What is a Terrorist? You May Know One | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

What is a Terrorist? You May Know One

Published

 on

“I believe that Terrorism, in any shape or form, is against humanity. There should be zero tolerance for it”. (strangely enough Narendra Modi).

Terrorism is not necessarily just a person, thing, nation, organization or strategy. Terrorism is a state of mind we must all oppose from time to time.

Many of our leaders misapply this term, often manipulating its meaning, who can be and who may not be a terrorist. The Israeli Troops in Gaza have evolved into a well-organized, well-trained force that takes orders from a “terrorist”, Prime Minister Netanyahu. Don’t you think so? Israeli Forces are terrorizing the Palestinian population to drive them away from Gaza. Sounds like a job for a terrorist don’t you think? Che Guevara was known as a terrorist to the Bolivian and American governments, but the people of Cuba and Bolivia saw him as a freedom fighter.

Terrorists have one job and that is to inflict, amplify and direct fear into populations or groups of people. Terrorists simply terrify other people. Those who employ and use terrorists are themselves terrorists. Iran has invested in and supported many terrorist groups such as Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram and even their own Revolutionary Militia. America supported anti-Sandinista Forces and anti-Castro Forces which were known to be terrorists to the Cuban and Sandinista Governments. One people’s freedom fighter seems to be another’s terrorist.

Police are often accused of acting in a terroristic fashion by protestors and activists alike. To break up a protest march or event police have used weapons against unarmed groups of people. Does that sound terroristic to you? Create fear and drive the protestors away. Job done right? In police academies throughout North America the use of force, psychological weaponization of the very concept of Democracy, the freedom to speak our minds and protest peacefully is taught and openly employed in situations that often do not require such actions. The police fear those they are hired to protect. This fear is used to bring under control citizens who are simply carrying out their rights to free speech and assembly. Just wait until Donald Trump is re-elected. These methods will be used openly more and more.

Freedom Fighters are not terrorists unless they employ actions that create fear within the population like attacking innocent citizens, public gatherings and figures that represent the public. The difference is based on intention. Do freedom fighters, protestors or activists want to harm citizens or that authorities they claim misrepresent themselves to the public?

In North Africa, I experienced firsthand various forms of terrorism such as authorities upon the citizenry, religious terrorism and criminality imposing terror upon their prey. Fear reigns in this continent. Fear of those supposed to be defending the public’s needs, big business and foreign concerns all out to acquire power and wealth for a few. Terrorism is a way of life in Africa and many other parts of the world.

Terminology needs to be understood too. I have heard Canadians describe Justin Trudeau to be a terrorist. Terrorist, no. You can call the P.M. a tyrant, political hack, or totalitarian despot, but surely not a terrorist. Get it straight. Vladimir Putin is not a terrorist either, but a despot with ambitions that equal someone he admires, Joseph Stalin. Donald Trump’s followers besieged the Capital Building creating for a showtime a national sense of terror. Amateurish or perhaps unsuspecting terrorist. They only did what their leader and future tyrant had asked of them. The nation is still dealing with this distinct form of terrorism.

Terrorism does not need to be based on politics but can be criminal in nature, or even personal. The Drug Cartels are very much “terroristic” in every way possible. They deliberately inflict harm, death and destruction in order to spread fear-terror among the public. Fear creates a greater demand for drugs, as the tension and lack of hope spread throughout the population. The public becomes the cartel’s customer, victim, and protector all at the same moment.

A couple are torn by undue violence and abuse. Perhaps the husband inflicts mental, economic and physical terror upon his partner, family and even community. When a family member hits another to get what they want, that is terrorism. If a boss forces your mom, sister or brother to sexually service him, that is a form of terrorism. Remember all terrorism needs to flourish is the inaction of good people.

No matter your station in life, if you see terrorism in action and do nothing about it you are very much a part of that infliction upon others. A terrorist does not even need a gun or weapon except for their fists and cruel mouths to speak horrendous things to another person. Inflicting fear-terror for the sake of acquiring or achieving something no matter its purpose is wrong and socially punishable. Hero’s do something about their fear. They set it aside for a moment and do what is right in their eyes and that of society.

Raising your hand against another for whatever purpose you may have, can be viewed as a form of terrorism”. Violence of any kind is its tool to get what it wants and desires. ( S.K.)

Steven Kaszab
Bradford, Ontario
skaszab@yahoo.ca

News

Suspicious deaths of two N.S. men were the result of homicide, suicide: RCMP

Published

 on

Nova Scotia RCMP say their investigation into two suspicious deaths earlier this month has concluded that one man died by homicide and the other by suicide.

The bodies of two men, aged 40 and 73, were found in a home in Windsor, N.S., on Sept. 3.

Police say the province’s medical examiner determined the 40-year-old man was killed and the 73-year-old man killed himself.

They say the two men were members of the same family.

No arrests or charges are anticipated, and the names of the deceased will not be released.

RCMP say they will not be releasing any further details out of respect for the family.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Turning the tide: Quebec premier visits Cree Nation displaced by hydro project in 70s

Published

 on

For the first time in their history, members of the Cree community of Nemaska received a visit from a sitting Quebec premier on Sunday and were able to share first-hand the story of how they were displaced by a hydroelectric project in the 1970s.

François Legault was greeted in Nemaska by men and women who arrived by canoe to re-enact the founding of their new village in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region, in northern Quebec, 47 years ago. The community was forced in the early 1970s to move from its original location because members were told it would be flooded as part of the Nottaway-Broadback-Rupert hydro project.

The reservoir was ultimately constructed elsewhere, but by then the members of the village had already left for other places, abandoning their homes and many of their belongings in the process.

George Wapachee, co-author of the book “Going Home,” said community members were “relocated for nothing.”

“We didn’t know what the rights were, or who to turn to,” he said in an interview. “That turned us into refugees and we were forced to abandon the life we knew.”

Nemaska’s story illustrates the challenges Legault’s government faces as it looks to build new dams to meet the province’s power needs, which are anticipated to double by 2050. Legault has promised that any new projects will be developed in partnership with Indigenous people and have “social acceptability,” but experts say that’s easier said than done.

François Bouffard, an associate professor of electrical engineering at McGill University, said the earlier era of hydro projects were developed without any consideration for the Indigenous inhabitants living nearby.

“We live in a much different world now,” he said. “Any kind of hydro development, no matter where in Quebec, will require true consent and partnership from Indigenous communities.” Those groups likely want to be treated as stakeholders, he added.

Securing wider social acceptability for projects that significantly change the landscape — as hydro dams often do — is also “a big ask,” he said. The government, Bouchard added, will likely focus on boosting capacity in its existing dams, or building installations that run off river flow and don’t require flooding large swaths of land to create reservoirs.

Louis Beaumier, executive director of the Trottier Energy Institute at Polytechnique Montreal, said Legault’s visit to Nemaska represents a desire for reconciliation with Indigenous people who were traumatized by the way earlier projects were carried about.

Any new projects will need the consent of local First Nations, Beaumier said, adding that its easier to get their blessing for wind power projects compared to dams, because they’re less destructive to the environment and easier around which to structure a partnership agreement.

Beaumier added that he believes it will be nearly impossible to get the public — Indigenous or not — to agree to “the destruction of a river” for a new dam, noting that in recent decades people have come to recognize rivers as the “unique, irreplaceable riches” that they are.

Legault’s visit to northern Quebec came on Sept. 15, when the community gathers every year to remember the founding of the “New Nemaska,” on the shores of Lake Champion in the heart of the boreal forest, some 1,500 kilometres from Montreal. Nemaska Chief Clarence Jolly said the community invited Legault to a traditional feast on Sunday, and planned to present him with Wapachee’s book and tell him their stories.

The book, published in 2022 along with Susan Marshall, is filled with stories of Nemaska community members. Leaving behind sewing machines and hunting dogs, they were initially sent to two different villages, Wapachee said.

In their new homes, several of them were forced to live in “deplorable conditions,” and some were physically and verbally abused, he said. The new village of Nemaska was only built a few years later, in 1977.

“At this time, families were losing their children to prison-schools,” he said, in reference to the residential school system. “Imagine the burden of losing your community as well.”

Thomas Jolly, a former chief, said he was 15 years old when he was forced to leave his village with all his belongings in a single bag.

Meeting Legault was important “because have to recognize what happened and we have to talk about the repercussions that the relocation had on people,” he said, adding that those effects are still felt today.

Earlier Sunday, Legault was in the Cree community of Eastmain, where he participated in the official renaming of a hydro complex in honour of former premier Bernard Landry. At the event, Legault said he would follow the example of his late predecessor, who oversaw the signing of the historic “Paix des Braves” agreement between the Quebec government and the Cree in 2002.

He said there is “significant potential” in Eeyou Istchee James Bay, both in increasing the capacity of its large dams and in developing wind power projects.

“Obviously, we will do that with the Cree,” he said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Quebec premier visits Cree community displaced by hydro project in 1970s

Published

 on

NEMASKA – For the first time in their history, members of the Cree community of Nemaska received a visit from a sitting Quebec premier on Sunday and were able to share first-hand the story of how they were displaced by a hydroelectric project in the 1970s.

François Legault was greeted in Nemaska by men and women who arrived by canoe to re-enact the founding of their new village in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region, in northern Quebec, 47 years ago. The community was forced in the early 1970s to move from their original location because they were told it would be flooded as part of the Nottaway-Broadback-Rupert hydro project.

The reservoir was ultimately constructed elsewhere, but by then the members of the village had already left for other places, abandoning their homes and many of their belongings in the process.

George Wapachee, co-author of the book “Going Home,” said community members were “relocated for nothing.”

“We didn’t know what the rights were, or who to turn to,” he said in an interview. “That turned us into refugees and we were forced to abandon the life we knew.”

The book, published in 2022 by Wapachee and Susan Marshall, is filled with stories of Cree community members. Leaving behind sewing machines and hunting dogs, they were initially sent to two different villages, 100 and 300 kilometres away, Wapachee said.

In their new homes, several of them were forced to live in “deplorable conditions,” and some were physically and verbally abused, he said. The new village of Nemaska was only built a few years later, in 1977.

“At this time, families were losing their children to prison-schools,” he said, in reference to the residential school system. “Imagine the burden of losing your community as well.”

Legault’s visit came on Sept. 15, when the community gathers every year to remember the founding of the “New Nemaska,” on the shores of Lake Champion in the heart of the boreal forest, some 1,500 kilometres from Montreal. Nemaska Chief Clarence Jolly said the community invited Legault to a traditional feast on Sunday, and planned to present him with Wapachee’s book and tell him their stories.

Thomas Jolly, a former chief, said he was 15 years old when he was forced to leave his village with all his belongings in a single bag.

Meeting Legault was important “because have to recognize what happened and we have to talk about the repercussions that the relocation had on people,” he said, adding that those effects are still felt today.

Earlier Sunday, Legault had been in the Cree community of Eastmain, where he participated in the official renaming of a hydro dam in honour of former premier Bernard Landry.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version