Connect with us


What to expect from Ontario's budget as COVID-19 ravages the economy –



Thursday’s Ontario budget will pose a test for Premier Doug Ford: how willing is he to spend the kind of money needed to protect people from COVID-19 and spur economic recovery from the ongoing pandemic? 

In arguably the clearest sign of how vastly the pandemic has changed the political landscape in Ontario, a government led by Ford, elected on a crusade to cut spending, is about to table the biggest budget deficit in the province’s history. 

“This is going to be a great budget,” Ford said Wednesday during his daily COVID-19 briefing.

This is just the second budget of Ford’s mandate. The first, delivered in April 2019 by then-minister of finance Vic Fedeli, spurred outrage for its wide swathe of spending cuts — including a proposal to slash funding to public health units that was eventually reversed.

It’s a safe bet that Finance Minister Rod Phillips will not propose cutting public health spending in the midst of a second wave of COVID-19 with an average of nearly 1,000 new cases a day. Nor will there be any new taxes or fees, according to both Ford and Phillips.  

So what will be in the budget? Phillips dropped some hints on Wednesday. 

Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Finance Minister Rod Phillips delivered the province’s 2020 fiscal update at Queen’s Park on March 25. The government postponed tabling its full budget until November because of the COVID-19 pandemic. (Frank Gunn/The Canadian Press)

The budget “will begin to remove the biggest barriers to growth for communities across the province,” said Phillips, who joined Ford for the news briefing.

“We need to be making sure we’re dealing with the structural challenges that will get in the way of [economic recovery] and quite frankly, were getting in the way of Ontario’s potential even before the pandemic.” 

Phillips did not specify what “barriers to growth” are to be removed, but it’s clearly something to watch for. 

“We cannot expect our economy just to bounce back or for the lost jobs to return on their own,” he said.

“We will make available every necessary resource to continue to protect people’s health and [the budget] will expand on the support our government has provided for those still facing financial hardship due to the pandemic.” 

There are those who question whether the government has truly thrown every necessary resource at the pandemic, whether in supports to the private sector or the public sector. 

“We’re hoping the government will step up and really open their wallet for small businesses,” said Julie Kwiecinski, director of provincial affairs for the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB). 

Julie Kwiecinski is director of provincial affairs in Ontario for the Canadian Federation of Independent Business. (Julie Kwiecinski)

“Just letting businesses open is not going far enough,” said Kwiecinski in an interview with CBC News.     

Only one quarter of Ontario small businesses are seeing normal sales revenues, according to a CFIB survey. 

“How are they going to pay their bills?” said Kwiecinski. “We’ve seen the premier in news conferences saying he understands, that it breaks his heart. So we want to see him transfer that emotion into some tangible results and programs for small business.” 

Among the CFIB’s hopes for the budget: some relief on employers’ provincial health tax contributions, funding to buy personal protective equipment, a top-up to the federal commercial rent subsidy, and making good on Ford’s campaign promise to cut hydro rates by 12 per cent.  

A new poll shows plenty of support in Ontario for pandemic spending, and limited concern about red ink.  

The provincial government’s most recent forecast for the Ontario economy is a 6.7 per cent drop in GDP in 2020-21. (David Donnelly/CBC)

The survey by Abacus Data found 82 per cent of respondents want the government to “do what needs to be done to protect people impacted by the pandemic and public services,” even if it means big deficits. Only 18 per cent of respondents want the government to aggressively limit the size of the deficit. 

The Abacus Data survey was conducted through an online panel of 1,000 Ontario residents from Oct. 28 to 30. The margin of error for a comparable random sample of the same size is +/- 3.1 per cent, 19 times out of 20. The results were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched the age, gender, educational attainment, and regional breakdown of Ontario’s population.

The polling results suggest people and businesses are counting on the government for support to get through the pandemic, said Abacus Data CEO David Coletto. 

“When people are feeling vulnerable, when they don’t know how long this is going to go on for, now is not the time in their mind to be pulling back, to be cutting services, to be looking for any efficiencies or cuts,” Coletto said in an interview.  

“This is the moment where this government really needs to put its money where its mouth is,” said Sheila Block, senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, a non-partisan research agency with links to organized labour.

“We need to see funds flowing quickly and funds flowing in a way that’s consistent with the plan to support essential public services,” said Block in an interview with CBC News. 

“We really need the Ford government to take a larger role in the economy through this crisis. And we haven’t seen either of those things.”

Sheila Block is senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. (Lauren Pelley/CBC News)

Research by Ontario’s Financial Accountability Office found that provincial government spending accounts for just three per cent of the $110 billion in direct pandemic-related support to people, businesses and the public sector in Ontario. The federal government is the source of the other 97 per cent. 

Block is calling for big investments in the public sector — such things as school renovations and increased staffing in long-term care — as a way of stimulating the recovery. 

“What is going to be the engine of economic activity in Ontario over the next six months to a year?” Block asked.

“What we really are going to need is public-sector job creation and public-sector leadership to get us through this phase of the economic crisis that we’re in.”

Phillips has said the budget will lay out three scenarios for how the economy could play out over the next three years.

The government’s most recent financial report — published in August — projects the deficit for the 2020-21 fiscal year at $38.5 billion. That is based on a forecast that the economy would contract by 6.7 per cent this year, with government tax revenues taking a hit of some $10.8 billion. 

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


German economy grew by 8.5% in third quarter –



BERLIN (Reuters) – Germany’s gross domestic product grew by a record 8.5% in the third quarter as Europe’s largest economy partly recovered from an unprecedented plunge caused by the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in spring, the statistics office said on Tuesday.

The stronger-than expected rebound was mainly driven by higher household spending and soaring exports, the office said.

“This enabled the German economy to make up for a large part of the massive decline in gross domestic product caused by the coronavirus pandemic in the second quarter of 2020,” it added.

The reading marked an upward revision to an earlier flash estimate of 8.2% growth, and followed a 9.8% plunge in the second quarter.

The outlook is clouded by a second wave of coronavirus infections and a partial lockdown to slow the spread of the disease. Restaurants, bars, hotels and entertainment venues have been closed since Nov. 2, but shops and schools remain open.

Chancellor Angela Merkel and regional state premiers are planning to extend the “lockdown-light” on Wednesday until Dec. 20, according to a draft prepared for their meeting.

A contraction in the service sector is expected to weigh heavily on gross domestic product in the fourth quarter, while lockdown measures in other countries are likely to hit export-oriented manufacturers as well.

DIW economist Claus Michelsen said a decline in economic output was therefore on the cards, with initial estimates indicating a GDP drop of around 1% in the final quarter.

“Germany and many important trading partners are likely to slide back into recession,” Michelsen said.

(Reporting by Michael Nienaber and Rene Wagner; Editing by Riham Alkousaa and EKevin Liffey)

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


ROGER TAYLOR: Box maker, Maritime Paper, bets on post-pandemic economy – The Journal Pioneer



Roger Taylor
All Dailies
[email protected]

Packaging company, Maritime Paper Products Limited Partnership in Dartmouth has purchased some new technology, which will “reduce its manual operations with increased automation.”Despite that, Sheldon Gouthro president and CEO of Maritime Paper, says it will not reduce the size of the workforce at the company.
Currently there about 150 people at the company’s operation in Dartmouth and when combined with operations in St. John’s, N.L. and in Moncton, N.B., he says, the company’s total compliment of employees is about 250 people.
The equipment purchased from Fremont, Calif.-based Electronics For Imaging (EFI) Inc. is expected to improve productivity, cut waste and reduce Maritime Paper’s carbon footprint.
Gouthro wouldn’t say how much the new equipment cost, except to say it is a significant investment. The plan is for the equipment to be installed at the main plant in Burnside Industrial Park by the end of the first quarter next year.
He admitted concern about the break down of the Atlantic Bubble, which may make it difficult to bring in technicians to complete the installation of the new equipment on time.
“Our number-one goal is to reduce waste, not just in paper but in overall operational efficiency,” Gouthro stated in the EFI news release. “We estimate our waste reduction with Escada (control systems technology) will be more than 10 per cent.
“With better process control we can increase speed and push up time on our corrugator and run a more sustainable operation with benefits that trickle down to every area of the company,” he said. “It’s like having cruise control on your car. I doesn’t mean there isn’t someone there still driving the machine.”
Maritime Paper produces more than 150 cardboard packaging combinations, says Gouthro.
“Each one has a unique recipe requiring specific run speeds, so this technology will give us the best efficiency and quality of our combined board while making rapid, automatic adjustments without comprising the quality of our board,” he said.
Maritime Paper, has been an independent corrugated manufacturer and printer for more than 90 years. It is one of six operating companies controlled by Scotia Investments Ltd. based in Bedford. Scotia Investments was incorporated in 1927, as part of the ongoing legacy of the late Nova Scotia industrialist Roy Jodrey.
The company started planning to purchase the EFI Escada Corrugator Control system during the last part of 2019, before anyone heard of COVID-19 and what it would mean, says Gouthro.
The new Escada system being installed in Dartmouth gives Maritime Paper a competitive advantage with the ability to produce higher-quality graphics on superior combined board manufactured.
While there was concern about what would happen at the beginning of the pandemic, Gouthro says there was a small downturn in the beginning but business picked up as it became apparent that there was increased need for packaging due growth in e-commerce.
“We were fortunate enough to be designated an essential service, because of the increased need for packaging during,” he says.
While there were plenty of concern about making this type of investment during a medical and economic crisis, Maritime Paper’s decision to proceed with its plan, means the company is focused greater efficiency which should serve the company well once the pandemic comes to an end.
The Escada system purchased from EFI is designed to produce the highest-quality boards at optimum speeds and with repetitive consistency. The other EFI product purchased is the Escada Syncro 7, which is designed to manage the corrugator control functions automatically, thus achieving maximum output.
Although the new system is being installed in Dartmouth, it is expected to also create greater efficiencies at the company’s plants in St. John’s and Moncton.
With the growth in demand for packaging, driven by increased home deliveries across all sectors of the economy, Gouthro says, achieving high-quality graphics is a competitive advantage when dealing with clients, particularly in the food and beverage industries.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


The downfall of adtech means the trust economy is here – TechCrunch



2020 has brought about much-needed social movements. In June, activists launched the Stop Hate for Profit campaign, a call to hold social media companies like Facebook accountable for the hate happening on their platforms.

The idea was to pull advertising spending to wake these social platforms up. More than 1,200 businesses and nonprofits joined the movement, including brands such as The North Face, Patagonia and Verizon. I led my company, Cheetah Digital, to join alongside some of our clients like Starbucks and VF Corp.

Stop Hate for Profit highlighted social media hitting its tipping point. Twitter and Snapchat chose to stand up against hate speech, banning political ads and taking action to flag misinformation. Facebook, unfortunately, has not yet been as proactive, or at best it’s been sporadic in its response.

While many thought the movement would come and go, the reality is it has only just begun. With America conducting arguably its most divisive election in history, these problems won’t just go away. For marketers, Stop Hate for Profit is more than a social movement — it is pointing to an issue with ad tech as a whole.

I believe we are seeing the downfall of ad tech as we know it with social media boycotts and data privacy leading the charge.

The social media quagmire

In May, Forrester released a report titled “It’s OK to Break Up with Social Media” that contained statistics indicating that consumers are fed up with social media: 70% of respondents said they don’t trust social media platforms with their data. Only 14% of consumers believe the information they read on social media is trustworthy. 37% of online adults in the U.S. believe social media does more harm than good.

Here is the reality we need to get back to: Social media isn’t built for marketers to reach consumers. In the beginning of the social media craze, brands rushed to get on board and join the conversations. What many brands discovered is these channels became a platform for customer complaints not for building positive brand perception. Furthermore, the social platforms marketers flocked to as an avenue to reach customers began charging marketers just to get to the customers.

The algorithms that define what content you see unfortunately make it harder for people to see opposing views, and this more than anything else polarizes society further. If you start looking at QAnon content, very soon that’s all the algorithms feed you. You might spend more time on social platforms fueling their ad dollars, but you have also lost a grip on reality. Marketers must admit things have gone too far on social media and it is okay to move on.

Privacy matters

Imagine you are in need of a minor surgery. Perhaps you take an Uber ride to the specialist for a consultation. Next, you go get the surgery and it is successful. Soon you find yourself at home recovering and all is well. That is, until you start scrolling Facebook. Suddenly advertisements pop up for medical malpractice lawyers, but you haven’t told anyone about the surgery and you certainly didn’t post about it on social media.

Here you are, just wanting to rest and recover at home, but instead you are being bombarded by advertisements. So how did those ads get there? You left a digital footprint, your data was sold and now you’re being hit with intrusive ads. To me, this story crystallizes the abuse ad tech has been fostering in the world around us. There’s an utter invasion of privacy and consumers aren’t blind to it.

Data privacy has been a focus of conversation for marketers for several years now. Just this year, America saw the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) go into effect and become enforceable. This legislation gives back control of data to the consumer. In June, Apple announced updates to make it harder for apps and publishers to track location data and use it for ad targeting. At the beginning of August, Meredith and Kroger announced a partnership to provide first-party sales data for advertising efforts in an attempt to move off of cookies. It is clear data privacy is not a fad going away anytime soon.

Where do marketers go from here?

I believe the future of marketing is the trust economy. The Stop Hate for Profit campaign, the invasion of privacy and shifting attitudes and behaviors of consumers point to the end of an era where marketers relied upon third-party data. Trust is now the most impactful economic power, not data. We conducted research earlier this year with eConsultancy, and our findings revealed that 39% of U.S. consumers don’t like personal ads driven from cookie data. People don’t want to be tracked and targeted as they click around the web. Ad tech’s roof is caving in and marketers must adjust.

The old methods of marketing won’t carry you through into the era of the trust economy. It is time to look to new channels and revisit old channels. We have to shift back to the channels where we own what is being said. Advertising on social platforms should be focused on driving consumers to owned channels where you can capture their permissions and data to connect with them directly. Consider email as a channel to focus on.

Don’t worry — it works. That same eConsultancy report found nearly three out of four consumers made a purchase in the last 12 months from an email sent by a brand or retailer and massively outperformed social ads when it came to driving sales. Similarly nine times as many U.S. consumers want to increase their participation in loyalty programs in 2020 than those that want to reduce their involvement. You have to ensure you are owning your data and loyalty programs are a treasure trove of consumer data you own. Emily Collins from Forrester does a good job of explaining why you can achieve this with a true loyalty strategy, not just a rewards program.

Your goal should be to build direct connections to consumers. Building trust means offering a value exchange for data and engagement, not going and buying it from a third-party. Fatemah Khatibloo, a principal analyst for Forrester wrote, “Zero-party data is that which a customer intentionally and proactively shares with a brand. It can include purchase intentions, personal context, and how the individual wants the brand to recognize her.” This zero-party data is foundational for the trust economy and you should check out her advice on how it helps you navigate privacy and personalization.

Take responsibility

The trust economy is really about asking yourself, as a marketer, what you stand for. How do you view your relationship with consumers? Do you care? What kind of relationship do you want? Privacy has to be part of this. Accountability is crucial. We must be accountable to where we are putting our money. It’s time to stop supporting hate, propping up the worst of society and fueling division. Start taking responsibility, caring about social issues and building meaningful relationships with consumers built on trust.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading