What's Pierre Poilievre's Conservative Party Policy on Racism on Black Canadians? | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

What’s Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party Policy on Racism on Black Canadians?

Published

 on

Pierre Poilievre is the newly elected leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, and the CBC has described him as “a 21st-century populist who thinks his moment has arrived”. As leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, Pierre is a Harper Conservative, following the political ideology of Stephen Harper, the former Canadian prime minister.

Unfortunately, Harper’s Ideologies aren’t favoured by many Canadians as they have been criticized for opposing multiculturalism and immigration and disregarding environmental and social issues.

Therefore, Harper Conservatives have been criticized by many as “authoritarian, undemocratic, out of touch, and racist.” This criticism also rubs off on Pierre Poilievre, as many question his policy on social issues, especially racism against black Canadians.

Controversial Remarks and Action of Pierre Poilievre

For now, Poilievre has not explicitly stated his policy on racism against Black Canadians since no source conveys such information. Nevertheless, the Conservative Leader has made controversial remarks and actions on related issues. 

Opposed Recognizing Systemic Racism in the RCMP 

Pierre Poilievre previously opposed the motion to recognize systemic racism in the RCMP and called it a “smear” against the police in June 2020, when he was the Conservative finance critic. He said the motion, which the NDP introduced, was “an attack on the brave men and women in uniform who keep us safe.”

Poilievre further argued that there was no evidence of systemic racism in the RCMP and that the term was vague and undefined. According to Pierre, “systemic racism means that the entire system is racist, that the people who built the system are racist, that the people who operate the system are racist, and that the outcomes of the system are racist.” 

Nevertheless, his opposition to the motion was criticized by many, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who said that systemic racism was an issue in all institutions, including the RCMP. 

Trudeau argued that systemic racism does not mean that individuals are intentionally racist but that the systems they operate in have biases that affect racialized people disproportionately.

Introducing the Fair Elections Act

Another example linking Pierre Poilievre to controversy is when he introduced the Fair Elections Act in February 2014, when he was the Minister of Democratic Reform. 

The act was controversial because it made several changes to the Canada Elections Act and other acts related to federal elections in Canada. One of the changes was to eliminate the use of vouching and Voter Information Cards as a form of ID. Poilievre claimed that these forms of ID were prone to fraud and abuse and undermined the integrity of the electoral system. 

Pierre Poilievre argued in favour of the Fair Elections Act that “vouching is a broken system that is wide open to fraud” and that “Voter Information Cards are not a reliable form of identification.” He also argued that there were 39 other acceptable forms of ID that electors could use to prove their identity and address and that most Canadians had access to them.

However, many critics and experts disagreed with Poilievre‘s claims and opposed the elimination of vouching and Voter Information Cards. They argued that these forms of ID were necessary for some groups of electors who faced barriers to obtaining other forms of ID.

These groups mainly include students, seniors, homeless people, people with disabilities, and Canada’s black population. One member of the Canadian Federation of Students, Maude Barlow, commented against the notion, saying, “…this is just a way of blocking all sorts of people — the ones least likely to vote for the Harper government.” 

These examples, alongside others, make it complicated to determine Pierre Poilievre’s policy on Racism, especially towards Canada’s black community. However, it’s also worth mentioning that Poilievre was quick to reject someone strictly for their racist views.

Using ‘Racist’ Thin Blue Line in Commemoration

Pierre Poilievre got into another controversy in March 2023 over the use of the thin blue line symbol in his social media post to commemorate two Edmonton police officers who were killed that week. 

It’s worth mentioning the thin blue line is a symbol that is supposed to show support for the police or honour fallen officers. However, it’s been banned since it’s associated with white supremacy, racism, and fascism, especially since the Black Lives Matter movement. 

Most people on Twitter criticized Poilievre for politicizing the tragedy and using a divisive and offensive symbol. The Canadian Anti-Hate Network also stated that it often encounters the thin blue line and ‘back the blue’ symbols on social media pages used by hate groups. 

Despite the backlash, Poilievre has not responded to the accusations or explained his reason for choosing the symbol.

Pierre Has Denounced a Racist and Their Views

Recently, Pierre Poilievre distanced himself and his political party from the racist and hateful views of German politician Christine Anderson. She was on a cross-Canada tour and chose to have dinner with three conservative Members of Parliament (MP) – Niagara West MP Dean Allison, Oshawa MP Colin Carrie, and Haldimand–Norfolk MP Leslyn Lewis.

Shortly afterwards, photos emerged online showing Anderson at a group dinner along with these three Canadian MPs. The meeting was condemned on X, formerly Twitter, by the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, commenting on their concerns about communicating with Christine Anderson. 

It’s worth noting that Christine Anderson is a member of a far-right party in Germany called Alternative for Germany (AfD). This political group is known for having extreme racist, anti-Muslim, and anti-immigration perspectives. 

Ultimately, Christine Anderson is at the centre of several controversies, and Canadians were upset at her arrival in Canada and having dinner with three Members of Parliament. 

Upon noticing the backlash, conservative leader Pierre Poilievre quickly distances himself and the party from Anderson. A statement from Poilievre, issued by the director of media relations, condemned Anderson and her views.

It stated, “Christine Anderson’s views are vile and have no place in our politics. The MPs were unaware of this visiting Member of the European Parliament’s opinions and regretted meeting with her. “

He continues, “Frankly, it would be better if Anderson never visited Canada in the first place. She and her racist, hateful views are not welcome here.” 

Pierre Poilievre further comments that they were unaware of Anderson’s views, mentioning that such knowledge would have deterred them from meeting. According to his statement,”…we do not share or endorse her views and strongly condemn any views that are racist and harmful”. 

Harper Conservatives have faced criticism for allegedly having authoritarian, undemocratic, out-of-touch, and racist views. As the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, Pierre Poilievre is no exception to this scrutiny.

While he has been at the centre of several controversies, there is no definite indication of Poilievre’s policy on racism against Canada’s Black community. He refused to recognize systemic racism in the RCMP, used a ‘racist’ symbol, and introduced the Fair Elections Act in 2014.

At the same time, he has also denounced racism, with a grand example being him distancing himself from German politician Christine Anderson and her racist views. Pierre also denounced the “White replacement theory” in 2022, which was thought to motivate the shooting at Buffalo, N.Y.

Ultimately, the debate on Pierre Poilievre’s policy on Racism is still debatable, but for now, there’s insufficient evidence to say he’s against Black people in Canada.

News

Politics likely pushed Air Canada toward deal with ‘unheard of’ gains for pilots

Published

 on

MONTREAL – Politics, public opinion and salary hikes south of the border helped push Air Canada toward a deal that secures major pay gains for pilots, experts say.

Hammered out over the weekend, the would-be agreement includes a cumulative wage hike of nearly 42 per cent over four years — an enormous bump by historical standards — according to one source who was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. The previous 10-year contract granted increases of just two per cent annually.

The federal government’s stated unwillingness to step in paved the way for a deal, noted John Gradek, after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made it plain the two sides should hash one out themselves.

“Public opinion basically pressed the federal cabinet, including the prime minister, to keep their hands clear of negotiations and looking at imposing a settlement,” said Gradek, who teaches aviation management at McGill University.

After late-night talks at a hotel near Toronto’s Pearson airport, the country’s biggest airline and the union representing 5,200-plus aviators announced early Sunday morning they had reached a tentative agreement, averting a strike that would have grounded flights and affected some 110,000 passengers daily.

The relative precariousness of the Liberal minority government as well as a push to appear more pro-labour underlay the prime minister’s hands-off approach to the negotiations.

Trudeau said Friday the government would not step in to fix the impasse — unlike during a massive railway work stoppage last month and a strike by WestJet mechanics over the Canada Day long weekend that workers claimed road roughshod over their constitutional right to collective bargaining. Trudeau said the government respects the right to strike and would only intervene if it became apparent no negotiated deal was possible.

“They felt that they really didn’t want to try for a third attempt at intervention and basically said, ‘Let’s let the airline decide how they want to deal with this one,'” said Gradek.

“Air Canada ran out of support as the week wore on, and by the time they got to Friday night, Saturday morning, there was nothing left for them to do but to basically try to get a deal set up and accepted by ALPA (Air Line Pilots Association).”

Trudeau’s government was also unlikely to consider back-to-work legislation after the NDP tore up its agreement to support the Liberal minority in Parliament, Gradek said. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, whose party has traditionally toed a more pro-business line, also said last week that Tories “stand with the pilots” and swore off “pre-empting” the negotiations.

Air Canada CEO Michael Rousseau had asked Ottawa on Thursday to impose binding arbitration pre-emptively — “before any travel disruption starts” — if talks failed. Backed by business leaders, he’d hoped for an effective repeat of the Conservatives’ move to head off a strike in 2012 by legislating Air Canada pilots and ground crew to stick to their posts before any work stoppage could start.

The request may have fallen flat, however. Gradek said he believes there was less anxiety over the fallout from an airline strike than from the countrywide railway shutdown.

He also speculated that public frustration over thousands of cancelled flights would have flowed toward Air Canada rather than Ottawa, prompting the carrier to concede to a deal yielding “unheard of” gains for employees.

“It really was a total collapse of the Air Canada bargaining position,” he said.

Pilots are slated to vote in the coming weeks on the four-year contract.

Last year, pilots at Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and American Airlines secured agreements that included four-year pay boosts ranging from 34 per cent to 40 per cent, ramping up pressure on other carriers to raise wages.

After more than a year of bargaining, Air Canada put forward an offer in August centred around a 30 per cent wage hike over four years.

But the final deal, should union members approve it, grants a 26 per cent increase in the first year alone, retroactive to September 2023, according to the source. Three wage bumps of four per cent would follow in 2024 through 2026.

Passengers may wind up shouldering some of that financial load, one expert noted.

“At the end of the day, it’s all us consumers who are paying,” said Barry Prentice, who heads the University of Manitoba’s transport institute.

Higher fares may be mitigated by the persistence of budget carrier Flair Airlines and the rapid expansion of Porter Airlines — a growing Air Canada rival — as well as waning demand for leisure trips. Corporate travel also remains below pre-COVID-19 levels.

Air Canada said Sunday the tentative contract “recognizes the contributions and professionalism of Air Canada’s pilot group, while providing a framework for the future growth of the airline.”

The union issued a statement saying that, if ratified, the agreement will generate about $1.9 billion of additional value for Air Canada pilots over the course of the deal.

Meanwhile, labour tension with cabin crew looms on the horizon. Air Canada is poised to kick off negotiations with the union representing more than 10,000 flight attendants this year before the contract expires on March 31.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:AC)



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Energy minister says public money could help finance Alberta energy cleanup

Published

 on

EDMONTON – Alberta’s energy minister is promising strong action by next fall to clean up the province’s growing backlog of unreclaimed oil and gas sites.

“There are many oil wells to reclaim and the current system is unlikely to see them reclaimed,” Brian Jean said in an interview with The Canadian Press.

But Jean said industry might need help from public finances to live up to its legal obligations, as well as lower municipal tax burdens and a lighter regulatory approach.

“I don’t like sticks. I like carrots,” Jean said.

“Without changes to how we approach fixed costs and we approach financing well closure, we won’t make the required progress. We need to find new ways to do liability financing, and we need to change the approach on municipal taxes.”

Alberta government figures show the province has nearly a half-million energy wells. Less than a quarter are reclaimed.

Meanwhile, the province’s conventional oilpatch is in decline, with production falling slightly over the last decade. Less than 30 per cent of Alberta’s wells are new or active.

The squeeze between growing environmental liabilities and falling revenue has many worried about who will pay the cleanup bill. The tab has been estimated at anywhere from $59 billion to $260 billion.

Energy companies are required to clean up after themselves as a condition of their licences, and Jean said he supports the principle of polluter pay.

“It’s important to me to make certain industry is responsible for its own messes,” he said.

But they may need a little help.

“To stimulate activities that are necessary to protect Albertans, we might have to do some investment,” said Jean. “I’m not going to rule anything out.”

The United Conservative Party government has already proposed two programs that would use taxpayer dollars to help energy companies pay for their legally required cleanup. Both have been heavily criticized.

Jean said municipal taxes on energy facilities will also be scrutinized. He suggested municipal leaders are open to the idea that some taxes are better than no taxes at all.

“They understand that the industry needs to be healthy in order to pay municipal taxes. You have to have a tax that actually makes sense.

“They also understand we’re in it together.”

Rural Municipalities Alberta calculates provincial moves have cost its members $9 billion in reduced assessments and $332 million in mandated tax holidays on top of $252 million in unpaid taxes.

Jean refused to commit whether industry levies, such as those that go into the fund that cleans up abandoned wells, would increase.

“At this stage, I would say the Orphan Well Association is well funded. But the truth is, it’s going to change.”

Rules governing oilpatch operations may also change.

“We need to make sure our industry is able to operate competitively and, as such, lower the regulatory burden as far as things that aren’t necessary,” Jean said.

He said the Alberta Energy Regulator’s current board of experts and industry players has removed what he calls “politics” from the board’s decisions.

“That’s why we want experts on the board and filled it with people who find solutions rather than just complaints.”

Meanwhile, Jean’s government is considering a report that recommends the regulator operate more closely with politicians.

The report, by longtime industry insider and conservative activist David Yager, suggests the regulator “improve long-term planning and strategic alignment between the Government of Alberta and the (regulator).”

Consultation on new legislation, which Jean said he hopes to introduce in fall 2025, is already being organized. Six discussion tables are being formed with industry players, landowners, reclamation experts, rural municipalities and Indigenous oil and gas interests.

Jean listed organizations he planned to hear from but did not mention any environmental groups. There are no forums planned for public input.

“As far as public participation in letter-writing campaigns or open-mike sessions, I don’t see that,” Jean said. “I invite people to write to their provincial representative.”

Alberta’s environmental legacy from decades of oil and gas extraction has grown under Progressive Conservative, New Democrat and UCP governments. Jean said the current regime is the one that will finally face up to the problem.

“We are more aggressive on this cleanup file than anybody else in the world,” he said.

“It’s one that’s been ignored by governments for years, because they’ve been afraid of it. I’m not going to be afraid.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump doesn’t share details about his family’s cryptocurrency venture during X launch event

Published

 on

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on Monday launched his family’s cryptocurrency venture, World Liberty Financial, with an interview on the X social media platform in which he also gave his first public comments on the apparent assassination attempt against him a day earlier.

Trump did not discuss specifics about World Liberty Financial or how it would work, pivoting from questions about cryptocurrency to talking about artificial intelligence or other topics. Instead, he recounted his experience Sunday, saying he and a friend playing golf “heard shots being fired in the air, and I guess probably four or five.”

“I would have loved to have sank that last putt,” Trump said. He credited the Secret Service agent who spotted the barrel of a rifle and began firing toward it as well as law enforcement and a civilian who he said helped track down the suspect.

World Liberty Financial is expected to be a borrowing and lending service used to trade cryptocurrencies, which are forms of digital money that can be traded over the internet without relying on the global banking system. Exchanges often charge fees for withdrawals of Bitcoin and other currencies.

Other speakers after Trump, including his eldest son, Don Jr., talked about embracing cryptocurrency as an alternative to what they allege is a banking system tilted against conservatives.

Experts have said a presidential candidate launching a business venture in the midst of a campaign could create ethical conflicts.

“Taking a pro-crypto stance is not necessarily troubling; the troubling aspect is doing it while starting a way to personally benefit from it,” Jordan Libowitz, a spokesperson for the government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said earlier this month.

During his time in the White House, Trump said he was “not a fan” of cryptocurrency and tweeted in 2019, “Unregulated Crypto Assets can facilitate unlawful behavior, including drug trade and other illegal activity.” However, during this election cycle, he has reversed himself and taken on a favorable view of cryptocurrencies.

He announced in May that his campaign would begin accepting donations in cryptocurrency as part of an effort to build what it calls a “crypto army” leading up to Election Day. He attended a bitcoin conference in Nashville this year, promising to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the planet” and create a bitcoin “strategic reserve” using the currency that the government currently holds.

Hilary Allen, a law professor at American University who has done research on cryptocurrencies, said she was skeptical of Trump’s change of heart on crypto.

“I think it’s fair to say that that reversal has been motivated in part by financial interests,” she said.

Crypto enthusiasts welcomed the shift, viewing the launch as a positive sign for investors if Trump retakes the White House.

Meanwhile, Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign has not offered policy proposals on how it would regulate digital assets like cryptocurrencies.

In an effort to appeal to crypto investors, a group of Democrats, including Sens. Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, participated in an online “Crypto 4 Harris” event in August.

Neither Harris nor members of her campaign staff attended the event.

____

Gomez Licon contributed from Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version