Work from home: Can it be permanently scrapped? | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

Work from home: Can it be permanently scrapped?

Published

 on

After Elon Musk unceremoniously laid off roughly 50 per cent of Twitter’s workforce, he announced this week that he plans to scrap the company’s ‘work from anywhere policy’ and mandate a full-time return to offices for all of its employees.

It raises an important question about the future of remote work in North America on the heels of an impending recession and a historic labour shortage, which experts say could ideally put employees in the driver’s seat for negotiating their working conditions.

“Employers are absolutely risking a floodgate of wrongful dismissal claims for severance when they make fundamental changes to (policy) for their employees,” Mackenzie Irwin, a Toronto-based employment lawyer, told CTVNews.ca on Friday.

According to Irwin, if a job is advertised as a remote position and if remote work is embedded in an employee’s contract or as a company policy, then an argument can be made that work-from-home counts as an agreed-upon term of employment.

In those cases, employees fired for not returning to offices or who quit due to the change in policy can sue for constructive dismissal, she said, which refers to when an employer doesn’t abide by their original agreement with an employee.

This could lead to a stronger exit or severance package, or in some rare cases, renewed employment.

But, for the workers without a written stipulation and who worked remotely due to unprecedented circumstances such as COVID-19, there is no “legislative framework” in place to protect those who refuse to return to the office, Sundeep Gokhale, a Toronto-based labour lawyer told CTVNews.ca on Friday.

“That said, we’re starting to see a very strong movement from employees making this determined condition of employment when they accept new work,” he said.

“I think we’re all seeing it as one of the first questions asked by employees (in a job interview), such as, ‘Is it a flexible work environment’ or, ‘How often do I have to come into the office?'”

Remote work’s popularity in Canada has surged, with many ready to quit if forced back to the office full-time, according to an October online survey by Hardbacon, a financial technology company.

It revealed that more than 80 per cent of Canadian remote workers would quit their job and look for new ones if their employer asked them to return to the office five days a week.

Another study by the Environics Institute for Survey Research on workplace preferences found that an increasing proportion of Canadians have grown acclimated to working remotely since the COVID-19 pandemic began, and want to keep it an indefinite option.

“I think it would have been reasonable to think that, after two-and-a-half years, people would have had enough, and want to go back. And we’re just not seeing that,” Andrew Parkin, one of the report’s lead authors, told CTVNews.ca in September.

But many companies in Canada have started putting their foot down and are renewing efforts to get employees back into office buildings.

Rather than voluntary return-to-office guidelines, employers are mandating office attendance through corporate policies. Some Bay Street companies and law firms appeared to be leading the charge, issuing memos mandating a set number of days a week in the office in September.

Law firm Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP said in a statement that on Sept. 6 its offices would move to a hybrid working model where most employees will work three to four days a week in the office, subject to operational requirements and local public health guidance.

The Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) is encouraging staff to visit the office more frequently, which could be an indication that Canadian big banks will follow their American counterparts and reduce remote work.

Rafael Ruffolo, a spokesman for RBC, told BNN Bloomberg via email that most office jobs under hybrid arrangements would require two to three days of in-person work each week.

“It won’t just happen organically,” RBC’s president and chief executive Dave McKay said in a LinkedIn post in September. “We’re asking teams across the bank to start coming together in person more often to work and collaborate.”

“There’s an energy and spontaneity that comes from connecting in-person that I don’t believe technology can replicate.”

While conflicted about the fate of working from home, experts believe that unions may be able to offer support to negotiate better deals for workers.

“Unions can definitely negotiate remote work to be included in employees’ collective agreements,” Valerio De Stefano, a York University professor and Canada Research Chair of the Innovation, Law and Society at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto, told CTVNews.ca on Friday.

“Even if remote work is not in collective agreements, but something that has been implemented by an employer, then a union can claim that the employer cannot revoke the policy unless they have demonstrable business grounds to do so.”

Employers also can’t roll back work-from-home policies without a reasonable amount of notice given to workers, Irvin says, arguing that often even a week’s notice wouldn’t be considered reasonable after two years of remote work.

While there is no hard and fast rule or formula, employers following best practices should transition workers to the office slowly with plenty of notice and start with a hybrid model, she said.

Parkin cautions that employers with rigid approaches may find a harder time retaining staff as opposed to those who are more flexible.

“While I can’t say if (permanent remote work) is sustainable or not, the way I’d put it is that it’s unavoidable,” he said.

With files from The Canadian Press and CTV News

Are you being asked to return to the office but would prefer to continue working from home? Share your story by emailing us at dotcom@bellmedia.ca with your name and location. Your comments may be used in a CTVNews.ca story.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Montreal skateboarders rally to protect skatepark

Published

 on

Montreal skateboarders rally to protect skatepark

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Ilia Malinin lands 4 quads – and a backflip – to win his third straight Skate America title

Published

 on

World champion Ilia Malinin won Skate America on Sunday for the third consecutive year, altering his free skate on the fly after an early mistake and punctuating the program with a backflip that had been banned in competition until this season.

The two-time and reigning U.S. champion scored 290.12 points to finish ahead of Kevin Aymoz of France, whose career-best free skate left him with 282.88 points and earned a standing ovation inside Credit Union of Texas Event Center in Allen, Texas.

Kao Miura of Japan, who was second after his short program, finished third with 278.67 points.

“It was a pretty challenging moment for me, just stepping on the ice. I felt way more nervous than usual,” said Malinin, the early favorite for gold at the 2026 Winter Olympics in Italy. “That may have played a part in the whole program.”

Vancouver’s Wesley Chiu placed ninth in the free skate with a score of 140.08 points, he finished ninth overall with a total of 206.94 points.

The ice dance competition was to be decided later Sunday in the final event of the season-opening Grand Prix. Lilah Fear and Lewis Gibson of Britain had the lead over American world champs Madison Chock and Evan Bates after the rhythm dance.

Malinin and Miura were separated by a mere 0.15 points after their short programs, but it was Aymoz who challenged Malinin for the top of the podium. The 27-year-old from France, who struggled mightily at the end of last season, landed a pair of quads in an error-free program to score 190.84 points — the best of all the free skates — and vault into first place.

Nika Egadze of Georgia was next on the ice but fell on his opening quad lutz and stepped out on his quad salchow, and those two mistakes kept him from medal contention. He wound up fourth with 261.71 points.

Miura, the 19-year-old former world junior champion, landed three quads during a program set to “The Umbrellas of Cherbourg,” the 1964 musical romantic drama film. But Miura lost points for an under-rotated triple axel and on a step sequence that led into a quad toe loop-triple toe loop combination midway through his free skate.

Malinin was last to take the ice, performing a program set to “I’m Not a Vampire” by the rock band Falling In Reverse.

He opened with a perfect quad flip and then hit a triple axel, even though Malinin remains the only skater to have landed the quad version of the jump in competition. Then came the mistake, when he doubled a planned quad loop, leaving Malinin to make changes on the fly over the second half of the program in an attempt to make up the lost points.

After putting his hand down on his triple lutz, Malinin landed a quad toe loop-triple toe loop combination before a quad salchow-triple axel in sequence — a pair of huge jumping passes that sent his technical score soaring.

Malinin capped the recovery of his program with a backflip during his choreographed sequence, a move that had been banned until this season because of its inherent danger. It was expected all along but nonetheless sent a roar through the crowd, just as Malinin’s program came to an end and a steady stream of stuffed animals were thrown onto the ice.

“It was really hard for me in the middle of the program to think what I have to do — what I need to do,” Malinin said when asked about the early mistake. “I just went full autopilot through there and I’m glad I made it out.”

___

AP sports:

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Leclerc wins US Grand Prix and late penalty gives Verstappen 3rd place over Norris in title chase

Published

 on

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Charles Leclerc earned Ferrari its first United States Grand Prix victory since 2018 with a clever start and a commanding drive Sunday, and Red Bull’s Max Verstappen strengthened his lead in the F1 season championship by finishing third ahead of McLaren’s Lando Norris.

Verstappen earned the podium only after Norris was given a five-second penalty for leaving the track to pass Verstappen in the final laps.

Verstappen immediately complained about the move, while Norris insisted Verstappen also left the track. Norris’ pass came after the two drivers had battled for the final podium spot and critical championship points over several laps and Verstappen had stubbornly refused to give ground.

The penalty and fourth place finish cost Norris valuable points in the title chase. Verstappen stretched his championship lead over Norris from 54 points to 57 with five grand prix and two sprint races left.

Leclerc earned his third win of the season and Ferrari pulled a 1-2 finish with his teammate Carlos Sainz in second. Kimi Raikkonen had been the last Ferrari winner at the Circuit of the Americas in 2018.

But the bigger battle was raging behind them as Verstappen and Norris fought over every inch of the final dozen laps.

Verstappen has not won a grand prix since June and Norris has steadily chipped away at his lead as the Red Bull car has faded. Yet Verstappen still stretched his lead by five points over the weekend by also winning Saturday’s sprint race.

Norris will leave Austin knowing he squandered a big chance to gain ground. He had even earned pole position for Sunday’s race.

Verstappen started right beside him, and it was their battle into the first turn that saw both cars run wide, leaving room for Leclerc to pounce on the opening.

The Ferrari driver jumped from fourth and straight into the lead.

Norris complained Verstappen forced him off the track at the start to begin a battle that would be fought over the entire race.

___

AP auto racing:

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version