adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

The week in politics: Populism and polarization in Canada and the U.S. – Waterloo Region Record

Published

 on


WASHINGTON—Next Wednesday, I’ll be appearing on a panel at Toronto Metropolitan University’s Democracy Dialogues to discuss the question, “Is toxic partisanship destroying democracy?”

In preparation for that, one of the questions the moderators asked me to consider is why Canada seems so far to have avoided the kind of bitter polarization that’s overtaken the U.S. during the Trump era. A different question, which came up this week while I was talking to Canadian pollster Frank Graves of EKOS Research, was whether Canada is actually still avoiding it.

“The mood of the country coming out of the pandemic, it’s terrible. It’s polarized in ways that it’s never been,” he said. “When I asked Canadians, what’s the number one cost, when you look back at the pandemic … they say it was the degree to which the country’s become polarized on issues around the vaccine.”

And that polarization, once in place, doesn’t just exist on one issue. Graves went on to say that when polling Canadians’ opinions on the war in Ukraine, he sees those who are unvaccinated agreeing with Russian talking points to an astonishing degree. Those points come out of the same misinformation ecosystem that drives the right-wing extremist support for Donald Trump in the U.S.

And even as the U.S. continued to grapple with the results of that this week, when the public hearings of the Jan. 6 Commission began Thursday night outlining a moment of “maximum danger” for U.S. democracy, as I wrote Friday morning, Canada may be in for the same kinds of grappling.

“In his quest for the national Conservative leadership it seems there are no limits on what Pierre Poilievre is prepared to say to curry favour with the angry anti-vax constituency in his party, the same people prone to disappear down the rabbit hole of conspiracy theories about globalist plots to run the world,” the Star’s editorial board wrote on Wednesday, about the man who appears destined to be the next leader of that party.

Graves told me Poilievre is running the textbook campaign to appeal to “the northern Trumpist crowd,” a constituency with an authoritarian political outlook that has grown to be a substantial chunk of Canadian voters. He said that may be a recipe for electoral success even in a general election, in a country where a majority government could be won with less than 35 per cent of the vote. “Yes, he could definitely win. In fact, I would bet that he would win if there was a vote in the next year.”

That last fact of the first-past-the post electoral system led the editorial board to call for change to the voting system on Thursday, reacting to a system that saw Doug Ford win re-election late last week with only 40.8 per cent of the vote, while only 43 per cent of eligible voters cast a ballot.

That the combined votes of the other parties represented an actual majority was another topic of debate this week. “NDP-Liberal merger talks were in the air a decade ago, as they are now,” Susan Delacourt wrote, although she concluded the option was “not likely.”

“I have one message for the Ontario Liberals — resist the temptation,” former Liberal cabinet minister John Milloy wrote on Monday of a potential merger. Among his reasons? “An NDP-Liberal merger might fuel polarization,” he wrote. “Although Canadian society is divided, we have thankfully avoided the ‘you are either a Democrat or Republican’ phenomenon we see south of the border. Being forced to self-identify as either ‘left’ or ‘right’ has created two growing solitudes in the U.S. We don’t need it replicated in Ontario.”

Interestingly, major recaps of the Ontario election campaign focused on how Ford — who, in my days in Toronto in the not-that-distant past, was the most polarizing politician around — won in part by portraying himself as a uniter, not a divider. The “populist who likes to be liked,” Robert Benzie wrote on Thursday, shunned the anti-vax wing of his party, diversified its candidate pool and made appeals to working-class voters in traditional NDP areas to become “the big-spending ‘party of yes.’”

“He is not a partisan or ideological guy at his core. He’s comfortable working with people who have traditionally been in the other side of the fence,” Conservative strategist Kory Teneycke told Benzie. “There are whole swaths of ridings across Ontario that we’re only competitive in because of his brand.”

As I say, this is fascinating for me — having covered Ford as a municipal and provincial politician when he regularly villainized his opponents and the “downtown elites” who voted for them — to observe. At least rhetorically, as Graves told me on the phone, Ford has moved away from rage-fuelled populism — even if his base of voters hasn’t.

Graves said the same authoritarian outlook that drives Trump voters in the U.S and is driving Poilievre’s federal Conservative campaign was “highly predictive of Doug Ford’s supporters.” The same block of voters, Graves said, also supported Ford’s brother Rob as Toronto’s mayor, and have been with him a long time. But Ford also has a high degree of support from self-defined “upper class” voters, a crossover that may be possible because of the softening of his rhetoric to appear less polarizing.

While Poilievre is leaning into Trump-style polarization, Ford has been backing away from it while retaining the support of those it appeals to, at least for now.

Former NDP strategist Robin Sears wrote Sunday that whether Ford sticks with that transformation of his image from angry populist to an apparent trusting partnership with Trudeau’s government “to lay the foundations of a more appealing, more enduring legacy” is the most interesting question in the years ahead. “Will he slide back into his old populist cant, or will he continue evolving as both a person and a leader?”

In considering the question of whether Canada is heading toward the kind of U.S.-style toxic partisanship I’ll be discussing at the panel this coming week, the different approaches of Ford and Poilievre — and the reaction of voters to them — may be one key to determining the answer in the near future.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

BC United to run some candidates to keep party alive, despite halting campaign

Published

 on

 

VICTORIA – British Columbia’s Official Opposition BC United party says it will run some candidates in the Oct. 19 election despite the recent suspension of its “full province-wide” campaign to throw its support behind the surging B.C. Conservative Party.

A letter to party members Friday said the move is intended to leave open a door to the party being resurrected for future elections.

It said despite last week’s campaign suspension by Leader Kevin Falcon “we intend on running a select number of candidates in the upcoming election.”

The letter said the move ensures BC United, formerly the B.C. Liberal Party, remains a registered political party with Elections BC.

“Again, I want to reiterate that we have simply suspended the full province-wide BC United campaign for this upcoming provincial election,” BC United executive director Lindsay Cote said in the letter.

“This does not fold our party or erase our organization,” she said. “Our intent is to ensure that following the October 2024 election, we will be able to have a thorough discussion with our membership about the future of BC United. If there is a desire within our membership to rebuild the party, and a plausible path to do so, we want to be in a position to act on this.”

Cote said the party has yet to decide how many of its candidates will stand in which ridings.

Falcon announced last week he was suspending the campaign and withdrawing the party’s candidate nominations and instead urging support for the Conservatives to prevent a vote-split that would help the New Democrats win re-election.

“Kevin Falcon, as leader of BC United, had the power under our party constitution to revoke nominations of all candidates for the upcoming election,” said Cote. “While he did not need support of the provincial executive for this decision, he sought it and it was granted. We are now in the process of revoking these nominations with Elections BC.”

Cote said the decision to suspend the campaign was difficult for party members, candidates, MLAs and staff employees.

“While we know this decision was gut wrenching, we strongly believe it gives British Columbians the best opportunity to defeat the NDP and secure a free-enterprise victory in the provincial election this October.”

Adam Wilson, BC United communications director, said in a statement running some candidates ensures the party name is available in future elections.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

NDP used stock video from Russia, weeks after decrying Tories for doing the same

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – The New Democrats used a stock image from Russia in a recent video, weeks after the party criticized the Conservatives for doing the same.

On Wednesday NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh announced in a video message that he was ending the supply and confidence deal with the Liberal government, while accusing Conservative policies of hurting Canadians, including retirees.

The video then flashes to a stock video of two seniors sitting at a table looking at their laptop.

The Canadian Press independently verified from several stock images sites, including Getty Images, that the video originated from Russia.

The two seniors are also featured in photographs on a website for a Russian university, which says they are faculty members there.

“We obtained the image from a North American stock image service,” New Democrats said in a statement,

“Nowhere did the service mention where the video was taken. We’ll take better care in the future.”

The NDP video remains up on all their social platforms.

Last month New Democrats denounced the Conservative Party of Canada after it used non-Canadian stock images in one of their videos, including Russian fighter jets.

The Conservative party deleted the video after online criticism, saying “mistakes happen” while pointing out that a Liberal ad from 2011 was scrutinized over its use of stock images.

At the time, deputy critic for ethics MP Charlie Angus criticized the use of non-Canadian images in political messaging.

“I love Canada. I want the next election to be run in Canada, for Canada,” Angus said in a statement on Aug. 19.

New Democrats went on to condemn the use of “phoney, fake, bogus” digital content.

“I find it very strange that two major Canadian political parties – the NDP and the CPC – are not taking more care in their communications to Canadians about Canadians,” said Government House leader Karina Gould in a statement.

She said both parties will have to explain why “neither could be bothered to use images of actual Canadians.”

While the NDP and Conservatives are “focused on promoting their own political interests,” she said the Liberal government is “squarely focused on delivering important measures and programs for Canadians that meet their needs.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

It’s not just Harris and Trump who have a lot at stake in next week’s debate. ABC News does, too

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Hours after ABC News released the rules for next Tuesday’s presidential debate, resolving a final dispute in Donald Trump’s favor, the former president was on the attack — against ABC News.

“I think a lot of people will be watching to see how nasty they are, how unfair they are,” he said Wednesday on a Fox News town hall.

It was an unsubtle reminder that Trump and Kamala Harris aren’t the only ones with a lot at stake next week. The same is true for ABC News and moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis, in what is the only scheduled debate between the presidential contenders this fall.

Multiple outlets will televise and stream it. But unlike in past years, when presidential debates were organized by a bipartisan commission, this is solely an ABC News production. It won’t include a live audience.

“This is a huge opportunity for ABC News,” said Ben Sherwood, former ABC News president and now publisher & CEO of the Daily Beast. “It’s like getting to host, moderate and produce the Super Bowl of politics. It gives the network luster at a time broadcast television is in decline.”

That is, of course, if things go well.

ABC sees it as a ‘huge responsibility’

The ABC debate was set last spring, when President Joe Biden was the likely Democratic nominee. When he dropped out, it was unclear if the debate would go on. Harris and Trump eventually gave the go-ahead, although the Republican’s repeated criticism of ABC last month raised questions about it again.

It all had little effect on ABC’s planning, said Rick Klein, the network’s Washington bureau chief. “It truly wasn’t a lot of turmoil on our end of things,” he said.

Biden and Trump debated on June 27 — what seems a lifetime ago. That event was put on by CNN, although it is remembered more for Biden’s shaky performance that eventually led him to end his campaign than for anything done by the network or its moderators, Dana Bash and Jake Tapper.

“At the end of the day, this is about helping to create a forum for the candidates to communicate with the public,” Klein said. “It’s a huge responsibility. It’s a humbling responsibility.”

An estimated 51.3 million people watched Biden and Trump in June. But that was before many people were truly tuned into the election, and the potential rematch of the 2020 campaign was drawing little enthusiasm. Tuesday’s debate will almost certainly reach more people, whether or not it approaches the record debate audience of 84 million for the first face-off between Hillary Clinton and Trump in 2016.

Muir’s “World News Tonight” has led the evening news ratings for eight years, making him effectively America’s most popular newscaster. Many nights “World News Tonight” has a bigger audience than anything on prime-time television.

One secret to his success has been ABC’s efforts to craft an apolitical image for him. Tuesday’s audience will be his biggest ever — including people largely unfamiliar with Muir because they seek news elsewhere — and it’s for a political event in polarized times.

Davis has a lower profile, though she hosts ABC’s nightly streaming newscast, fills in for Muir and has moderated presidential nominating debates in the past. Many will be seeing her in action Tuesday for the first time.

Although more complicated in the Trump years, the role of debate moderator is often akin to baseball umpires — it indicates they’ve done a good job when you don’t really notice them. If Muir or Davis figure prominently in Wednesday morning’s stories, that’s probably not a good sign.

“It’s absolutely a minefield,” said Tom Bettag, former ABC News “Nightline” producer. “Ask Chris Wallace.”

Wallace was well respected, considered even-handed and, in 2020 when he moderated the first Biden-Trump debate, was working at Fox News “so the Trump people couldn’t accuse him of being a liberal hack,” Bettag said. “And it still blew up pretty badly. ” Trump’s frequent interruptions exasperated Biden and led to criticism that Wallace lost control of the evening.

The moderators will be ‘there to facilitate’

There’s less of a chance of that happening this year because debate rules call for a candidate’s microphone to be muted when their opponent is speaking, something Trump’s campaign sought because interruptions turn many voters off.

An open mic led to one of Harris’ most-remembered exchanges in her 2020 debate with Vice President Mike Pence. “Mr. Vice President, I am speaking,” she said when Pence interrupted one of her answers, a moment many women could relate to in business situations with men.

While Bash and Tapper occasionally tried to steer Trump or Biden back to the questions when the politicians ducked in CNN’s June debate, they would not correct any lies or misstatements, many of which were pointed out in post-debate analysis. While Klein would not commit to the same policy, he did say that “it’s a debate between them and we’re there to facilitate the conversation.”

Even before his Fox News appearance this week, Trump had repeatedly criticized ABC News, even though he agreed twice to participate in a debate on the network.

He has targeted network political journalists George Stephanopoulos and Jonathan Karl specifically. The former president last spring filed a defamation lawsuit against Stephanopoulos over comments the journalist made about Trump being held liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll. ABC has said Stephanopoulos is not involved in debate preparation.

Trump has also spoken about the reported friendship between Harris and Dana Walden, a top executive at ABC’s parent Walt Disney Co., whose oversight has recently expanded to include ABC News. ABC has said Walden is not involved in any news coverage decisions.

To a certain extent, Trump’s comments can be seen as “working the refs,” or appealing to supporters who don’t like the press. A nightmare scenario for ABC is Trump lashing out on Tuesday if he feels things aren’t going well for him.

“From our perspective, we just have to do our job and do it as well as we can,” Klein said.

He wouldn’t give any details about how ABC’s preparations are going, such as what figures have been assigned to portray Harris or Trump in mock debates.

Bettag, a University of Maryland journalism professor who is teaching a course this fall on covering the presidential campaign, has been involved in these preps before. He advises Muir and Davis to take some deep breaths.

“The most important thing is to stay cool, which is hard to do since they’re likely to get yelled at,” he said. “It’s really important to try to keep their voices down and stay steady.”

___

David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending