adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

An Insider View Of 20th-Century Politics & Leadership With Former Canadian PM Brian Mulroney

Published

 on

 

Gabriele Hartshorne-Mehl, a Finance and Political Science Student at McGill University, contributed to this story.

World leaders as we know them in history textbooks and news media radiate a distant aura. We are rarely fortunate enough to uncover intimate details and closed-door interactions between prominent political figures, and as such, we often forget that they are people too. Earlier this month, Former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney gifted us an extraordinary insider view into the global political landscape of the late 20th century.

“Politics is one-of-a-kind in the sense that you get a unique opportunity to design the future of your country in significant ways,” said Mulroney.

Mulroney served as the 18th Prime Minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993. He entered office as the first Conservative majority government in 26 years, with 74.8% of parliament seats and over 50% of the popular vote. We have yet to witness another landslide victory like his. Mulroney’s term brought to Canada the goods and services tax, the privatization of 23 crown corporations, and the foundation for the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

During its time, the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement represented an unprecedented advancement of trade liberalization. Amidst significant domestic opposition, U.S. President Ronald Reagan collaborated with Mulroney to negotiate this historic deal. With President George H.W. Bush, Mulroney later advocated for Mexico’s inclusion. NAFTA immediately tripled Canada’s annual GDP, positioning Mulroney’s judgement on the right side of history despite initial domestic hostility.

As a well–established figure, Mulroney developed strong relationships with ten American Presidents throughout his political career and retirement. He served his term alongside Presidents Reagan, Bush, and Bill Clinton.

On leadership, Mulroney recalled one of his favorite slogans from Clinton: “Leadership is the capacity to look around the corner of history, just a little bit.”

Clinton is right—the ability of an effective leader to anticipate and recognize future circumstances is vital to the direction of a country, a corporation, or any collaborative endeavor.

My research into strategic leadership in the context of industry trends, Generation Z, and ambiversion all but confirm this insight. Post-pandemic, organizations and institutions must acclimate to increasingly rapid changes in business and political environments. A leader who can predict these shocks will be more likely to adequately prepare and tailor their strategy to ensure adaptability and subsequent success.

Overseas, Mulroney also admired the initiative of foreign leaders Margaret Thatcher of the U.K., Yasuhiro Nakasone of Japan, Helmut Kohl of Germany, and Mikhail Gorbachev of the Soviet Union.

Mulroney recalled meeting Gorbachev in the Kremlin and later travelling to Quebec City.

“There is a new game in town,” Mulroney told Reagan. “If we are smart, we will play this properly. As the leader of our alliance, you will be able to do big things with this guy.”

However, above all, Nelson Mandela stood out to Mulroney as the epitome of exceptional leadership.

Canada led the foreign campaign for the liberation from apartheid in South Africa. As the leader of a G7 country and Chairman of the Commonwealth, Mulroney utilized Canada’s unique position of influence. Exceptionally, he backed the African National Congress (AMC) and challenged Thatcher and Reagan regarding the issue of economic sanctions on the state. Mulroney strongly supported Mandela and repudiated the imposition of sanctions to combat apartheid, since this burden would bear upon South Africa’s domestic population.

One of Mandela’s first phone calls after his release from jail was to Mulroney’s office. He had heard that, through members of the AMC and limited access to BBC short-wave news, a newly-elected Conservative Prime Minister in Canada stood at the forefront of external power endorsement of the AMC. Mandela thanked Mulroney for participating in South Africa’s fight for freedom and offered to visit.

“My first call is to tell you that I would like to make my first speech as a free man in a free country—Canada,” said Mandela.

In response, Mulroney joked, “Would you like me to send a plane tomorrow morning or would tomorrow night be okay?”

Mandela visited Ottawa three weeks after this conversation. According to Mulroney, he delivered one of the greatest speeches in Canadian history.

Mulroney also offered his advice for younger generations regarding success. He advised focus, discipline, and use of all available resources to ensure preparation and adaptability.

“The competition is brutal,” he said. “You’ve got to put your best foot forward. No one else is going to do it for you.”

And yet, he also believes that the future is bright.

“I always look at younger groups with a small degree of envy, thinking of what wonderful lives they will have, the things they will be able to do, and the inventions that will take place,” he said. “They will be walking around the moon!”

The future opportunities for younger generations in the Western world are unheralded. I, too, look forward to witnessing the changes that Generation Z will bring to corporations, governments, and the environment as they ascend into leadership positions.

Source link

Politics

BC United to run some candidates to keep party alive, despite halting campaign

Published

 on

 

VICTORIA – British Columbia’s Official Opposition BC United party says it will run some candidates in the Oct. 19 election despite the recent suspension of its “full province-wide” campaign to throw its support behind the surging B.C. Conservative Party.

A letter to party members Friday said the move is intended to leave open a door to the party being resurrected for future elections.

It said despite last week’s campaign suspension by Leader Kevin Falcon “we intend on running a select number of candidates in the upcoming election.”

The letter said the move ensures BC United, formerly the B.C. Liberal Party, remains a registered political party with Elections BC.

“Again, I want to reiterate that we have simply suspended the full province-wide BC United campaign for this upcoming provincial election,” BC United executive director Lindsay Cote said in the letter.

“This does not fold our party or erase our organization,” she said. “Our intent is to ensure that following the October 2024 election, we will be able to have a thorough discussion with our membership about the future of BC United. If there is a desire within our membership to rebuild the party, and a plausible path to do so, we want to be in a position to act on this.”

Cote said the party has yet to decide how many of its candidates will stand in which ridings.

Falcon announced last week he was suspending the campaign and withdrawing the party’s candidate nominations and instead urging support for the Conservatives to prevent a vote-split that would help the New Democrats win re-election.

“Kevin Falcon, as leader of BC United, had the power under our party constitution to revoke nominations of all candidates for the upcoming election,” said Cote. “While he did not need support of the provincial executive for this decision, he sought it and it was granted. We are now in the process of revoking these nominations with Elections BC.”

Cote said the decision to suspend the campaign was difficult for party members, candidates, MLAs and staff employees.

“While we know this decision was gut wrenching, we strongly believe it gives British Columbians the best opportunity to defeat the NDP and secure a free-enterprise victory in the provincial election this October.”

Adam Wilson, BC United communications director, said in a statement running some candidates ensures the party name is available in future elections.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

NDP used stock video from Russia, weeks after decrying Tories for doing the same

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – The New Democrats used a stock image from Russia in a recent video, weeks after the party criticized the Conservatives for doing the same.

On Wednesday NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh announced in a video message that he was ending the supply and confidence deal with the Liberal government, while accusing Conservative policies of hurting Canadians, including retirees.

The video then flashes to a stock video of two seniors sitting at a table looking at their laptop.

The Canadian Press independently verified from several stock images sites, including Getty Images, that the video originated from Russia.

The two seniors are also featured in photographs on a website for a Russian university, which says they are faculty members there.

“We obtained the image from a North American stock image service,” New Democrats said in a statement,

“Nowhere did the service mention where the video was taken. We’ll take better care in the future.”

The NDP video remains up on all their social platforms.

Last month New Democrats denounced the Conservative Party of Canada after it used non-Canadian stock images in one of their videos, including Russian fighter jets.

The Conservative party deleted the video after online criticism, saying “mistakes happen” while pointing out that a Liberal ad from 2011 was scrutinized over its use of stock images.

At the time, deputy critic for ethics MP Charlie Angus criticized the use of non-Canadian images in political messaging.

“I love Canada. I want the next election to be run in Canada, for Canada,” Angus said in a statement on Aug. 19.

New Democrats went on to condemn the use of “phoney, fake, bogus” digital content.

“I find it very strange that two major Canadian political parties – the NDP and the CPC – are not taking more care in their communications to Canadians about Canadians,” said Government House leader Karina Gould in a statement.

She said both parties will have to explain why “neither could be bothered to use images of actual Canadians.”

While the NDP and Conservatives are “focused on promoting their own political interests,” she said the Liberal government is “squarely focused on delivering important measures and programs for Canadians that meet their needs.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

It’s not just Harris and Trump who have a lot at stake in next week’s debate. ABC News does, too

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Hours after ABC News released the rules for next Tuesday’s presidential debate, resolving a final dispute in Donald Trump’s favor, the former president was on the attack — against ABC News.

“I think a lot of people will be watching to see how nasty they are, how unfair they are,” he said Wednesday on a Fox News town hall.

It was an unsubtle reminder that Trump and Kamala Harris aren’t the only ones with a lot at stake next week. The same is true for ABC News and moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis, in what is the only scheduled debate between the presidential contenders this fall.

Multiple outlets will televise and stream it. But unlike in past years, when presidential debates were organized by a bipartisan commission, this is solely an ABC News production. It won’t include a live audience.

“This is a huge opportunity for ABC News,” said Ben Sherwood, former ABC News president and now publisher & CEO of the Daily Beast. “It’s like getting to host, moderate and produce the Super Bowl of politics. It gives the network luster at a time broadcast television is in decline.”

That is, of course, if things go well.

ABC sees it as a ‘huge responsibility’

The ABC debate was set last spring, when President Joe Biden was the likely Democratic nominee. When he dropped out, it was unclear if the debate would go on. Harris and Trump eventually gave the go-ahead, although the Republican’s repeated criticism of ABC last month raised questions about it again.

It all had little effect on ABC’s planning, said Rick Klein, the network’s Washington bureau chief. “It truly wasn’t a lot of turmoil on our end of things,” he said.

Biden and Trump debated on June 27 — what seems a lifetime ago. That event was put on by CNN, although it is remembered more for Biden’s shaky performance that eventually led him to end his campaign than for anything done by the network or its moderators, Dana Bash and Jake Tapper.

“At the end of the day, this is about helping to create a forum for the candidates to communicate with the public,” Klein said. “It’s a huge responsibility. It’s a humbling responsibility.”

An estimated 51.3 million people watched Biden and Trump in June. But that was before many people were truly tuned into the election, and the potential rematch of the 2020 campaign was drawing little enthusiasm. Tuesday’s debate will almost certainly reach more people, whether or not it approaches the record debate audience of 84 million for the first face-off between Hillary Clinton and Trump in 2016.

Muir’s “World News Tonight” has led the evening news ratings for eight years, making him effectively America’s most popular newscaster. Many nights “World News Tonight” has a bigger audience than anything on prime-time television.

One secret to his success has been ABC’s efforts to craft an apolitical image for him. Tuesday’s audience will be his biggest ever — including people largely unfamiliar with Muir because they seek news elsewhere — and it’s for a political event in polarized times.

Davis has a lower profile, though she hosts ABC’s nightly streaming newscast, fills in for Muir and has moderated presidential nominating debates in the past. Many will be seeing her in action Tuesday for the first time.

Although more complicated in the Trump years, the role of debate moderator is often akin to baseball umpires — it indicates they’ve done a good job when you don’t really notice them. If Muir or Davis figure prominently in Wednesday morning’s stories, that’s probably not a good sign.

“It’s absolutely a minefield,” said Tom Bettag, former ABC News “Nightline” producer. “Ask Chris Wallace.”

Wallace was well respected, considered even-handed and, in 2020 when he moderated the first Biden-Trump debate, was working at Fox News “so the Trump people couldn’t accuse him of being a liberal hack,” Bettag said. “And it still blew up pretty badly. ” Trump’s frequent interruptions exasperated Biden and led to criticism that Wallace lost control of the evening.

The moderators will be ‘there to facilitate’

There’s less of a chance of that happening this year because debate rules call for a candidate’s microphone to be muted when their opponent is speaking, something Trump’s campaign sought because interruptions turn many voters off.

An open mic led to one of Harris’ most-remembered exchanges in her 2020 debate with Vice President Mike Pence. “Mr. Vice President, I am speaking,” she said when Pence interrupted one of her answers, a moment many women could relate to in business situations with men.

While Bash and Tapper occasionally tried to steer Trump or Biden back to the questions when the politicians ducked in CNN’s June debate, they would not correct any lies or misstatements, many of which were pointed out in post-debate analysis. While Klein would not commit to the same policy, he did say that “it’s a debate between them and we’re there to facilitate the conversation.”

Even before his Fox News appearance this week, Trump had repeatedly criticized ABC News, even though he agreed twice to participate in a debate on the network.

He has targeted network political journalists George Stephanopoulos and Jonathan Karl specifically. The former president last spring filed a defamation lawsuit against Stephanopoulos over comments the journalist made about Trump being held liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll. ABC has said Stephanopoulos is not involved in debate preparation.

Trump has also spoken about the reported friendship between Harris and Dana Walden, a top executive at ABC’s parent Walt Disney Co., whose oversight has recently expanded to include ABC News. ABC has said Walden is not involved in any news coverage decisions.

To a certain extent, Trump’s comments can be seen as “working the refs,” or appealing to supporters who don’t like the press. A nightmare scenario for ABC is Trump lashing out on Tuesday if he feels things aren’t going well for him.

“From our perspective, we just have to do our job and do it as well as we can,” Klein said.

He wouldn’t give any details about how ABC’s preparations are going, such as what figures have been assigned to portray Harris or Trump in mock debates.

Bettag, a University of Maryland journalism professor who is teaching a course this fall on covering the presidential campaign, has been involved in these preps before. He advises Muir and Davis to take some deep breaths.

“The most important thing is to stay cool, which is hard to do since they’re likely to get yelled at,” he said. “It’s really important to try to keep their voices down and stay steady.”

___

David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending