What Makes My Spidey Senses Tingle With a Job Candidate | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Business

What Makes My Spidey Senses Tingle With a Job Candidate

Published

 on

Mentor

Call it my spidey senses—a feeling that something, or someone, is risky or dangerous—or “Professionally Ingrained Cynicism;” when someone doesn’t feel right, they just don’t “feel right.”

When you’ve been hiring for as long as I have, you develop an innate sense that tells you when a candidate is exaggerating or lying outright.

 

Consider these scenarios as a hiring manager:

 

1. A candidate claims to be a cutting-edge CPA. You ask them for their opinion on how blockchain may affect the corporate accounting function and related staffing. They look at you as if you’ve got three heads.

2. A candidate’s cover letter promotes themselves as a lead-generating digital marketer. However, when you Google them, you learn that they only have a few hundred X/Twitter followers, haven’t posted on LinkedIn in months, have barely any presence on Instagram, and aren’t on TikTok.

 

An experienced hiring manager will walk through a candidate’s digital footprint to determine if they’re interview-worthy. If deemed to be, they’ll ask probing questions for their opinions on or a “tell me a time when you” story to expose candidates who aren’t what they claim to be, such as the CPA not being cutting-edge or the digital marketer not practicing what they preached.

 

I’ve interviewed enough candidates to conclude that many have an overinflated sense of their skills and value to employers. “I have advanced Excel skills” is often untrue when given a test to assess Excel skills. “I speak French fluently” often becomes questionable when I conduct the interview in French.

 

Fake candidates—candidates who grossly overstate their competencies—are becoming increasingly prevalent, prompting employers to scrutinize a candidate’s background more deeply than ever before.

 

Your verbal responses and evidence of ability must be aligned.

 

Today, the hiring process of many employers, not all, presents job seekers with a Catch-22. In today’s job market, employers seek the “perfect candidate.” Searching for a unicorn often makes lies more attractive than truths. Consider how many people buy

into get-rich-quick schemes. People tend to believe someone if they can believe they can serve their self-interests, such as making them rich.

 

Lies and exaggerations are unethical attempts by candidates to tell hiring managers what they believe they want to hear, hoping to convince them they’re the unicorn candidate, hence why my spidey senses tingle when a candidate is excessively polished. The adage “too good to be true” is an adage I live by. I can tell when a candidate is talking to me straight or is rehashing verbiage some self-proclaiming career expert said would influence an interviewer. Having hired my share of Jekyll and Hydes, all tough lessons, I want to avoid a candidate who, once hired, is unrecognizable from the person they were during the hiring process.

 

In addition to being excessively polished, my spider senses tingle when a candidate is:

 

1. Not giving me straightforward, concrete answers.

 

Dodging my questions or not giving straight answers is evasive, a major red flag. A candidate who’s being evasive irritates me, sometimes to the point of ending an interview early. Besides being aggravating, evasiveness makes me feel the candidate is hiding something or is reluctant to admit they don’t know the answer.

 

During an interview, you must communicate clearly, straightforwardly, and, above all, honestly.

 

2. Not managing their emotions.

 

For many candidates, their emotions or being easily triggered (read: offended) are their own worst enemies. During an interview, if a candidate can’t control their emotions or maintain their composure, including nervousness, an indication of an inability to cope with stressful situations, I wonder how they’d handle an angry customer yelling.

 

An interview isn’t the place to bring up your financial and personal struggles. Instead of trying and hoping to make your interviewer feel sorry for you, focus on using examples and numbers to demonstrate why you’d be a great hire.

 

3. Unable to convincingly (keyword) explain why they’re looking to leave their job.

 

If you’re currently employed, your interviewer will ask, “Why are you looking to leave your job?” My spidey senses go off if a candidate’s answer doesn’t feel right.

 

As someone who’s changed jobs more than most, when asked why I’m looking to leave, I’ve given answers along the lines of:

 

· Company reorganization or downward trend in the industry.

· Shorten my commute.

 

These are reasons everyone can relate to. When a candidate says, “I’m looking for more responsibilities and career growth,” I ask myself, why isn’t their current employer giving them more responsibilities? Why aren’t they being promoted?

 

4. Unable to explain job changes.

 

As I mentioned, I’ve changed jobs frequently. Changing jobs to achieve career goals is often necessary, such as when I wanted to experience working overseas. However, your job changes need to make sense. They need to be supporting an end goal. It’s your responsibility to connect the dots and create an overarching career story in your resume, LinkedIn profile, and certainly during an interview. A candidate without a compelling career story makes my spidey senses tingle. I look for candidates looking for a job that’ll contribute to their career story, as opposed to just wanting a paycheck.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers “unsweetened” job search advice. You can send Nick your questions to artoffindingwork@gmail.com.

Business

Restaurant Brands reports US$357M Q3 net income, down from US$364M a year ago

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported net income of US$357 million for its third quarter, down from US$364 million in the same quarter last year.

The company, which keeps its books in U.S. dollars, says its profit amounted to 79 cents US per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with 79 cents US per diluted share a year earlier.

Revenue for the parent company of Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes and Firehouse Subs, totalled US$2.29 billion, up from US$1.84 billion in the same quarter last year.

Consolidated comparable sales were up 0.3 per cent.

On an adjusted basis, Restaurant Brands says it earned 93 cents US per diluted share in its latest quarter, up from an adjusted profit of 90 cents US per diluted share a year earlier.

The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 95 cents US per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:QSR)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Electric and gas utility Fortis reports $420M Q3 profit, up from $394M a year ago

Published

 on

 

ST. JOHN’S, N.L. – Fortis Inc. reported a third-quarter profit of $420 million, up from $394 million in the same quarter last year.

The electric and gas utility says the profit amounted to 85 cents per share for the quarter ended Sept. 30, up from 81 cents per share a year earlier.

Fortis says the increase was driven by rate base growth across its utilities, and strong earnings in Arizona largely reflecting new customer rates at Tucson Electric Power.

Revenue in the quarter totalled $2.77 billion, up from $2.72 billion in the same quarter last year.

On an adjusted basis, Fortis says it earned 85 cents per share in its latest quarter, up from an adjusted profit of 84 cents per share in the third quarter of 2023.

The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 82 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:FTS)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Thomson Reuters reports Q3 profit down from year ago as revenue rises

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Thomson Reuters reported its third-quarter profit fell compared with a year ago as its revenue rose eight per cent.

The company, which keeps its books in U.S. dollars, says it earned US$301 million or 67 cents US per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30. The result compared with a profit of US$367 million or 80 cents US per diluted share in the same quarter a year earlier.

Revenue for the quarter totalled US$1.72 billion, up from US$1.59 billion a year earlier.

In its outlook, Thomson Reuters says it now expects organic revenue growth of 7.0 per cent for its full year, up from earlier expectations for growth of 6.5 per cent.

On an adjusted basis, Thomson Reuters says it earned 80 cents US per share in its latest quarter, down from an adjusted profit of 82 cents US per share in the same quarter last year.

The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 76 cents US per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TRI)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version