What we really want to see at CES 2020 - Mashable | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Tech

What we really want to see at CES 2020 – Mashable

Published

 on


We’re hoping to see companies’ talk about more than just shiny new products this year.

Image: ROBYN BECK / AFP via Getty Images

When it comes to CES, there are a few things that will always be true: the TVs will get bigger and thinner, the robots will be weirder, and companies will find even more creative ways cram Google Assistant and Alexa into every object you own. 

Mashable will once again be on the ground uncovering the best (and the weirdest) the show has to offer. But besides jaw-dropping TVs and an endless buffet of WTF smart home gadgets, we’re hoping to see a few new trends emerge this year.

Flexible screens that don’t suck

Last year at CES, we saw just one foldable phone: Royole’s FlexPai. But while the Chinese company had the distinction of being the first to show off a consumer-ready smartphone with a flexible display, it had some major issues. In the year since, we’ve seen foldable phones from Samsung, Huawei, and Motorola. And, given all the excitement these devices have created, it seems all but inevitable we’ll see even more companies experimenting with flexible display technology.

But given how many of these early devices have been plagued with bugs and delays, we’re hoping we’ll see advancements in flexible display technology that make us excited for a future with bendy devices.

Real conversations about privacy

One of the biggest fails of last year’s CES was that there were basically zero meaningful conversations about consumer privacy. In fact, at the biggest tech trade show of the year, the major privacy-related headline came from Apple’s shade-throwing billboard.

But with new privacy laws, and continued threats of impending government regulation, we expect this year will be different. Companies can no longer afford to ignore privacy issues in the hopes of distracting us with their latest shiny new feature. Even Apple, which typically ignores CES, is making an appearance at the show this year. And while we can’t be sure how other major companies will handle privacy issues, we’re hopeful the last year has given them enough incentive to treat the issue as seriously as the rest of their announcements.

Self-driving cars that don’t disappoint

Image: bob al-greene / mashable

Self-driving cars have been a mainstay at CES for a while now, but as we noted last year: the novelty of these cars is getting old and, increasingly, companies are instead trying to outdo each other with tech inside the car rather than competing on self-driving features alone.

I asked Mashable’s transportation reporter, Sasha Lekach, what would make this year’s crop of self-driving tech stand out and her answer was simple: “actual driverless cars without anyone in the driver seat.” 

She also hopes more companies will focus on using AI technology for safety upgrades, such as systems that can detect drowsiness and distracted driving, rather than unnecessarily cramming “AI” into infotainment systems or climate control. 

Embrace sex tech

CES has long been criticized for rampant sexism. Last year, CES organizer CTA (Consumer Technology Association) came under fire for revoking a coveted award from a female-led sex toy company and effectively banning sex tech companies from the show floor saying they violated the organizations rules against “profanity.” 

Mashable’s Jess Joho, who has been following the saga for the last year, says she hope this year CTA will not just accept these companies but embrace them. 

“I’d love to see the CTA embrace sex tech and wellness as not only a normal part of everyday life, but also an absolutely vital part of the more human-centric vision of technology we need in the future,” she tells me. “For a long time male sexuality was covertly embraced at CES with booth babes, VR porn, and robotic strippers. It’s time we elevated other perspectives on the future of sex, forgoing seedy voyeurism for a framework that instead treats sexual pleasure as a human right for everyone.”

Wearables move beyond the wrist

While there’s no shortage of companies with new (and sometimes strange) forms of wearable tech, it’s much more difficult to find ones that can improve our everyday lives. Mashable tech reporter Rachel Kraus says she’s hoping to see a greater variety of wearable tech that doesn’t just look like a watch. 

“I want to see wearables not for your wrist that aren’t totally heinous or useless,” she says. That can be anything from smart clothing with sensors to brain-scanning technology. The bottom line: she wants “anything that can actually tell you valuable information.”

More sustainability

It’s hard not to walk around CES, which plays hosts to hundreds of thousands of attendees and more gadgets and useless swag than you could ever keep track of, and not think about the sheer amount of waste produced by these companies. And while CES’ organizers say they are trying to reduce waste, we’d love to see more of a focus on sustainability throughout the show. 

Whether it’s upstarts like alternative meat company Impossible Foods (which is making another CES appearance this year) or old-fashioned consumer tech companies taking more responsibility for the products they create, we’re hoping to see more innovation that makes us actually feel good about the future.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Slack researcher discusses the fear, loathing and excitement surrounding AI in the workplace

Published

 on

 

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Artificial intelligence‘s recent rise to the forefront of business has left most office workers wondering how often they should use the technology and whether a computer will eventually replace them.

Those were among the highlights of a recent study conducted by the workplace communications platform Slack. After conducting in-depth interviews with 5,000 desktop workers, Slack concluded there are five types of AI personalities in the workplace: “The Maximalist” who regularly uses AI on their jobs; “The Underground” who covertly uses AI; “The Rebel,” who abhors AI; “The Superfan” who is excited about AI but still hasn’t used it; and “The Observer” who is taking a wait-and-see approach.

Only 50% of the respondents fell under the Maximalist or Underground categories, posing a challenge for businesses that want their workers to embrace AI technology. The Associated Press recently discussed the excitement and tension surrounding AI at work with Christina Janzer, Slack’s senior vice president of research and analytics.

Q: What do you make about the wide range of perceptions about AI at work?

A: It shows people are experiencing AI in very different ways, so they have very different emotions about it. Understanding those emotions will help understand what is going to drive usage of AI. If people are feeling guilty or nervous about it, they are not going to use it. So we have to understand where people are, then point them toward learning to value this new technology.

Q: The Maximalist and The Underground both seem to be early adopters of AI at work, but what is different about their attitudes?

A: Maximalists are all in on AI. They are getting value out of it, they are excited about it, and they are actively sharing that they are using it, which is a really big driver for usage among others.

The Underground is the one that is really interesting to me because they are using it, but they are hiding it. There are different reasons for that. They are worried they are going to be seen as incompetent. They are worried that AI is going to be seen as cheating. And so with them, we have an opportunity to provide clear guidelines to help them know that AI usage is celebrated and encouraged. But right now they don’t have guidelines from their companies and they don’t feel particularly encouraged to use it.

Overall, there is more excitement about AI than not, so I think that’s great We just need to figure out how to harness that.

Q: What about the 19% of workers who fell under the Rebel description in Slack’s study?

A: Rebels tend to be women, which is really interesting. Three out of five rebels are women, which I obviously don’t like to see. Also, rebels tend to be older. At a high level, men are adopting the technology at higher rates than women.

Q: Why do you think more women than men are resisting AI?

A: Women are more likely to see AI as a threat, more likely to worry that AI is going to take over their jobs. To me, that points to women not feeling as trusted in the workplace as men do. If you feel trusted by your manager, you are more likely to experiment with AI. Women are reluctant to adopt a technology that might be seen as a replacement for them whereas men may have more confidence that isn’t going to happen because they feel more trusted.

Q: What are some of the things employers should be doing if they want their workers to embrace AI on the job?

A: We are seeing three out of five desk workers don’t even have clear guidelines with AI, because their companies just aren’t telling them anything, so that’s a huge opportunity.

Another opportunity to encourage AI usage in the open. If we can create a culture where it’s celebrated, where people can see the way people are using it, then they can know that it’s accepted and celebrated. Then they can be inspired.

The third thing is we have to create a culture of experimentation where people feel comfortable trying it out, testing it, getting comfortable with it because a lot of people just don’t know where to start. The reality is you can start small, you don’t have to completely change your job. Having AI write an email or summarize content is a great place to start so you can start to understand what this technology can do.

Q: Do you think the fears about people losing their jobs because of AI are warranted?

A: People with AI are going to replace people without AI.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Biden administration to provide $325 million for new Michigan semiconductor factory

Published

 on

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration said Tuesday that it would provide up to $325 million to Hemlock Semiconductor for a new factory, a move that could help give Democrats a political edge in the swing state of Michigan ahead of election day.

The funding would support 180 manufacturing jobs in Saginaw County, where Republicans and Democrats were neck-in-neck for the past two presidential elections. There would also be construction jobs tied to the factory that would produce hyper-pure polysilicon, a building block for electronics and solar panels, among other technologies.

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said on a call with reporters that the funding came from the CHIPS and Science Act, which President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. It’s part of a broader industrial strategy that the campaign of Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee, supports, while Republican nominee Donald Trump, the former president, sees tariff hikes and income tax cuts as better to support manufacturing.

“What we’ve been able to do with the CHIPS Act is not just build a few new factories, but fundamentally revitalize the semiconductor ecosystem in our country with American workers,” Raimondo said. “All of this is because of the vision of the Biden-Harris administration.”

A senior administration official said the timing of the announcement reflected the negotiating process for reaching terms on the grant, rather than any political considerations. The official insisted on anonymity to discuss the process.

After site work, Hemlock Semiconductor plans to begin construction in 2026 and then start production in 2028, the official said.

Running in 2016, Trump narrowly won Saginaw County and Michigan as a whole. But in 2020 against Biden, both Saginaw County and Michigan flipped to the Democrats.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

The Internet is Littered in ‘Educated Guesses’ Without the ‘Education’

Published

 on

Although no one likes a know-it-all, they dominate the Internet.

The Internet began as a vast repository of information. It quickly became a breeding ground for self-proclaimed experts seeking what most people desire: recognition and money.

Today, anyone with an Internet connection and some typing skills can position themselves, regardless of their education or experience, as a subject matter expert (SME). From relationship advice, career coaching, and health and nutrition tips to citizen journalists practicing pseudo-journalism, the Internet is awash with individuals—Internet talking heads—sharing their “insights,” which are, in large part, essentially educated guesses without the education or experience.

The Internet has become a 24/7/365 sitcom where armchair experts think they’re the star.

Not long ago, years, sometimes decades, of dedicated work and acquiring education in one’s field was once required to be recognized as an expert. The knowledge and opinions of doctors, scientists, historians, et al. were respected due to their education and experience. Today, a social media account and a knack for hyperbole are all it takes to present oneself as an “expert” to achieve Internet fame that can be monetized.

On the Internet, nearly every piece of content is self-serving in some way.

The line between actual expertise and self-professed knowledge has become blurry as an out-of-focus selfie. Inadvertently, social media platforms have created an informal degree program where likes and shares are equivalent to degrees. After reading selective articles, they’ve found via and watching some TikTok videos, a person can post a video claiming they’re an herbal medicine expert. Their new “knowledge,” which their followers will absorb, claims that Panda dung tea—one of the most expensive teas in the world and isn’t what its name implies—cures everything from hypertension to existential crisis. Meanwhile, registered dietitians are shaking their heads, wondering how to compete against all the misinformation their clients are exposed to.

More disturbing are individuals obsessed with evangelizing their beliefs or conspiracy theories. These people write in-depth blog posts, such as Elvis Is Alive and the Moon Landings Were Staged, with links to obscure YouTube videos, websites, social media accounts, and blogs. Regardless of your beliefs, someone or a group on the Internet shares them, thus confirming your beliefs.

Misinformation is the Internet’s currency used to get likes, shares, and engagement; thus, it often spreads like a cosmic joke. Consider the prevalence of clickbait headlines:

  • You Won’t Believe What Taylor Swift Says About Climate Change!
  • This Bedtime Drink Melts Belly Fat While You Sleep!
  • In One Week, I Turned $10 Into $1 Million!

Titles that make outrageous claims are how the content creator gets reads and views, which generates revenue via affiliate marketing, product placement, and pay-per-click (PPC) ads. Clickbait headlines are how you end up watching a TikTok video by a purported nutrition expert adamantly asserting you can lose belly fat while you sleep by drinking, for 14 consecutive days, a concoction of raw eggs, cinnamon, and apple cider vinegar 15 minutes before going to bed.

Our constant search for answers that’ll explain our convoluted world and our desire for shortcuts to success is how Internet talking heads achieve influencer status. Because we tend to seek low-hanging fruits, we listen to those with little experience or knowledge of the topics they discuss yet are astute enough to know what most people want to hear.

There’s a trend, more disturbing than spreading misinformation, that needs to be called out: individuals who’ve never achieved significant wealth or traded stocks giving how-to-make-easy-money advice, the appeal of which is undeniable. Several people I know have lost substantial money by following the “advice” of Internet talking heads.

Anyone on social media claiming to have a foolproof money-making strategy is lying. They wouldn’t be peddling their money-making strategy if they could make easy money.

Successful people tend to be secretive.

Social media companies design their respective algorithms to serve their advertisers—their source of revenue—interest; hence, content from Internet talking heads appears most prominent in your feeds. When a video of a self-professed expert goes viral, likely because it pressed an emotional button, the more people see it, the more engagement it receives, such as likes, shares and comments, creating a cycle akin to a tornado.

Imagine scrolling through your TikTok feed and stumbling upon a “scientist” who claims they can predict the weather using only aluminum foil, copper wire, sea salt and baking soda. You chuckle, but you notice his video got over 7,000 likes, has been shared over 600 times and received over 400 comments. You think to yourself, “Maybe this guy is onto something.” What started as a quest to achieve Internet fame evolved into an Internet-wide belief that weather forecasting can be as easy as DIY crafts.

Since anyone can call themselves “an expert,” you must cultivate critical thinking skills to distinguish genuine expertise from self-professed experts’ self-promoting nonsense. While the absurdity of the Internet can be entertaining, misinformation has serious consequences. The next time you read a headline that sounds too good to be true, it’s probably an Internet talking head making an educated guess; without the education seeking Internet fame, they can monetize.

______________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a self-described connoisseur of human psychology, writes about what’s

on his mind from Toronto. You can follow Nick on Twitter and Instagram @NKossovan.

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version