Art
Will AI art trigger the end of human creativity?
|

Could people dislike art created by artificial intelligence because it threatens their humanity?
According to a new study from the University of British Columbia, the answer is yes. According to a study recently published in Computers in Human Behavior, UBC researcher Guanzhong Du and his colleagues found AI-generated writing, photography, art and music production has been skyrocketing in popularity in recent times.
But, that surging success has also triggered an enormous backlash, with many rejecting AI art — and even asserting that its proliferation marks the beginning of the end for humanity.
To learn why, the researchers led a series of psychology experiments involving AI art.
In one, participants were shown two paintings, and were told that one was generated by AI and the other was human-made.
They also listened to two pieces of music, one supposedly created by humans and the other by AI.
In reality, however, both pieces of artwork that participants were asked to evaluate were created by either AI or by a human. The researchers had randomly labelled one of them as AI-made and the other one as human-made.
Still, participants showed an overwhelming preference for artwork they thought was made by people, researchers found.
The researchers concluded some of the participants’ rejection of AI art could come about because it challenges what it is to be human.
“It’s not like some people prefer Coke and some prefer Pepsi. It represents a deeper philosophical question about our understanding of human identity,” said Du, PhD student in UBC’s Sauder School of Business.
“What makes human beings unique as a species? What differentiates us from others? And what is our place in the universe?”
Humans’ sense of being special
Jeremy Turner, an instructor of cognitive science at Simon Fraser University, said the dislike of AI art is a form of anthropocentrism — a belief that humans are the most significant entities in the world.
Turner, who wasn’t involved in the research, said the issue of computers doing things humans can (or perhaps bettering them) is not new. He pointed to the furor over the IBM supercomputer Deep Blue beating chess master Gary Kasparov in 1997.
Turner said AI is a tool that can be used to create art, and that its abilities are likely to progress across music, poetry and art as software becomes more powerful.
“We’re becoming meta-artists,” he said. “A lot of artists will learn how to create artists instead of creating art.”
The fear of such art, though, Turner said, is humans’ fear of not being special.
“People really want to hang onto what it means to be human,” he said. “We like believing that we have a soul. Being creative means having a unique soul. It’s the last bastion of being human, being special.”
Conductor says AI can’t yet share ‘part of your story’
Vancouver conductor Kevin Zakresky says he has not been impressed yet.
“Art is sharing part of your story with someone else,” said Zakresky, who has a PhD in music from Yale University and is on the voice faculty of the Vancouver Symphony Orchestra School of Music.
“I have yet to find a computer who interests me in this way.”
The UBC study is the first of its kind to link people’s aversion to AI art with the idea that artistic creation is “the last fortress of human supremacy,” according to Du.
But in the future, Du said it’s inevitable humanity will encounter more and more AI art. He believes we should be aware of the human bias the study exposes, and embrace AI-generated art rather than resist it.
“If we leverage AI, if we work with AI, maybe we can better develop our own creativity. Maybe we can collaborate with AI, and achieve something we cannot achieve alone,” he says. “But if we are unaware of our bias against AI, that is not possible.”





Art
In apparent first, Croatia restores looted art to grandson of Holocaust victim
|
In the first reported case of its kind in Croatia, three museums have restored several pieces of art stolen from a Jewish businessman during the Holocaust to his grandson, according to a report Friday.
The move marks the end of a 70-year struggle by the descendants of Dane Reichsmann, who was a wealthy owner of a department store in the country’s capital Zagreb before the Nazi-led genocide and was deported and murdered at Auschwitz along with his wife.
“This seems almost beyond belief,” Andy Reichsman, Dane’s grandson, and inheritor of the looted works told The New York Times. “I thought that our chances would be one in a million. They never had any interest in giving anything back to Jews.”
The artworks returned include paintings by André Derain, “Still Life With a Bottle,” and Maurice de Vlaminick’s “Landscape by the Water,” which were held by the National Museum of Modern Art, and lithographs from the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts by Pablo Picasso, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Paul Cézanne and Pierre Bonnard.
A bronze plaque, copper tray, and bowl from the Zagreb Museum of Arts and Crafts was also restored. However, 19 additional pieces from the institution are still being pursued by Reichsman’s lawyer.
The pieces were looted by the ruling Croatian fascist group, the Ustaše.


Reichsman’s aunt Danica Scodoba and father Franz Reichsman fled Europe before the outbreak of World War II to London and the United States, respectively (Franz dropped the extra N from his family name “Reichsmann” when he immigrated).
Reichsman took up the struggle of his aunt, who tried for half a century to reclaim the property. He recalled that “she traveled to Zagreb every summer and met with gallery directors, government officials and anyone she felt could help her in her attempts to retrieve the art.”
Scodoba died more than two decades ago and was unable to witness a Zagreb Municipal Court ruling in December 2020 that determined the pieces legally belonged to her.
A subsequent decision in 2021 affirmed her nephew as her heir.
Reichsman’s Croatian laywer, Monja Matic, said she valued her client’s patience after she had worked on the case for some 20 years.
“This is a positive step in dealing with outstanding Holocaust Era restitution issues in Croatia,” said Gideon Taylor, President of the World Jewish Restitution Organization.
The National Museum of Modern Art said in a Facebook statement it was “working intensively on researching provenance” of artworks suspected of being looted during the war.
The institution regretted that the resolution took as long as it did.
Croatia rebuffed restitution claims by descendants of Holocaust victims until last year when its government and the World Jewish Restitution Organization published a joint report detailing the looting of art by the fascist regime. Stolen property was subsequently seized and nationalized by the country’s communist government.
The Nazi-allied Ustaše regime, which ran the Independent State of Croatia from 1941 to 1945, persecuted and killed hundreds of thousands of ethnic Serbs, Jews, Roma and anti-fascist Croatians.





Art
Can David Salle Teach A.I. How to Create Good Art?
|
The totem pole previously displayed at the Orillia Opera House has officially and permanently been removed from the city’s public art collection.
Created by artists Jimi McKee and Wayne Hill more than 20 years ago, the formerly prominently displayed work tells the story of Orillia from the days of the ancient fishing weirs at The Narrows through the present, in the fashion of totem poles created by west coast Indigenous communities.

Last summer, after the piece developed deep cracks and structural instability, the city received two public complaints regarding the structural issues and its “insensitivity” to west coast Indigenous communities.
Council voted to remove it from the Opera House for health and safety reasons, and to undertake consultation with relevant Indigenous groups regarding potential repairs or updates to the work.
In Friday’s council information package, city staff announced the piece would be permanently removed from the city’s public art collection after consultation with McKee and experts from the Museum of Anthropology at the University of British Columbia (UBC).
“The subject experts from the Museum of Anthropology at UBC support deaccessioning the piece from the city’s collection due to concerns surrounding cultural appropriation and misrepresentation of Indigenous cultures from the West,” staff wrote.
City staff said they support UBC and the city’s art in public places committee (APPC) recommendation to remove the totem pole to help ensure the city’s public spaces are “welcoming and inclusive.”
“Given the feedback from subject experts at UBC, the sacred nature of the totem pole, and the health and safety concerns identified by the joint health and safety committee, staff support the APPC’s recommendation to remove the artwork from the (Opera House) and deaccession the art from the city’s permanent collection,” staff wrote.
“As understanding of Indigenous culture grows, this step looks to ensure the municipality’s public spaces are welcoming and inclusive places for our Indigenous peoples who visit and call Orillia home.”





Art
Opera House totem pole permanently removed from city’s art collection
|
The totem pole previously displayed at the Orillia Opera House has officially and permanently been removed from the city’s public art collection.
Created by artists Jimi McKee and Wayne Hill more than 20 years ago, the formerly prominently displayed work tells the story of Orillia from the days of the ancient fishing weirs at The Narrows through the present, in the fashion of totem poles created by west coast Indigenous communities.

Last summer, after the piece developed deep cracks and structural instability, the city received two public complaints regarding the structural issues and its “insensitivity” to west coast Indigenous communities.
Council voted to remove it from the Opera House for health and safety reasons, and to undertake consultation with relevant Indigenous groups regarding potential repairs or updates to the work.
In Friday’s council information package, city staff announced the piece would be permanently removed from the city’s public art collection after consultation with McKee and experts from the Museum of Anthropology at the University of British Columbia (UBC).
“The subject experts from the Museum of Anthropology at UBC support deaccessioning the piece from the city’s collection due to concerns surrounding cultural appropriation and misrepresentation of Indigenous cultures from the West,” staff wrote.
City staff said they support UBC and the city’s art in public places committee (APPC) recommendation to remove the totem pole to help ensure the city’s public spaces are “welcoming and inclusive.”
“Given the feedback from subject experts at UBC, the sacred nature of the totem pole, and the health and safety concerns identified by the joint health and safety committee, staff support the APPC’s recommendation to remove the artwork from the (Opera House) and deaccession the art from the city’s permanent collection,” staff wrote.
“As understanding of Indigenous culture grows, this step looks to ensure the municipality’s public spaces are welcoming and inclusive places for our Indigenous peoples who visit and call Orillia home.”





-
News14 hours ago
India-Canada news: How the visa office suspension affects travellers
-
News15 hours ago
Why is rent going up faster in Brampton than everywhere else in Canada?
-
Business17 hours ago
Vote “No” to Unifor’s sellout Ford Canada contract! Build rank-and-File committees to fight for a North America-wide strike against the Detroit Three!
-
News13 hours ago
India-Canada news LIVE updates: Justin Trudeau says evidence was shared ‘many weeks ago’
-
News12 hours ago
Canada is still processing visas for Indian nationals
-
Art20 hours ago
Opera House totem pole permanently removed from city’s art collection
-
Economy17 hours ago
Weak Euro-Area PMI Data Suggest Economy Facing Contraction
-
Art20 hours ago
Can David Salle Teach A.I. How to Create Good Art?