Connect with us

Art

When does art transform rather than copy? U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on Warhol painting of Prince

Published

 on

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to ponder in a case centring on work by Andy Warhol a question as philosophical as it is legal: when a work is inspired by other material, what is the line between art and copyright theft?

On Wednesday, the justices will hear arguments in a copyright dispute between Warhol’s estate and celebrity photographer Lynn Goldsmith over his paintings based on a 1981 photograph she took of rock star Prince.

The case dealing with when an artist makes “fair use” of another’s work under copyright law has led to split decisions on its way to the top court. The dispute over the legal boundary between inspiration and misuse has also drawn broad interest for its implications for artists.

Warhol, who died in 1987, was a central figure in the pop art movement that emerged in the 1950s, known for his whimsical style and bold use of colours. He often created silkscreen print paintings and other works inspired by photos of famous subjects, including actors Marilyn Monroe and Elizabeth Taylor, Queen Elizabeth II, Chinese leader Mao Zedong and music icon Debbie Harry, among others.

Genius Dog 336 x 280 - Animated

Goldsmith photographed Prince for Newsweek magazine in 1981. Warhol made 14 silkscreen prints and two pencil illustrations based on one of Goldsmith’s Prince photos.

Goldsmith, 74, has said she learned of Warhol’s works only after Prince’s 2016 death. Goldsmith countersued the Andy Warhol Foundation for copyright infringement in 2017 after it asked a Manhattan federal court to rule that his works did not violate her rights. The Supreme Court will hear arguments in the estate’s appeal of a lower court’s decision favouring Goldsmith.

The limits of fair use

Copyright law sometimes allows for the fair use of copyrighted works without the creator’s permission. A key factor courts consider in determining fair use is whether it has a “transformative” purpose, such as parody, education or criticism.

The Supreme Court has not ruled on fair use in art since 1994, when it found that rap group 2 Live Crew’s parody of singer Roy Orbison’s Oh, Pretty Woman made fair use of the 1960s song.

The high court’s take on the case is “very hard to predict,” said Harvard Law School professor Rebecca Tushnet, who wrote a brief supporting Warhol with other copyright scholars.

Megan Noh, who heads the art law practice at the firm Pryor Cashman, said she hopes the Supreme Court will clarify how courts determine when a work is transformative and how much weight this should receive compared to other considerations.

Both sides have backers

A federal judge found Warhol’s works were protected by the fair use doctrine, having transformed the “vulnerable” Prince depicted in Goldsmith’s work into an “iconic, larger-than-life figure.”

In reversing that ruling last year, the Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said judges should not “assume the role of art critic and seek to ascertain the intent behind or meaning of the works,” but instead should decide whether the new work has a “fundamentally different and new artistic purpose and character” that “stands apart from the ‘raw material’ used to create it.”

Lynn Goldsmith, seen in 2013 at a New York City event, is supported by the Justice Department in her court battle. (Cindy Ord/Getty Images)

The 2nd Circuit decided Warhol’s paintings were “much closer to presenting the same work in a different form,” more similar to a “derivative” work, like an art reproduction, than a transformative one.

The Supreme Court’s eventual decision could have broad or narrow implications for fair use depending on the ruling, Tushnet said, which is not expected for several weeks.

The Warhol estate told the Supreme Court the 2nd Circuit’s decision “casts a cloud of legal uncertainty over an entire genre of visual art, including canonical works by Andy Warhol and countless other artists.”

The estates of famed pop artists Robert Rauschenberg and Roy Lichtenstein, joined by the Brooklyn Museum, backed the foundation, telling the justices in a brief that the 2nd Circuit decision would “impose a deep chill on artistic progress, as creative appropriation of existing images has been a staple of artistic development for centuries.”

Fan fiction writers, documentary filmmakers and intellectual property professors also have supported the foundation.

Goldsmith’s lawyers told the Supreme Court that a ruling favouring the foundation would “transform copyright law into all copying, no right.”

President Joe Biden’s administration has backed Goldsmith, as have trade groups for the recording industry, actors and publishers.

In its amicus brief to the court in August, the Justice Department said that reversing the appeal court ruling “would dramatically expand the scope of fair use.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Photos from See Every Star at Art Basel 2022 – E! Online – E! NEWS

Published

 on


Genius Dog 336 x 280 - Animated

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Diplo ‘Wins’ Art Basel Miami by Topping ATM’s Leaderboard

Published

 on

Photo: Thaddaeus McAdams/Getty Images for Ocean Drive

Diplo has about $3 mil in the bank, FYI. The celebrity DJ who once streamed Sophie Turner’s wedding to Joe Jonas (remember that?) claimed to have “won” Miami Art Basel this year. One of the most talked-about pieces at the annual art fair is an ATM that posts your picture and bank balance if you use it. The ATM has a leaderboard, which Diplo topped on December 2. At the time he posted his “high score” on social media, Diplo had $3,004,913.06 in his account. So we know his cash assets, but do we know if he’s in on the joke? This piece is from Brooklyn art collective MSCHF, who are known for their trolly stunt art. “ATM Leaderboard is an extremely literal distillation of wealth-flaunting impulses,” MSCHF co-founder Daniel Greenberg said on NPR. “From its conception, we had mentally earmarked this work for a location like Miami Basel, a place where there is a dense concentration of people renting Lamborghinis and wearing Rolexes.” The piece is goofing on ostentatious displays of wealth, Diplo. Having the most ostentatious display isn’t the flex you think it is. The ATM was a collab between MSCHF and the gallery Perrotin. They had the banana duct taped to the wall, to give some more context on where everyone involved stands on the art vs. prank spectrum.

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Free Press celebrates launch of art exhibit

Published

 on

The Winnipeg Art Gallery has opened its doors to an exhibition focusing on the Winnipeg Free Press and its 150th anniversary.

Headlines: The Art of the News Cycle, which includes works from seven artists from across North America as well as archival material from the Free Press and the gallery’s permanent collection, looks at the many changes that have taken place in how the Free Press and other news organizations let their readers know what’s going on in the world around them.

The exhibit runs through to May 21, 2023 at the Winnipeg Art Gallery.

— with files from Alan Small

Genius Dog 336 x 280 - Animated

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending