adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Early U.S. election returns leave London politics watchers with mixed feelings – CBC.ca

Published

 on


Many bleary-eyed political watchers in London went to bed late Tuesday — or early Wednesday — not knowing whether Donald Trump will get a second term in the White House with too many votes in key swing states to be counted to declare a winner.

U.S. elections are always closely watched in Canada but Trump’s turbulent first term combined with the COVID-19 pandemic amped up local interest in this race. 

However this morning., the results were not decisive in enough to name a winner in the presidential race, though some Democratic party supporters weren’t feeling good about their chances with Trump having won Ohio and Florida and holding leads in crucial states including Pennsylvania, Texas, Wisconsin and Michigan. 

Many of the early results could change due to the record number of absentee ballots cast as voters tried to avoid crowded voting centres. Some states may not be able to declare the winner for days, depending on possible recounts and legal challenges.

‘Not looking good’ says Biden supporter

Londoner Joe Roberts ran for Congress in his native Ohio back in 2010. He lost the race but didn’t lose his love and passion for politics. (Andrew Lupton/CBC)

Among the Londoners watching the results closely was Joe Roberts. 

He’s the executive director of London’s Jewish Centre, but he’s also a native Ohioan who ran for Congress as a Democrat in what was then the Buckeye State’s Third District back in 2010. 

He lost that race to a Republican incumbent but didn’t lose his love of politics. He voted by mail in this election weeks ago. 

“I’ve been looking forward to this all year, for four years really,” he told CBC News before results began to come in. “Starting in March, all I could think about was November.” 

Early Tuesday evening he believed Democratic Party challenger Joe Biden was heading for a win. 

But hours later, after partial results had rolled in, Roberts told CBC News he feared Biden faced a very difficult path to win the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the White House.  

“Looking at the vote total that’s still out and where it’s out in Wisconsin and Michigan, it’s really not looking good for Biden,” said Roberts just after midnight. “You have to flip both Pennsylvania and one of those two states to win and it just doesn’t look likely.” 

If political history is any indicator, Trump’s win in Ohio doesn’t bode well for Biden and the Democrats.

Ohio has a good track record of picking winning presidential candidates. Going back to 1944, the state has voted for the losing candidate only once, opting for Nixon over Kennedy back in 1960. 

“A Republican presidential candidate, historically, has not won without winning Ohio,” said Roberts.

Trump won Ohio four years ago but the state also has a history of oscillating back and forth between the two parties. In the last 12 elections, Ohio has voted for Republican presidential candidates seven times, Democrats five

London Republican watching Texas

Jess McDougall is Canadian but says she’d be voting for Trump if she lived in the United States. Many of her relatives are Trump supporters. She says the polls are failing to capture the number of voters who support Trump, but aren’t willing to admit to it publicly. (Jess McDougall)

Another London-based U.S. politics watcher, but one on the opposite side of the political spectrum, is Jess McDougall. 

A 22-year-old political science student at Western University, McDougall says if she lived in the United States, she’d be voting for Trump, like her family does. 

They’re based in the Dallas area and she calls them “hardcore Republicans.” They are religious, gun carrying conservatives who want to see Trump in office for another four years.

McDougall said too many polls that predicted a Biden win failed to capture the voting intentions of so-called “shy” Trump supporters. 

She’s predicting a Trump win with an Electoral College count similar to when Trump beat Hillary Clinton in 2016. 

“Nothing has changed to sway those Trump voters in my opinion,” McDougall said. 

CBC News checked in with McDougall just after 11 p.m. Tuesday. She didn’t want to declare Trump the winner, but said she was happy with what she saw in the early results. 

“I’m pretty confident obviously but I don’t want to count my chickens too quickly,” she said. “But the pathways are narrowing for Biden.”

Zoom watching party at Western

McDougall was watching the race with others but not in a crowded pub, restaurant or living room. 

The political science club at Western University held a Zoom meeting of politics-watchers to discuss and debate as the results were reported.

Club president Aidan Link organized the event and said more than 150 people joined the chat at once. He programmed a half-dozen student moderators, including McDougall, to take turns leading the discussion as the night unfolded. A few Western political science professors also joined the online discussion throughout the night.

It’s not the same as watching the results and victory speeches among a crowd but it will have to do. This is 2020 after all and politics is often about compromise. 

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

BC United to run some candidates to keep party alive, despite halting campaign

Published

 on

 

VICTORIA – British Columbia’s Official Opposition BC United party says it will run some candidates in the Oct. 19 election despite the recent suspension of its “full province-wide” campaign to throw its support behind the surging B.C. Conservative Party.

A letter to party members Friday said the move is intended to leave open a door to the party being resurrected for future elections.

It said despite last week’s campaign suspension by Leader Kevin Falcon “we intend on running a select number of candidates in the upcoming election.”

The letter said the move ensures BC United, formerly the B.C. Liberal Party, remains a registered political party with Elections BC.

“Again, I want to reiterate that we have simply suspended the full province-wide BC United campaign for this upcoming provincial election,” BC United executive director Lindsay Cote said in the letter.

“This does not fold our party or erase our organization,” she said. “Our intent is to ensure that following the October 2024 election, we will be able to have a thorough discussion with our membership about the future of BC United. If there is a desire within our membership to rebuild the party, and a plausible path to do so, we want to be in a position to act on this.”

Cote said the party has yet to decide how many of its candidates will stand in which ridings.

Falcon announced last week he was suspending the campaign and withdrawing the party’s candidate nominations and instead urging support for the Conservatives to prevent a vote-split that would help the New Democrats win re-election.

“Kevin Falcon, as leader of BC United, had the power under our party constitution to revoke nominations of all candidates for the upcoming election,” said Cote. “While he did not need support of the provincial executive for this decision, he sought it and it was granted. We are now in the process of revoking these nominations with Elections BC.”

Cote said the decision to suspend the campaign was difficult for party members, candidates, MLAs and staff employees.

“While we know this decision was gut wrenching, we strongly believe it gives British Columbians the best opportunity to defeat the NDP and secure a free-enterprise victory in the provincial election this October.”

Adam Wilson, BC United communications director, said in a statement running some candidates ensures the party name is available in future elections.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

NDP used stock video from Russia, weeks after decrying Tories for doing the same

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – The New Democrats used a stock image from Russia in a recent video, weeks after the party criticized the Conservatives for doing the same.

On Wednesday NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh announced in a video message that he was ending the supply and confidence deal with the Liberal government, while accusing Conservative policies of hurting Canadians, including retirees.

The video then flashes to a stock video of two seniors sitting at a table looking at their laptop.

The Canadian Press independently verified from several stock images sites, including Getty Images, that the video originated from Russia.

The two seniors are also featured in photographs on a website for a Russian university, which says they are faculty members there.

“We obtained the image from a North American stock image service,” New Democrats said in a statement,

“Nowhere did the service mention where the video was taken. We’ll take better care in the future.”

The NDP video remains up on all their social platforms.

Last month New Democrats denounced the Conservative Party of Canada after it used non-Canadian stock images in one of their videos, including Russian fighter jets.

The Conservative party deleted the video after online criticism, saying “mistakes happen” while pointing out that a Liberal ad from 2011 was scrutinized over its use of stock images.

At the time, deputy critic for ethics MP Charlie Angus criticized the use of non-Canadian images in political messaging.

“I love Canada. I want the next election to be run in Canada, for Canada,” Angus said in a statement on Aug. 19.

New Democrats went on to condemn the use of “phoney, fake, bogus” digital content.

“I find it very strange that two major Canadian political parties – the NDP and the CPC – are not taking more care in their communications to Canadians about Canadians,” said Government House leader Karina Gould in a statement.

She said both parties will have to explain why “neither could be bothered to use images of actual Canadians.”

While the NDP and Conservatives are “focused on promoting their own political interests,” she said the Liberal government is “squarely focused on delivering important measures and programs for Canadians that meet their needs.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

It’s not just Harris and Trump who have a lot at stake in next week’s debate. ABC News does, too

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Hours after ABC News released the rules for next Tuesday’s presidential debate, resolving a final dispute in Donald Trump’s favor, the former president was on the attack — against ABC News.

“I think a lot of people will be watching to see how nasty they are, how unfair they are,” he said Wednesday on a Fox News town hall.

It was an unsubtle reminder that Trump and Kamala Harris aren’t the only ones with a lot at stake next week. The same is true for ABC News and moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis, in what is the only scheduled debate between the presidential contenders this fall.

Multiple outlets will televise and stream it. But unlike in past years, when presidential debates were organized by a bipartisan commission, this is solely an ABC News production. It won’t include a live audience.

“This is a huge opportunity for ABC News,” said Ben Sherwood, former ABC News president and now publisher & CEO of the Daily Beast. “It’s like getting to host, moderate and produce the Super Bowl of politics. It gives the network luster at a time broadcast television is in decline.”

That is, of course, if things go well.

ABC sees it as a ‘huge responsibility’

The ABC debate was set last spring, when President Joe Biden was the likely Democratic nominee. When he dropped out, it was unclear if the debate would go on. Harris and Trump eventually gave the go-ahead, although the Republican’s repeated criticism of ABC last month raised questions about it again.

It all had little effect on ABC’s planning, said Rick Klein, the network’s Washington bureau chief. “It truly wasn’t a lot of turmoil on our end of things,” he said.

Biden and Trump debated on June 27 — what seems a lifetime ago. That event was put on by CNN, although it is remembered more for Biden’s shaky performance that eventually led him to end his campaign than for anything done by the network or its moderators, Dana Bash and Jake Tapper.

“At the end of the day, this is about helping to create a forum for the candidates to communicate with the public,” Klein said. “It’s a huge responsibility. It’s a humbling responsibility.”

An estimated 51.3 million people watched Biden and Trump in June. But that was before many people were truly tuned into the election, and the potential rematch of the 2020 campaign was drawing little enthusiasm. Tuesday’s debate will almost certainly reach more people, whether or not it approaches the record debate audience of 84 million for the first face-off between Hillary Clinton and Trump in 2016.

Muir’s “World News Tonight” has led the evening news ratings for eight years, making him effectively America’s most popular newscaster. Many nights “World News Tonight” has a bigger audience than anything on prime-time television.

One secret to his success has been ABC’s efforts to craft an apolitical image for him. Tuesday’s audience will be his biggest ever — including people largely unfamiliar with Muir because they seek news elsewhere — and it’s for a political event in polarized times.

Davis has a lower profile, though she hosts ABC’s nightly streaming newscast, fills in for Muir and has moderated presidential nominating debates in the past. Many will be seeing her in action Tuesday for the first time.

Although more complicated in the Trump years, the role of debate moderator is often akin to baseball umpires — it indicates they’ve done a good job when you don’t really notice them. If Muir or Davis figure prominently in Wednesday morning’s stories, that’s probably not a good sign.

“It’s absolutely a minefield,” said Tom Bettag, former ABC News “Nightline” producer. “Ask Chris Wallace.”

Wallace was well respected, considered even-handed and, in 2020 when he moderated the first Biden-Trump debate, was working at Fox News “so the Trump people couldn’t accuse him of being a liberal hack,” Bettag said. “And it still blew up pretty badly. ” Trump’s frequent interruptions exasperated Biden and led to criticism that Wallace lost control of the evening.

The moderators will be ‘there to facilitate’

There’s less of a chance of that happening this year because debate rules call for a candidate’s microphone to be muted when their opponent is speaking, something Trump’s campaign sought because interruptions turn many voters off.

An open mic led to one of Harris’ most-remembered exchanges in her 2020 debate with Vice President Mike Pence. “Mr. Vice President, I am speaking,” she said when Pence interrupted one of her answers, a moment many women could relate to in business situations with men.

While Bash and Tapper occasionally tried to steer Trump or Biden back to the questions when the politicians ducked in CNN’s June debate, they would not correct any lies or misstatements, many of which were pointed out in post-debate analysis. While Klein would not commit to the same policy, he did say that “it’s a debate between them and we’re there to facilitate the conversation.”

Even before his Fox News appearance this week, Trump had repeatedly criticized ABC News, even though he agreed twice to participate in a debate on the network.

He has targeted network political journalists George Stephanopoulos and Jonathan Karl specifically. The former president last spring filed a defamation lawsuit against Stephanopoulos over comments the journalist made about Trump being held liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll. ABC has said Stephanopoulos is not involved in debate preparation.

Trump has also spoken about the reported friendship between Harris and Dana Walden, a top executive at ABC’s parent Walt Disney Co., whose oversight has recently expanded to include ABC News. ABC has said Walden is not involved in any news coverage decisions.

To a certain extent, Trump’s comments can be seen as “working the refs,” or appealing to supporters who don’t like the press. A nightmare scenario for ABC is Trump lashing out on Tuesday if he feels things aren’t going well for him.

“From our perspective, we just have to do our job and do it as well as we can,” Klein said.

He wouldn’t give any details about how ABC’s preparations are going, such as what figures have been assigned to portray Harris or Trump in mock debates.

Bettag, a University of Maryland journalism professor who is teaching a course this fall on covering the presidential campaign, has been involved in these preps before. He advises Muir and Davis to take some deep breaths.

“The most important thing is to stay cool, which is hard to do since they’re likely to get yelled at,” he said. “It’s really important to try to keep their voices down and stay steady.”

___

David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending