adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Health

The COVID-19 Clinical Spectrum and the Effect of Associated Comorbidities on Illness Severity in the North Indian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study – Cureus

Published

 on


Background: The activity level of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as it is now called, is considered low. Despite early preventive lockdown measures and a massive vaccination drive, almost the entire adult population in India will have been vaccinated at least once by the beginning of 2022 (2,072,946,593 till 11 August 2022). There is still concern about a pan-India outbreak and threat due to newly emerging pathogenic strains. The goal of this study is to find out how common various presenting complaints are in COVID-19 patients as well as how comorbidities affect the severity of the illness.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted from December 2020 to January 2021 at a tertiary care hospital’s department of internal medicine in North India. The study included 237 patients who were COVID-19-positive and were admitted to our hospital after providing informed consent. They were classified into three groups: mild, moderate, and severe.

Results: Fever was the most common presenting symptom, affecting 84.4% of the population, while diarrhoea was the least common, affecting only 3.4% of the population. Fever, cough, sore throat, headache, and breathlessness were significantly correlated with the severity of the illness. Gastrointestinal symptoms like diarrhoea did not have any significant correlation with the severity of the illness. The severity of illness was statistically related to comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Conclusion: Males were more likely to develop more serious illnesses. However, the correlation was not statistically significant. The number of comorbid conditions and the severity of the illness were found to have a fair and significant relationship. None of the diarrhoea symptoms were related to the severity of the illness.

Introduction

The 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as it is now called, is rapidly spreading worldwide from its place of origin in Wuhan city of Hubei province of China [1]. The 2019-nCoV has a close similarity to bat coronaviruses, and it has been postulated that bats are the primary source. While the origin of the 2019-nCoV is still being investigated, current evidence suggests that spread to humans occurred via transmission from wild animals illegally sold in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market [2]. The pandemic has been renamed SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) due to its resemblance to severe acute respiratory syndrome [3,4]. The WHO declared COVID-19 a global pandemic on 11th March 2020 [5].

The severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak was encountered in 2003, and, more recently, there was an outbreak of a related but different coronavirus, the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus [6]. The primary coronavirus, discovered in bats in 1937, rarely infects humans and is found in animals such as bats, camels, and cats rather than humans or other mammals. They later mutated, causing the disease to infect rats, cows, pigs, mice, cats, dogs, horses, and turkeys. Cough and cold were common symptoms of the first human coronavirus discovered in the 1960s [7].

The enormity of symptoms and clinical manifestations observed in COVID-19 patients displayed a vast array of inter-individual differences. According to a meta-analysis by Sanyaolu et al., conducted in 2020, the most common symptom during COVID-19 was fever followed by dry cough [8]. It has been observed that most of the severely affected patients also had pre-existing comorbidities such as diabetes, cardiovascular conditions, and hypertension [8]. It was displayed that a higher probability of getting admitted to intensive care units also had a high mortality rate [9,10].

It is therefore required to evaluate the symptoms, mortality rates, patient profiles, and severity of the illness in the pre-vaccination era to assess early detection and appropriate treatment of critical cases. This is an invaluable asset to the healthcare system in India, which displays immense socio-economic and cultural diversity. Accordingly, this study aims to understand the prevalence of symptoms, comorbidities, and mortality rates in the pre-vaccination era and how they can be utilized to prevent future COVID-19 outbreaks.

Materials & Methods

This cross-sectional observational study lasted 62 days, from December 2020 to January 2021. The study focused on COVID-19 cases admitted to Sharda Hospital in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. All patients diagnosed with COVID-19 admitted to Sharda Hospital and willing to participate in this study were enrolled in the study. Patients under the age of 13 and those who refused to participate were excluded from the study.

The prevalence of fever was found to be 88.7% during hospitalization among diagnosed cases of COVID-19, according to a study by Guan et al. [11]. The sample size was calculated using the formula: n = Z2pq/d2; where Z is the ordinate of standard normal distribution at α% level of significance (1.96 at α = 5% level of significance), p is the observed prevalence, q = 100 – p, and d is the margin of error (5%). According to the calculation, 154 subjects were required for the study. During the study, we were able to recruit 237 patients for the study.

All cases of COVID-19 infections underwent the nasopharyngeal swab test, which was evaluated using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for the presence of the COVID-19 virus. All the patients included in the study underwent a thorough history taking, which included demographic parameters such as age, gender, and area of residence, i.e., urban or rural, and a rigorous evaluation for detection of various symptoms of COVID-19 infections such as fever, chills/rigour, cough, fatigue, anorexia, myalgia, sore throat, and rhinorrhea. Other comorbid illnesses such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney disease, cancer, and obesity were also evaluated in all cases. Patients were classified based on the severity of symptoms [12], as shown in Table 1.

Severity of symptoms
Mild: low-grade fever, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea, no alteration in mental status, and immunocompetent
Moderate: respiratory rate greater than 30 breaths per minute, SpO2 greater than 93%, PaO2/FiO2 greater than 300, and pulmonary infiltrates greater than 50% within 24 to 48 hours
Severe: septic shock and MODS are all examples of critical respiratory failure (requiring mechanical ventilation)

Laboratory investigations included chest X-ray, complete blood count, renal function test, liver function test, electrocardiography, blood sugar, and body mass index calculation.

Statistical analysis

Data were gathered and tabulated using Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and analysed using the statistical software package SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the quantitative parametric data were presented. Percentages and proportions were used to represent qualitative data. As a means of determining significance, the chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Other descriptive statistics like ANOVA and independent t-test were employed to compare continuous data. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The mean ± SD of age among the study participants was 37.89 ± 16.10 years. Maximum subjects were between the age group of 21-30 years (32.1%), followed by 31-40 years (19.8%) and 41-50 years (14.8%). Approximately 14.3% of the subjects were asymptomatic. Of the patients, 84.4% had a fever, 59.9% had a cough, 40.5% had a sore throat, 21.5% had a headache, 26.6% had breathlessness, and 3.4% had diarrhoea. Comorbidities, namely, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) accounted for 8.4%, 6.8%, 2.1%, 2.5%, and 3.4% of the study population, respectively (Table 2).

Variable Frequency Percentage
Age group (in years)    
10-20 25 10.5
21-30 76 32.1
31-40 47 19.8
41-50 35 14.8
51-60 32 13.5
61-70 10 4.2
71-80 9 3.8
>80 3 1.3
Gender    
Male 155 65.4
Female 82 34.6
Asymptomatic    
Yes 34 14.3
No 203 85.7
Fever    
Yes 200 84.4
No 37 15.6
Cough    
Yes 142 59.9
No 95 40.1
Sore throat    
Yes 96 40.5
No 141 59.5
Headache    
Yes 51 21.5
No 186 78.5
Breathlessness    
Yes 63 26.6
No 174 73.4
Diarrhoea    
Yes 8 3.4
No 229 96.6
Acute respiratory distress syndrome    
Yes 24 10.1
No 213 89.9

The distribution of comorbidities was found to be the same in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. When different comorbidities were compared between the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups using the chi-square test, an insignificant difference was found at p > 0.05 (Table 3).

Comorbidities Asymptomatic (n = 34), N (%) Symptomatic (n = 203), N (%) P-value
Hypertension      
Present 1 (2.9%) 19 (9.36%) 0.21
Absent 33 (97.1%) 184 (90.64%)
Diabetes mellitus      
Present 0 16 (7.9%) 0.09
Absent 34 (100%) 187 (92.1%)
Coronary artery disease      
Present 0 5 (2.5%) 0.355
Absent 34 (100%) 198 (97.5%)
Chronic kidney disease      
Present 1 (2.9%) 5 (2.5%) 0.87
Absent 33 (97.1%) 198 (97.5%)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease      
Present 0 8 (3.9%) 0.24
Absent 34 (100%) 195 (96.1%)

Mild, moderate, and severe illness was found among 68, 4, and 10 females and 118, 18, and 19 males, respectively. Hence, the severity of illness was found to be more among males as compared to females, as shown in Figure 1.

Fever, cough, sore throat, headache, and breathlessness were significantly correlated with the severity of the illness. Gastrointestinal symptoms like diarrhoea did not have any significant correlation with the severity of the illness (Figure 2).

The severity of illness was statistically related to comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and COPD. Patients with severe illness had a higher prevalence of hypertension than those with mild or moderate illness (p = 0.001). Patients with severe illness had a higher prevalence of diabetes than those with mild or moderate illness (p = 0.001). Patients with severe illnesses had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease than patients with mild or moderate illness (p = 0.002). Patients with severe illness had a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease than patients with mild illness (p = 0.001), as shown in Table 4.

Comorbidities Mild, N (%) Moderate, N (%) Severe, N (%) P-value
Hypertension        
Present 4 (2.2%) 5 (22.7%) 11 (37.9%) <0.001
Absent 182 (97.8%) 17 (77.3%) 18 (62.1%)
Diabetes mellitus        
Present 6 (3.2%) 2 (9.1%) 8 (27.6%) <0.001
Absent 180 (96.8%) 20 (90.9%) 21 (72.4%)
Coronary artery disease        
Present 1 (0.5%) 1 (4.5%) 3 (10.3%) 0.002
Absent 185 (99.5%) 21 (95.5%) 26 (89.7%)
Chronic kidney disease        
Present 1 (0.5%) 0 5 (17.2%) <0.001
Absent 185 (99.5%) 22 (100%) 24 (82.8%)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease        
Present 2 (1.1%) 1 (4.5%) 5 (17.2%) <0.001
Absent 184 (98.9%) 21 (95.5%) 24 (82.8%)

All laboratory parameters evaluated were found to be elevated in patients suffering from a severe illness as compared to mild and moderate illness (Table 5).

Laboratory parameters Mild (mean ± SD) Moderate (mean ± SD) Severe (mean ± SD) P-value
D-dimer 0.89 ± 0.88 3.69 ± 2.10 7.44 ± 2.72 <0.001
CRP 62.95 ± 18.09 84.73 ± 29.41 109.07 ± 40.42 <0.001
Ferritin 229.09 ± 62.24 564.23 ± 150.42 870.41 ± 130.59 <0.001
IL-6 4.47 ± 3.30 17.18 ± 8.43 41.52 ± 7.68 <0.001
SPO2 0.98 ± 0.13 0.94 ± 0.02 0.91 ± 0.03 0.52
RR 18.97 ± 2.73 22.32 ± 2.95 25.45 ± 3.54 <0.001
SGPT 49.80 ± 5.79 72.09 ± 24.11 132.07 ± 52.34 <0.001
SGOT 55.65 ± 5.69 77.09 ± 25.45 139.45 ± 53.58 <0.001
TLC 12170.97 ± 2417.86 14120.91 ± 4440.43 15757.93 ± 4243.20 <0.001
CTSS 3.02 ± 1.91 9.82 ± 1.79 19.00 ± 2.86 <0.001

C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), respiratory rate (RR), serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), total leucocyte count (TLC), and CT severity score (CTSS) were all found to be significantly higher in symptomatic patients as compared to asymptomatic patients (Table 6). To calculate CTSS, according to the anatomic structure, 18 segments of both lungs were divided into 20 regions, in which the posterior apical segment of the left upper lobe was subdivided into apical and posterior segmental regions, whereas the anteromedial basal segment of the left lower lobe was subdivided into anterior and basal segmental regions. The lung opacities in all of the 20 lung regions were subjectively evaluated on chest CT images using a system attributing scores of 0, 1, and 2 if parenchymal opacification involved 0%, less than 50%, or equal to or more than 50% of each region, respectively. The CTSS was defined as the sum of the individual scores in the 20 lung segment regions, which may range from 0 to 40 points [13].

Laboratory parameters Asymptomatic (n = 34) Symptomatic (n = 203) P-value
D-dimer 0.63 ± 0.75 2.19 ± 2.74 <0.001
CRP 56.03 ± 9.79 73.05 ± 29.10 <0.001
Ferritin 226.41 ± 119.32 357.48 ± 246.27 <0.001
IL-6 3.03 ± 5.51 11.38 ± 13.67 <0.001
SPO2 0.98 ± 0.008 0.96 ± 0.19 0.52
RR 17.53 ± 1.56 20.50 ± 3.69 <0.001
SGPT 47.21 ± 5.08 64.40 ± 35.73 <0.001
SGOT 53.12 ± 5.12 70.36 ± 36.48 <0.001
TLC 9805.88 ± 2057.35 13290.84 ± 3044.26 <0.001
CTSS 3.02 ± 1.91 6.39 ± 1.57 <0.001

Discussion

The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 237 COVID-19 patients in the tropical region of North India reveal a variety of patterns that can aid in the management of COVID-19 patients and provide a platform for developing strategies for improving public health strategies, which could help us to flatten the epidemic curve and decelerate COVID-19 disease explosion. The majority of the patients in the sample (158, 66.7%) were found to be the most severely affected, with the majority of them being between the ages of 20 and 49 years. In this study, the severity of illness was reported more in males as compared to females. Similar male dominance was revealed by Singh et al. [14].

During the study period, no home quarantine was permitted in Uttar Pradesh, so the majority of patients were admitted to a quarantine centre or a COVID-19-dedicated hospital. In this study, the most common symptom was fever, followed by cough and sore throat. Similarly, Guan et al. reported fever (88.7%) as the most common symptom [11]. Our study had a higher prevalence of fever and cough compared to Singh et al. but a lower percentage of fever than those reported by Wang et al. [14,15]. The presence of similar signs and symptoms in both the temperate Wuhan region of China and the tropical region of India lends credence to the idea that these signs and symptoms could be used as a first public screening measure and tool to test for SARS-CoV-2 infection suspects.

Of our study participants, 8.4% had hypertension, 6.8% had diabetes, 2.1% had coronary artery disease, 2.5% had chronic kidney disease, and 3.4% had COPD. Approximately similar findings were revealed by Singh et al. [14]. Diabetes was linked to a two-fold increase in COVID-19 mortality and severity compared to non-diabetics in Kumar et al.’s study [16]. According to Singh et al., the most common comorbidities associated with mortality were hypertension and chronic kidney disease [14].

A population-based surveillance report via COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network reported clinical data on 1478 COVID-19-positive patient hospitalizations. Among the 1478 patients studied, 12% of adults showed clinical data of underlying medical conditions with the most prevalent being hypertension (49.7%) and obesity a close second (48.3%). Other medical conditions included chronic lung disease (34.6%), diabetes mellitus (28.3%), and cardiovascular diseases (27.8%) [17]. This was similar to our study. In a study by Filardo et al., advanced age, male sex, and obesity were the main factors associated with mortality. Cardiovascular and renal comorbidities were not associated with mortality in an adjusted analysis, perhaps owing to the limited sample size and the inability to detect these associations [18].

Due to COVID-19 being a relatively new disease, the data available were limited. However, from the cases that emerged, it was observed that comorbidities increase the chances of infection. Based on current information and clinical expertise, a generalization can be made that those with comorbidities have more symptomatic COVID. The elderly, a vulnerable population, with chronic health conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular or lung disease are not only at a higher risk of developing severe illness but are also at an increased risk of death if they become ill. People with underlying uncontrolled medical conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, lung, liver, and kidney disease, and patients taking steroids chronically are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection [11,14].

In this study, IL-6 was found to be significantly more in symptomatic as compared to asymptomatic patients. Chen et al. reported a similar finding with significant elevation in the level of inflammatory cytokine IL‑6 in critically ill COVID‑19 patients [2]. Similarly, Liu et al. showed that a higher serum level of IL-6 was an independent and reliable risk factor for COVID-19 patients and led to higher disease severity and mortality [19]. IL‑6 is an important pro‑inflammatory factor in the disease process of SARS‑CoV‑2. It contributes to COVID‑19‑associated cytokine storms, largely enhancing vascular permeability and impairing organ function. The SARS‑CoV‑2 virus replicates rapidly, triggering a storm characterized by increased levels of cytokines such as IL‑6. Such an inflammatory response causes inflammation of the respiratory system and other bodily systems, with subsequent occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome or respiratory failure. Thus, estimation of IL‑6 levels could be an important tool to assess disease severity in COVID‑19 patients.

CTSS was found to be significantly more among symptomatic as compared to asymptomatic patients in this study. In a study by Raoufi et al., patients with lower CTSS had lower mortality [20]. According to Zayed et al., chest CT plays a segregate role in COVID-19 disease, adds an advantage in clinical data in triage, and highlights the decision of hospital admission [21].

Limitations

The major limitations of our study were that the prevalence of comorbidities was lower at an earlier age, and the sample population with comorbidities was small. Despite the study’s inclusion of a sufficient number of COVID-19 patients, no significant associations between multiple comorbidities and mortality were found. The population was unvaccinated as India began vaccination on 16 January 2021.

Strength

The unique aspect of our study was the comparison of interleukin and CTSS scores among asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in a resource-limited setting.

Conclusions

Males were more likely to develop more serious illnesses. The number of comorbid conditions and the severity of the illness were found to have a significant relationship. Fever, cough, sore throat, headache, and shortness of breath were found to be associated with a higher degree of illness. None of the diarrhoea symptoms were related to the severity of the illness. Hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and COPD were all found to have statistically significant associations with illness severity.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

How many Nova Scotians are on the doctor wait-list? Number hit 160,000 in June

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – The Nova Scotia government says it could be months before it reveals how many people are on the wait-list for a family doctor.

The head of the province’s health authority told reporters Wednesday that the government won’t release updated data until the 160,000 people who were on the wait-list in June are contacted to verify whether they still need primary care.

Karen Oldfield said Nova Scotia Health is working on validating the primary care wait-list data before posting new numbers, and that work may take a matter of months. The most recent public wait-list figures are from June 1, when 160,234 people, or about 16 per cent of the population, were on it.

“It’s going to take time to make 160,000 calls,” Oldfield said. “We are not talking weeks, we are talking months.”

The interim CEO and president of Nova Scotia Health said people on the list are being asked where they live, whether they still need a family doctor, and to give an update on their health.

A spokesperson with the province’s Health Department says the government and its health authority are “working hard” to turn the wait-list registry into a useful tool, adding that the data will be shared once it is validated.

Nova Scotia’s NDP are calling on Premier Tim Houston to immediately release statistics on how many people are looking for a family doctor. On Tuesday, the NDP introduced a bill that would require the health minister to make the number public every month.

“It is unacceptable for the list to be more than three months out of date,” NDP Leader Claudia Chender said Tuesday.

Chender said releasing this data regularly is vital so Nova Scotians can track the government’s progress on its main 2021 campaign promise: fixing health care.

The number of people in need of a family doctor has more than doubled between the 2021 summer election campaign and June 2024. Since September 2021 about 300 doctors have been added to the provincial health system, the Health Department said.

“We’ll know if Tim Houston is keeping his 2021 election promise to fix health care when Nova Scotians are attached to primary care,” Chender said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Newfoundland and Labrador monitoring rise in whooping cough cases: medical officer

Published

 on

 

ST. JOHN’S, N.L. – Newfoundland and Labrador‘s chief medical officer is monitoring the rise of whooping cough infections across the province as cases of the highly contagious disease continue to grow across Canada.

Dr. Janice Fitzgerald says that so far this year, the province has recorded 230 confirmed cases of the vaccine-preventable respiratory tract infection, also known as pertussis.

Late last month, Quebec reported more than 11,000 cases during the same time period, while Ontario counted 470 cases, well above the five-year average of 98. In Quebec, the majority of patients are between the ages of 10 and 14.

Meanwhile, New Brunswick has declared a whooping cough outbreak across the province. A total of 141 cases were reported by last month, exceeding the five-year average of 34.

The disease can lead to severe complications among vulnerable populations including infants, who are at the highest risk of suffering from complications like pneumonia and seizures. Symptoms may start with a runny nose, mild fever and cough, then progress to severe coughing accompanied by a distinctive “whooping” sound during inhalation.

“The public, especially pregnant people and those in close contact with infants, are encouraged to be aware of symptoms related to pertussis and to ensure vaccinations are up to date,” Newfoundland and Labrador’s Health Department said in a statement.

Whooping cough can be treated with antibiotics, but vaccination is the most effective way to control the spread of the disease. As a result, the province has expanded immunization efforts this school year. While booster doses are already offered in Grade 9, the vaccine is now being offered to Grade 8 students as well.

Public health officials say whooping cough is a cyclical disease that increases every two to five or six years.

Meanwhile, New Brunswick’s acting chief medical officer of health expects the current case count to get worse before tapering off.

A rise in whooping cough cases has also been reported in the United States and elsewhere. The Pan American Health Organization issued an alert in July encouraging countries to ramp up their surveillance and vaccination coverage.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 10, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Bizarre Sunlight Loophole Melts Belly Fat Fast!

Published

 on

Product Name: Bizarre Sunlight Loophole Melts Belly Fat Fast!

Click here to get Bizarre Sunlight Loophole Melts Belly Fat Fast! at discounted price while it’s still available…

 

All orders are protected by SSL encryption – the highest industry standard for online security from trusted vendors.

Bizarre Sunlight Loophole Melts Belly Fat Fast! is backed with a 60 Day No Questions Asked Money Back Guarantee. If within the first 60 days of receipt you are not satisfied with Wake Up Lean™, you can request a refund by sending an email to the address given inside the product and we will immediately refund your entire purchase price, with no questions asked.

(more…)

Continue Reading

Trending