adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Sports

With Trump done, pro athletes and leagues have to decide if the fight is over – theglobeandmail.com

Published

 on


Members of the Carolina Panthers take a knee before the start of a game against the Atlanta Falcons at Bank of America Stadium on Oct. 29, 2020 in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Grant Halverson/Getty Images

Five days after Donald Trump won the U.S. presidency in 2016, Atlanta Falcons wide receiver Mike Evans decided to take a pop at him.

Like a few of his colleagues, Evans knelt during that weekend’s NFL pregame anthems. Unlike any of them, Evans singled out Trump as his target.

“It’s well documented what he’s done,” Evans said. “I’m not going to stand for something I don’t believe in.”

300x250x1

Story continues below advertisement

That principled stand lasted until the next Tuesday, when Evans released a contrite statement: “I want to start by apologizing to all the U.S. military members …”

In the annals of athletic protest, Mike Evans’s name does not ring out. But his apology was a seminal moment – the last time the left retreated under pressure from the right.

The soon-to-end (at least in terms of official titles) Trump era was good to sports. Right up until COVID-19 came down on their business model like a falling piano, everyone was thriving.

An external enemy gave many leagues focus; it bound management and labour together in common cause; and it tightened their collective grip on the imaginations of the young – the most important customer base of any entertainment offering.

By the time things got hairy this past summer, sports was no longer aligned with the protest movement. It was leading it. The NBA in particular has become a sort of political movement in short pants, as though Gold’s Gym started its own party.

Giving it to Trump and his supporters also insulated a group of bajillionaires from the anti-elite sentiment that underpins the progressive left. Somehow, the likes of LeBron James (annual earnings, according to Forbes: US$88-million) are able to project man-of-the-people vibes while maintaining their private-jet privileges.

All of this canny manoeuvring was predicated on outsiderness. Pro athletes – a group about as 1-per-center as it gets – got to have it both ways as long as they railed against an unpopular sitting establishment. At least, unpopular in the places athlete-moguls make their money (Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Fifth Avenue, etc.). Sports had figured out how to turn the counter-culture into a profit driver.

Story continues below advertisement

Well, bad news – they won. Trump’s done. And now things start getting complicated.

With Trump in place, the sports world’s messaging was controlled by a hive mind. It wasn’t hard to figure out the right things to say: ‘Trump is bad’, ‘Police brutality is worse’, ‘It’s time for change’, ‘We have to work together’.

These are not exactly nuanced ideas. Saying them requires zero understanding of policy issues. It’s simple to slap a slogan on the back of a jersey. It’s simpler still to point at a teammate who seems to better understand what’s what when it comes time to speak.

For most participants, this wasn’t about convincing anyone of anything. It was about fighting for your side. Nobody understands combat better than elite athletes. It’s what they do for a living.

Now that Joe Biden will be the next president of the United States, leagues and the athletes who play in them have a decision to make. Now that our side has the top job, is the fight over? There are as many ways to answer that question as people you could ask.

Presumably, some will continue publicly hitting just as hard at systemic problems that aren’t solved magically by moving a Democrat into the White House.

Story continues below advertisement

Others may declare victory and move on.

Others still may simply be tired of being de facto spokespeople for this or that cause, and want to get back to the simple life.

And – here’s where it gets dicey – may now be emboldened to go off-brand.

Over the past few years, big leagues figured out how to stop dissent – you don’t stop it all. You just make sure it looks a lot like consensus.

They presented an easy-to-understand story of good guys (us) vs. bad guys (everyone who doesn’t agree with us). They turned America into a two-team league, and invited everyone (and their money) to sign with them.

So when we analogize entire teams of players and staff kneeling during the anthems with Muhammad Ali being criminally charged and stripped of his titles for refusing the draft, the comparison doesn’t hold.

Story continues below advertisement

Current athletic protests build up the business of sport. Ali was trying to tear it down. One is smart marketing, the other takes guts.

What the people who own sports teams (man, have they ever got off easy in all of this) should fear now is that they have created a generation of Alis.

For the better part of four years, athletes have been told that speaking out on social issues that matter to them isn’t just permissible, but compulsory. A bunch of guys raised on “Shut up and play” just made a hairpin turn into “Tell us how you feel.”

One thing kept that ad-hoc and very public group-therapy session from becoming messy – Donald J. Trump. He’s the Vladimir Lenin in this story. Once he’s gone, prepare for an outbreak of ruthless factionalism in the leftist circles sports has embraced.

In the past, sports leagues negotiated these eruptions of athlete protest with appeals to capitalism. Sure, you may feel strongly about Issue X, but you like money more, don’t you? Most players decided they did. The ones who didn’t were seen as malcontents or oddballs.

That’s out the window now. Every league crumbled this summer under pressure to put politics front and centre. You’re not putting that genie back in the bottle, not with social media sitting there as an alternate broadcasting platform. Woe betide the league that tries to shut anyone up these days. Whatever that guy is yelling about will lead the news cycle for days.

Story continues below advertisement

What comes next is dissent, the uncontrollable sort, the kind that risks turning off your customers. Eventually, activist players may decide their allegiances don’t line up with their employer’s. One WNBA team, the Atlanta Dream, spent the past few months trying to unseat the owner, Republican senator Kelly Loeffler. (Loeffler is headed to a run-off against a candidate supported by WNBA players.) Imagine that sort of dissent spreading into other leagues.

This all has the potential for complete chaos, which sounds like more fun than another season of fan-free baseball. Sports wanted a political awakening and, for its sins, it got one.

If sports was at war with Trump, then what comes next must necessarily resemble peace. And, as Nietzsche said, in times of peace, the warlike man attacks himself.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Need to Know: Bruins at Maple Leafs | Game 3 | Boston Bruins – NHL.com

Published

 on


Familiar Territory

James van Riemsdyk has played his fair share of playoff contests here in Toronto – but all of them have come in blue and white. On Wednesday night, he would be on the other side for the first time if he indeed makes his Bruins postseason debut, which appeared to be a strong possibility based on the Black & Gold’s morning skate.

“It’s always special to play in this building,” said van Riemsdyk, who played in 20 postseason games with Toronto, including nine at Scotiabank Arena. “In this rivalry, it’s always a lot of fun. This time of year is always amazing, no matter where you’re at – if you’re at a 500-seat arena or a rink with all the tradition and history like this. It’s always fun and always a great opportunity to get in there.”

van Riemsdyk was a healthy scratch for the first two games of this series, following a trend across the second half of the regular season, during which he sat out several games.

300x250x1

“Playoff time of year is always the best time of year,” said van Riemsdyk, who has 20 goals and 31 points in 71 career playoff games between Philadelphia and Toronto. “Obviously, in this rivalry, it’s always a lot of fun – two fun buildings to play in. You cherish every opportunity you get.

“This time of year, you learn that along the way, it’s all about the team. Whatever the team’s asking you to do, that’s always got to be your mindset and approach…you stay at it every day and just take it one day at a time.”

Montgomery said that if van Riemsdyk does re-enter the lineup, he’ll be looking for the veteran winger to help the Bruins’ offensive game. He also complimented van Riemsdyk’s professionalism throughout a trying second half.

“I guess getting his stick on more pucks,” Montgomery said on what he wants to see from van Riemsdyk. “We’ve talked about it a lot of times internally. Him and [Kevin] Shattenkirk have been great. They’re true pros. Every day come to work, come to get better. It’s not an easy situation, but he’s been great.”

van Riemsdyk concurred with his coach’s sentiments about helping Boston’s offensive attack, saying that he’ll be aiming to be around the net as much as possible.

“I think you’ve got to stay true to who you are as a player and play with good details and manage the game well and play to your strengths as a player,” he said. “This time of year, being around the net is always an important trait. You see all the goals being scored, it’s all within 5-10 feet of the net. That’s an area that I pride myself on, so going to be doing my best to get there and have an impact there.”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

NHL teams, take note: Alexandar Georgiev is proof that anything can happen in the playoffs

Published

 on

It’s hard to say when, exactly, Alexandar Georgiev truly began to win some hearts and change some minds on Tuesday night.

Maybe it was in the back half of the second period; that was when the Colorado Avalanche, for the first time in their first-round Stanley Cup playoff series against the Winnipeg Jets, actually managed to hold a lead for more than, oh, two minutes or thereabouts. Maybe it was when the Avs walked into the locker room up 4-2 with 20 minutes to play.

Maybe it was midway through the third, when a series of saves by the Avalanche’s beleaguered starting goaltender helped preserve their two-goal buffer. Maybe it was when the buzzer sounded after their 5-2 win. Maybe it didn’t happen until the Avs made it into their locker room at Canada Life Centre, tied 1-1 with the Jets and headed for Denver.

At some point, though, it should’ve happened. If you were watching, you should’ve realized that Colorado — after a 7-6 Game 1 loss that had us all talking not just about all those goals, but at least one of the guys who’d allowed them — had squared things up, thanks in part to … well, that same guy.

300x250x1

Georgiev, indeed, was the story of Game 2, stopping 28 of 30 shots, improving as the game progressed and providing a lesson on how quickly things can change in the playoffs — series to series, game to game, period to period, moment to moment. The narrative doesn’t always hold. Facts don’t always cooperate. Alexandar Georgiev, for one night and counting, was not a problem for the Colorado Avalanche. He was, in direct opposition to the way he played in Game 1, a solution. How could we view him as anything else?

He had a few big-moment saves, and most of them came midway through the third period with his team up 4-2. There he was with 12:44 remaining, stopping a puck that had awkwardly rolled off Nino Niederreiter’s stick; two missed posts by the Avs at the other end had helped spring Niederreiter for a breakaway. Game 1 Georgiev doesn’t make that save.

There he was, stopping Nikolaj Ehlers from the circle a few minutes later. There wasn’t an Avs defender within five feet, and there was nothing awkward about the puck Ehlers fired at his shoulder. Game 1 Georgiev gets scored on twice.

(That one might’ve been poetic justice. It was Ehlers who’d put the first puck of the night on Georgiev — a chip from center ice that he stopped, and that the crowd in Winnipeg greeted with the ol’ mock cheer. Whoops.)

By the end of it all, Georgiev had stared down Connor Hellebuyck and won, saving nearly 0.5 goals more than expected according to Natural Stat Trick, giving the Avalanche precisely what they needed and looking almost nothing like the guy we’d seen a couple days before. Conventional wisdom coming into this series was twofold: That the Avs have firepower, high-end talent and an overall edge — slight as it may be — on Winnipeg, and that Georgiev is shaky enough to nuke the whole thing.

That wasn’t without merit, either. Georgiev’s .897 save percentage in the regular season was six percentage points below the league average, and he hadn’t broken even in expected goals allowed (minus-0.21). He’d been even worse down the stretch, putting up an .856 save percentage in his final eight appearances, and worse still in Game 1, allowing seven goals on 23 shots and more than five goals more than expected. That’s not bad; that’s an oil spill. Writing him off would’ve been understandable. Writing off Jared Bednar for rolling him out there in Game 2 would’ve been understandable. Writing the Avs off — for all of Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar’s greatness — would’ve been understandable.

It just wouldn’t have been correct.

The fact that this all went down now, four days into a two-month ordeal, is a gift — because the postseason thus far has been short on surprises, almost as a rule. The Rangers and Oilers are overwhelming the Capitals and Kings. The Hurricanes are halfway done with the Islanders. The Canucks are struggling with the Predators. PanthersLightning is tight, but one team is clearly better than the other. BruinsMaple Leafs is a close matchup featuring psychic baggage that we don’t have time to unpack. In Golden KnightsStars, Mark Stone came back and scored a huge goal.

None of that should shock you. None of that should make you blink.

Georgiev being good enough for Colorado, though? After what we saw in Game 1? Strange, surprising and completely true. For now.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

"Laugh it off": Evander Kane says Oilers won’t take the bait against Kings | Offside

Published

 on

The LA Kings tried every trick in the book to get the Edmonton Oilers off their game last night.

Hacks after the whistle, punches to the face, and interference with line changes were just some of the things that the Oilers had to endure, and throughout it all, there was not an ounce of retaliation.

All that badgering by the Kings resulted in at least two penalties against them and fuelled a red-hot Oilers power play that made them pay with three goals on four chances. That was by design for Edmonton, who knew that LA was going to try to pester them as much as they could.

That may have worked on past Oilers teams, but not this one.

300x250x1

“We’ve been in a series now for the third year in a row with these guys,” Kane said after practice this morning. “We know them, they know us… it’s one of those things where maybe it makes it a little easier to kind of laugh it off, walk away, or take a shot.

“That type of stuff isn’t gonna affect us.”

Once upon a time, this type of play would get under the Oilers’ skin and result in retaliatory penalties. Yet, with a few hard-knock lessons handed down to them in the past few seasons, it seems like the team is as determined as ever to cut the extracurriculars and focus on getting revenge on the scoreboard.

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, the longest-tenured player on this Oilers team, had to keep his emotions in check with Kings defender Vladislav Gavrikov, who punched him in the face early in the game. The easy reaction would be to punch back, but the veteran Nugen-Hopkins took his licks and wound up scoring later in the game.

“It’s going to be physical, the emotions are high, and there’s probably going to be some stuff after the whistle,” Nugent-Hopkins told reporters this morning. “I think it’s important to stay poised out there and not retaliate and just play through the whistles and let the other stuff just kind of happen.”

Oilers head coach Kris Knoblauch also noticed his team’s discipline. Playoff hockey is full of emotion, and keeping those in check to focus on the larger goal is difficult. He was happy with how his team set the tone.

“It’s not necessarily easy to do,” Knoblauch said. “You get punched in the face and sometimes the referees feel it’s enough to call a penalty, sometimes it’s not… You just have to take them, and sometimes, you get rewarded with the power play.

“I liked our guy’s response and we want to be sticking up for each other, we want to have that pack mentality, but it’s really important that we’re not the ones taking that extra penalty.”

There is no doubt that the Kings will continue to poke and prod at the Oilers as the series continues. Keeping those retaliations in check will only get more difficult, but if the team can continue to succeed on the scoreboard, it could get easier.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending