Connect with us

Tech

Why users are flocking to messaging app Signal in droves – CP24 Toronto's Breaking News

Published

 on


(CNN) — Users have flocked to encrypted messaging app Signal by the millions in recent days — bringing it to the No. 1 spot on both Google Play Store and Apple App Store’s top free apps lists this week.

Signal had about 7.5 million installations globally from the App Store and Google Play between Thursday and Sunday, more than 43 times the installations it received during the previous week, according to market intelligence firm Sensor Tower.

Encrypted messaging services like Signal have gained popularity in recent years, as people are increasingly concerned with safeguarding their private information. However, this particular bump in Signal’s usership comes in the wake of confusion over an updated terms of service notification from Facebook-owned encrypted messaging service WhatsApp.

Signal also received endorsements last week from several of Silicon Valley’s biggest names, including Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

The jump in new Signal downloads also followed the riots in Washington D.C. and moves by Amazon, Apple and Google to cut ties with Parler, the social networking service favored by members of the far-right. Telegram, another encrypted messaging app on Tuesday said it had attracted 25 million new users from around the world in the previous 72 hours, bringing its total active user base to 500 million.

The huge spike in Signal’s traffic caused some glitches. On Thursday, Signal tweeted that verification codes for new user sign-ups might be delayed “because so many new people are trying to join Signal right now (we can barely register our excitement).” The issue was resolved over the weekend.

“We are currently having a record level of downloads for the Signal app around the world,” Signal staff said in a Reddit post Friday.

What’s happening with WhatsApp?

WhatsApp began notifying users last month of its updated terms of service and privacy policy, which people must agree to in order to keep using the app beyond February 8.

Many users expressed concerns about a section of WhatsApp’s privacy policy that details what user data is collected and shared with parent company Facebook, which has a troubled reputation when it comes to protecting user data.

All private messages between individuals and most businesses on WhatsApp are protected by end-to-end encryption, meaning the app can’t see them or share them with Facebook (users will be notified before chatting with a business where messages are not end-to-end encrypted). But WhatsApp does collect other user information, such has how and when someone uses the app, and user device information like IP addresses.

WhatsApp’s privacy policy states that user information it collects may be shared with other Facebook companies “to help operate, provide, improve, understand, customize, support, and market our Services and their offerings.”

However, these data sharing practices are not new, according to the company.

Here’s what has changed: WhatsApp’s privacy was last updated globally in 2016. At the time, it offered WhatsApp users the ability to opt-out of sharing data with Facebook, an option that was available for only a short time. In this latest update, the reference to that now-expired opt-out option has been removed.

The more significant update to the policy relates to WhatsApp’s business users. It discloses that businesses thatuse WhatsApp to talk to customers can choose to store logs of their conversations on Facebook hosting services.

“The update does not change WhatsApp’s data sharing practices with Facebook and does not impact how people communicate privately with friends or family wherever they are in the world,” a WhatsApp spokesperson said in a statement, adding that the company remains “deeply committed to protecting people’s privacy.”

In short: No additional WhatsApp user data will be shared with Facebook after accepting the new terms than was shared before. That is, unless you took advantage of the opt-out in 2016.

WhatsApp has been trying to disspell confusion over the updated policy, including by publishing an FAQ on its privacy practices.

Why Signal?

While the policy isn’t new, the dustup has drawn attention to WhatsApp’s data sharing practices with Facebook which many people might not have read before clicking “agree.” That may be encouraging users to jump ship, with Signal proving to be the most popular alternative.

Signal is another free app that provides encrypted messaging, calling and video chat. “Encrypted” means that the contents of messages are scrambled until they reach the recipient, and no intermediary can view them. The app is run by the nonprofit Signal Foundation, which launched in 2018 with the help of WhatsApp Co-Founder Brian Acton, who left WhatsApp and Facebook the prior year.

Acton said in a 2018 statement announcing the launch of the foundation that Signal aims to build “sustainable technology that respects users and does not rely on the commoditization of personal data.”

Amid the rush of new sign-ups, Signal is rolling out new features similar to those on WhatsApp, such as wallpaper backgrounds for chats and an “about” section for user profiles. And a new Apple policy requiring that apps provide a label detailing their privacy practices on the App Store may make it easier for users to compare various messaging apps’ policies.

Signal did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding the rush of new sign-ups.

The app has received some high profile endorsements. Tesla’s Musk on January 7 tweeted: “Use Signal.” Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey retweeted it, and later posted an image of Signal at the top of the App Store chart, captioning it with a heart.

Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden also retweeted Musk’s post, adding the message: “That’s @signalapp, for those who don’t speak Elon.”

Though their tweets didn’t mention Facebook or WhatsApp, both Musk and Dorsey have previously criticized the social media giant.

Some people were apparently confused about Musk’s advice, though. Shares of Signal Advance — a small, Texas-based technology company unrelated to the messaging app — rose more than 6,000% in the days following Musk’s tweet, before tempering on Tuesday.

Signal, the messaging app, posted a cheeky tweet about the mix-up, saying: “Is this what stock analysts mean when they say that the market is giving mixed Signals?”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Calgary's Hotel Arts to debut new luxury golf studios next month – Eat North

Published

 on


This week, Calgary hospitality group Hotel Arts revealed an exciting new offering that will provide hotel guests and Calgarians alike with an additional escape to choose from within its award-winning catalogue of urban resort experiences.

Set to debut sometime in early February, Hotel Arts’ newly-built luxury golf studios feature state-of-the-art technology that will allow guests to virtually tee-off from 50 of the world’s top courses, including Pebble Beach, St. Andrews, and Valderrama. Each private studio will have a custom food and beverage menu created by Hotel Arts’ executive chef Quinn Staple.

Players will have the choice between full 18-hole rounds, practice sessions, PGA of Canada-instructed lessons, and various stay-and-play packages in conjunction with Poolside and the hotel itself.

Tentative pre-bookings are currently available via Golf Performance Canada. Availability will depend on current health and safety restrictions. More information regarding the custom menu and official opening date will be revealed in the coming weeks.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

If You Stop Using WhatsApp, Don't Make This 'Dangerous' Mistake – Forbes

Published

 on


WhatsApp’s recent PR disaster has seen tens of millions flock to other platforms. Millions more are now planning to do the same, after a backlash over data sharing with Facebook. But beware—not all messengers are the same and you could be taking a more ‘dangerous’ risk than you realize. So, what should you do now?

“Using WhatsApp is dangerous,” Telegram’s founder Pavel Durov warned last January, citing cyberattacks against WhatsApp running on phones belonging to key targets, including Jeff Bezos. A year on and Durov is now celebrating “the largest digital migration in human history,” writing that “in the first week of January, Telegram surpassed 500 million monthly active users—25 million new users joined Telegram in the last 72 hours alone.”

In his warning, Durov cited a WhatsApp vulnerability in its handling of video files as well as alleged nation state attacks like the one targeting Bezos. Durov claimed that “backdoors are usually camouflaged as ‘accidental’ security flaws—in the last year alone, 12 such flaws have been found in WhatsApp.” Durov also (correctly) pointed out the risks for users who back up their WhatsApp chat histories to public clouds and questioned WhatsApp’s fabled security. “How can anybody be sure that the encryption WhatsApp claims to use is the one actually implemented in their apps?”

WhatsApp is now fighting back to fix the self-inflicted wound from a forced terms of service change coming just after Apple’s privacy labels exposed its extensive data collection. It was a haphazard PR nightmare for the company. And while it has backtracked on its take it or leave (it) before February 8 ultimatum, there’s no contrition yet over the extent of the data collection itself. One can’t help but think WhatsApp will need to do more, as its competitors welcome enough fleeing WhatsApp users to push their backends to the limit.

The two WhatsApp competitors that have benefited most from its stumble are Signal and Telegram. But they are very different to one another, and the WhatsApp versus Telegram versus Signal debate has exposed just how unaware most users are of those critical differences. Worse, many of the articles explaining WhatsApp’s issues and the alternatives do not clear up any of that confusion. This puts you at risk.

The surge of new users to Telegram is perhaps the most interesting aspect of the WhatsApp exodus. Let’s be very clear—while Signal is a more secure WhatsApp lookalike, Telegram is nothing of the sort. It is a completely different platform, designed for a completely different purpose. And while Durov says “I consider Telegram Secret Chats to be significantly more secure than any competing means of communication,” the fact remains that Telegram is not end-to-end encrypted by default, and those secret chats work between just two devices—they do not extend to groups, and they need to be manually selected.

Telegram has been described as part social media and part messenger. It is a cloud-based platform that was designed to deliver messages “seamlessly across any number of your phones, tablets or computers.” The initial use case for Telegram supported dissidents and protest groups. By hosting messages outside the state’s reach, any device could be used to access the repository. And while your data might be outside the reach of the authorities, it is technically accessible by Telegram and its employees.

Telegram operates huge groups and channels, as such it hosts content in the same way as Facebook and Twitter, pushed out to subscribing members. This functionality led to Telegram’s reputation being tainted through the platform’s alleged use by criminals, terrorists and hate groups. Just this week, it has been sued “for failing to crack down on violent extremist conversation in the aftermath of the attack on the U.S. Capitol.”

“Chat apps that offer functionality beyond messaging often compromise privacy in favor of extra features,” warns security researcher Tommy Mysk. “Telegram offers a feature like channels, that are public feeds. This makes Telegram more of an alternative to Twitter than Signal. Telegram mingles messaging methods that are end-to-end encrypted with others, such as normal chats and channels, that are not. A lay person won’t tell the difference and might end up opting for a feature that is less secure.”

With the exception of its limited secret chats, Telegram doesn’t encrypt messages all the way from you to your contacts, instead it encrypts messages between your device and its cloud, and again between its cloud and your contacts. You can use multiple devices to access your cloud-based messaging repository, and Telegram holds the keys to all that encryption. 

In contrast, both Signal and WhatsApp do encrypt end-to-end by default. And while Durov is right, WhatsApp does not make its encryption open-source, it is based on Signal’s own protocol, which is fully open-source. There have never been any credible claims of vulnerabilities in this encrypted message transport itself, only with compromised endpoints—i.e., hitting phones with malware.

“When you throw nation state level capabilities and the ability to attack endpoints,” Cyjax CISO Ian Thornton-Trump says, “all bets are off and the conversation (at least one side of it) is as vulnerable as if was just clear text.”

But it turns out that while alleged Israeli spyware attacks and various technical vulnerabilities were not able to shake the confidence of WhatsApp’s vast user base, the combination of Apple’s privacy labels and a change to its terms of service, misreported as WhatsApp shares your data with Facebook, caused a backlash. Facebook has always been WhatsApp’s Achilles heel, and this has been a risk since 2014.

There are legitimate reasons for users to want to switch from WhatsApp to alternatives—the platform does collect too much data, it does share some of that data with Facebook, it is developing commercial offerings while unable to offer multi-device functionality and fully secure cloud backups. And, most of all, because of the planned integration with Facebook Messenger and Instagram.

But the one reason not to move from WhatsApp is over concerns with its message security. WhatsApp takes credit for universalizing access to end-to-end encryption, and while any platform of its scale will be subject to sophisticated nation state attacks—just look at Apple, WhatsApp’s end-to-end encryption is fine. The irony is that the millions switching WhatsApp for Telegram will be less secure in doing so—that’s not a matter of opinion, that’s because it does not have end-to-end encryption by default.

Don’t take my word for it—let’s look at what Telegram itself says. “Do I need to trust Telegram for this to be secure?” the platform asks in its own FAQs. “When it comes to secret chats, you don’t,” it says. And to the question, “why not just make all chats ‘secret’?” Telegram argues that it has balanced security, speed and multiple device access, as well as restoring messages when a phone is lost. It has compromised with “messages in Secret Chats using client-client encryption, while Cloud Chats use client-server/server-client encryption and are stored encrypted in the Telegram Cloud.”

Telegram is right—if users opt to use WhatsApp’s public cloud (Apple or Google backups), then they lose the protection of its end-to-end security. But with WhatsApp you can trade the risk of lost device against compromising message security. You don’t get to make that choice with Telegram—not unless you stick to 1:1 secret chats.

Because most of your Telegram messages are not end-to-end encrypted, you rely on Telegram’s internal security and policies. “To protect the data that is not covered by end-to-end encryption,” it says, “Telegram uses a distributed infrastructure. Cloud chat data is stored in multiple data centers around the globe that are controlled by different legal entities spread across different jurisdictions. The relevant decryption keys are split into parts and are never kept in the same place as the data they protect.”

Bear in mind Telegram’s origins—this is all about keeping data from the authorities. As a result of this structure, it says, “several court orders from different jurisdictions are required to force us to give up any data… We can ensure that no single government or block of like-minded countries can intrude on people’s privacy and freedom of expression. Telegram can be forced to give up data only if an issue is grave and universal enough to pass the scrutiny of several different legal systems around the world.” All of which, it says, means “we have disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments.”

But Mysk cautions that “Telegram stands out from Signal and even WhatsApp in the way it persistently begs for access to contacts. Telegram makes it inconvenient to use the app without granting access to contacts. In addition, it offers its users the chance to connect without exchanging phone numbers. However, when adding a new contact by username, the option to share the user’s phone number with the new contact is activated by default.”

As a Telegram user, if you want to match the actual messaging security used by WhatsApp, you need to stick to those secret chats. But, unlike WhatsApp and Signal and iMessage, among others, those secret chats cannot include groups or anything beyond selected 1:1 chats. With secret chats, Telegram says, “all data is encrypted with a key that only you and the recipient know—there is no way for us or anybody else without direct access to your device to learn what content is being sent in those messages… Secret chats are not part of the Telegram cloud and can only be accessed on their devices of origin.”

This might sound familiar to users of WhatsApp, which says, “end-to-end encryption ensures only you and the person you’re communicating with can read or listen to what is sent, and nobody in between, not even WhatsApp. This is because with end-to-end encryption, your messages are secured with a lock, and only the recipient and you have the special key needed to unlock and read them. All of this happens automatically: no need to turn on any special settings to secure your messages.”

Telegram is not a high-risk platform. But it’s not the step-up from WhatsApp, security-wise, that it claims. In reality, both platforms have issues—albeit different ones, and are reasonably secure. Jumping ship from one to the other makes little sense.

If you want to leave WhatsApp over security and privacy concerns, you should move to Signal, not Telegram. Signal is the closest lookalike to WhatsApp. It does not link any data to its users—albeit it uses your phone number to identify your account. 

But what about other messaging platforms—how do they stack up?

The most sophisticated messaging architecture is Apple’s. iMessage is underpinned by some very clever tricks, enabling users to run a central iCloud message repository that syncs across all your trusted Apple devices, without ever losing end-to-end encryption. In Telegram’s parlance, this is the best of both worlds. To enable this, you need to have “Messages in iCloud enabled.” There is a caveat, though. If you also have iCloud backups enabled, a copy of your end-to-end encryption key will be included.

The main issue with iMessage, of course, is that it doesn’t operate cross-platform. So, while it is the cleverest messaging option for Apple users, it can’t be the go-to messenger on your device. The fallback when you message non-Apple users is SMS, and SMS is a security horror show.

Android Messages is not a good alternative to WhatsApp. It is essentially an SMS client that has now evolved to RCS to add the chat features available in WhatsApp and iMessage. it is not end-to-end encrypted at the moment, although Google has this update in beta. But right now, it only works for 1:1 messaging, rather like Telegram, does not extend to groups, and needs both sides of a chat on the beta app. 

Facebook Messenger is even more of a no-go. It offers a similar 1:1 “secret” chat option to Telegram—which is end-to-end encrypted, but everything else does not have that level of security. It also has a woeful privacy policy—a vast array of metadata is collected by Facebook, and the platform admits to monitoring content, including file links and attachments. The best advice for Messenger users is to switch.

There are other, less well known options now available, including Viber, which adds end-to-end encrypted messaging to its VoIP platform and Wickr, which is best described as an enterprise version of Signal, designed for corporate use. There is also Swiss-based Threema, which has become a favorite of the very security conscious. That platform is even more secure than Signal—it doesn’t use phone numbers as identifiers and so can keep accounts wholly anonymous. It has a much smaller user base though, so you’ll be unlikely to find many of your contacts (if any) onboard.

Somewhat topically, I asked Flavio Aggio, CISO at the World Health Organization, which messenger he would recommend. He wouldn’t advocate for any single one, but mentioned Signal, Threema and Telegram as good options. I did get the sense that he would plump for Threema if pushed—the fact that it can be used without a phone number, he saw as a major plus.

If you do move, you’re fine with any of the end-to-end encrypted alternatives I’ve mentioned. You’re also fine with Telegram, but make sure you understand the differences and the risks; you will be committing to storing most of your content in Telegram’s cloud, and that won’t be for everyone. Most new users are unaware of this and assume that it’s a more secure version of WhatsApp. That simply isn’t the case.

For ESET’s Jake Moore, “Signal seems to be winning the race against Telegram,” based on the contacts he sees moving. “I think that may continue due to its default end to end encryption on offer,” he says, “a must for any messaging service in my opinion. People migrating to privacy focused apps does not happen overnight. However, WhatsApp was available for years before it became the number one messaging platform.”

This misinformation dilemma was perfectly illustrated by one of the many emails I received this week from messaging platforms looking to plug their wares. “Messaging apps, like Telegram and Signal, are end-to-end encrypted,” the email said. “WhatsApp, while end-to-end encrypted, has a number of loopholes that allow conversations to be stored or shared.” 

This is all dangerously misleading, and shows what little chance everyday users have of picking through the misinformation to get the facts. Signal and WhatsApp are end-to-end encrypted by default, Telegram is not. And while Signal’s deployment is fully open source and so theoretically more secure, there are no “loopholes” in WhatsApp, by which the email meant backdoors allowing Facebook to monitor content.

As former intel officer Philip Ingram points out, “the debate about continued security with different messaging apps after the mass exodus from WhatsApp underpins that many using the excuse of privacy seem to want to follow herd induced habits rather than think for themselves.” Unsurprisingly, Ingram uses Threema. “A Swiss-based, truly anonymous messaging app,” he says. “I haven’t looked back.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3 Review – Forbes

Published

 on


At CES 2021, Samsung launched its new enterprise tablet, the Galaxy Tab Active3. The Galaxy Tab Active3 targets the mobile workforce. In 2021, much work is getting done in odd places. In the front seat of a car, in an office, or outside on a construction site. The Galaxy Tab Active3 will serve those types of workers in industries ranging from retail to transportation and beyond.

Samsung sent me one of its new Galaxy Tab Active3 to review. I admit I am not a huge tablet user, but rather an enterprise PC fanatic due to my work nature. With that said, I do enjoy using a tablet for checking email, browsing the web, streaming entertainment, and snapping pics. I spent a couple of days using it in addition to my PC, and below is my experience. 

My configuration 

I will start by outlining my configuration. My Galaxy Tab Active3 came with an 8″ display at 1080P resolution, Exynos 9810 processor, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage, 5050mAh battery, and Wi-Fi 6 connectivity. Like most Samsung devices, there is the ability to add up to an additional 1TB of storage via microSD. There are 4G LTE enabled versions of the system available, but mine was the standard Wi-Fi configuration. The Galaxy Tab Active3 comes with IP68 water and dust resistance certification and MIL-STD-810H military-grade certification as well. 

Build quality 

The Galaxy Tab Active3 comes in Samsung’s signature packaging with a system image on the front and an S Pen draped down the box’s side. Once I took the system out of the box, I installed the removable battery, replaced the back covering, and dropped the tablet into the rugged case that comes with the Galaxy Tab Active3. The tablet didn’t feel very rugged until I dropped it into the case. I noticed immediately that this case feels durable and fits the tablet like a glove. It was tough to get the case off once I put it on, I guess even more reason to leave it on. I felt like a could drop this tablet down the stairs and not sweat it a bit. I was able to toss the tablet into my backpack with no worry of cracking the display or denting the device. Overall, I like the design of the Galaxy Tab Active3. The device is sleek, lightweight, and, most importantly, durable. 

The system comes with a USB-C charging port, Pogo Pin, audio jack, power button, volume up and down, and a programmable button. The Galaxy Tab Active3 also comes with a 13MP rear camera with flash and a 5MP front camera.

Display 

The Galaxy Tab Active3 has an 8″ display at 1920 x 1080P resolution. It isn’t edgeless like Samsung’s smartphone lineup but instead has thicker edges. The display borders aren’t necessarily a bad thing, but it is worth calling out. I found the display to be extremely responsive to touch. The virtual keyboard onscreen was surprisingly easy to type on. The individual keys were a little too small for my liking, but it worked well when I did use the keyboard. I was impressed with the S Pen pairing with this display. I used the S Pen to scroll through Forbes articles and switch between YouTube videos with ease. There was very an instance where I felt uncomfortable using the pen with the display. Another plus is that the S Pen fits conveniently into the top of the case. It is sometimes hard to pull the pen out, so don’t worry about it falling out of the case. 

Performance and battery life 

Both the fingerprint scanner and biometric face login were smooth to use. I had no trouble using either option as a secure way to log in. As far as performance goes, this tablet was able to do everything I asked of it. I mostly used it for light productivity workloads like checking email, watching YouTube videos, and snapping pictures. But for those workloads, I never had a hiccup or lag. I felt comfortable using the tablet for all my G-Suite apps like Google Hangouts, Google Meet, and Google Drive. The photos that I captured on the devices didn’t blow me away, but the tablet will work well for scanning barcodes or snapping a quit picture of a document at work. I was getting around 6 to 7 hours of battery life on a day’s typical use. When I upped the display brightness and streamed more video content, that brought me into the 5-hour range. You can always purchase an additional 5050mAh battery and swap it out for more uptime. The benefit with the swappable batteries is that all you’re swapping is the battery, not the full device. While this equates to more batteries, you won’t need too many spare devices. The audio on the device came through loud and clear. I was 10+ feet away from the tablet while listening to a YouTube video, and I could hear the audio clearly with ease. The Android 10 OS worked great for my use case and but I welcome the upgrade to Android 11 soon.

Another welcomed addition is “glove mode.” The mode allows users the ability to use the display while wearing gloves. I turned on glove mode in display options under the device settings, and it worked well. I was able to swipe and navigate on the device with a high degree of touch accuracy. I can see anyone working on construction sites, oil and gas sites, or anyone working in outdoor occupations loving this feature. I understand I am not the target audience of this tablet, so take my statements about performance and battery life with a grain of salt. 

Pricing 

The Galaxy Tab Active3 is available now in the U.S. for purchase. The system’s standard Wi-Fi configuration will start at $489.99, while the LTE-enabled version starting at $589.99. 

Wrapping up

All in all, I was pleased with my experience with the Galaxy Tab Active3. There is something oddly satisfying about having a rugged device, knowing that it is still likely to perform if you drop or abuse the machine. The Galaxy Tab Active3 had a great display and good battery life wrapped in a small, durable form factor. I was impressed with the enterprise features and capabilities of this new tablet-like Samsung wireless Dex, Wi-Fi 6, and a programmable key. I can see this tablet being used and abused by mobile and frontline workers, and I believe it is up to the task. I do not doubt that this tablet can contribute to some meaningful productivity boosts to enterprise users. 

If you’re an enterprise with a mobile workforce or frontline workers, The Galaxy Tab Active3 needs to be on your consideration list.

Note: Moor Insights & Strategy writers and editors may have contributed to this article. 

Moor Insights & Strategy, like all research and analyst firms, provides or has provided paid research, analysis, advising, or consulting to many high-tech companies in the industry, including 8×8, Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Applied Micro, ARM, Aruba Networks, AT&T, AWS, A-10 Strategies, Bitfusion, Blaize, Box, Broadcom, Calix, Cisco Systems, Clear Software, Cloudera, Clumio, Cognitive Systems, CompuCom, Dell, Dell EMC, Dell Technologies, Diablo Technologies, Digital Optics, Dreamchain, Echelon, Ericsson, Extreme Networks, Flex, Foxconn, Frame (now VMware), Fujitsu, Gen Z Consortium, Glue Networks, GlobalFoundries, Google (Nest-Revolve), Google Cloud, HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Honeywell, Huawei Technologies, IBM, Ion VR, Inseego, Infosys, Intel, Interdigital, Jabil Circuit, Konica Minolta, Lattice Semiconductor, Lenovo, Linux Foundation, MapBox, Marvell, Mavenir, Marseille Inc, Mayfair Equity, Meraki (Cisco), Mesophere, Microsoft, Mojo Networks, National Instruments, NetApp, Nightwatch, NOKIA (Alcatel-Lucent), Nortek, Novumind, NVIDIA, Nuvia, ON Semiconductor, ONUG, OpenStack Foundation, Oracle, Poly, Panasas, Peraso, Pexip, Pixelworks, Plume Design, Poly, Portworx, Pure Storage, Qualcomm, Rackspace, Rambus, Rayvolt E-Bikes, Red Hat, Residio, Samsung Electronics, SAP, SAS, Scale Computing, Schneider Electric, Silver Peak, SONY, Springpath, Spirent, Splunk, Sprint, Stratus Technologies, Symantec, Synaptics, Syniverse, Synopsys, Tanium, TE Connectivity, TensTorrent, Tobii Technology, T-Mobile, Twitter, Unity Technologies, UiPath, Verizon Communications, Vidyo, VMware, Wave Computing, Wellsmith, Xilinx, Zebra, Zededa, and Zoho which may be cited in blogs and research.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending