Who Will Pick Up The Economic Slack? - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Who Will Pick Up The Economic Slack? – Forbes

Published

 on


Just a few days ago, the Commerce Department released figures on new business formation, and they are strikingly upbeat. They say a lot about how this pandemic has played out economically and suggest that a powerful recovery lies ahead but one filled with tremendous business and labor turnover.

The statistical release indicates that in last year’s fourth quarter some 1,115,984 new businesses of all sizes formed in the United States. Of these, some 373,740 are likely to hire new employees, what the department refers to as “high-propensity” startups.  These fourth quarter figures were down sharply from the third quarter, 28.5% for total new businesses and 30.5% for the high-propensity sort. This all seems reasonable. The summer quarter enjoyed a partial economic re-opening, while the last quarter saw renewed lockdowns and quarantines. What is impressive is that even the reduced fourth quarter activity was some 30% above 2020’s first quarter, which was largely free of the pandemic’s economic effects. Still more telling, those fourth quarter figures were about the same amount above levels of business formation in 2018 and 2019.  If this were not compelling enough evidence that business generally is gearing up to come back from the pandemic strictures, preliminary figures for January show that new business formation in that month alone amounted to 492,133, up 42.6% from December, and high-propensity business formation came to 164,691, up 41.2% from December.    

This pattern should engender optimism about the economy as it emerges the constraints on business activity the authorities have imposed in response to the pandemic. The higher-than-average level of business formation says clearly that business is eager to fill the gap left by the unavoidable bankruptcies and closures created by the economic strictures. Because of the vagaries of bankruptcy law, many of those forming news businesses are likely the same people whose businesses failed during the lockdowns and quarantines. They are leaving their creditors holding the bag, so to speak, while they start up fresh with new capital. Others behind these new startups are new entrepreneurs ready to step in to take over where others have failed. Either way, the message is clear. Plenty are willing, indeed eager to fill the economy’s needs when it re-opens.

This unfolding pattern finds confirmation in the mix of employment numbers. On the surface, labor statistics appear to contradict each other. On the one hand, initial claims for unemployment insurance remain elevated, not as high as in April, to be sure, but much higher than historical averages. This news says that large numbers of people were losing their jobs. On the other hand, the Labor Department reported strong net employment growth between June and November, enough to recover more than half the jobs lost during the severe lockdowns of April and May. The business turnover just described makes sense of this seemingly contrary behavior. As old firms have gone out of business or downsized, they have laid off people who have naturally gone on to claim unemployment insurance. As new firms have formed, they have hired people, sometimes the same people who were laid off, especially if they are in part the same people who managed the failed concern. Though these workers then drop off the unemployment rolls, their original claim remains in the statistics. This kind of churning in business formation as well as hiring and firing keeps both net job creation and indicators of layoffs simultaneously higher than in more normal times. 

The economy will no doubt suffer many imbalances as a legacy of this pandemic and the steps the authorities have taken to contain it. Many creditors, for instance, will face defaults even as they lend to other, newer firms coming on stream to take the place of those that failed. The pressures may ultimately cause many creditors to default themselves. Once the re-opening surge runs its course, some of these legacy debt problems may well impose financial imbalances on the economy that will cause trouble, perhaps even a recession. But for the time being, these reports indicate that the failed businesses are seeing rapid replacements so that the nation’s Main Streets as well as the avenues of its great cities may quickly free themselves from the empty store fronts and boarded up windows that have multiplied while the quarantines and lockdowns have remained in place.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version