line.

But with high fixed costs of entry and non-negligible technological hurdles, domestic clean energy is still at a significant disadvantage relative to fossil fuels.

A nuclear energy company considering a reactor project in Canada, for example, must contend with the fact that the upfront investments are enormous, and they may not pay off for years, while incumbent oil and gas firms benefit from low fixed costs, faster economies of scale and established technology.

The carbon tax cannot address these problems on its own, but it does help level the playing field by encouraging demand and capital to flow toward where we need it most. Comparable policies like green subsidies are also useful, but second-best; they weaken the government’s balance sheet and in certain cases can even make emissions worse.

Unfortunately, these arguments hold little sway for Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives, who called for a vote of no-confidence on the dubious basis that the carbon tax is driving the cost-of-living crisis. Nor is it of much consequence to provincial leaders, who have fought the federal government hard on implementing the tax.

Not only is this attack a misleading characterization of the tax’s impact, it is also a deeply political gambit. Most expected the vote to fail. Yet by centering the next election on the carbon tax debate, Mr. Poilievre is hedging against the possibility of a new Liberal candidate, one who lacks the Trudeau baggage but still holds the line on the tax.

With the reality of inflation, a housing crisis and a general atmosphere of Trudeau-exhaustion, Mr. Poilievre has plenty of ammunition for an election campaign that does not leave our climate and our clean industries at risk. The temptation to do what is popular is ever-present in politics. Leadership is knowing when not to.

Nor are the Liberals innocent on this front. The Trudeau government deserves credit for pushing the tax through in the first place, and for structuring it as revenue-neutral. But the government’s attempt to woo Atlantic voters with the heating oil exemption has eroded its credibility and opened a vulnerable flank for Conservative attacks.

Thus, Canadian businesses are faced with the possibility of a Conservative government which has promised to eliminate the tax altogether. This kind of uncertainty is a treacherous environment for nascent companies and existing companies on the precipice of investing billions of dollars in clean tech and processes, under the expectation that demand for their fossil fuel counterparts are being kept at bay.

The tax alone is not enough; the government and opposition need to show the private sector that it can be consistent about this new policy regime long enough for these green investments to pay off. Otherwise, innovation in these much-needed technologies will remain stagnant in Canada, and markets for clean energy will be dominated by our more forward-thinking competitors.

A carbon tax is not a panacea for our climate woes, but it is central to any attempt to protect a rapidly warming planet and to develop the right businesses for that future. We can only hope that the next generation of Canadian leaders will have a little more vision.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Business leaders say housing biggest risk to economy: KPMG survey – BNN Bloomberg

Published

 on


Business leaders see the housing crisis as the biggest risk to the economy, a new survey from KPMG Canada shows.

It found 94 per cent of respondents agreed that high housing costs and a lack of supply are the top risk, and that housing should be a main focus in the upcoming federal budget. The survey questioned 534 businesses.

Housing issues are forcing businesses to boost pay to better attract talent and budget for higher labour costs, agreed 87 per cent of respondents. 

300x250x1

“What we’re seeing in the survey is that the businesses are needing to pay more to enable their workers to absorb these higher costs of living,” said Caroline Charest, an economist and Montreal-based partner at KPMG.

The need to pay more not only directly affects business finances, but is also making it harder to tamp down the inflation that is keeping interest rates high, said Charest.

High housing costs and interest rates are straining households that are already struggling under high debt, she said.

“It leaves household balance sheets more vulnerable, in particular, in a period of economic slowdown. So it creates areas of vulnerability in the economy.”

Higher housing costs are themselves a big contributor to inflation, also making it harder to get the measure down to allow for lower rates ahead, she said. 

Businesses have been raising the alarm for some time. 

A report out last year from the Ontario Chamber of Commerce also emphasized how much the housing crisis is affecting how well businesses can attract talent. 

Almost 90 per cent of businesses want to see more public-private collaboration to help solve the crisis, the KPMG survey found.

“How can we work bringing all stakeholders, that being governments, not-for-profit organizations and the community and the private sector together, to find solutions to develop new models to deliver housing,” said Charest.

“That came out pretty strong from our survey of businesses.”

The federal government has been working to roll out more funding supports for other levels of government, and introduced measures like a GST rebate for rental housing construction, but it only has limited direct control on the file. 

Part of the federal funding has been to link funding to measures provinces and municipalities adopt that could help boost supply. 

The vast majority of respondents to the KPMG survey supported tax measures to make housing payments more affordable, such as making mortgage interest tax deductible, but also want to maintain the capital gains tax exemption for a primary residence.

The survey of companies was conducted in February using Sago’s Methodify online research platform. Respondents were business owners or executive-level decision makers.

About a third of the leaders are at companies with revenue over $500 million, about half have revenue between $100 million and $500 million, with the rest below. 

This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 27, 2024.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending